AAP’s Delhi Power Policy: Higher benefits for the better-off?

The hard fact: those who consume 0-200 units would benefit by Rs170 per month at the most, or 25%. However, well-off household consuming 200-400 units are the real beneficiaries. They will enjoy upto 43% cut in their bill

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has delivered on its promise of reducing electricity rates by 50% within three days of assuming power in Delhi and made its implementation effective from 1 January 2014 for three months. Whereas in case of water, the route adopted by AAP was to cross-subsidize part of the population (read detailed analysis of impact of AAP’s water policy on different consumer classes here), in case of electricity, Delhi government has announced a budgetary subsidy to be paid to distribution companies (discoms) from Delhi exchequer as fixing power tariff comes under the purview of Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) and not the Delhi government. How does the subsidy affect the Aam Aadmi? It may surprise your to know that middle-class is a far bigger beneficiary of the power rate cut than the poorer sections.


Firstly, it has disappointed those who believed that reduction in electricity rates would be across-the-board and that it would be come from the discoms that are suspected to be fudging their accounts, even though AAP has also announced a move to begin audit of discom’s account books.

 

But the bigger question is as to how does this budgetary subsidy impact different consumer classes in Delhi? Is it a subsidy for the really poor or the middle class?  Also, what impact it may have on discom’s finances and government exchequer? Is it a prudent decision or it adds more fire to a ticking time-bomb?

The metered slab-wise energy charge for domestic consumers without subsidy, with subsidy applicable before the new order and current subsidy after the new order is given below. We have not considered consumers in other categories as present subsidy is not applicable to them.


The difference between old and new subsidy is that whereas earlier the applicable subsidy in 0-200 units was not applicable if consumption went beyond 200 units, now, consumers within 400 units consumption level would get benefit of subsidy in both slabs. There is a fixed charge levied as per the sanctioned load which is given in Table 1.2 on which no subsidy is applicable


Additionally, there is an 8% surcharge (levied on metered slab-wise energy charge and fixed charge net of subsidy) and 5% Electricity Tax (levied on final amount). There is one more charge -- Power Purchase Adjustment Charge (PPAC) -- which has been discontinued from 31st July 2013.

 

So, how does it change the billing for consumers at different consumption points? Below is the table (Table 1.3) and graph (Graph 1.1) for comparison. Also, BSES companies claim a cost of Rs7.40 per unit for supplying power in Delhi, but more on this later.
 


 

What are the conclusions from these tables and graph?

  • The subsidy in metered energy charge is indeed 50% when calculated from the base rate without taking earlier applicable subsidy into account
  • However, whereas, the earlier subsidy regime established a clear distinction between consumers in 0-200 and 200-400 units slab and gave more benefit to consumers in 0-200 units slab, such distinction is erased in the new subsidy regime. Consumers in both categories are considered eligible for progressively higher subsidy
  • As a result, consumers in the 0-200 units consumption category would get an additional benefit of Rs170 per month at the most which is less than 25% of their earlier bill. There is no 50% cut for them
  • However, households who consume more than 200 units but less than 400 units are the real beneficiaries of new subsidy regime whose bills would go down by 43%

 

Middle-class benefits more, not the poor

The question is: what kind of consumers consume up to 400 units of power in a month? Are they poor households or middle-class households, even assuming they are all Aam Admi? For an answer consider the table below (Table 1.4) of power consumption of different household appliances for a broadly representative household that may limit their consumption up to 400 units.



The purpose of this list is to indicate an approximate level of consumption. While care has been taken to source reliable wattage and consumption data, it should not be taken as precise depiction of consumption

 

Note that the list indicates that a household would be able to afford 1 AC of 1 Ton for cooling, geyser for heating water and yet limit their consumption within the 400-unit limit to gain from new subsidy regime. In our view, such consumption is possible for a middle-class household and is definitely not indicative of a poor household.

 

Our experience is that for four winter months in a year when air-conditioning is not required, middle-class households (who use more appliances like microwave oven, food processor, lot more lighting, washing machine, vacuum cleaners etc.) generally do not cross the 400-unit consumption threshold. It is a moot point whether such consumption pattern should be eligible for subsidy. Also, as per the ET report, this move is going to benefit ~80% of household with electricity connection. Again, it’s difficult to understand why the capital of India needs power subsidy for 80% of its population.

 

Due to middle-class activism, Delhi government had started providing subsidy from around April 2012 for 0-200 units slab and later announced it for 200-400 units slab as well. After the announcement of new tariff order by DERC for FY14, whereby rates were increased by 5%, such increase was made good to discoms by Delhi government by increasing quantum of subsidy (from Rs1 to Rs1.20 in Aug 2013) and therefore there was no impact in billed rates to consumers for consumption up to 400 units. Given this background and widespread support to AAP by middle-class, it is not surprising that Kejriwal has taken care of this constituency by bringing in new subsidy regime. 
 

But what are the implications for this giveaway to the better-off middle-class at the macro level? That will be in the second part of the analysis

(Vivek Khaitan is an MBA from IIM Calcutta and is working as a management consultant for past five years in New Delhi)

Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

Ashok Kumar Rastogi

5 years ago

Reduction in tariff is because of subsidy not because of the Hera feri in account as claimed by Kejriwal.It is to be seen how AAP would arrange subsidy . Either they have to raise taxes or borrow from central govt. What AAP claimed in their manifesto that they would catch the corruption of discoms & bring down the rates. AAP is inhurry to reduce rate as populist measure through which many parties like cong,bjp have been doing.He should have given almost free power to poors who live in one room & use only one bulb & one fan i.e. up to 50 units per month.

REPLY

Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to Ashok Kumar Rastogi 5 years ago

it is biggest curruption by a party which took birth from india against curruption. it is bribe given to voters if congress were not to support confidence motion. so there is nothing different in aap it is on among the aam parties.

MOHAN

5 years ago

A A P has only one Policy - "Power".

Dayananda Kamath k

5 years ago

you have ignored one more aspect many a times there wil be submeters 2 to 3 in each metre becasue of renting out. and actually many who are tenents who deserve but will not get it as combined bill will show more than 400 units. further earlier his argument was that due to curuption and connivance of congress govt electricity charge are high. but now by giving subsidy he has justified the higher rate. he is more dangerous politician than all prevailing now.

REPLY

rajivahuja

In Reply to Dayananda Kamath k 5 years ago

This precise practice is used by the landlords

Rita Krishna

5 years ago

Another excellent article. Look forward to the sequel. When electricity bills in Delhi are higher than they are in Zurich (my source is a friend in New Rajinder Nagar, but fact could easily be verified), then it does seem that the entirety of the middle class SHOULD benefit. This and the water article have illumined the complexity that exemplifies day to day Delhi life.

As a principle, would you not agree that any tariff system should be simple, both to understand and to administer? Otherwise in the name of meeting the needs of ever more artificially created segments of population you set up bureaucratic edifices to check bills while having no-one, apparently (from water article), to either repair or check meters.

REPLY

Vivek Khaitan

In Reply to Rita Krishna 5 years ago

I completely agree with the principle that unwarranted complexity in the system increases inspector raj.

Any dent in corruption that AAP may wish to make would necessarily have to be anchored in reducing complexities, reducing discretionary power of officials. It needs to be anchored in large governance reforms. Even the idea of Lokpal which made them into heroes is not a great idea because this institution would be reactive and not pro-active to attack the source/incentive structure of corruption

Rita Krishna

In Reply to Vivek Khaitan 5 years ago

The reason I think they are right is that it appears that, setting the question of who is being subsidised aside, this step does actually reducie the numbers of separate possible categories of bill - it creates a larger middle category, does it not? This is then leading to interesting questions in the private rented sector about the behaviour of private landlords to their tenants. It is like the layers of an onion! Is it the responsibility of government to make private landlords behave responsibly towards their tenants? Or should the landlord pass on the benefits anyway? Look forward to your next piece. In my opinion large scale governance reforms could very well have less impact than this incremental approach.

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to Rita Krishna 5 years ago

Large-scale governance reforms could have less impact than this incremental approach? I think there is no evidence in economics (anywhere in the world) to support that argument. Reminds me of V.P. Singh who had inspired us as teenagers, only to disappoint very badly later.

Look at all those folks entering AAP today. A danseuse who considers GDP to be of little significance for a nation's future; a failed businessperson who bankrupted airline firms; an opportunist who was an "independent" politician for so long; an academic with almost no background in economics but claiming to be an adviser on everything under the sun.

R Varadarajan

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 5 years ago

Good observation. But every publicity move would be welcome for AAP

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to R Varadarajan 5 years ago

Sadly that's true.

Rita Krishna

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 5 years ago

I was expressing an opinion, rather than asserting a fact. Also VP Singh attempted large scale rather than incremental. Based on the analyses in Mr Khaitans articles, it does appear that these steps will make a difference to consumers.

How can it be represented as a bad thing that dancers and others of whatever professional background want to get involved in politics and the good governance of the country? Is it not right that parliament should be made up of people who have had a range of different life experiences?

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to Rita Krishna 5 years ago

I think the incremental change is what you referred to w.r.t this electricity policy. And I doubt if Vivek is praising the new policy. So not sure what you mean by saying that his analysis shows this will make a difference to consumers (unless you mean a negative difference). Such pricing policies are known to encourage wastage and to eventually burden taxpayers (the very same people who are seeing the benefits now).

VP Singh carried out a LARGE-SCALE (agree!) social experiment that left the country maimed for decades. Mr. YY is suggesting something similar. That's why AAP reminds me of VP.

I have no problems with a diverse set of ppl (from any party for that matter) in politics. In fact, I am all for it, but not if they think GDP, or other economic indices, are of no significance in decision-making.

Ask these newly inducted high-profile AAP members how GDP is measured or how infrastructure can impact GDP in a developing nation, and they'll look at you like you have a hole in your brain :(

Developing nations need infrastructure, reduced red tape, a well-regulated stock market, and an environment conducive to business. These opportunists in AAP don't care for any of this. They are there for an LS ticket, my friend! I am too old to be fooled!

The wonderful Kiran Bedi (one generation older than me) knew better and stayed away from AAP.

Vivek Khaitan

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 5 years ago

Brilliantly put Sir

Just to add, I am not too old but old enough to recognize the benefits millions like me reaped from post-91 freeing of economy unlike 20-somethings who perhaps do not appreciate enough the perils of 'socialist' doles economy

Rita Krishna

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 5 years ago

This has been a rapidly implemented policy, as was the water one. Vivek clearly was not praising either policy, however both his analyses were enlightening. There is a further analysis to come I believe, but my question was, is it not the case that the policy has in effect simplified the 'system' by reducing the number of subcategories of bill and creating a larger 'middle' category of consumer, many of whom may see some immediate relief in their cost of living. Has it been suggested that subsidy is the mid to long term strategy of the Delhi Govt? I don't see that there is anything intrinsically socialistic in this current subsidy, given that there are many non-functioning parts of the 'system' (water meters being one example), which need to be attended to properly, and which can't be fixed by waving a magic wand. As to Kiran Bedi, there is nothing surprising about her decision. With a background in the police her choices are likely - this is an opinion - to err on the side of the conservative and known, rather than the radical and untested. As long as there are people, senior people in a political party who do understand GDP and growth - pretty fundamental for governing after all - there should surely also be room for others, and for other priorities. When you say infrastructure, do you include in that the infrastructure of governance?

Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 5 years ago

aap is being mobbed by people who are conscious of their right than conscious of their duty. then it will lead to caos because every one is fighting for his right than performing his duty.

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to Dayananda Kamath k 5 years ago

Agree! It's a lot like VP Singh's Janata Dal (or whatever it was called). Full of opportunists wanting to be MPs. There were some honest ppl there just there are in AAP.

R Varadarajan

5 years ago

Reduction of any charge through subsidy is nothing but juggling of accounts and will not provide any solution in the long term. I would have admired AAP had they promissed to enforce discipline, transperancy and improve efficiency in the EB to provide power at cost+ x% ( to cover the future capital expenses,besides fixed costs and oil prices) instead of blind offer of 50% ( which also comes through subsidy ) This is nothing but tempting the public with some sort of of bribe. It is an irony that the party wanting to eradicate bribe has come to power through bribing people. Thye are enalrging the options with new reservations, and others. This indicates that AAP has arrived in the Political arena and are not much different from others.

REPLY

Rita Krishna

In Reply to R Varadarajan 5 years ago

I fail to see how it is a bribe, to offer hard-pressed consumers some immediate relief, while in parallel working out the best means of 'enforcing discipline, transparency etc.' Those are words which are easy to say, and moreover to appear to be doing something. What they have done is very concrete.

Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to Rita Krishna 5 years ago

it is just like colour tv, laptop, cooker etc announcing these things in election is bribing the voters only and today we are seing the result of these feebees. we elect people to mainain law and order and not to indulge in such gimmicks.

Rita Krishna

In Reply to Dayananda Kamath k 5 years ago

They are in government and have implemented a policy which i believe is offering relief to hard pressed consumers - month on month, not a one-off TV or something like that. Cost of living is an economic concern - or not?

Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to Rita Krishna 5 years ago

govt giving subsidy is nothing but moving cash from one pocket to other pocket. it will be recovered from you through other taxes and inflation. so wrong policies of robing john to provide for robert will not serve any pupose. and this is being used to the hilt now a days and people have started believing these tactics are part of governance and fooling themselves.

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to Dayananda Kamath k 5 years ago

Actually, it is difficult to make any sense of what Mr. AK is doing --- subsidy or no subsidy. He's the same age as me, but he thinks people have forgotten VP Singh and his double talk.

After all the claims made during the campaign about Sheila D's corruption, he now says he knows nothing about it (exactly what VP did after becoming PM!). One day his closest associate asks for a referendum in JK (have they ever talked to any JK Pandits?), and the next day, he dissociates himself from those comments. Then, he goes to hug Sibal (poor Anna doesn't need to see that photo!), and today his "law" minister is in legal trouble from the courts, but he is defending him --- saying the court is wrong!

Boy, have you ever seen a more rocky start to a CM's tenure?

Rita Krishna

In Reply to Dayananda Kamath k 5 years ago

Of course law and order is a matter for government but so is cost of living and hundreds of other things.

Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to R Varadarajan 5 years ago

all these half hearted moves are taken in a hurry to ensure themselves reelection if congress do not support their confidence motion and reelection were to be held. this is biggest curruption by a party which came to politics with lokpal.

Yerram Raju Behara

In Reply to R Varadarajan 5 years ago

I fully agree Mr Varadarajan. By agreeing to provide subsidy the AAP conceded to the pricing of the previous government that carried with it all the leakages and outages. It is necessary to reduce the costs of delivery and reduce the price per se as a reform measure. Does not matter if AAP govt takes a little more time to do such exercise. It is worthwhile examining whether every dwelling unit should have independent meters instead of sub-meters when it would be possible for any concessionary or regulatory measure can easily be taken care of better. Further, most houses use non-standard electrical wires and switches and switch boards as also main switches. By adopting standard electric ware and having a plan for modification, transmission leakages can be arrested. The costs incurred for this purpose can be subsidized by the Government to the extent feasible. This subsidy would add efficiency to the system on a permanent basis. Sale of non-standard items should be banned legally by amending the State Acts.

R Varadarajan

In Reply to Yerram Raju Behara 5 years ago

Yes I agree. It is important that the Govt Looks at cutting the losses at every stage - by replacing Transformers, and Cables, besides maintining the transformers periodically. They should also spend money on replacing the meters and providing digital meters to all tenants. In fact, it would be worthwhile long term measure to improve efficiency and recovery, instead of draining the Govt funds by way of subsidies

Vivek Khaitan

In Reply to R Varadarajan 5 years ago

One of the reasons that politicians encourage this subsidy culture is the rewards they reap due to immense attraction of freebies in our society. Like any other human being, politicians respond to the way their incentives are structured.

True that such subsidies are more of account juggling and at best a short-term palliative with deleterious long-terms consequences

MOHAN

5 years ago

AAM ADMI PARTY or AMIR ADMI PARTY?

Are Mr. Balakrishnan (INFOSYS) and Captain Gopinath AAM ADMI?

Shivangni Sharma

5 years ago

Well at least some people are not swayed by the half baked, ill thought out populist promises of this new kid in town.

I hope the scales fall off the eyes of rest of the intelligentsia and media soon or we might see instability or worse communists as our rulers.

Dr Paresh Vaidya

5 years ago

The source of anomaly such that the upper middle class and rich benefits more from AAP's new tariff stems from the fact that they have broadened the concessions upto 400 Units. Poor man uses less than 100 units and middle class should be upto 180 units. Anyone using more electricity than this is using sophisticated gadgets beyond the reach of 'common man'. As a wise energy policy concession should not be extended to those who consume large amount.

(Incidentally the debate so far on this page seems to be political than economic.)

MOHAN

5 years ago

.

AAP's "power" policy itself is defective in a democratic country as its leadership is a secret society. Now they are panning to contest Lok Sabha elections. Only God knows whether AAP supports Congress or not after the Lok Sabha elections.

Are Kejriwal & Co., Congress 'B' team?



Yerram Raju Behara

5 years ago

Leave off the party leanings. How do these measures measure up to the electoral promises? AAP delivered its promise. The implications will come to a cross during the course of implementation. When the State Budget goes for a toss, the real economics will come to play. You have to rob the Paul to pay the Peter if distributive justice has to play its part sooner than later. The rich would have to pay - the middle class of which so much noise is made have always been at the worst paying end. The rich get away with their ability to bear the burden; the poor have the subsidies with no income tax to pay as they are within the threshold level; it is the middle class who pay all taxes and cess. I do not see any reason for the growl when they get a cake of what they pay through their other valet.

NARENDRA GUPTA

5 years ago

Whatever given in the Article is Fact, But this may not be intentional. Arvind Kejriwal is really a person with High integrity. Give him sometime to rectify these errors.

REPLY

MOHAN

In Reply to NARENDRA GUPTA 5 years ago

What integrity Mr. Gupta?

How did he become the CM of Delhi?

Ashish Singh

In Reply to MOHAN 5 years ago

He became CM becoz people wanted so.

MOHAN

In Reply to Ashish Singh 5 years ago

Which people ? CONGRESS PEOPLE?

Ashish Singh

In Reply to MOHAN 5 years ago

Seems you didn't saw TV or news those days ;)

MOHAN

In Reply to Ashish Singh 5 years ago

While watching soap opera you may read the following also ;-)

Mani Shankar Aiyar hints at Congress tie-up with AAP


http://www.firstpost.com/politics/mani-s...

Ashish Singh

In Reply to MOHAN 5 years ago

Mani Shankar Aiyar hints or thinks.
Its his choice ;)

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to NARENDRA GUPTA 5 years ago

Intention is not everything! Well-meaning policies often produce the opposite effect: increase corruption and poverty. Eliminating loopholes and red tape helps reduce corruption. But hiring 40 additional "anti-corruption" officers doesn't! Surely, those officers could themselves become corrupt?

But, it's been a while since AK took a basic course on engineering economics at the IIT. My fear is he doesn't read: which country pursuing leftist economic policies has prospered?

And who is Mr YY? What are his credentials on economics? How come he's your economic advisor? He is not going to let you fix any errors!

Saddest thing, though, is the latest double talk on evidence related to Sheila D. And you are fighting corruption?

Amith

5 years ago

Again moneylife comes up with a nice analysis and shows the facts. AAP is just like BJP/Congress. I believe we need 'Poor' aadmi party now, anyone up for grabs?

REPLY

uttamkumar dubey

In Reply to Amith 5 years ago

yes you can leave your job and replace kejriwal.i cannot do thats y asking.
But gauze urself before commenting on kejriwal otherwise CONG-BJP wont let u live/breath.

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to uttamkumar dubey 5 years ago

The article is about an AAP policy which appears to be economically flawed. Great article, btw, and look forward to the next part.

Eajaz Hussain

5 years ago

we all know Money Life is PRO BJP, kindly dont stoop so low, if you wish to highlight, please do write to them AAP of the apprehensions you had mentioned, then based on their response, do comment. It will be a trust worthy behaviour.

REPLY

uttamkumar dubey

In Reply to Eajaz Hussain 5 years ago

BJP will make Moneylife financial adviser or so? so we will be safe from SEBI /NSE-BSE and UID.

Suiketu Shah

In Reply to Eajaz Hussain 5 years ago

After elections you wl have to say whole India is pro-BJP!lol

Ashish Singh

5 years ago

May I know ur political inclination and OR affiliation ;)

REPLY

Sachin

In Reply to Ashish Singh 5 years ago

How does political inclination matters in bringing facts with data. Did you do your maths before commenting ? If the above data in article is wrong then post it here and then argue.

Ashish Singh

In Reply to Sachin 5 years ago

Higher benefits for the better-off?
To me it seems like comparing ,
Get 10% off on purchase up to Rs 10K and 15% off on purchase more than 10K.

The greater you spend, may or will result in greater saving.

Vivek Khaitan

In Reply to Ashish Singh 5 years ago

And nothing off if you spend more than 20K :)

I don't think it ever occurred to anyone that the policy was designed to enhance consumption :)

Ashish Singh

In Reply to Vivek Khaitan 5 years ago

Its not designed to enhance consumption. A simple waiver till use of 400 Units. And 400 units in a billing cycle is normal consumption for common man with family. The real problem with most of us is defination of Aam Aadmi. We don't expect them to own a car, AC or a 2BHK or watch movies at multiplex. If someone who finds tough to arrange for 2 meals a day, we call him Aam Aadmi.

Abhijit Gosavi

In Reply to Sachin 5 years ago

Authors seeking to avoid questions about political inclinations should end like this:

This is a big blow to Modi!!! ;)

Vivek Khaitan

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 5 years ago

Ha ha ha.. I was thinking of declaring my political inclination as Zionist neo-con fundamentalist! Putatatively, that would put the article beyond the pale of rational discussion :)

sreenath

In Reply to Ashish Singh 5 years ago

sathyacumaran
operational head india
singapore media and channel group
its not the political inclination or affliation as far moenylife is concerned they analyse the situation with full facts and figures and bring out in their website and pass to memebers like us and we should encourage the boldness of moenylife in the goonda based indian political system where we jorunalist are threatened more frequently we really appreciate the boldness of susheta dalal she is not going to achieve anything form this infact if she soft peddalas you said to which policitcal party she can very live and luxurious life without any threat or any fear please support the insitution hats off to madam

Narain Jagirdar

In Reply to Ashish Singh 5 years ago

How does that matter?
He has analysed and placed the facts.

Ashish Singh

In Reply to Narain Jagirdar 5 years ago

Higher benefits for the better-off?
To me it seems like comparing ,
Get 10% off on purchase up to Rs 10K and 15% off on purchase more than 10K.

The greater you spend, may or will result in greater saving.

VIP quota in Railways: CBI probing alleged corruption in ticket bookings

CBI suspects that certain vested interests within various unions of railways and in alleged conspiracy with private travel operators confirm these VIP tickets against a premium

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is probing alleged corruption to the tune of crores of rupees in sale of VIP or emergency quota tickets in the Railways. The agency has sought records for the last two years, claiming that even signatures of members of Parliament (MPs) have been forged to confirm the tickets in some cases.

 

On an average day, as many as 35,000 tickets in various classes of all trains that originate from Delhi or cross the city are reserved under the emergency quota which is also known as VIP or Headquarters quota.

 

The agency suspects that certain vested interests within various unions of railways and in alleged conspiracy with private travel operators confirm these tickets against a premium, official sources said.

 

The sources said that the agency had some requests which had forged signatures and in some cases even the letter heads were fake. Initially, the probe may be limited to the national capital but, if required, it may cover other states, they said.

 

CBI has already registered a preliminary enquiry (PE) last week against unknown persons to carry out a thorough probe for misuse of the railway tickets issued under quota to various railway unions.

 

The quota is meant for emergencies which includes medical necessity but the agency has alleged that the process was abused by certain vested interests.

 

It had found some related documents while looking into the functioning of railways as part of its probe into the alleged bribery case involving the nephew of former railway minister Pawan Kumar Bansal.

 

In May last year, the CBI had also searched the office of an RPF inspector who had allegedly helped the sacked Railway Board member, Mahesh Kumar, besides shifting some movable assets from his Mumbai residence. Many documents which pointed to a scam in railway ticketing were recovered from there.

 

CBI had, during a discreet probe, claimed to have found that the emergency quota tickets to unions were being handed over to some travel agents who used to charge a huge price for confirming a wait-listed ticket.

 

A senior CBI official claimed it was a full-fledged racket. The official said the travel agents had been identified and would be called for examination soon besides some of the office bearers of a few railway unions who had allowed confirmation of wait listed tickets.

User

Adarsh Housing Scam: Here is what the probe panel report says

The judicial commission on Adarsh Housing Scam had indicted several bureaucrats and politicians, including four former CMs of Maharashtra. The state government, which earlier rejected the commission report, has now partially accepted it. Here are excerpts from the report

Maharashtra government that was 'forced' to reconsider the judicial panel report on Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society (Adarsh CHS) scam, on Thursday, partially accepted the report and decided to form a committee to decide upon further action.
 

Last month, the Maharashtra government rejected the report of the judicial commission of inquiry on the Adarsh CHS scam that indicted several politicians, including four former chief ministers of Maharashtra, for blatant violations of statutory provisions. The report of the two-member commission headed by retired High Court Judge JA Patil came down heavily on those in authority, describing the scam as a bad precedent.
 

The report of the two-member judicial commission had indicted several politicians including four former chief ministers—Ashok Chavan, late Vilasrao Deshmukh, Sushilkumar Shinde and Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil—for blatant violations of statutory provisions. Several bureaucrats were also indicted in the report.
 

While accepting the judicial commission report in parts, the Prithviraj Chavan-led Congress government accepted quid pro quo allegations against former chief minister Ashok Chavan. On the other hand, it gave a clean chit to former chief ministers, Sushilkumar Shinde and late Vilasrao Deshmukh, and ministers Sunil Tatkare and Rajesh Tope.
 

Here are excerpts from the Adarsh Report (remember Rs7 crore of public money has been spent for making this report and politicians from Maharashtra have ‘partially’ accepted it):
 

  • Adarsh portrays a “shameless tale of blatant violation of statutory provisions, rules and regulations. It reflects greed, nepotism and favouritism’’ (Adarsh Report)
  • Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society (CHS) was floated in 1994 by RC Thakur, an officer with Defence Estates Office, as the chief promoter and Brig Wanchoo (retd) in 1994 as the secretary.
  • The Society was meant to be for serving and retired defence officers who have not been able to procure a shelter despite full length of service to the motherland.
  • The 8,300sq mtrs of land lying adjacent to Oyster and Dolphin buildings was chosen for the Adarsh CHS but it fell in the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) and no building is allowed to be constructed 500 metres from the high tide line. Hence, the proposal was rejected by the Collector in 1994 and then in 1998 too. Both Thakur and Wanchoo continued to persist – even wrote a letter to Narayan Rane, the then chief minister – for shelter to members who have dedicated their lives to the service of the motherland. They failed.
  • One Captain Kala introduces Thakur to Kanhayalal Gidwani, who was a Congress person and had great influence over its leaders. Thakur and Wanchoo requested Gidwani to represent the case to get the required permission for the “welfare of the defence personnel”.
  • Gidwani wanted to have his pound of flesh so made Thakur and Wanchoo make a formal declaration in 1999 that he (Gidwani) would carry out the assignment on a condition that 30 flats should be at his (Gidwani’s) disposal. The duo agreed for hook or crook they wanted Adarsh to be built
  • Twelve letters written by Gidwani to various government authorities including chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh in 2000 made the same appeal–to look into the genuineness of the case and the sacrifice made by military officers to their motherland.
  • The office bearers of the Society also tried to ask the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) to change the CRZ to II level from I so that they could get clearance for the building, but failed in their attempts.
  • Thereafter, the Society members wrote to the then Minister of Revenue, Ashok Chavan and suggested that another alternate land measuring 3,854 sq mtrs should be considered but it is in physical possession of military authorities. They appealed that it should be taken back from the defence authorities. The letter also proposed that the state government had proposed to widen the Cuffe Parade Road and join it to 60 mtrs wide road known as Colaba-Uran Road. Since that did not come through due to ban in reclamation land, this could be adjusted by making changes in the DP plan and added to the land for making Adarsh CHS.
  • The then Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh showed great enthusiasm and asked for the file and wrote “please call for the proposal and put it up immediately”. That began a trail of permissions to be sought from different authorities.
  • Besides the Collector who cleared it, Col SS Jog on behalf of the GOC-IN-C wrote that the said land falls out of the defence boundary and therefore, decision may be taken for the housing welfare of the military personnel. Collector Debashis Chakrobarty submitted his report stating that the proposed society is for 40 top grade officers of the army, navy and defence estate personnel. As far as taking the land which was dedicated to road widening, a clearance should be taken from Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA).
  • On 2 June 2000, a letter was written to the then Revenue Minister Ashok Chavan requesting him to consider 40% civilians as members for the Adarsh CHS, thus making it 19 members from the civilian side and 31 members from the defence.
  • MMRDA also gave a nod to the reduction of the Captain Prakash Pethe Marg and the state government changed the zoning from road to partial residential.
  • The greed was not over though. In 2003, Gidwani proposed that the Adarsh Society be given additional floor space index (FSI) from the nearby BEST depot also, besides eating up a part of the Pethe Marg. And the reason? Thakur wrote to the then revenue minister that since the civil members have risen from20 to 71, which has been approved by the state government, additional FSI should be granted to ensure decent housing for these members. This meant swallowing a part of the 2,669 odd sq mtrs additional space from the BEST land which was reserved for bus depot in the DP. Adarsh CHS was permitted to use 700-odd sq mtrs for commercial use and so a part of the Bus Depot reservation was changed to residential use.
  • The Report remarks: “It was also noticed that some persons, for instance a driver in a remote place at Nagpur who had never been to Mumbai or an ordinary vegetable vendor sitting on the side of the road making a modest earning all of a sudden goes for buying a flat in Adarsh CHS although he has no intention of leaving his place of occupation or residence”.
  • Adarsh CHS enjoyed political patronage of four former chief ministers, late Vilasrao Deshmukh, Sushilkumar Shinde, Ashok Chavan and Shivajirao Nilengakar Patil as well as two ministers of state Sunil Tatkare and Rajesh Tope.
     

The complete report can be downloaded from http://www.satyamevajayate.info/

Like this story? Get our top stories by email.

User

COMMENTS

Vaibhav Dhoka

5 years ago

Where we are heading if we have government that approves CORRUPTION and shields GUILTY?What kind of signal we are passing to next generation.?All in governance are there to loot NATION.This is because we have never ending trail of judiciary.This system is used by mighty to prolong and to remain in power as ever.

Gopalakrishnan T V

5 years ago

The politicians and bureaucrats jointly loot the national wealth taking advantage of the positions they occupy. Now the attempt is to trap only Bureaucrats and allow politicians to escape from follow up measures if any. The corruption is designed by Bureaucrats and they take extra pains to ensure that when ever policies are framed on any issue,there is scope for making money and this has been going on for decades unquestioned. Now the media is alert and keeping a watch on the atrocities committed on both intelligent and gullible public alike,people come to know how the society's wealth is looted in the cover of democracy. Money Life has been playing a very active and vigilant role deserving all support and appreciation.

Yerram Raju Behara

5 years ago

It is a shame on democracy. The Congress governments are unable to see the writing on the wall. Once they are kicked in the bourses ere long, it will be no holds barred to put several politicians who are fraudulent and who perpetrated fraud would all be counting the bars in the jails.

nagesh kini

5 years ago

There is more than meets the eye.
Just because Rahul/Sonia now disappoved that the CM came out in a 'selective acceptance' leaving out the NCP Ministers of the UDD because their party blackmailed him. The Governor on the Govt. advice has withheld his approval for CBI procecution of Ashok Chavan.
Instead of any knock on the knuckles for the guilty babus att their allotments need to be cancelled and the building converted into a Miltary Hospital.

SuchindranathAiyerS

5 years ago

India's ruling criminals are adept at protecting their own. They have had sisty six years of practice!

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

online financial advisory
Pathbreakers
Pathbreakers 1 & Pathbreakers 2 contain deep insights, unknown facts and captivating events in the life of 51 top achievers, in their own words.
online financia advisory
The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
financial magazines online
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
financial magazines in india
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Online Magazine)