Adani Bribery Scandal: SECI & Power Ministry’s Silence Speaks Volumes
Amid the uproar surrounding the indictments and arrest warrants in the sprawling Adani bribery scandal, the glaring silence of a central player—Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI)—stands out.
 
The policies of SECI, a Central public sector undertaking (PSU) are at the heart of the criminal proceedings by the US Department of Justice and the civil complaint filed by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). And yet, SECI has chosen to remain silent—neither initiating an investigation, nor filing a complaint, nor providing any explanation. This raises troubling questions about its role in the controversy, especially after France-based Total Energies has declared that it will not make any new financial contribution to the Adani group.
 
Shares of Adani Green Energy Ltd (Adani Green) closed 8% lower (after an 11% drop) on 25th November, after the Total Energies’ statement. Significantly, Total Energies said, it “was not made aware of the existence of an investigation into the alleged corruption scheme.” In doing so, it confirms the DoJ’s charge that the Adani group failed to disclose that it was under investigation by SEC and had been raided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as far back as 17 March 2023. It also persisted with the lies and denials in March 2024 after Bloomberg published a report headlined “US Probing Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani and His Group over Potential Bribery”.
 
Adani executives called the report ‘baseless’, ‘malicious’ and ‘defamatory’ and repeatedly told investors that they were fully compliant with anti-bribery laws and unaware of any investigation against chairman Gautam Adani.
 
A 41-page summary of charges by the US SEC correctly places SECI and the high cost of its power at the centre of the sordid saga. Was SECI in the dark about the reason for the abrupt reversal by state utilities which suddenly agreed to pay inflated prices for solar power? Let’s understand the sequence of events as detailed by the SEC filing.
 
In 2021, Adani Green Energy Limited, under the leadership of Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani, ‘orchestrated a bribery scheme’ involving hundreds of millions of dollars (US$265mn—million—according to the Justice department filing) to secure power purchase contracts for Adani Green.
 
These contracts were key to the Adani group’s ambition to establish itself as the world’s largest private solar power producer. Now, Adani Green had raised US$750mn through a corporate bond offering in September 2021, including US$175mn from US investors. The sale of bonds required mandatory declarations that it had adhered to stringent US anti-bribery laws under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
 
The US regulators allege that the Adani group made false declarations, even after they had hatched an elaborate plan to bribe power distribution companies (DISCOMs) to sign power purchase agreements (PPAs) with SECI. Deals between the DISCOMs and SECI were critical to Adani Green’s ambitious plan to set up the largest solar project in the world.
 
The SECI deal required solar power developers to construct plant/plants in India capable of producing solar power component parts (such as cells, modules, or wafers) and, in exchange, SECI would purchase power generating capacity from these developers. These were called ‘manufacturing linked project’ contracts, since they combined power generation with solar component manufacturing.
 
Apart from Adani Green, Azure Global Power (Azure), which had bagged SECI contracts, allegedly agreed to participate in the bribery scheme. It paid its share by surrendering its rights in an Andhra Pradesh project to Adani Green on the pretext that it was unviable.
 
Adani Green’s revenues were approximately US$50mn and it had not recorded a profit’, but the SECI deal would allow it to ‘earn more than a billion dollars in profit’, says SEC. But there was a catch. The profits for Adani Green and Azure would only materialise if SECI was able to persuade various state DISCOMs to purchase power at a high enough tariff. SECI would then buy power from the two private companies and resell it to the state DISCOMs for 25 long years.
 
The five states mentioned in the indictment (Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Jammu & Kashmir and Tamil Nadu) were initially reluctant to pay ‘above market’ power prices until the alleged bribery scheme was rolled out. Key to the problem was that SECI had agreed to pay energy prices to Adani Green and Azure that were way too high. As a Central government undertaking, why would it agree to such high ‘tentative’ prices without clarity about viability or discussion with state governments?
 
The process by which SECI arrived at this decision merits a detailed investigation. After all, high prices for solar power only rip off Indian consumers and businesses, especially when solar energy prices were on a decline. Without the state agreements, there would be no big pay-off for Adani Green or Azure. The US filings indicate that Azure was almost giving up on the project when the bribery plan was put into action and it agreed to share a third of the cost.
 
The role of the central government has also been questioned by former Union Secretary EAS Sarma. In a letter to the finance minister he alleges, “The Ministry of Power (MOP) has deliberately created scope for corruption in the solar sector by issuing illegal directives under Section 11 of the Electricity Act of 2003 to State power utilities to absorb a minimum of 10% of their power requirement, irrespective of cost, from centralised solar power plants set up by corporates like the Adani Group and the foreign-based Azure, both specifically arraigned in the indictment.”
 
He says it is ironic that the power ministry should encourage “corporates setting up large centralised solar plants in preference to decentralised systems like rooftops and solar-driven irrigation pumpsets.” Centralised plants require high investments, operate at low load factors and have high transmission and delivery (T&D) losses, leading to higher costs to the consumer. According to Mr Sarma, a review of the working of corporate solar plants during the past decade would make it clear that “there was all round political corruption revolving around the setting up of most of those plants.”
 
Former IAS officer Dr PV Ramesh has posted in X that in June 2019, Andhra Pradesh cancelled PPAs involving 23 projects to generate 2,132MW of power. The same government then signed one PPA for 7,000MW of solar power with SECI in December 2021. He alludes to the role of two bureaucrats in engineering this deal.
 
Since the central vigilance commission (CVC) is conspicuous by its silence, it is clear that we need an independent investigation into the policy for buying solar power, the machinations behind SECI’s and the strange ‘manufacturing-linked project’ contracts that seemed designed to impose higher costs on consumers while enriching private companies. The role of powerful politicians and bureaucrats at the Centre, at least five states, SECI and various DISCOMs also warrants serious investigation. Who is best suited to do this, when so many are exposed by the US action?
 
The Way Forward
The US indictment has revived the demand for action against the Adani group. An advocate has sought permission to place additional documents before the Supreme Court (SC) in a petition that was filed after the 2023 Hindenburg report. The Opposition parties, led by the Congress party, are demanding a joint parliamentary committee (JPC) probe.
 
Given the number of political parties likely to be involved, a JPC may end up with a lot of drama and media coverage but no clear evidence or conclusions. This has happened in the past with some members openly rooting for persons under investigation.
 
A serious, time-bound investigation is possible only by an independent judicial commission, headed by a non-partisan judge, that is supported by officials from our tax, enforcement, investigation and vigilance agencies. Ideally, political parties should be allowed a say in choosing who heads the commission to ensure its independence.
 
Comments
Nahom
6 days ago
Adani Group itself has no technical capability to undertake this large projects. Behind them are large Foreign Companies like Total of France, Chinese Solar Manufacturers and Installers. That was why Power rates to AP were further raised from 2.2 to 3 due to Customs and GST increases. US companies had little role except some investments. Most probably matter will be settled out of Court. Andhra will be compensated and Indian public will pay increased GST, Power bills and Income taxes. Matter resolved. Sagar Adani will get new laptop and mobile and new identity.
covaimthangavel
7 days ago
Adani cannot be investigated so easily. Because of the loans he has taken from Indian banks and investments he has received from abroad. If the government starts taking any action against him, India's stock market and investments will be affected altogether. Therefore, there will be a problem in India's economy. This is the cunning business model that Adani has created.
Kamal Garg
Replied to covaimthangavel comment 6 days ago
Indian model of economic growth and development ?
covaimthangavel
7 days ago
Taking advantage of the American culture of corporate bosses being indirectly involved in politics, Adani turned the ruling BJP party into his ally and made India his property.
SRS
1 week ago
The US DOJ claims to be in possession of the names, dates, amounts, etc. of the bribes that were paid to various execs of the DISCOMs. It refers even to an AP exec who was in office from 2019-2023, and that the grand jury is aware of this person's name.

Normally, at some point, the prosecution will unveil all of this evidence well in advance of a trial, to be in compliance with discovery rules whereby a defendant must be shown all the evidence before the trial so he/she can prepare a defence. I don't know if this requires the defendant to surrender and be formally arraigned in court, or if it can be done regardless.

But clearly, whenever this happens, the identities of all the bribe recipients listed in Sagar Adani's phone will be made public, and an Indian court or investigating agency can them act. Even now, a state CID can open an investigation, the most logical one being Andhra Pradesh, where the CM Chandrababu Naidu would love nothing better than to label his predecessor as corrupt and a recipient of bribes from Gautam Adani.

Unfortunately for him, Adani is also very close to the BJP, his coalition partner. So, I guess we'll have to wait!
UUUU
Replied to SRS comment 6 days ago
Legally it is not enough to identify names of officials who were promised a bribe. DoJ has to prove that the plan was EXECUTED and BRIBES ACTUALLY paid. This is ver, very difficult because officials will surely deny they received any bribe. Instead, they will rely on the directive that authorised them to purchase solar power even it is higher upto 10%.
Meenal Mamdani
Replied to SRS comment 1 week ago
Very well put.
That is the trouble in India as elsewhere, even in the USA. Politics overrides everything.
What India must do urgently is judicial reform so that cases brought to the court are decided expeditiously and not linger on for months and years. As the Trump case shows, even in America justice can be delayed but in most cases justice is delivered quickly.
ED and CBI can keep a person in prison for months, even years while the investigating agency is supposedly collecting evidence, making the process itself a punishment. And as an honest and brave judge pointed out, ED's conviction rate is less than 1%. So obviously these agencies are being used by the party in power to intimidate adversaries.
spparashar1955
1 week ago
Adani case must be investigate immediately.
tlrchandran49
1 week ago
No one in India dares Adani and his group.
yesdkadam
Replied to tlrchandran49 comment 1 week ago
Except Rahul Gandhi ?
jaishirali
2 weeks ago
SECI is one more deaf, dumb and blind organisation, when someone close to the powers that be are involved. SEBI had received this information earlier, but slept over it. Besides all these charges, such businessmen end up spoiling India's image. I feel India has a chance to replace China in countries unhappy with their Chinese experiences, especially financial ones. However such a brazen attitude by our businessmen will ruin India's image and our chance to regain goodwill, all the more reason that we need to take this matter seriously.
shaileshgan
2 weeks ago
A detailed account which explains the issue. It would become very clear to readers if the rates of power purchase were known and the loss estimated
sathya2011
2 weeks ago
It is evident that with so much of power with them and a fragmented opposition not clear on their strategies, the government at the centre may have the last laugh. The Central electricity regulation which is deciding the price under their and most of the states using power to give free electricity in the guise of supporting marginalised people this will become a very easy route and as usual the hapless middle class need to murmur and bear the burden.
ksukumaran_72
2 weeks ago
As long as the impression Adani is India and India is Adani persists,hardly anything material is going to happen in the country.
Dr.Manohar
2 weeks ago
Too premature to jump into any action or calling for a probe by any agency, though it could very mcuh be warranted in days to come. The CEO of SECI Mr. RP Gupta has already clarified that SECI is yet to receive formal communication with documentation from US authorities and that he cannot comment based on whatever that appeared in media, which is fair to accpt atleast for now. So we may need to allow some time and duly support the advocate to place additional documents in the PIL filed in Supreme Court earlier with suitablly amended prayers.
kumarvijay200
Replied to Dr.Manohar comment 1 week ago
What kind of nonsense you are talking. Whether or not he is formally served the documents are in public domain, he is aware of it and indian govt and bjp statements also show that they are aware.
pgodbole
2 weeks ago
While the article correctly questions silence of SECI, surprisingly it does not speak about silence of respective state governments and state power utilities who signed the power purchase agreements at inflated prices. It is inconceivable that state governments, ruled as they were by opposition parties, would have signed on dotted lines just because SECI asked them to do so. If illegal consideration has changed hands, which most probably did, palms of politicians and officials in these state governments would also have been greased. So, their silence on the accusations is equally intriguing. While Adani has refuted the charges, silence of accused bribe takers is deafening. And opposition parties are gunning for Adani rather than bribe takers, who after all are their own people.
MLD
Replied to pgodbole comment 2 weeks ago
Do read the last paragraph -- the question is raised. But I am sure you understand and realise that the role of each state government is worth another 100 page study or, at the least, a separate article.
Meenal Mamdani
2 weeks ago
How does one decide if a judge is honest and impartial?
Pick one who has not been given a plum post.
spparashar1955
Replied to Meenal Mamdani comment 1 week ago
How any one prove this government is not saving Adani.
sathyandavid
2 weeks ago
Were these 5 states the only ones who signed the Purchase Agreements- did other states not sign up?
hako
2 weeks ago
Adani will pay a fine and settle with the DOJ. Indian government will never be able to investigate or prosecute Adani. He's filled the pockets of many politicians on both sides, which is the smart way. His ability to raise capital will be diminished greatly. Modi has been coercing politicians from poodle nations like Sri Lanka and Bangladesh to buy inflated power form Adani. That will also stop. But there are many other natural resources left in India, for Modi, to give out to Adani. I feel a little sad that Adani will not be able to fleece the people of other countries though.
Asset Reconstruction Companies: Controversies, Questions & A Bleak Future
Sucheta Dalal, 22 November 2024
Asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) were designed to clean up the banking sector by resolving non-performing assets (NPAs). Consequently, people outside the banking, finance and investment world had nothing to do with them nor had...
Who Will Hold SEBI Accountable? The Legal Void in India’s Market Infrastructure
Sucheta Dalal, 31 October 2024
When asked to address serious charges of conflict of interest, by Hindenburg Research and the Congress Party which have made media headlines for the past two months, Madhabi Puri Buch, the chairperson of the Securities and Exchange...
SEBI’s Conflict of Interest Code: A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery inside an Enigma
Sucheta Dalal, 25 October 2024
On 24th October, the public accounts committee (PAC) of Parliament is scheduled to meet officials of the finance ministry, regulators and tax departments and the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The multi-party PAC, headed...
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback