Economy & Nation   Exclusive
Allegations of NDTV’s Many Shenanigans

Sanjay Dutt, director of Quantum Securities and a long-term shareholder of NDTV has alleged that chairman Prannoy Roy received irregular promoter funding of Rs375 crore by pledging NDTV shares which, according to him, is against the RBI rules

In August 2011, Moneylife wrote: “NDTV got listed in 2004 and is trading below its listed price after seven years. It has given a negative return of 19% compounded in the past five years and a total shareholder return (TSR) of negative 66% for the same period. Its viewership claims, like those of all TV channels, are impossible to verify. Its credibility is at a nadir (after the recent phone-tapping controversy) and its finances are in a mess. NDTV has rarely made money from operations. For the past few years, its consolidated operations have been making cash losses and it has been running on money made by selling loss-making subsidiaries to strategic investors.”

We further pointed out how marquee institutional investors always line up to acquire this loss-making company’s bits and pieces and exit at a loss at regular intervals, only to make way for other big name investors! The latest was DE Shaw which provided an exit to Goldman Sachs in 2011 by acquiring a 14.2% stake. After this, NDTV acquired a significant investor—Abhay Oswal, who owns nearly 15% of its equity but seems to have no presence on NDTV’s board of directors. Mr Oswal happens to be the father-in-law of Navin Jindal, an industrialist and Congress Member of Parliament.

In all these years, no investor has complained, or uttered a word of public criticism, about the losses and operations of this strange company. But, a few weeks ago, Moneylife received an email from Sanjay Dutt, director of Quantum Securities P Ltd, a name familiar to all those who watch the business TV regularly. Mr Dutt said that his firm is a long-term shareholder of NDTV and holds over 1% of its equity capital. He also disclosed that he had worked as a consultant with the group from 2006 to 2008 and has been a personal friend of the current CEO for over 15 years. But, more about that later. Mr Dutt was writing to make some startling allegations about NDTV’s capital structure.

 

He alleges that chairman Prannoy Roy received irregular promoter funding to the tune of a massive Rs375 crore by pledging NDTV shares which, according to him, is against the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) rules. The loan was made to a company called RRPR Holdings Private Limited in October 2008 against the pledge of NDTV shares.








RRPR Holdings has a capital of only Rs1 lakh and is 100% owned by Prannoy and Radhika Roy, says Mr Dutt in a letter to Dr KC Chakrabarty, RBI deputy governor, in April 2013. RRPR Holdings’ only asset and business is the 29% equity holding of NDTV. He further alleges that the loan to RRPR Holdings was made without even a mandatory haircut and, at times, in excess of the company’s market value. Of course, the loan was backed by the personal guarantee of a director.

Mr Dutt has obtained certified information from the Registrar of Companies (ROC) to back his allegation and written a formal complaint to RBI’s department of banking supervision at the end of April, with copies of his findings. All these documents are also available with Moneylife. Mr Dutt further alleges that the pledge of promoter holding has not been made public, as mandated by the listing agreement of stock exchanges.

I wrote to NDTV’s CEO, Vikram Chandra, seeking a response to Mr Dutt’s allegations. Within a couple of hours, I received a 1,600-word response from KVL Narayan Rao, executive vice chairperson of the NDTV group. Curiously, the letter did not answer Mr Dutt’s simple allegation about promoter funding in violation of RBI norms. Mr Rao wanted a couple of days to respond to those. Instead, he wrote about how Quantum Securities, a brokerage firm, was an active trader in NDTV shares. Mr Rao called Sanjay Dutt a ‘stock market manipulator’ who had settled charges with the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) by paying Rs53.41 lakh under a consent order.

According to Mr Rao, the company had yet to receive a response from Mr Dutt about whether he had indulged in similar trading in NDTV shares. The SEBI order of January 2013, which is on the regulator’s website, shows that Quantum Securities was accused of synchronised and circular trading in GHCL shares and paid Rs33.41 lakh in a consent deal, while Sanjay Dutt and Prenita Dutt, together, paid Rs15 lakh to settle charges against them.

Mr Rao then goes on to tell us that Sanjay Dutt was a consultant with NDTV and that he was paid a hefty Rs2.6 crore for his services over less than two years. This included several foreign trips to structure overseas subsidiaries for its foray into ‘non-news areas’. He was also given some shares in subsidiary companies which he had to forfeit when he left the company in 2008, allegedly because he could not get along with people.

Mr Rao says that Mr Dutt holds a ‘grudge’ against NDTV and has ‘misused’ and ‘distorted’ confidential information obtained as a consultant to level charges against the company in letters to various regulators as well as to NDTV’s board of directors.

In fact, according to him, Sanjay Dutt’s actions do not fall in the realm of ‘shareholder activism’ but are ‘blackmail, extortion and defamation’ which ‘amount to criminal offences under Indian Penal Code’. 


This then raises another question. Why has NDTV not initiated action against Mr Dutt so far? Clearly, neither side is telling us the whole truth. Mr Dutt is clearly not your usual activist investor; but it is also hard to imagine that a mere ‘grudge’ would motivate him to start a war against an extremely powerful media house like NDTV. As a person who has been in the organisation, Mr Dutt is also fully aware of NDTV’s phenomenal reach and connections in the Congress government.

On the other hand, what is holding NDTV back? Why has it not initiated action against Mr Dutt, if it is fully aware of his allegedly ‘defamatory’ letters to multiple regulators? Is it far more convenient for NDTV to simply use its clout to silence the regulators? Have any of them asked NDTV raised these issues about the frequent changes in its equity capital and Mr Dutt’s allegations?

Since Mr Rao says that Sanjay Dutt has written to NDTV’s board of directors, have the independent directors raised these issues? Surely, all of NDTV is not scared of what Narayan Rao calls Mr Dutt’s ‘bouts of uncontrollable rage and anger’?

Incidentally, Mr Dutt studied at the Doon School, is a chartered accountant, like Prannoy Roy, and is an IIM-Ahmedabad alumnus. The Quantum Securities’ website says that he was with the firm since 1994, but does not mention why he gave it up to act as a consultant to NDTV for the two peak years of the most ferocious bull market that India has seen.

An earlier version of the website listed the economist Dr Surjit Bhalla as a third member of the Quantum Securities management team. Dr Bhalla’s Oxus Fund Management was a division of Quantum. Dr Bhalla is on several SEBI and government committees and used to be close to NDTV, but is now independent.

Ironically, Quantum’s website, at one time, had listed among its ‘prominent’ clients Dr Prannoy Roy. Is there more to this unravelling story than meets the eye so
far?

 

Here is the detailed letter we received from Mr Rao, after sending this article for printing...
 



And here is the response from Mr Dutt on Mr Rao's letter...



Sucheta Dalal is the managing editor of Moneylife. She was awarded the Padma Shri in 2006 for her outstanding contribution to journalism. She can be reached at [email protected]

  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User

    COMMENTS

    Dipu

    6 years ago

    Same information was already came in Sunday-Gardian few years back

    CHANDRASEKHAR SKS

    6 years ago

    Nice article. But my only issue with this is that you should have masked all the email IDs of the indivuduals. You shouldn't have exposed their personal information. Just saying :-)

    REPLY

    Sucheta Dalal

    In Reply to CHANDRASEKHAR SKS 6 years ago

    Yes indeed. Appreciate your feedback. WE will do it right away.

    shivkumar

    6 years ago

    Unfortunately, promoters of most of the public listed companies are interested only in Public funds and not public accountability.

    Moreover, chances of well known names misusing the system are higher than an ordinary promoter as they have greater reach amongst the regulators and political leaders.

    Jose Koshy

    6 years ago

    Is it wrong to pledge one's personal holdings and take a Loan ? Not informing the stock exchange will be an issue. Post Oswal buying into NDTV, is Pranoy & Co. still the promoters ? Though the exchange says they hold 61.45 % of the Co.

    Debashis Basu

    6 years ago

    Its a publicly listed company, not private linen

    REPLY

    nagesh kini

    In Reply to Debashis Basu 6 years ago

    There is no distinction between "public" and "private" for the companies' statutory auditors.
    They are answerable. But will take shelter under "fiduciary relationship". A right case for the Regulators SEBI for the cos and ICAI for the auditors!
    Sometimes even the Auditors' also be subjected to Audit?

    R Balakrishnan

    In Reply to Debashis Basu 6 years ago

    Not in that sense... Just wondering how these listed vehicles become a playground for wrong doing and private dirt gets thrown about.If public shareholders still hang in.. why?

    R Balakrishnan

    6 years ago

    Washing private linen in public?? Is there something to choose between the two? Wonder..

    Sahara freeze order gets SEBI Rs52 crore in cash, investments
    After passing its attachment orders, SEBI informed all the banks, depositories, mutual funds and NBFCs, among others, about the matter and also requested the RBI to direct the chiefs of the banks to transfer the money of Sahara firms to a designated SEBI account
     
    Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has been able to get hold of cash and investments totalling about Rs52 crore and details of more than 450 acres of land so far through its attachment orders against Sahara group entities.
     
    In the high-profile case involving refund of over Rs24,000 crore to the bondholders of two Sahara companies, SEBI had passed orders for attachment of various properties and freezing of accounts in February after the entities failed to deposit the entire money.
     
    The cash totalling over Rs23 crore, received from various banks pursuant to these orders, has been invested in a term deposit for now, while investments worth about Rs28 crore in mutual funds and demat accounts have also been frozen, sources said.
     
    After passing its attachment orders, SEBI informed all the banks, depositories, mutual funds and NBFCs, among others, about the matter and also requested the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to direct the chiefs of the banks to transfer the money of Sahara firms to a designated SEBI account.
     
    SEBI had also approached the collectors of as many as 600 districts to request them not to permit the concerned Sahara entities and persons from any sale or transfer of properties attached by the regulator.
     
    As a result, the district collectors and revenue officers from various parts of the country have provided SEBI details of more than 450 acres of land belonging to Saharas, sources added.
     
    The regulator has already asked the Supreme Court to allow it to appoint an Officer on Special Duty and other officers to deal with the objections and claims relating to the property to be sold and for conducting the sale of the property to garner funds for refunding the investors’ money.
     
    The Saharas have so far deposited Rs5,120 crore with SEBI towards the refund and claims that this amount is more than sufficient to meet the outstanding liabilities towards its bondholders as the group has already paid close to Rs20,000 crore directly to the investors.
     
  • User

    South Africa’s ibiboGroup to acquire ticketing firm redBus.in

    Commenting on the development, ibiboGroup CEO Ashish Kashyap said: “We see this as an exciting market opportunity. Online penetration of the bus market is only 5.7% compared to 28% for air travel, suggesting headroom for rapid future growth”

    E-commerce firm ibiboGroup on Friday said it will acquire Bangalore-based online bus ticketing firm redBus.in for an undisclosed amount.

     

    ibiboGroup and Pilani Soft Labs Pvt Ltd, owner of redBus.in have executed a binding agreement for the acquisition, the company said in a statement.

     

    “This transaction will expand and diversify Ibibo Group’s existing travel assets—Goibibo.com (a B2C travel aggregator) and TravelBoutiqueOnline (a B2B travel agency platform),” the statement added.

     

    redBus.in sells more than a million tickets a month and has over 600 full time employees.

     

    Commenting on the development, ibiboGroup CEO Ashish Kashyap said: “This gives us significant combined scale in terms of daily transaction volumes...We see this as an exciting market opportunity. Online penetration of the bus market is only 5.7% compared to 28% for air travel, suggesting headroom for rapid future growth.”

     

    He further said India now has a network of good roads, which is increasing further. The number of buses would increase as people are opting for bus travel due to costly air travel and long wait-listed railway tickets, said Kashyap.

     

    Pilani Soft Labs was founded in 2006 by three BITS-Pilani graduates—Phanindra Sama, Charan Padmaraju and S Pasupunuri, which own three products—redBus, BOSS and SeatSeller—serving the fragmented bus industry in India.

     

    All travel entities of ibiboGroup, including redBus.in will continue to run independently and operate as separate businesses to drive deep focus, it said, adding, the founders and management teams of redBus.in would continue in their respective positions in the company.

     

    IbiboGroup is owned by a holding company MIH, which is jointly owned by South Africa’s media house Naspers and China’s internet firm Tencen.

  • User

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone