Arrogance: Supreme Court Initiates Contempt Case Against Yatharth Hospital for Ignoring Court Notice in EWS Case
Ritu Yadav (Bar  and  Bench) 10 September 2026
The Supreme Court on Wednesday initiated formal contempt of court proceedings against Yatharth Hospital for filing an “ex facie false” affidavit claiming that it had not received a notice issued by the Court. [Union of India v. Moolchand Khairati Ram Trust]
 
A Bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Shree Chandrashekhar passed the order in proceedings concerning the obligation of private hospitals allotted government land at concessional rates to provide free treatment to patients from economically weaker sections (EWS).
 
Yatharth Hospital claimed that it learnt about the court proceedings only through informal communication and industry peers, and not through formal service of notice by the Court.
 
However, the Bench found that this assertion was contradicted by the Court’s office report dated April 22, which clearly recorded that the notice had been served.
 
Thus, the Court drew up formal contempt of court proceedings against the hospital through its Medical Superintendent and directed a reply to be filed within one week.
 
During the hearing, the Bench sharply criticised the hospital for disregarding a Supreme Court notice.
 
“All 52 hospitals received notice. This is not the way court notices are to be responded to. Sorry, but you (Yatharth Hospital) will have to be sent behind bars; jail is the only place for you. You are not responding to a notice issued by the Supreme Court. How will you treat patients belonging to the EWS? Look at the arrogance of this hospital. Sorry, we are not ready to accept this. You have to be sent to jail,” the Court said.
 
The proceedings arose from a 2018 Supreme Court judgment requiring private hospitals that received government land at concessional rates to provide completely free treatment to 25 per cent of their outpatients and 10 per cent of their inpatients belonging to the EWS category.
 
In February 2026, the Court found that strict action had not been taken against hospitals violating the judgment. It also criticised the Delhi government, Delhi Development Authority (DDA), Land and Development Office and Municipal Corporation of Delhi for treating the matter casually.
 
Following this, the Court issued contempt notices to 51 hospitals, including Yatharth Hospital, asking why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them and why the concessions granted to them should not be withdrawn.
 
On May 13, the top court had directed the amici curiae, government authorities, and the noticee hospitals to hold joint meetings until an effective Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for implementing the 2018 judgment was prepared.
 
Today, the Court was told that a revised SOP for enforcing the EWS treatment requirement had been filed, although only 12 hospitals participated in the consultation process.
 
Senior counsel appearing for several hospitals sought permission to file their responses. The Court allowed the request and listed the matter for further hearing on September 30.
 
Comments
Notice to CJP Protestor despite Order Quashing FIRs: Supreme Court To Seek Explanation from Greater Noida Authority
Debayan Roy (Bar  and  Bench) 09 September 2026
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will ask authorities in Greater Noida to explain why a notice was issued to a second-year student over his participation in the recent Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) led protests in Janatar Mantar,...
UP Govt To Move Supreme Court against Allahabad HC Order Reprimanding Noida DM for Detention of Akriti Chaudhary
Debayan Roy (Bar  and  Bench) 09 September 2026
The Uttar Pradesh government will file an appeal before the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court's recent ruling in which it had reprimanded Gautam Buddha Nagar District Magistrate Medha Roopam for ordering detention of...
Can Stamp Authorities Probe Property Undervaluation without Proof of Fraud? Supreme Court Larger Bench To Decide
SN Thyagarajan (Bar  and  Bench) 08 September 2026
A larger bench of the Supreme Court will examine whether stamp authorities can initiate proceedings over alleged undervaluation of property even though there is no proof showing fraudulent intention to evade stamp duty (BPCL Vs...
HC Rejects Swatantra Bhardwaj's Habeas Corpus Plea over Arrest, Delhi Court Orders 14 Days of Judicial Custody
Moneylife Digital Team 07 September 2026
The Delhi High Court on Monday refused to entertain a Habeas Corpus petition filed by right-wing influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj, challenging his arrest in connection with the alleged assault of the father of a Dalit student-activist...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback