In another example of cartelization among bankers, several banks have increased or started imposing charges for transaction alerts through SMS as well as for mobile banking. As usual, private lenders have taken the lead, which soon would be followed by nationalized banks
There is no free lunch says a popular adage. Our banks, having lured consumers with ‘free’ services, have now started charging for them or hiking already existing fees to fatten their bottomlines. So far this year, many banks have started charging for SMS alerts on transactions and hiked the annual fees on debit/credit cards. A few banks have even increased charges to deposit cash in your accounts. The list includes large banks such as ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and Canara Bank. Here are some areas in which charges have been increased.
SMS Alerts: Over the past month, almost all banks have begun to charge for SMS alerts on transactions.
Axis Bank sent an SMS to its account holders which states that “From 15 June 2013 this (SMS banking) service will be charged Rs5 per month”. ICICI Bank is charging Rs15 per quarter. Interestingly, both amount to an identical Rs60 per annum giving rise to the suspicion that banks, working through the Indian Banks Association, decide to hike rates in tandem or to a pre-decided plan.
State Bank of India (SBI) is providing various services like MobiCash, mobile banking and SMS banking free of cost. Other state-run lenders like Punjab National Bank (PNB), Bank of Baroda (BoB) and Canara Bank are also providing SMS banking and mobile banking services free of cost.
(Update: As of 1 July 2013, both SBI and PNB decided charging Rs15 per quarter for SMS alert services. PNB, however, said, accounts of senior citizens, its staff-in service and retired and students, will be exempted from this charge)
When asked, an Axis Bank executive said whoever is subscribed to their SMS banking services will be charged Rs5 per month. He said, whoever chooses to unsubscribe from (to unsubscribe customers have to visit branch personally) their SMS Banking services will not be charged anything. Clearly, the banks are testing the ground. Nobody is likely to unsubscribe at a time when SMS alerts have helped protect part of the money.
ICICI Bank notifies on its website “Please note with effect from 1 May 2013 all savings account customers availing alerts facility through an SMS will be charged Rs15 per quarter (inclusive of taxes)”. However, ICICI Bank has kept the facility free for accounts such as salary account, senior citizen savings account, silver savings account and privilege banking.
HDFC Bank notifies on its website, “Effective 1stApril, customers registered for InstaAlert service with ‘SMS’ as the alert delivery channel, would be charged.”
HDFC Bank customers registered for InstaAlert service through ‘SMS’ are charged Rs15 per quarter for salary or savings accounts, while customers who hold current account are charged Rs25 per quarter.
However, HDFC Bank said, InstaAlerts delivered through emails would remain free. Interestingly debit or credit card transaction alerts sent as per regulatory guidelines and net-banking transaction alerts are not covered in the HDFC Bank InstaAlertservice. Customers who are not registered for InstaAlert service will continue to get these alerts free of charge, according to HDFC Bank.
While all private sector lenders have increased charges for SMS alerts, Kotak Mahindra Bank has decided to reduce its already very high charges. This reduction would bring the rates at par with other banks. It notifies on its website “for savings account holders: The daily balance SMS alert that costs Rs200 per annum will be reduced to Rs120 per annum while SMS for weekly balance, transactions and value added alerts will cost Rs60 per annum from Rs75 per annum with effect from 1st July.”
Yes Bank, which offers up to 7% interest on saving accounts, is charging Rs10 per month to their basic saving account (smart salary) holders. While other account holders would continue to get transaction alert messages free of cost.
Kotak and Yes Bank, pays a higher interest on savings account balances above Rs1 lakh. But it seems both were clearly charging significantly more for other services. Even today, at Rs120 per annum, the charges are double than that of ICICI, HDFC Bank or Axis Bank.
Debit Cards:
Banks from the private sector also started hiking annual fees for debit or ATM cards. Among the state-run lenders, except Canara Bank, no other bank has increased the fees. From 1st July Canara Bank would charge Rs112 as annual fee for its debit cards issues to all customers, except holders of small savings account, basic savings account and financial savings account.
SBI is charging Rs102 annual fees on all debit cards, except Yuva International debit card. PNB is charging Rs112 and BoB is levying Rs113 as annual fees or maintenance charges on debit-cum-ATM cards.
Axis Bank has increased the annual charges by 50%. It would charge Rs150 instead of Rs100 as annual fee from its debit card users in metro and urban centers. For bank account holders from semi-urban and rural, the same is revised to Rs100 from Rs50. In addition, all prime salary account would be charges Rs150 as annual fee for a debit card. Axis Bank has also increased card issuance fee for all its customers to Rs150 from 1st May.
While ICICI Bank is charging Rs99 for gold or silver debit cards and Rs250 for business banking debit card, HDFC Bank charges between Rs100 to Rs500. Kotak Mahindra Bank is charging between Rs100 to Rs750 for platinum debit card, as annual fees.
Yes Bank has already increased the charges from November last year. The Yes Business Gold Debit Card has become costlier by Rs150 following the increase. The annual fees for the card are now Rs499. There is no annual fee on the debit card for the bank’s basic savings account holders.
Annual fees charged on ATM/debit cards
Bank | Minimum Annual Fees (in Rs.) (Basic Debit Cards) | Maximum Annual Fees (in Rs.) (Platinum /Business cards) |
Axis Bank | 100 | 500 |
ICICI Bank | 99 | 250 |
HDFC Bank | 100 | 500 |
Kotak Mahindra Bank | 100 | 750 |
Yes Bank | 149 | 499 |
State Bank of India | 0 | 102 |
Canara Bank | 112 | 112 |
Bank of Baroda | 113 | 113 |
Punjab National Bank | 112 | 112 |
The increase in banking charges is contradictory to the stand taken by the regulators. Earlier this month, while speaking at an Open House organized by Moneylife Foundation, Dr KC Chakrabarty, deputy governor of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has said that the decision on various charges levied by banks has been left to their respective board of directors while the Indian Banks Association oversees the reasonableness aspect and can suggest a cap on the charges.
Mohan Siroya, chairperson of the Consumer Complaints Cell (CCC) had said, "The ‘greatest wrong’ the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has committed is by disowning its responsibility to supervise the ‘exploitation’ of bank customers. RBI has given the full liberty to each bank to levy ‘service charges’ as per their wish. It has become an open market. Now it has come to the light from the Banking Codes and Standards Board of India (BSCBI) that the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) has been given an authority to put a 'cap' on such charges, thus fully abdicating its own duty as a statutory regulator. How is such a body expected to control the greed of making more and more money by its own members?”
Adding to Mr Siroya's view, Sucheta Dalal, trustee of Moneylife Foundation said, “The IBA operates in a particular pattern. When one bank decides to charge Rs500 for a debit card, the others, especially nationalised banks, follow its lead and say; okay we will charge only Rs250. This is how banking charges increase every time. Competition does not work because IBA has become a cartel. When was the last time that IBA spoke to any consumer organization or sought the consumers’ views?”
Ashok Ravat of All India Bank Depositors Association (AIBDA) and Vasundhara Deodhar from Mumbai Grahak Panchayat (MGP) also raised questions on the reasonableness of banking charges. Both requested the banking regulator to determine reasonable service charges.
Interestingly, while consumers are increasingly complaining about reasonableness of bank charges, the banks themselves are lobbying hard with the RBI, claiming that high cost of technology is making each transaction very expensive. For instance, having encouraged and pushed to obtain corporate accounts of companies, banks are now cribbing about high transaction costs on small withdrawals from ATMs.
For instance, a senior central banker says that each balance inquiry costs the bank Rs11 while each transaction costs around Rs18. However, this calls for a serious discussion on the cost-benefit of technology to consumers, since the solution cannot be to load higher costs on to consumers.
The frequent hikes in service charges are fast reaching a stage where consumers will revolt. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which follows a policy of forbearance (allowing bankers to decide charges themselves) with regard to service charges, refuses to intervene. At the same time, the RBI is pushing banks to extend services to hundreds of million unbanked Indians. There is a clear disconnect here, since no-frills accounts permit only ATM transactions and banks now claim that those too involve a huge cost.
Can the RBI afford to remain silent about rising service charges? It is a question that the banking regulator needs to answer.
Inside story of the National Stock Exchange’s amazing success, leading to hubris, regulatory capture and algo scam
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
1-year online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
30-day online access to the magazine articles published during the subscription period.
Access is given for all articles published during the week (starting Monday) your subscription starts. For example, if you subscribe on Wednesday, you will have access to articles uploaded from Monday of that week.
This means access to other articles (outside the subscription period) are not included.
Articles outside the subscription period can be bought separately for a small price per article.
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance.
Complete access to Moneylife archives since inception ( till the date of your subscription )
Moneylife requests all readers not to post their personal details like bank account number, debit/credit card number , mobile number or email ID on this and any other public forums.
Thanks,
MDT
Please contact your bank branch for this. Also we request you and all other readers from posting your account number, card number and mobile number on public forums.
Thanks,
MDT
SEND ME MOBILE ALERT VIA SMS
SUMMER S
I feel it needs to give a balanced view.. Banks are public limited companies, and need to make profits to be able to expand their reach, recover their costs, provide for the bad debts, invest in better technologies to prevent fraudsters from running amok, etc.
I don't think when we work for a company, we say that our cost of living is only Rs. 25,000, you don't need to pay me more than that. If my cost of living goes p, will come and ask you for a pay revision.
Banks need to increase dividend to shareholders, pay salaries to thousands of people they employ, give loans to small and big companies so that they can expand their operations and give employment.
Now, no doubt there are many things wrong about our banking system - banks' reluctance in general to give loans to smaller enterprises and individuals without taking adequate collateral to protect their capital; banks inability to expand into villages and rural areas; the propensity of politicians to manipulate banks into giving loans to undeserving organizations; corruption involved in lending decisions; the business of NPAs; tendency to increase charges frequently; et al.
What muddles the picture even more is the prevalence of the grey economy in the country. A large part of the economy works on cash only, and unaccounted cash at that. What it means is that those funds either don't enter the banking system at all, or reaches in fictitious names leaving the banks vulnerable to KYC norms.
Customers across the world pay far more charges for accessing banking services, and people don't mind paying those charges as the alternatives are either not present or are very expensive. Also, product prices vary depending on the features available on the product as well. So, if a particular banking account comes to you with free life insurance or general insurance cover, then paying a nominally higher amount as fees should be okay?
What Axis Bank has done is actually being clever by half. Whoever thought of this thing of customer canceling it by visiting branches did the bank's brand a big disservice, as customers would immediately understand that they are being taken for a ride here, and maybe lots of them wont switch banks immediately, but they will remember that the bank took advantage of the fact that they wouldn't find the time to visit the branch and cancel their mobile banking subscription. I suspect that even if the customer were to go to the branch, the branch would know nothing about this, and would require the customer to make multiple visits to get the necessary action recorded and undertaken. This is a malicious action and reeks of profiteering.
Banks spend approximately 25 paise for every sms and it sounded like a good idea to charge for actual number of sms sent, but maybe putting something like that in place might be expensive for banks.
No doubt RBI needs to pay attention to this streak of banks to increase charges from time to time. But maybe RBI also needs to see what it needs to regulate and what it needs to free up for the banks.
For instance should the banks in India be making NIMs of 4.5 percent?? That sounds very high when compared with the NIMs in other developing countries.
Should the banks be having prepayment penalties when they have already charged processing fee upfront?
The government's role in banking also needs to be assessed. Do we need the government to run banks, and dictate terms to them about whom to lend and how much?
Let me give an example.
I am holding 2 accounts with Axis bank and my wife is holding one account.
On 14th -Jun I got a SMS saying that from 15th -Jun every month 5Rs will be charged for SMS banking and if don't want that then need to go "BRANCH" to discontinue this.
1)If they want to start charging from 15th-Jun why they have sent the notification on 14th.
2)As 14th and 15th are working day's for me, how can I plan and visit the Branch.
3)Why given such a short notice .
4)most importantly when enabling the SMS banking, I could do it through net banking. But to stop it why should I visit the Branch?
Basically Bank's want to charge and loot money, So they will not give sufficient time and set practically impossible things to customer.
Thanks & Regards,
Dipak.Sholapurkar
For the compulsory draw bank account it charges yearly fees and it was/is supposed? to send account statement every year, we have never received it in our lives !
SBI charges Rs 10/ for entries in passbook outside of home branch. They also charge for transfer of SB a/cs from one branch to another, and for closing accounts. I have paid all these charges , so my experience is first hand.
If SBI is charging for all these small services, then its high time that either U go "Online Operation" where U may avail all these services free 24x7 or request the Branch /Nodal officer under Bank's Consumer Redressal system to credit back the charges. If they do not help, then no way but to change your bank, if some 'No charge Bank" is available. Finance Ministry and the RBI have thrown us to the wolves who grab a piece of flesh at the slightest opportunity.
However, SBI (Versova Branch, Mumbai) has charged me Rs.102/= for a Basic Debit Card (which according to the article and Table therein is Charge-Free!)
I'll Re-Check with SBI as to Why they have charged me for the same.
Thanks for being Helpful!
Tapan Chatterjee ... 20Jun13
When every aspect of living has been increasing, how can one expect banking to be untouched by costs? A debit/credit card saves you the hassle of carrying cash and doing transactions outside of banking time, but are the banks not paying the service providers for this facility?
Yes adhoc / exhorbitant costs should be countered, but fair charges have to be paid.
If the charges are not much, it is all the more reason for the Banks to not charge it.
This trend is the same as private telecom operators in 1990s who made a killing (Rs. 16/minute) in the early days of mobile telephony. As in the telecom sector, investments in technology solutions in Banking too are capital intensive in the early stages only, and thereafter they reap handsome rewards, as their cost doesn't increase with customers' usage. But is RBI even bothered ?
RBI has not doing the duty of supervising the reasonableness of ATM /Debit card charges. By using these cards workload on the bank is reduced and so the bank should actually compensate the customer.
The banks (including State bank) charges money for the transfer of Savings bank from one branch to another branch in mumbai and Navi Mumbai which is unreasonable.
Please make it clear, IS SBI charging for 'Transfer of Savings A/c from one branch to another or transfer of 'Money' from once branch to another branch of the same bank ?
One suggestion.The list of banks who are levying these charges on Debit/ATM is Ok, but let us give credit to other equally good public sector banks which have not yet started levying any ATM or SMS/ Transaction alert charges. IDBI is once such bank . Also No Quarterly Minimum Balance (QMB) or any fee on ATM/Debit card/Alert charge on savings account holders with or without KYC in IDBI. Of course, this is the present position, can't say if they also become a part of 'Cartelisation' which RBI is encouraging openly by passing its regulatory authority to IBA.
In this scenario, I do not envisage any move on RBI's part to wield back its Regulatory function to control or decide Reasonableness or levy of the service charges with or without CAP.
Levying charges for tech.driven services does not bring in great services but makes customers angrier!