While the US is planning to tax the rich, India’s tax burden falls on the poor

India is a tax haven for the rich as they do not have to pay any tax on their dividend income. But the middle-class citizen has tax deducted at source even on the paltry interest received from savings bank accounts

President Obama of the United States is proposing to levy a tax on people earning over $1 million a year, calling it the "Buffett Rule" as a part of his long-term deficit-reduction programme and to stem the country's escalating national debt.

The "Buffett Rule" is nicknamed after billionaire investor Warren Buffett, because he is said to have made a statement that rich people like him in the US often pay less in tax than those who work for them, due to loopholes in the tax provisions. The present proposal, therefore, is designed to prevent millionaires from taking advantage of lower tax rates on investment earnings than what middle-income taxpayers pay on their wages.

During last year, Warren Buffett's total income was $46 million and his average tax rate was 17.7%, due to his investment income being charged at 15%. His secretary's income was $60,000 on which average tax rate was 30%.

If in the US, the rich are paying a lower tax on their investment income, India is a tax haven for the rich as they do not have to pay any tax on their investment income, because the dividend income is totally tax-free at the hands of the shareholders. As per media repots, the aggregate dividend earned by business houses last year was Rs48,191 crore on which no tax was required to be paid. The Tata Group dominated the business houses on this count and its 29 group companies together paid Rs3,845 crore as dividend to the holding company, on which the holding company did not have to pay any tax.

Here is a list of the top ten individuals whose dividend income runs into crores of rupees, totally tax-free under the existing laws in India.

It is ironical that a common man in India has to pay income-tax even on the paltry amount of interest that he receives on his savings bank account, if his total income crosses the basic exemption limit of Rs1,60,000 per year. And if he places his surplus savings in fixed deposits with commercial banks, the income-tax gets deducted at source from the interest received on these deposits, even before he receives any interest from the bank. On 8th August, Moneylife had written on the agony and suffering undergone by the common man to get TDS (tax deduction at source) certificates from banks and the harassment meted out to him by the tax authorities to get refund of such TDS (See: TDS is not only tedious, it is sheer harassment. Government must make interest from banks free from income-tax).

The paradox of life in India can be best explained by the following examples:

1.    The rich and the wealthy do no pay any tax on crores of their investment income, but the poor and the middle class have to pay taxes even on a small amount of interest received from banks on their savings account and fixed deposits.

2.    The tax provisions make a distinction between 'earned' income and 'unearned' income. The unearned income on stock market investments including capital gains is either tax-free or taxed at a lower rate. But the common man who earns through his sweat and toil has to pay tax at 30% because it is considered as earned income.

3.    The common man has to pay Rs70 per litre for petrol used for running his two-wheelers and small cars, which are run only on petrol, while the rich pay only Rs40 per litre for diesel used by them on their Mercedes vehicles and BMWs, the big luxury cars which run on diesel.                    

4.    While the banks offer car loans to the rich & wealthy at interest rates varying from 10% to 12% p.a., poor students are offered education loans at rates varying from 14% to 16%.

5.    As the saying goes, if you borrow a small amount from a bank, you are at the mercy of the bank and if you borrow a few crores from the bank, the bank is at your mercy. This is in fact a reality, because small borrowers are hounded and persecuted if they fail to repay, but large borrowers are given five-star treatment like CDR (Corporate Debt Structuring) facility, moratorium on payment of interest and instalments and of course, lower interest rates including waiver of penal interest charged etc.

6.    If big companies are unable to honour their commitments and become virtually bankrupt, technically called 'sick', they are given all the benefits of a five-star hospital and admitted to what is called the BIFR (Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction). Once admitted to BIFR, no creditor can file a suit for recovery, nor can banks proceed against them. Because of this luxury of protection from creditors, companies feel comfortable to continue to remain sick indefinitely, though the promoters of many such companies continue to be healthy and flaunt their wealth in unproductive activities. But this facility of protection from the creditors is not available to common people who have their own small businesses, and they have to face the wrath of the banks and other creditors, even if they are genuinely in trouble due to external circumstances.

The common man and the ordinary middle-class citizen of our country is suffering under the burden of rising inflation and due to the apathy of the banks and government institutions, and they have nobody to champion their cause.

It is, therefore, to support their cause and improve their life to some extent, that the Moneylife Foundation (article dated 6th September, see: Moneylife Foundation sends memorandum on TDS to the FM, RBI ) submitted a memorandum to the Hon'ble Finance Minister, requesting him to exempt from tax, all interest paid by commercial banks on savings accounts and fixed deposits—which if conceded, will provide some succour to a large number of middle-class people of our country.

Let us hope that the FM listens to our appeal and provides the
much-needed relief to the people of this country by enacting necessary modifications to the tax laws in the Finance Bill or the Direct Tax Code (DTC) coming up during the current financial year.
(The author is a financial consultant and he writes for Moneylife under the pen name, 'Gurpur')




5 months ago

Being a Rich, they have done some thing wrong all the time.... and they dont pay tax.....

Always Govt puts more and more tax on rich people, no govt subsidy help in Gas, Extra service tax on income tax.....

The article is telling like being rich means, i am doing a crime.....

if each and every person starts paying there income tax properly... then India can be richest country in the world.... Most of the middle class non-salaried people wont file IT returns, small business men, road side shop owners, many others wont file income tax...... so finally what will happen, govt start putting more tax on salaried class people, and people who are paying income tax sincerely....

Always write article to encourage people to pay tax or declare there income what ever they have.... income declaration can be done weather we earn 1 rupee or 1 crore.... it just needs to sincere in declaring and paying the required tax.....


6 years ago

the top 1% of US citizens pay 38% of the 10% pay 70% of the taxes in the US. and this is unfair because?
while i agree lower income folks are taxed too much,it doesnt come at the cost of the rich dividend earners.dont try to make it a us vs them scenario.that would be a blatant attempt to divide citizens.
the reason rich people get cheaper loans is because they are more credit worthy.simple economics and no racism.
investment should be encouraged further.if you want go ahead and tax those rich fellows(it is the easiest thing to do).the only problem is,investment will reduce,jobs will reduce and there will be lesser income earned by the lower classes -given that jobs will be fewer.



In Reply to pravin 6 years ago

There is nothing 'fair' or 'unfair'. It boils down to fat cats wallowing in unearned wealth paying taxes at lower rates, evading taxes, stashing funds abroad. After Warren Buffet, many others like him came forward. Not one from Mera Bharat Bhahan, Magar hum sub hai pareshan, Kyu ki 99% hai beimaan. QED


In Reply to NAGESH KINI 6 years ago

I beg to differ with your comments. On your comment on 'not one from....' is inappropriate. We do not have to ape US. They are in deep shambles not India. Their banking operations were dubious resulting in sub prime, not ours. And by the way... which percentage you would put yourself in ..99% or 1%. The answer is obvious. If you put yourself in 1% then others too have a right to call themselves honest. And if you are amongst 99% then you have no right to comment. I am not denying that we do not have corrupt people all around, but putting 99% is going too far without any stats.

nagesh kini

In Reply to Prakash 6 years ago

Mr. Prakash you don't have to be personal in slotting anyone in the 99% or 1% category. For your info. I'm in neither!
GBS had said "Lies, damn lies and statistics".
Don't expect precise numbers in such matters.
Even the GOI/SC appointed High Powered Committee/ SIT can not even 'guestimate' the extent of the parallel economy, black money or the monies stashed abroad.

Spider Rico

In Reply to pravin 6 years ago

"... and this is unfair because?"

That's a valid question. Here's the answer: It's unfair because harvesting from the remainder of the population the funds necessary for this country to operate would create a such a burden that it would affect many's ability to meet the most meager of their financial obligations: food, shelter, and clothes.

To suggest that these individuals dig deeper into their already stressed financial resources while the most privileged people in the world -- literally -- watch their effective tax rate plummet is shameful.


6 years ago

The FM always calls upon Coporate Heads seeking their advise on poilicy making , does he ever call Anna Hazare as to what needs to be done for the common man??? . Its a lop sided world. India must learn from other examples in the west say Singapore where you pay high taxes & also get the quality of life.



In Reply to ramchandran 6 years ago

I fully agree with the view that seeking the advice of Corporate Heads is not correct since we have very few people like Tatas or Narayana murthy. The rest will only bother about their own interests and not about even their own employees who create fortune for them. This country has lot of talent and there should be no difficulty in forming a high level panel to suggest the best way of taxation. What is required is political will which is absent.


6 years ago

I am not in agreement with the author on certain points:

- As regards the dividend income, you have tried to make your point by showing big businessmen whose worth anyways is thousands of crores. But by highlighting and alleging that 'rich' get away with tax free income in form of dividend is not an entirely true statement. There are lakhs of middle class people (including widows) who run their houses and struggle to meet their dreams and responsibilites from their "dividend income" which comes from their hard earned money invested wisely in stock market. Taxfree dividends in their hands is a blessing for them. If this is taxed then it would be burden on them. Just because you eye few big industrialists earning crores from dividend does not mean you do injustice to lakhs of people surviving on dividend income. You cannot and should not ape West in everything.

Though I am a strong supporter for removing bank interest and any other interest earned returning below 8%, to be removed from tax bracket. In today's time of high inflation, a meagre 4.5% from savings bank SHOULD NOT BE TAXED.

Vikas Gupta

6 years ago

In my opinion, there is no need of Income tax or TDS. The things which are used by Rich people only should be brought under Transcation Tax which should be at entry level e.g. you put a limit on Price of Cars that anybody who purchases a Car of more than X Rs. has to give Y % tax on the transcation amount. Similarly, Limits & Percentages can be set for Different Luxurious items based upontheir necessity, demand & use.

Nagesh Kini FCA

6 years ago

The worse part is the income divide is worsening by the day. To add to the miseries of the poor is the utterly absurd Planning Commission filing declaring Rs.32 for urban and Rs.26 for rural India as thresh hold for declaring the Below Poverty Line classification.
The netas and babus and the High Networth Individuals wallowing in tax sheltered perks like bungalows, cars and tax free incomes, including under the table payments and 'reimbursements' are not in sync with the realities of a small income earner like a hand cart puller or food vendor who is the first target for rioters and who income for the day is taken away by anyone and everyone declaring a bandh - in Telagana it is going on for 14 days. The Courts have declared them illegal, but these BPL have not lobbies and don't constitute vote bank. They and their kids go to bed on empty stomach. The great divide is for ever widening. Who cares?



In Reply to Nagesh Kini FCA 6 years ago

It seems you have a problem with HNIs. Well, for your knowledge not all HNIs have amassed their wealth from dubious means and 'under the table' means. If HNIs are enjoying 'tax free' incomes today then they also have made absurdly high tax payments during early years. If the taxes paid by HNIs are not reaching the masses, that does not mean you once again penalise HNIs and axe their 'tax free incomes'. Fight with the authorities to channelise and mobilise the various taxes collected. Fight for the money stashed abroad.

Spider Rico

6 years ago

The GOP oppose tax increases for the wealthy because that's what the nation's aristocrats demand. Not to mention flag-waving good 'ol boys who watch Fox News, quote conservative radio hosts, and view tax increases as an affront to capitalism, apple pie, and Jesus himself.



In Reply to Spider Rico 6 years ago

and you have drunk at the socialist obama well? giv me break. the very attempt to take other people money and be generous with it makes me feel repulsed by statists like you

Spider Rico

In Reply to pravin 6 years ago

I don't view keeping the heat on in the homes of our elderly, providing medical care for our needy, or feeding the children of underprivileged parent(s) to be "generous." And I sure don't view revenues generated through taxes to be "other peoples' money." And I believe the fact that you find me "repulsive" for finding nobility in these aspiration says one helluva lot about you, friend. Social programs are part of what makes this country great.

India, China agree to deepen bilateral investment, open markets

The two sides have agreed to stay committed to deepening bilateral investment co-operation, further opening markets and improving the investment environment in both countries to lay a solid foundation for pragmatic co-operation between the businesses of the two countries

Beijing: Holding their first comprehensive Strategic Economic Dialogue (SED) here today, India and China have reached an understanding to deepen bilateral investment cooperation, further open up markets to each other and improve the investment environment, reports PTI.

High-level delegations led by India's Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia and China's National Development and Reform Commission chairman Zhang Ping had a very positive and successful dialogue on stepping up cooperation and coordination on a host of economic issues, Indian officials said.

The two sides have agreed to stay committed to deepening bilateral investment co-operation, further opening markets and improving the investment environment in both countries to lay a solid foundation for pragmatic co-operation between the businesses of the two countries on the basis of complementarities, mutual benefit and win-win outcomes, minutes circulated at the end of first session said.

The two sides also agreed to strengthen cooperation on energy efficiency and conservation, as well as on environmental protection.

Both sides agreed to actively foster co-operation on energy, including the renewable energy sector, in order to promote sustainable development.

Enhanced exchanges in these spheres would be the new engine for greater co-operation between the two sides, the minutes said.

In his opening address, Mr Ahluwalia said India and China share many commonalities.

"China's economic reforms began a decade and more before those of India. Your achievements in transforming your economy are well recognised all over the world. We in India are deeply impressed by your progress and we believe there are many lessons from your experience that may be valuable to us," Mr Ahluwalia said.

He noted that both countries had Five Year plans for their development strategy.

"You have unveiled your Twelfth Plan and we are going to finalise our Twelfth Plan in 2012," he said.

"Challenges like energy efficiency, water pricing, management of urbanisation and rapid modernisation of infrastructure are common to us also," he said and proposed that the first goal of the SED should be a continuous exchange of economic experiences on all critical sectors from which both nations can benefit.

In his address, Mr Zhang said as the world's economic and political landscape is undergoing 'profound changes', India and China as developing countries are faced with rare and historical development opportunities.

"Since we are at the important stages of acceleration of industrialisation and urbanisation, our two countries are faced with similar or even identical problems in the course of development," he said.

He hoped that the SED will enhance mutual understanding and trust between India and China by drawing upon each other's strengths and experiences in economic development to seek mutually beneficial co-operation

"By doing so, we will enhance our practical co-operation in various fields and find solutions to our common problems.

This will help promote long-term and steady development of our respective economies and have a profound impact on our two countries," Mr Zhang said.


Lack of jobs is the real problem now, not falling markets

Unemployment rates have to drop, only then will aggregate demand go up, which will then boost economies across the globe

The crash of falling shares all over the globe has given rise again to fears of more recessions. Most commentators are focusing on European sovereign debt as the crisis de jour. However, one may point out that the problems with European sovereign debt have been going on for over a year. There are enormous potential problems due to misallocation of capital in emerging markets that haven't yet appeared on the radar. But the real problem that is bothering economies, at least for now in developed markets, is the lack of demand, and for 'demand', read jobs. Until the unemployment rate drops and more people become employed, aggregate demand will suffer.
In the US, the president and his Democratic party have put a Bill before Congress that is supposed to create jobs. The programme basically has two elements. It hopes to create jobs by spending money to build, or rebuild physical infrastructure. It also hopes to create jobs with classic Keynesian stimulus by cutting taxes. In short, it is attempting to cure the problems with money.
This is normally not such a bad idea if you were farsighted enough to understand the concept of a business cycle. It is a good idea to squirrel away some savings in good times to carry you over the bad. But politicians can't resist spending money, usually on their friends and families. Economists and promoters always assure us that business cycles are a thing of the past. So many governments, again in the developed world, didn't save for the inevitable rainy day and the cabinet is bare.
The US Opposition party, the Republicans, feel that just spending money is not a good idea, although they spent over eight years doing just that. Enthralled by newfound fiscal orthodoxy, they are worried that the money has to come from somewhere and that somewhere is the rich. These rich, we are told, are "job creators" and if you tax them they won't create jobs. If you look at the US economic history over the past 50 years, you will find that this thesis is simply not true. Strong economic growth and job creation did in fact occur when taxes for the wealthy were high. So reigning in the taxman is not the answer.
Many people today are looking at the Chinese model. China has been able to create millions of jobs and move those employed millions out of poverty. They were able to do this with industrial policies that limited household income in order to spur manufacturing growth and investment. This had the obvious secondary effect of speeding up employment and, with it, household income.
Seems like a good idea, until you consider that the programme was and is filled with unsustainable subsidies and imbalances. The Chinese economy is tilted in an unprecedented way towards investment and away from consumption. Its currency has been kept low artificially in order to move the excesses of this policy onto its trading partners. The subsidies are given disproportionally to friends of the state in the state-owned sector. The private sector, the main source for jobs, has been starved. The combination leaves China inordinately exposed to a global slowdown, trade restrictions, enormous bad debts, and eventually serious job losses.
The Chinese have another way to hinder job growth. They don't protect property rights. Since property rights can be denied at any time, the private sector's incentive to grow and hire more employees is severely restricted.
India and Brazil have sadly adopted labour codes from Europe. These laws weren't worried about creating jobs. They were worried about protecting workers. They have been exceptionally successful. They have worked so well that it is almost impossible for employers to fire even the most incompetent employee. In addition, there are myriad of taxes and regulations that make compliance difficult and require vast amounts of time to do so.
The Noble Laureate Ronald Coase proposed in his famous theorem that it did not matter what the initial allocation of property rights in the law was. As long as the transaction costs were low enough, the parties could bargain their way to an efficient outcome. And that is the rub.
Bureaucrats and politicians have raised transaction costs. They do so by failing to define property rights; failing to enforce property rights; creating barriers to realising property rights, and finally constantly changing the property rights. This is the last thing that employers need. Employers, to create jobs, must invest. Any investment is a bet on the future. If the laws are inconsistent, they cannot make this bet, because they don't know what the future holds.
To create jobs, governments need to do theirs. Their job is to create clear property rights and enforce them. But this is one job that none of them seem able to do.
 (The writer is president of Emerging Market Strategies and can be contacted at [email protected] or [email protected]).


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)