They must be encouraged and asked to open their heart, and speak out the real reason, or confirm that there is no reason other than the one that they mention while resigning. Also, the auditor must not leave the auditee in the lurch, and complete the on-going audit engagement to the point of completing the audit of the year or limited review of the quarter. The resignation must be discussed with the audit committee chairman, and thence, with the audit committee, highlighting the concerns, if any. The views of the audit committee will be filed before the stock exchanges.
In essence, the proposal of SEBI tries to implement what seems to be the clear intent – that the veil of secrecy behind auditor resignation, where everyone can sense that everything is not alright but does not get to know what exactly it is – should be lifted.
Inspiration for the Proposed Amendment
The inspiration for the SEBI proposal comes from the recent turmoil in the corporate sector, where, mostly in the midst of worsening financial position, auditors put in their papers. There are rumours of auditors’ discomfort with the financial statements; mostly people smell transactions that may involve transfer of assets to connected entities, inflation of profits or hiding of losses. One wonders as to why most of these resignations come only when the financial position of the entity is suddenly worsening—is it that in good times, financial statements are immune from such vulnerable transactions or practices? However, it mostly seems that an impending default will bring the entity into regulatory glare, and the auditor may have to face persecution action.
What has made the auditor fraternity even more jittery is the action of the regulators against auditors of a failed financial entity, seeking to use the very heavy provisions of section 140 (5) of the Companies Act. It is just a matter of time when the country may witness class action suits against auditors, which abound in the Western world.
The instinctive action of auditors’ in such cases is, try to control the damage by quitting the scene, rather than qualify the statements which, in the past, have been affirmed by the same auditor. Of course, the reasons cited can be as slippery as “pre-occupation” or lack of bandwidth.
It was reported in 2018 that the minister of state for corporate affairs, PP Chaudhary’s written reply to the Rajya Sabha stated that as per the filings in MCA 21 registry, auditors of 204 listed entities had resigned between 1 January 2018 and 17 July 17 2018.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) also constituted a group and the task of developing guidance for the members was entrusted to the auditing and assurance standards board (AASB).
Is It Wrong To Resign?
No, as ICAI’s auditing standards (SA-705) provide the situation under which an auditor may resign from the audit. If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive so that a qualification of the opinion would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor shall resign from the audit, where practicable and not prohibited by law or regulation.
Is It Necessary to Cite Reason for Resignation?
Section 140 (2) of Companies Act, 2013 mandates an auditor to indicate the reason and other facts as regard to its resignation while filing the statement of resignation with the registrar and the comptroller and auditor-general of India, where applicable.
What Is the Meaning Of Resignation?
It is important to note that the appointment of an auditor is done for a term of 5 years. Therefore, even if an auditor resigns after completion of the audit for a financial year, within the term of 5 years, it is still a case of resignation.
Provisions of section 139 (9) may be interpreted to mean that the auditor may actually state before a general meeting, within the term of 5 years, that he is not willing to be reappointed. However, is that a case of resignation?
Read with section 140 (2), even an unwillingness to be reappointed becomes a case of resignation. This is so because the appointment is done for 5 years, and the ratification of the appointment at the annual general meeting, every year during the 5 year term, has been done way with by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 w.e.f. May 7, 2018.
Therefore, the following are some examples of what may be construed as a case of resignation:
(a) The auditor was appointed in the AGM of Year 1, for completing the audit for FY 1 to FY 5, until the conclusion of the AGM for Year 5. At the end of Year 2, after completing the audit of Year 2, auditor gives a letter to the management that he is not willing to audit for Year 3.
(b) Same case as above, however, instead of the auditor indicating unwillingness to be reappointed, the audit committee while evaluating the performance of the auditor does not recommend continuation of appointment.
(c) Same case as (a), however, the auditor becomes ineligible to continue.
Case (a) is a case of resignation; (b) is a case of removal and (c) is a case of vacation of office resulting in a casual vacancy.
SEBI’s Prescription: Reveal the Truth
The resigning auditor shall reveal all the reasons for resignation in the resignation letter along with the efforts made by the auditor prior to resignation. Against whom was the concern raised? What was the concern was raised in relation to? Why was the concern not addressed - due to a management-imposed limitation or circumstances beyond the control of the management? The auditor is expected to pour his heart out in the resignation letter, which is in line with the prescription made in ICAI’s implementation guide.
Role of Audit Committee
After the auditor approaches the chairman/ audit committee, the audit committee has to communicate its views to the management and the auditor, which is also required to be disclosed to the stock exchange.
As per SEBI (LODR) Regulations, the audit committee is responsible for the appointment, performance evaluation, ensuring independence of the auditors, finalising the audit plan and reviewing and monitoring effectiveness of the audit process. The audit committee is also required to mandatorily review management letters / letters of internal control weaknesses issued by the statutory auditors.
Auditor’s Duty to Complete Pending Assignments
The language seems unclear. The consultative paper provides that if the auditor makes a decision to resign in August 2019 the auditor shall issue the audit report for the quarter ended 30 September.
However, the proposed amendment to SEBI (LODR) Regulations mandates issuance of the limited review/audit report for that financial year/ quarter, as applicable, before such resignation (i.e. previous financial year/ quarter in reference to the date of resignation).
It will be logical to interpret that the auditor will resign first, and then complete the audit/ limited review for the current/ on-going quarter.
Thankfully, for all Indians, one can relate most tricky situations in life to a Bollywood song, and that really helps to dismiss the gravity of the matter. When it comes to something like auditor’s resignation (judaai), or silence (khamoshi), there will a large number of songs or flicks on such situations, evidently the popular themes for Bollywood. Therefore, without claiming to be the best for the situation, here is one that may possibly help to lighten the pain that SEBI and investors may be having:
(Vinod Kothari is a chartered accountant, trainer and author. Mr Kothari, through his firm, Vinod Kothari & Co, is also engaged in the practice of corporate law for over 25 years. CS Vinita Nair is Partner at Vinod Kothari & Co