R Balakrishnan
Why insurers like defaults

For an insurance company, it actually helps if clients default on policies that have not acquired any surrender value

A business paper recently carried a story about life insurance policies worth over a trillion rupees which have lapsed. Some of the interesting bits are:

i) A total of 9.1 million policies lapsed in 2009

ii) The lapse ratio for ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co Ltd, the life insurance arm of India’s largest private sector lender ICICI Bank Ltd, stood at 53% in 2009, up from 40% in the previous year. About 777,000 conventional policies worth Rs25,269 crore lapsed, the highest among private insurers by value. (Obviously, ICICI does not want to miss market share any which way)

iii) In terms of lapse ratio, Aviva Life Insurance Co India Ltd, leads the list with 32,000 policies or 59% lapsed

iv)
  Reliance Life Insurance Co Ltd saw its lapse ratio almost double—40% in 2009 against 21% a year ago.

iv) Life Insurance Corp of India (LIC) declined to 4% for 2009 from 6% in the previous year. In absolute terms, nearly 7.3 million traditional policies worth Rs52,926 crore lapsed. Almost half the conventional policies that lapsed in the industry in 2009 were sold by LIC.

If this is not rampant mis-selling, I do not know what is. Most insurance companies do not repay or refund anything, if the policies are less than three years paid up. After three years, the agents’ commissions drop to ‘small’ levels of 2.5%-5%, so he cares two hoots. He would rather tell the fool (the client) to take a different policy after ditching the old, since it would give him a higher commission.

The great thing is that the paper quotes the Max New York honcho as saying that it is not mis-selling but “it indicates a lack of understanding on the part of policyholders”. Sir, who delivers the ‘understanding’?

Most insurance companies have a scheme or a process to ‘revive’ lapsed policies within around three years of the last premium paid. After that, they quietly pocket the money. So, for an insurance company, it actually helps if clients default on policies that have not acquired any surrender value. Probably, they must be hoping for this to happen every year and would be part of their business goals for each year. Probably, they reward agents who bring in such kind of clients into their web of deceit.

It is time people woke up. IRDA, being run by retired guys with either LIC or RBI backgrounds, will never help the insured. They are the owners’ representatives. The ideal rules would be:

i) When policies lapse, blacklist the agent/withdraw his IRDA code, so that he can get no more commissions and sell no more policies. This is the best way to ensure that the mis-selling stops.

ii) When there is a lapse, the insurance companies should refund the amounts collected less the charges they have actually incurred. For instance, if I have paid Rs2,000 per year for two years, I should get a refund of something like Rs2,000-Rs3,000. This should be made statutory and any violation should result in a heavy penalty on the insurance company.

iii) A list of lapsed policies should be put online compulsorily. 

iv) Surrender values should be made compulsory even for a one premium old policy. Why should the insurance company rob the payer?
The other option is to explore if third-party buyers of lapsed policies can emerge legally. Maybe they can take a call on whether to revive the policy and take the assignment in their favour and continue it. All possibilities exist.

I am sure that the IRDA will do zilch to resolve this issue. It is high time that the finance ministry stepped in and passed the supervision to another body where the insured is also taken care of. If SEBI can handle mutual funds, I am sure it can handle insurance also. After all, every product they sell (except the pure term policy which they hide) is an investment product with some optional insurance.
 

User

COMMENTS

Suresh R

7 years ago

Actually - I am not against policies being sold by agents. I am simply arguing that there should be a facility to buy policies directly, for people who are well informed and capable of planning their own finances. LIC policies cant be bought except through agents.

Look at mutual funds, you can buy through an agent and pay a certain amount of premium (lets say Rs.5 over the NAV, per unit - now that entry loads are abolished). That's besides any rate you work out with the agent.

However there is nothing at all that stops you from opening up an online transaction account with each fund house you want to hold funds in, and transacting with them online - buy, sell, switch etc funds. When your agent is listed as "DIRECT" there's no entry load at all. Small but significant saving for a regular and heavy investor. All the major fund houses like HDFC, Reliance, ICICI, SBI MF etc

Santosh Kurian

7 years ago

In response to Mr. Suresh R.

Sir, If I read you right, you seem well versed with the financial services industry. Apparently - you approve of insurance as an essential component of one's savings/protection portfolio.

I agree with the fact there are many instances of mis-selling that happens - a phenomenon that exists purely because the buyer is not well informed about the concept per se.

That said; this needs to be viewed in the macro-perspective of the necessity of addressing the need for a general societal safety net not available in this country. (Many developed countries have an elaborate safety net funded through their series of taxation procedures; in India - taxes paid need to be utilized to uplift the under-privileged while to a large extent leaving the rest to fend for themselves. The caveat here - even those covered by government schemes by this meager amount aren't well informed about this benefit)
Anyway - i digress - the bottom line; would people buy insurance online (or through non-push methodologies for that matter?) - The answer is an emphatic "No"! I think energies could be better spent looking at ways to better customer awareness (very much like IRDA's new proactive campaign that seeks to educate the public - "Bima Bemisaal")
In all fairness - Insurance companies are doing their best to ensure strict compliance to benefit/solution based selling; granted - there is ample room for improvement and things will improve as the market (and the average consumer becomes more and more aware); in the meantime – look at it as a necessary evil – a means to an end!

Suresh R

7 years ago

As to the gentleman who mentioned customer acquisition cost .. that is mostly because of solely selling policies through agents, who then get fat commissions of upto 40%..60% of the premium paid for the first 3 years.

Start selling the LIC policies online (just like you can pay LIC premiums online), with KYC procedures done at the branch and see much better value to the customer.

The premium paid will drop like a stone. And there is far less incentive for agents to oversell policies simply to drive up their commissions. With the agent selling my policies it got so that I had to firmly tell the guy I am not buying any more and I will pay premiums online so he doesnt need to bother, after he took to coming over once every month or so "to collect the premium" but actually always advertising a new policy to buy

In fact many agents will pay the first one or two premiums in the policy .. giving up a part of their commission to the policyholder and still leaving themselves a comfortable profit margin.

That is about the only way (besides preying on their friends and acquaintances to sell them policies) that they can make any kind of money

Or else all these grandiosely named jeevan this, jeevan that policies are the same jargon spouted by the lakhs of LIC agents around the country so there is nothing at all remaining that influences peopel to buy from one agent instead of the other

If agents are able to shell out the first one or two months premium .. you will see that this so-called customer acqusition cost is a giant racket in padding up premium costs and ripping off the general public.

Suresh R

7 years ago

I am in complete agreement with Mr.Balakrishnan here.

Agents - especially those who go around convincing people to heavily overinsure themselves (to about 90,000 to a lakh in premium per annum - often in loss making to the insured but high commission to the agent schemes) are the root cause of this.problem.

When there is an economic slowdown nobody wants to pay 1 lakh in insurance premium, when they can surrender some of the older policies, and then keep 30,000 insurance, invest 70,000 a year in PPF

Zoher Doctor

7 years ago

I on the first instance don't agree to the subject. Insurance Company as well as agents looks for the interest of the insured (clients) and not on the premium or commission paid. This do happen due to some unethical practice done by some insurance companies who introduced Event Managements Companies to sell insurance. This needs to be taken care by the regulators. Clients needs to be educated and not forced for higher premium ie more than his / her capacity.
As we have Cibil same system to be introduced so that the blacklisted agents & insured can be crossed checked by other insurance company, before underwriting the proposal.
I am into this industry and is associated as advisor and mine lapsed policy is hardly any...
Policy Holder has to be more aware of his need and should approach the right counsultant / advisor.

Santosh Kurian

7 years ago

Mr. Balakrishnan
With all due respect - your article (in my opinion) is misleading and entirely misguided to say the least!

You somehow completely miss the fact - It is in the insurer's best interest to retain customers over the entirety of his/her policy term!
Your article does not clearly expand on all the costs to be factored while underwriting a policy - 'customer acquisition cost' in itself costs the insurer at least 2-3 years of premium money (not to mention the operational costs that follow!)
Mr. Balakrishnan - you should instead resort to advocating better levels of persistency by exhorting the lesser informed public to keep renewing their policies!

We can always get into an endless debate on who's making what in a poorly developed Insurance market - bottom line - Insurance is an absolute essential - so long as policy holders don't understand the intrinsic benefit of protection (for self & family) - he'll never be inclined or motivated to keep the policy - in such instances - the fear of losing money already invested (if it's a savings related insurance product) is sometimes used as a motivator to keep the policy in-force.

You're right in that the policy holder loses out - you're not helping build peoples' awareness levels by spreading unfounded negative sentiments.

Regards
Santosh

natrajan

7 years ago

Superb. An eye opener.
Govt. should take initiative to spread the awareness through print and electronic media without waiting for IRDA action under the campaign "Jago Grahak Jago"

K.Kumarr

7 years ago

Dear sir, I am a regular reader of your article in Moneylife. I am an insurance agent for life & general. I am doing this for past 6 years. Till date I never allowed any of my customer to goto branch for renewal payment or any other services.
I recently shifted to Bangalore from Chennai. (2 years). Everymonth or alternate (according to the due date) I am going to Chennai, collecting premiums and depositing in branch.
Your above article shows that agents are there to get hefty commission and not for the service. A lot of agents are there making good relationship with the policyholders.

Safety situation in shipbreaking yards in India critical, says UN report

A United Nations (UN) special rapporteur said that the health and safety situation in many shipbreaking yards in India still remains 'critical' and there is a need to improve training facilities and working conditions for labourers

The health and safety situation in many shipbreaking yards in India still remains 'critical' and there is a need to improve training facilities and working conditions for labourers, a United Nations (UN) special rapporteur (reporter) said on Thursday.

Professor Okechukwu Ibeanu, the special rapporteur of the UN, also noted that only 3% of the 400,000 metric tonnes of e-waste generated in India is recycled in authorised facilities and recommended a national plan for safe management of electronic products.

The UN special rapporteur on the adverse effects of the movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous products and wastes on the enjoyment of human rights, was addressing the media after wrapping up a 10-day visit to examine India's progress in disposal of hazardous wastes.

Prof Ibeanu, who visited shipbreaking yards in Alang in Gujarat and Mumbai and an e-waste recycling facility in Roorkee, acknowledged the 'significant progress' made by India, including in developing an 'impressive' regulatory framework for environmentally sound management of toxic products.

Pointing to the differing opinions on environmental impact of shipbreaking, he also favoured an independent study to assess the adverse effects that may be caused by the discharge of hazardous material into the natural environment.

While noting the 'consistent efforts' being made by authorities in Gujarat to reduce risks to workers, he said, "The health and safety situations prevailing in most of the shipbreaking yards I visited remain critical as witnessed by 12 fatal accidents that occurred in Alang during the course of last year."

The five-day training provided to workers in Alang is 'grossly inadequate' and the facilities should be improved, Pro Ibeanu said. "In Mumbai, workers do not receive any form of training, making them more prone to serious accidents and injuries," he said.

Identifying other "shortcomings", Prof Ibeanu said that medical facilities established on or just outside the yards in Alang and Mumbai do not possess sufficient human, technical and financial resources to provide any treatment other than first-aid for minor injuries.

"The Red Cross facility I visited in Alang is not equipped to deal with serious accidents, and can only count on four medical doctors to provide healthcare not only to some 30,000 workers in the yards, but also the neighbouring villages of Alang and Sosia," he said.

He said he was 'shocked' to see the conditions in which most workers live in Alang and Mumbai. "Semi-skilled and unskilled workers live in makeshift facilities lacking basic sanitation facilities, electricity and even safe drinking water," Prof Ibeanu said.

On e-waste, the UN expert said while the Indian government is making efforts to meet the challenge, the international community should come up with technology assistance.

Prof Ibeanu, who will submit a report to the UN Human Rights Council, said the dismantling of electronic equipment by small-scale informal laboratories can pose health risks and favoured a national implementation plan for proper management of electronic products, with special focus of integrating informal recyclers into the formal economy.
 

User

Techfest to work with IRCC to transfer IIT-B tech to industries

IIT-B will be working closely with its Industrial Research Consultancy Centre during the annual tech festival starting from Friday

A unique initiative to transfer technologies developed at the Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay (IIT-B) to the industries, Techfest-2010, will be working closely with the institute's Industrial Research Consultancy Centre during the festival starting from Friday.

Techfest-2010 will include several activities including lectures by eminent scientists worldwide, exhibitions, and some other features like techno-entertainment 'Technoholix' and interactive installations from around the world, called 'scintillations'.

The exhibitions, which will be held at Powai (Mumbai), would include some of the best global exhibits including those from the Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition-UK, ETH Zurich-Switzerland, Indian Navy, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) who would be giving demonstrations on some disaster management techniques.

"With over 25 exhibits from over 15 countries, exhibitions at Techfest will be bigger than ever," said Nikhil Kashid, one of the student organisers.

The biggest draw at Techfest for students this year will feature a multitude of competitions with international participants, ranging from the best in robotics to ones with social objectives like developing devices that run on renewable sources of energy.

Technoholix will showcase the best in techno-entertainment at the end of every day and will include a breathtaking performance by 'Mountain Bike stunt group-M.A.D' from UK, display of urban acrobatics and extreme martial arts by Nexus Europe and a unique fire and pyrotechnics display by dynamic fire troupe, Pa-li-Tchi from the Czech Republic.

Scintillations will be a brand new segment of Techfest 2010 and will consist of interactive installations from around the world. Scintillations will consist of The Sunlight Eiffel, FlickrGettr, Light Ripples and Discovery Dome.

Techfest will also have lectures by experts from Google, the Large Hadron collider and developers of Wi-Fi, Mr Kashid said.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)