Banks technically write off loans worth over Rs68,000 crore, Mehul Choksi among 50 top wilful defaulters: RTI

Indian banks have technically written off a staggering amount of Rs 68,607 crore due from 50 top wilful defaulters, including absconding diamantaire Mehul Choksi, according to a reply under RTI from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Prominent RTI activist Saket Gokhale had filed an RTI query with the RBI seeking details of the 50 top wilful defaulters and their current loan status till February 16.

"I filed this RTI because Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Minister of State for Finance Anurag Thakur had refused to reply to this starred question asked in the Parliament by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi in the last Budget Session on February 16," Gokhale told IANS.

Disclosing what the government didn't, the RBI's Central Public Information Officer Abhay Kumar provided the replies on Saturday (April 24), with several startling revelations in the 'diamond-studded list', said Gokhale.

The RBI said that this amount (Rs 68,607 crore) comprising outstanding and the amounts technically/prudentially written off till September 30, 2019.

An inadvertent error had crept in a previous version of the report, which has now been now corrected.

"The apex bank also declined to provide the relevant information on overseas borrowers citing a Supreme Court judgement of December 16, 2015," Gokhale told IANS.

Topping the list is Choksi's scam-hit company, Gitanjali Gems Limited, which owed Rs.5,492 crore, besides other group companies, Gili India Ltd and Nakshatra Brands Ltd, which had taken loans of Rs 1,447 crore and Rs 1,109 crore, respectively.

Choksi is currently a citizen of Antigua & Barbados Isles, while his nephew and another absconder diamond trader Nirav Modi is in London.

The second in the list is REI Agro Ltd., with an amount of Rs 4,314 crore, and its directors Sandip Jhujhunwala and Sanjay Jhunjhunwala who are already under the scanner of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) since over a year.

The next on the list in the Rs 4,000-crore bracket is absconding diamantaire Jatin Mehta's Winsome Diamonds & Jewellery owing Rs 4,076 crore and which is being probed by the Central Bureau of Investigation for various bank frands.

In the Rs 2,000-crore category, there is the Kanpur-based writing instruments giant, Rotomac Global Pvt. Ltd., part of the famed Kothari group, which owed Rs 2,850 crore.

The others in this category include: Kudos Chemie, Punjab (Rs.2,326 crore), Baba Ramdev and Balkrishna's group company Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd., Indore (Rs.2,212 crore), and Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd., Gwalior (Rs.2,012 crore).

There are 18 companies in the Rs.1K-segment with some prominent names like Harish R. Mehta's Ahmedabad-based Forever Precious Jewellery & Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. (Rs.,1962 crore), and absconder liquor baron Vijay Mallya's defunct Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. (Rs 1,943 crore).

Another 25 companies fall in the sub-1K-crore category with outstandings ranging from Rs 605 crore to Rs 984 crore, either individually or as group companies.

Six among the 50 top wilful defaulters are connected with the glittering diamond and/or gold jewellery industries.

"A majority of them have defaulted prominent nationalist banks over the past several years and many of them are either absconding or facing action by various probe agencies and some are under litigation," Gokhale said.

No industry is sacrosanct as the top 50 willful defaulters are spread across various sectors of the economy including IT, infrastructure, power, gold-diamond jewellery, pharma, etc.

Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    mathurgcpta

    3 weeks ago

    Writing off Bank Loans by the government is not a show off of magnanimity, but a transferring of or diverting of hard cash of the citizens who had deposited it in PSU Banks in good faith to the thieves in the business - the theft done in connivance with the political leadership from time to time. It is like the words of a sage, "Chor ko kehna chori kar, sadhu ko kehna hoshiar rahe." This is how the Political Democracy functions.

    Time has come when citizens of India must think of changing the Political Democracy of India(Dictatorship) to simple democracy of the people, for the people, and by the people. It is not a difficult task, but needs the will and determination of us all.

    gouravguptac

    5 months ago

    Loan to ruchi soya was NPA way back, It was into NCLT from where Patanjali acquired this. Acquisition by patanjali was resolution to NPA and not the default by patanjali. I remember from 2013 itself Ruchi soya was stressed assets and later become NPA.

    REPLY

    satishalive

    In Reply to gouravguptac 5 months ago

    Yeah! not good..this is very biased reporting..the debt was issued in Congress era itself and reporting as if Baba Ramdev siphoned off money...grow up, please

    suhailaazam

    In Reply to satishalive 4 months ago

    How it is biased this is revealed by Mr. Gokhle they are putting the words of Gokhle now if you want to go in details you should do further research. Don't be a andhbhakt here

    m.prabhu.shankar

    5 months ago

    Lend loans to anyone with appropriate worth of properties as securities. That is how middle class and poor gets loans right. Why is it different for these corporate companies ?

    REPLY

    glnprasad52

    In Reply to m.prabhu.shankar 5 months ago

    There is lot of difference between individual loans and a large chunk of loans as earnings from the interest on large loans are much larger, and the main objective of the advance is to use huge idle money with bank with one reputed borrower alone. There are different theories. Some think that instead of lending to a thousand individual borrowers, the paperwork, process for monitoring in one account is easy, whereas some other believes that we should not put all our eggs in one basket. Such large advances are mainly consortium advances where the risk is distributed between several banks and monitoring is done by one lead/primary lender bank. The theory then was banks earn 80% only from 20% and focus should be on that 20 % alone and use those resources of 80% in other productive activities. Further some activities require huge initial investment and returns through steady income will be spread to several years. Now there should not be a distraction from this topic and this is only for general discussions. Security is not the alone criterion for lending in modern banking, productivity, and repayment capacity (projected) are only looked into.

    glnprasad52

    5 months ago

    I am surprised as to how members can sidetrack the original issue relevant to the context by bringing those names that are never related to or concerned with those issues. Focus on the issue, the supervising and controlling authorities are experts and have the mechanism to fix up the culprits sooner or later.

    josekottanani

    5 months ago

    Majority are all gujjus.... and what about loans taken by Adanis.... Modi and chamchas have stollen more in 5 yrs than congress in 70 yrs. Modi ko 70 yrs diyega, tho pura desh bhej diyega and bhakts will keep saying NaMo NaMo...
    we as a nation deserve such assholess

    raviforjustice

    5 months ago

    We have heard of a Robin Hood who used to rob the rich to help the poor. Our banks are Dooh Nibor. Now figure that out.

    REPLY

    tlrchandran49

    In Reply to raviforjustice 5 months ago

    LOVELY ACRONYM

    marknphiluk

    5 months ago

    I may get default on PL. pls let me know how can I convince bank to mark it as write off.

    asokkumarrathnam

    5 months ago

    I am surprised that a magazine of your standard comes out with such a wrong headline. RBI cannot write off because the loans were not given by them. RBI has just furnished information regarding loans written off by commercial banks as reported to them.

    REPLY

    shreyas2791

    In Reply to asokkumarrathnam 5 months ago

    Where does the headline mention RBI has written off loans ,it says .

    r_asokkumar

    In Reply to shreyas2791 5 months ago

    Headline before correction: RBI writes off loans worth over Rs68,000 crore, Mehul Choksi among 50 top wilful defaulters: RTI



    msivanand

    In Reply to shreyas2791 5 months ago

    That's what the online headline says (RBI writes off loans worth over Rs68,000 crore, ...) from where I got here.
    I can't copy in the screen shot here. But it says above that "An inadvertent error had crept in a previous version of the report, which has now been now corrected."

    ssk.pab

    5 months ago

    I have two questions:
    1. Will Baba Ramdev please raise his hand and explain what is happening at his end?
    2. Will our FM please raise her hand and explain why the Nationalized Banks have to bear the brunt of these frauds?

    REPLY

    asokkumarrathnam

    In Reply to ssk.pab 5 months ago

    Baba Ramdev's group acquired Ruchi Soya last year in insolvency proceedings. He has nothing to do with the default.

    glnprasad52

    In Reply to ssk.pab 5 months ago

    It is purely the discretion of individual banks that sanctioned the loans to those institutions. Neither BRD or PM was responsible for such defaults . When all those attempts to recover those amounts within stipulated time failed, the amounts are written off, and this should not mean that the amount was for ever lost. Banks should not show such amounts as assets in balance sheet. That is all.

    Indigo

    In Reply to glnprasad52 5 months ago

    Yeah ! PM / FM are not responsible for that. They Only know how to acquire funds from RBI and make a budget for Mandir and statue , and how to blame I opposition in everything . That's all they are doing ..

    venugopal.harnoor

    5 months ago

    [email protected]

    REPLY

    venugopal.harnoor

    In Reply to venugopal.harnoor 5 months ago

    Why adjustment of books. What does it mean when loan is given and itbis NOT returned back. It is purely ROBBING BANK LEGALLY.

    When Education loan is not written off why Business TYCOONS should not be spared.

    vkchauhan64

    5 months ago

    No loan should be written off, but all companies including all other companies of that board members whether guaranteed or not, should be auctioned to recover the loan. Lenders should be on road like a common man. Amrapali CMD has sighoned public as well as bankers money, but staying in five stars hotels and enjoying like top business man. How...,. Further, banks should compensate such bad loans from their own sources like other PSU...,..becomes sick if bad loans are not recovered. Otherwise these banks will continue disbursing loan at public money, by shaking hands with companies... reason best known to all.

    VNRAO

    5 months ago

    it is not writeoff only it is only provision made in books of accounts of babks revocery is pursued only after closure of the case the amount will be written off do not mislead

    Nasreen Rustomfram

    5 months ago

    And people with hard earned money and life savings lost are suffering in the PMC Bank and other such financial disasters!!

    Nasreen Rustomfram

    5 months ago

    And people with hard earned money and life savings lost are suffering in the PMC Bank and other such financial disasters!!

    glnprasad52

    5 months ago

    The report is misleading. RBI is not lender and at the maximum, RBI might have permitted for writing off the wilful defaulters and it need not be construed that it was a permanent loss and maybe accounting adjustment as loss asset and to clean up the balance sheet and at least 30% of the total sum can be recovered. The accountability factor of commercial banks and modus operandi of frauds, connivance of bankers etc., require a deeper probe. Without compromise at various levels, it is impossible to lend such huge amounts without adequate security. Some vital clues are missing.

    HDFC cuts prime lending rate by 15 bps, home loans to be cheaper
    Housing Development Finance Corp (HDFC) has reduced its prime lending rate by 15 basis points with effect from Wednesday.
     
    The change will benefit all HDFC retail home customers, the company said in a regulatory filing on Tuesday. Floating loan rates are benchmarked on the prime lending rate.
     
    "HDFC reduces its retail prime lending rate (RPLR) on housing loans, on which its adjustable rate home loans (ARHL) are benchmarked by 15 basis points with effect from April 22, 2020," it said.
     
    Post the reduction, rates will range between 7.85 per cent and 8.15 per cent for salaried class borrowers.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
     
  • User 

    Fintech-NBFCs To Face Litmus Test in FY20-21: Ind-Ra
    Financial year (FY) 20-21 could prove to be the year of reckoning for small non-banking financial institutions (NBFCs) because of the ongoing business disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This is especially for the new-age NBFCs that use technology substantially across the loan management cycle, i.e., financial technology NBFCs (FT-NBFCs), says a research note. 
     
    In a report, India Ratings and Research (Ind-Ra) says, "FT-NBFCs could be more disproportionately impacted than any other financial institution, given their borrower profile, majorly micro, small and medium size enterprises (MSMEs) and largely unsecured lending. In few cases, borrowers may also have leverage from traditional lenders and FT-NBFCs may have plugged the additional short-term borrowing needs."  
     
    The ratings agency has rated three FT-NBFCs, which it feels do not have immediate liquidity challenges. However, it says, they are likely to face elevated asset quality issues if MSME mortality intensifies with the extension of lock-down, followed by a slow recovery of overdues and refinancing and funding challenges in the short term.
     
    While Ind-Ra-rated FT-NBFCs in the investment grade (three) have sufficient liquidity to cover liability obligations for two-three months, assuming nil inflows and no moratorium, this also in Ind-Ra’s opinion may damage the short-mid-term fund-raising capabilities as risk aversion intensifies. 
     
    Cumulatively, Ind-Ra-rated FT-NBFCs have a total debt outstanding of around Rs30.0 billion, of which 50% of debt is funded by banks and financial institutions, which may curtail funding or refinancing to NBFCs for the short-to-medium term, given concerns on the asset side. Moreover, many banks still are uncertain providing moratorium to these NBFCs. 
     
    Ind-Ra says it also does not expect material inflows to these NBFCs via the targeted long-term repo operations mechanism since most of them are in the lower investment grade. However, they might receive some support from the refinance policy institutions, especially given that Rs0.5 trillion would be provided to these institutions for the MSME segment, it added.
     
    According to the ratings agency, during FY20-21, credit growth for FT-NBFCs would be muted and it would focus more on recovery of overdues. 
     
    Over FY17-18 to first nine months (9M) of FY19-20, the assets under management (AUM) of Ind-Ra rated FT-NBFCs grew at a CAGR of around 50% to Rs50.0 billion, with loans to MSMEs and SMEs (unsecured business loans) and merchant cash advance accounting for around 85%. 
     
    "They may lose out on more than a month’s revenue and also see a slow revenue recovery," the ratings agency says, adding, "This could also be aggravated by the loss of business opportunities and lower demand. The merchant cash advance product (daily repayment product) offered by some FT-NBFCs is likely to have minimal collections in the near-term, especially because discretionary spending could take longer and consumers may downscale in the short term." 
     
    "The overhang could be partially offset by the fact that collections are digital and if there are bank balances, the payment can be ‘pulled’. About 60% of the borrowers of Ind-Ra’s rated FT-NBFCs have already availed a moratorium and additionally 10%-20% may avail one, hence, even MSMEs operating in essential goods and services, which may have their cash flows intact, may prefer to delay the payments on account of an uncertain end to the lockdown," it added. 
     
    In addition, Ind-Ra says, these are mainly proprietor-driven businesses that are often the only source of income for the family. Hence, in its view, an immediate and main focus of NBFCs will be to recover overdues to minimise the credit costs, further affecting the profitability, it added. 
     
    According to the ratings agency, some FT-NBFCs may also re-strategise and revise their operating models and underwriting practices and conserve near-term liquidity, further contributing to the likely muted credit growth for FY20-21.
     
    Most FT-NBFCs operate at yield plus fee of 23%-25% and are operating at higher end of the yield curve, implying the credit risk is the highest. "In view of the FY20-21 muted credit growth, the pre-provisioning operating profit (PPOP) could come under pressure due to high fixed costs (10%-16% of AUM) on which these entities are operating. Also, these NBFCs have been incurring credit costs between 3%-6% which is likely to increase for near-term," the ratings agency says. 
     
    It says, "Any reasonable data-based estimates on credit cost would require collection data over the next four months; two months of moratorium period and two months of normal repayment environment. These entities are operating at a lower PPOP due to the high operating fixed costs, as the operations are expected to breakeven at a certain AUM level, and on steady state basis would report a PPOP in range of 7%-9%. However, considering the current scenario, some of the entities may not be able to achieve the economies of scale and the credit costs may further increase by 2%-3%, which could exceed PPOP, further leading to net losses in the near-term." 
     
    Ind-Ra says its rated FT-NBFCs maintain adequate capital buffers and low leverage levels, with tier-I capital adequacy ratio at 30%-32% and debt and equity below 3.0 times, which is conducive for favourable asset liability management. It says, "This is also necessitated as they operate at the higher end of the yield curve and their steady state credit costs are at least twice of higher rated asset financing NBFCs."
     
    "Historically, these FT-NBFCs have capped maximum leverage levels at 4.0 times and have been continuously supported with capital infusions by its equity investors for breakeven of operations, absorption of credit costs and growth prospects; however, in the Ind-Ra’s view, in this challenging environment, it may be difficult to conceive substantial equity support from the investor community as well," the ratings agency concludes.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone