A Soured Succession: Spoken by a Sore Patriarch
Vijaypat Singhania, who passed away on 28 March 2026, acknowledged, with rare candour, in his autobiography, ‘An Incomplete Life’, the series of impulsive decisions and errors of judgment that led to his legacy at Raymond Ltd being wiped clean.
 
This article draws on a few quotes from this book to thread a story.
 
This started with him losing the chair position.
 
 “Things really started to go downhill in 2000–2001, when our clashes became more frequent. After a period of unpleasantness, I thought that the only way out for me was to, in fact, resign as Raymond’s chairman and managing director (CMD)
 
I committed the first Himalayan stupid mistake of my life when I sent my resignation letter to Gautam. A meeting of the board of directors was urgently called, and my resignation was accepted in my absence. I was in London at the time. You can imagine my abject shock when I came to know of it. 
 
I kept quiet and continued on, now as Chairman Emeritus of Raymond, a title bestowed on me by the board for my exemplary services to the company. But in private, I berated myself mentally and not a day went by when I didn’t kick myself for being so impulsive with my legacy.”
 
The next in the sequence was his displacement from JK House, which the company had acquired in 1945, for the residence of the Singhania clan, who were on the board of Raymond. 
 
Located in Breach Candy—among the most expensive residential enclaves in the world—JK House stood on 1,916.65sqyds (square yards). Its duplex flats were routed through a subsidiary, Pashmina Holdings, and sublet to members of the Singhania family at nominal rents.
 
In 2007, Raymond’s board decided to redevelop the property. The occupants surrendered their tenancy rights and were given the right to purchase the flat in the redeveloped building at ₹9,000 per sqft (square foot).
 
Thus, Vijaypat Singhania lost his footing to live in that place and was left at the mercy of the company to get it back when it was redeveloped.
 
The next event that happened in February 2015 was even more momentous. Some of the relevant extracts from the book-
 
“A little over six years ago, I was in London with my senior advisors. We were having a heart-to-heart chat when I told them that I was thinking of gifting away all my shares of Raymond and its associate companies to Gautam. There was absolute silence in the room for a few seconds. Looking back, the unease on their faces was pretty comical. There were four men in the room and each one of them, when they regained their ability to speak, told me that this might not be a good idea. But I leapt to my son’s defence.
‘Gautam will never mistreat me,’ I said. 
 
I was advised to put my shares into a discretionary trust to make sure the beneficiary couldn’t take advantage of my generosity. I would own and hold the trust till I died, after which Gautam would become the executor on the condition that he would pay certain sums of money to my wife, my younger brother’s widow Veena, and my daughter Shephali.
 
I was on the verge of activating the trust and getting everyone on board when things took an unpleasant turn….”
 
“That fateful day was 13 February 2015. The day I made the stupidest mistake of my life. And signed a letter that would change the shape of my life forever…
 
While the book refers to 13 February 2015, records indicate that on 9 February 2015, Vijaypat Singhania formally wrote to the board of Raymond Ltd, gifting his entire shareholding in two promoter entities—JK Investors (Bombay) Ltd and Smart Investors Pvt Ltd—to his son, Gautam Hari.
 
These holdings effectively controlled 37.17% of Raymond Ltd.
 
The next event, and the more haunting one, concerns losing his right to live in JK House which had previously been agreed upon.
 
As mentioned, Raymond decided to redevelop JK House and vacated the occupants with an explicit agreement that the constructed space would be sold at ₹9000/sqft, once completed.
 
Construction of the new building was completed in March 2017 at a cost of approximately ₹271 crore.
 
Even as the construction was in progress, the previous tenants, including Vijaypat Singhania, sent letters to the company to exercise their purchase rights under the agreement. 
 
When the time came to honour the arrangement, the company chose to place the matter before shareholders, citing the sharp increase in market value.
 
According to press reports, the market value of the asset was ₹7,100 crore in the year 2017, and the adoption of the value of ₹9,000/sqft would have undervalued it by more than 90%! 
 
In the annual general meeting (AGM) held on 5 June 2018, the outcome was decisive. With promoters excluded from voting, institutional shareholders overwhelmingly rejected the resolution.
 
In that moment, the pathway for Vijaypat Singhania to regain the residence in JK House stood shut.
 
Around the same time, he also lost his board position due to an unusual statutory trigger.
 
Under Section 167(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, a director who fails to attend any board meetings over a continuous period of 12 months, without leave, vacates office automatically. This was on 24 January 2018. 
  
This sequence, in many ways, mirrors the unravelling behind 'The Complete Man'.
 
Raymond has changed significantly since the time of Vijaypat Singhania. He viewed it in the following way in an interview with Business Today in 2023.
 
“He’s (Gautam Singhania) breaking up Raymond. It breaks my heart. But I don’t interfere. I don’t tell him what he should do. He has to live. I have lived my life. I have maybe 2-3 years left," Vijaypat says.
 
“I gave him everything… By mistake, I was left with some money… Otherwise, I would have been on the road.” 
 
But for the father-son squabble, the importance of JK House would not have entered the public’ consciousness. 
 
Even in 2017, it was valued at around ₹7,100 crore. This must have gone up significantly in the period since.
 
An asset whose market value is many times the market valuation of the whole company is indicative of its passive existence. Who it is benefiting is the key question to pose.
 
 
There is no evidence of any scrutiny by the board, the auditors, or the institutional shareholders.
 
The lone voice that spoke all these, is silent! 
 
(Ranganathan V is a CA and CS. He has over 45 years of experience in the corporate sector and in consultancy. For 17 years, he worked as Director and Partner in Ernst & Young LLP and three years as a senior advisor post-retirement, handling the task of building the Chennai and Hyderabad practice of E&Y in tax and regulatory space. Currently, he serves as an independent director on the board of four companies.)
Comments
Free Helpline
Legal Credit
Feedback