Airtel ‘Enforcing’ Recharges despite Sufficient Balance. Is this Goondagiri of Another Kind?
As I write, Bharti Airtel has just paid Rs10,000 crore to the government as 'part payment' of dues as ordered by the Supreme Court.  That money came partly from my pocket and that of over 264 million subscribers relying on Airtel’s ‘service’ in India. No joking.
 
I have a prepaid account, which had a balance of Rs291 (January end), enough to last me for several months since I hardly make any outgoing calls. And, yet, from 1st February onwards, Airtel has been bombarding me with messages threatening to bar call facilities unless I 'recharged' my account. The messages got progressively more and more threatening—“recharge or else Rs23 will be deducted from your balance, for 28 days” (which was fine with me) but, two days later, saying “recharge or Rs45 will be deducted.” 
 
A day later, “since no recharge was done, call facilities will be barred.”
 
I am 80 years old, with multiple health problems (hearing loss, and vision loss) and walk with a stick. The mobile was gifted by my children so that they can check periodically that I am OK. They worry if calls go unanswered. 
 
So I went to the Airtel office, spending on auto-rickshaw, climbed up painfully to their first floor office, and was told that I had to pay Rs49 for a recharge, although I had Rs281 balance in my prepaid account.
 
What is going on? Is it Rs23, or Rs45, or Rs49? Or is it that Airtel is trying to raise the thousands of crores of rupees it owes the government, through extortion from its subscribers? The 'new rule' (effective last week) is that the balance in prepaid accounts, I am told, “will be kept as a deposit for my lifetime”, and in addition, “customers will have to keep recharging every month.”
 
Under what rule? If a roadside vegetable vendor quoted one price, pocketed my money and then demands a higher amount, I have grounds for complaining about cheating and take action. 
 
If a large telecom company does the same, after holding on to the prepaid amount I have already paid, and refuses to refund my money, and declares that charges have been hiked, without informing subscribers, forget about giving them options to withdraw?
 
I have a news report from Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) saying that service-providers cannot impose arbitrary charges. I used that report when I sued Airtel last time when I was harassed by repeated messages to recharge 'or else'. I won my case and was awarded compensation under the Consumer Protection Act. The magistrate, while passing judgement, even commented in court that “Airtel should be ashamed to harass an elderly citizen like this.”
 
So why is Airtel doing the same again? What is the meaning of 'prepaid balance' if I have to go on paying in more money every month? 
 
Last year, in disgust, I even filled up a form for migrating to Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL), but promptly got an email from Airtel saying “please do not migrate, we will look into your grievance.”
So what is going on now? 
 
I complained to Airtel and said I was obliged to sue once again, since I am being harassed (sometimes  with two-three SMSs in a day, threatening to cut off outgoing and incoming facilities), and have got a standard, impersonal email reply saying “please call 121 regarding your complaint and give more details.”
 
All details have been given in the complaint that I sent. Why am I required to call them, as if they are doing me a favour? If I make a call, that means revenue for Airtel, right? And they need revenue badly…
 
Besides, adding insult to injury, my prepaid balance is now showing Rs281 instead of original Rs330.
 
It is illegal to impose arbitrary and unilateral rules, without subscribers being informed in advance. It is a punishable malpractice to quote one amount in their message and demand a higher amount at the time of payment. 
 
And on whose authority or rules does Airtel decide that the balance in a subscriber’s account will be held as a 'lifetime' deposit? That too when TRAI has expressly announced that service-providers cannot impose arbitrary rules and change tariffs?
 
I have a thick file of email messages, sent to various 'customer service officials'; they all made polite noises, but without solving my problem or even giving satisfactory explanations. 
 
A mobile is an essential requirement today—one cannot even book gas refills without mobile number, or even pay electricity bills.
 
Even if just 20% of subscribers have prepaid accounts, Airtel has already squeezed and collected the Rs10,000 crore it has had to pay as 'part payment'. So, are we all pitching in, to bail out this 'service provider'? 
 
Ask for a refund of your balance and change to post-paid, advises one activist. But Airtel office says 'No refund'. 
 
Under the rules of TRAI, individual complaints cannot be taken up. How many other subscribers face this same problem of extortion, and how many have bothered to protest (forget about suing)?
 
(Dr Sakuntala Narasimhan is a Bengaluru-based senior journalist, writer, musician and consumer activist. She is former national Vice President of the Consumer Guidance Society of India (CGSI), Mumbai. She is also a renowned senior vocalist in both traditions of Indian classical music - Hindustani and Carnatic, an A-graded artiste of All India Radio in both traditions. She is also a musicologist and author, and has written a book on the Rampur gharana.)
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    ashuannu61

    4 weeks ago

    The TRAI has struck up on any disingenuous method of refusing to take up individual complaints by claiming that there's no provision in the TRAI Act. But a plain reading of Section 4.B(b)(ix) & it's Regulation proves that it has to give effect to all Service Obligations, the same section says as follows: "ix. ensure effective compliance of universal service obligations". I think service obligations include proper service to the customers/the end users also and not to or between some intermediaries alone, as the TRAI officials would like to interpret. Hope the civil society members act on this piece of information, interpret it proactively and make the TRAI a responsive body to the public and don't allow it to continue be a service provider to a handful of telecom service providers.

    samyukta.babu

    4 weeks ago

    Telecom companies are incurring losses and they are now extorting money from gullible customers. My "data" doesn't work most of the time. There are frequent call drops. But TRAI seems to be least perturbed. Everyone doesn't have the time or wherewithal to approach consumer courts. I have been living with this now. Earlier I had a disastrous experience with Tata Docomo. There is no solution in sight.

    avm007

    1 month ago

    yes Airtel should have debited Rs 49/- from the balance available ( there is nothing called free lunch) but Indian company are notorious for not honouring their promise/contract

    kiranshah254

    1 month ago

    In switching from post paid to pre paid Airtel made me deposit Rs. 678 on some flimsy grounds which i could not evaluate then. Now the Co. saying they will refund but not done since last 3 months. The Co. does not allow me to buy pre paid plans from the refund due. Earlier the co. forfeited my Rs 100 balance in Airtel money on the pretext that the account is idle for long without any notice to me.

    mAg

    1 month ago

    All telecom companies initiated validity recharges some time back. It has become mandatory to recharge with a minimum amount for minimum validity. Recharge for extra talk-time is different than the validity recharge. And this minimum validity recharge gets automatically deducted from the main balance, if not done manually. One also has the option to opt-out of this automatic deduction. But in that case, one has to manually recharge with the minimum validity option for restarting services.

    Initially it was 23 and now it has been raised to 45 by Airtel. This policy is followed among all telecom companies. Gone are the days when you could recharge for 222 or 333 or 500 with full talk-time and unlimited validity. India used to have the lowest tariff all over the world and if it is deemed unsustainable, one has no other option but to accept the eventuality.

    The threatening messages are to warn the customers that validity is about to expire. One can ignore those messages and wait for the telecom company to deduct the validity recharge from the main balance. I have been following it for the last few months with my Airtel number - with 1000 full talk-time recharge without validity and minimum validity being deducted automatically every month from the main balance of 1000. This ensures that I always have validity plus talk-time in case I need to call using that number (PS - I use the specified Airtel number only for banking / OTP purpose and not for talking / messaging)

    dr.tiwari.dinesh.kumar

    1 month ago

    it takes a lot of money to maintain a phone "line" how can any mobile company give you free incoming line unless u pay some money regularly

    REPLY

    B. V. KRISHNAN

    In Reply to dr.tiwari.dinesh.kumar 1 month ago

    The issue is not getting free service. We are prepared to pay, but let them take the money from our available balance instead of insisting on re-charge using fresh funds.

    deepak.narain

    1 month ago

    This is a very unfortunate situation. Airtel needs to do something about it.

    mbpras

    1 month ago

    I am also one of the consumer being harassed by Airtel the same way. Time to take up with consumer court collectively

    ramamanis

    1 month ago

    Ms Narasimhan has a genuine problem and Airtel has sucked the blood of many a "prepaid" customers by this method. I am also a prepaid customer of Airtel and have been
    maintaining a prepaid connection with "unlimited validity" until Airtel brought in their
    rule change and forced me to " recharge " with limited validity. THIS LEFT Rs 57/ IN THE
    MAIN BALANCE OF MY A/C. AIRTEL REFUSES TO "ADJUST" THE AMOUNT IN THE
    MAIN BALANCE WITH THE RECHARGE AND ALWAYS THREATEN THAT "Outgoing
    calls will be blocked"..!!.. Their main office has issued me a "Credit Note" for the amount
    lying in main account. But, I cannot have breakfast with the Credit Note..!!.. . Their office
    refuses to adjust the amount lying in the main account and as suggested by Ms Narasimhan, " THEY MAY BE COLLECTING THESE AMOUNTS TO PAY OFF GOVT..!!..

    REPLY

    B. V. KRISHNAN

    In Reply to ramamanis 1 month ago

    Very well put. This is exactly the status of many customers of Airtel. This corporate goondaism needs to be addressed. Let this common platform provided by ML be the launchpad for further action. Can anyone suggest next step?

    puranik.mukund

    1 month ago

    Today's scenario is that all the telecom companies are in loss except Jio. Companies like Airtel, Vodafone-Idea, MTNL, BSNL have lot of outstanding/losses. In people are left with nothing but only Jio for which everyone has his/her own experience and there is no guarantee when and how much tariff will be revised being a monopoly in present market.

    From your case you hardly have any choice in present circumstances. I am using Vodafone and with current scenario of outstanding I wanted to know whether they will shut down the services suddenly just saying sorry to all customers later on. I asked in advance in light of switching my account to Jio (only surviving in present market with some life compared to other service providers) but I too received telephonic call as well as written reply that nothing is wrong with our services and it will be continued as it is and there is no need to be panic and shift to other service providers. I am still rethinking as Feb. 23 is a dead line.

    Though TRAI does not accept individual complaint, but you can safely go to appropriate court ( Small cause / civil / chapter case) with your grievances. These are better options than consumer courts.

    You may even contact first to following.
    M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited All India Shri Ravi Gandhi Chief Regulatory Officer Plot No-16, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV Gurgaon-122015 Haryana. Tel # 0124-4243106
    0124-4248063 E-mail: [email protected]
    The above details are on TRAI website under service provider's list. If this fails then you are free to approach appropriate court.

    REPLY

    Newme

    In Reply to puranik.mukund 1 month ago

    If Airtel is in loss how come Sunil Mittal is among the top ten richest Indian?

    archana_rahatade

    1 month ago

    Even I have faced same problem with Airtel few months back. I was having balance but still had to recharge of minimum Rs.49 to avoid disconnection. ( if I don't recharge they stop incoming calls ) I complained on twitter and visited their office but in-vain, they said its policy. I am one of their unsatisfied customer.

    123vdeo

    1 month ago

    I too have this experience. Since the last year Airtel has begun this practices. If I do recharge on the day SMS are sent but 2 or 3 days before due date, the next period of 28 days begin that day itself, thus 2 days in current period are gulped. Facility to check balance and validity dialing on *121*51# does not work. Same is case with broadband. Promised speed of 24mbps never achieved. Overall the telecom players are not fair with customers. May be it is result of market disruption by Jio. Incidentally Jio has also began increase price of their packs. Latest pack of 84 days 1.5GB/day hiked from ₹399 to ₹555! Funnily there is no place to complain about this. It is time that regulators like TRAI open consumer courts.

    hmahesh45

    1 month ago

    I had a similar experience. But what to say AIRTEL behaves like a "T"elco gang gunda. And the graveness will grow as the Idea goes out of service. Thanks God atleast Jio is there. Even after having an Airtel Unlimited Plan Active it does not allow to call public utility numbers SBI, AXIS, ICICI Pru , Indigo etc. I took up the matter but Airtel says these are toll free but international numbers. LOOT Raj of 20005-2010 is going to come back for Airtel unless TRAI takes cognizance of. I strongly feel Govt must not allow Idea to die, may be they should allow merger of BSNL/MTNL with Idea-Voda. So that at least there remain fair competition.

    hamungel

    1 month ago

    Sad state of affairs and TRAI will do nothing.

    sjaanya

    1 month ago

    She has no choice but to move to BSNL and pray that Govt does not shut it down. Vodafone Idea charges Rs.24 pm For keeping a cell number active. Jio the market leader charges minimum 150 or so whether u use or not. And The regulator will do nothing as it has only decided this behind customer backs, which is the case with most regulators in INDIA today. Their customers are the companies not the common citizen who uses the services

    Cooking Gas prices may see monthly revision to contain subsidy
    Consumers of subsidised cooking gas may have to pay more for buying domestic LPG cylinders as the government is exploring the option to allow state-run oil companies to raise its price every month to reduce the oil subsidy burden that has almost doubled this month.
     
    Sources said that though quantum of increase in price of subsidised cooking gas has not been worked out, it could be in the range of Rs 4-5 per cylinder per month. This is similar to the practice adopted by state-run oil marketing companies (OMCs) in 2016-2017 of regularly increasing the price of a LPG cylinder by Rs 2 initially and Rs 4 later.
     
    The practice was phased out in October 2017 over stiff opposition to the move and the understanding that it worked contrary to Ujjwala scheme of providing free cooking gas connections to the poor.
     
    "The need for revising the price of domestic cooking gas is stronger this year than ever before as the subsidy per cylinder has doubled with effect from February. If the current price trend holds in FY20-21, it could jack up the government's LPG subsidy bill from Rs35,605 crore estimated in the Budget," said an official source privy to the development.
     
    Executives of the oil companies expressed ignorance about any plan to raise LPG cylinder prices at regular intervals from FY20-21 but said that decisions were taken this year as well to increase cooking gas price in line with changes in the government support per cylinder. Brokerage reports suggest that during July 2019-January 2020, the OMCs increased the price of subsidised LPG by Rs 63 per cylinder at the rate of Rs 9 per month.
     
    Though the quantum increase in gas prices may not pinch the consumers, it would gradually reduce government subsidy provided to them directly into their accounts.
     
    Every household is entitled to 12 cylinders of 14.2 kg each at subsidised rates in a year. Any requirement beyond that is to be purchased at market price. If the decision to raise subsidised LPG prices is taken, the burden will shift even to the 12 cylinders.
     
    The prevailing low demand conditions and resultant low oil prices are expected to act as a cushion to the government from overshooting its oil subsidy bill in FY20-21. Oil is projected to remain in $55-65 band in FY20-21. This would keep even product prices under check, thereby keeping the subsidy outgo lower. The situation could also mean that LPG prices may fall in coming months.
     
    If that happens, the government subsidy per cylinder may once again fall, negating any need for a regular revision in cooking gas prices.
     
    Sources said that regular revision may not just be going for monthly increase but it could be quarterly or depending on the actual need as was done in last year as well.
     
    Lower oil and product prices may once again help the government to eliminate oil subsidy that is one of the goals set by the Oil Ministry earlier.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    Govt proposes jail term for ads promoting magic remedies
    The Health and Family Welfare Ministry has proposed the draft amendment to the Drugs and magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements Act, 1954), with a stringent punishment of a jail term of up to five years and a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh for advertisements for magic remedies and drugs for fair skin, enhancing sexual performance, stammering, infertility in women, premature ageing and greying, increasing brain capacity among others.
     
    The draft amendment has made several additions to the list of diseases, disorders, conditions covered in the Act. The Act says that medicines, "magic remedies" and products to cure any of these 78 diseases, disorders, conditions named should not be advertised.
     
    The new additions include ads for drugs or treatment for enhancing sexual performance, sexual impotence, premature ejaculation and spermatorrhoea, fairness of skin, premature ageing, AIDS, improvement of memory, improvement in height of kids/adults, improvement in size of sexual organ, duration of sexual performance, premature graying of hair, stammering, sterility in women, disorders of menstrual flow hysteria, power to rejuvenate, obesity, maintenance or improvement of the capacity of the human being for sexual pleasure, improvement in size and shape of the sexual organ and in duration of sexual performance, insanity, increase in brain capacity and improvement of memory and improvement in height of children/adults.
     
    Under the Act, the first conviction is punishable with imprisonment of up to six months or fine or both; and a subsequent conviction can result in imprisonment of up to a year or fine, or both.
     
    The amendment proposes to increase the penalties. For the first conviction, the proposed punishment is imprisonment of up to two years and fine up to Rs 10 lakh. For subsequent conviction, the imprisonment may extend to five years with a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh.
     
    The Ministry said the amendment is being made in order to keep pace with changing time and technology. It has been decided to solicit suggestions/comments/objections from the public/ stakeholders with regard to the said draft Bill. The suggestions/comments/objections may be forwarded within 45 days from the date of issue of this notice.
     
    The draft bill also proposes an expansion of definition of an advertisement. It says, "any audio or visual publicity, representation, endorsement or pronouncement made by means of light, sound, smoke, gas, print, electronic media, internet or website and includes any notice, circular, label, wrapper, invoice, banner, poster or such other documents.
     
    Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
     
  • Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

    User 

    COMMENTS

    Newme

    2 months ago

    Guess we need to put BJP CONGRESS in jail for their election promises.

    We are listening!

    Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
      Loading...
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email
    Close

    To continue


    Please
    Sign Up or Sign In
    with

    Email

    BUY NOW

    online financial advisory
    Pathbreakers
    Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
    online financia advisory
    The Scam
    24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
    Moneylife Online Magazine
    Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
    financial magazines online
    Stockletters in 3 Flavours
    Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
    financial magazines in india
    MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
    (Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)
    FREE: Your Complete Family Record Book
    Keep all the Personal and Financial Details of You & Your Family. In One Place So That`s Its Easy for Anyone to Find Anytime
    We promise not to share your email id with anyone