What’s Really at Stake in the Apple Encryption Debate

The government has never been allowed to create a “backdoor” to encrypted devices. Now, it’s trying to force Apple to build one


The FBI's much-discussed request to Apple can seem innocuous: Help us extract six weeks of encrypted data from the locked iPhone of Syed Farook, an employee of San Bernardino's health department who spearheaded an attack that killed 14 people. Most people believe Apple should comply.


But the FBI is demanding a lot more than the data on a single phone. It has obtained a court order requiring Apple to build custom surveillance software for the FBI 2013 which computer security expert Dan Guido cleverly dubs an FBiOS.


Once that software exists, it is inevitable that other law enforcement agencies will approach Apple seeking to get it to use the FBiOS to unlock iPhones in other investigations. Already, Apple says it has received U.S. court orders, under the same legal authority, seeking to get it to unlock 12 other devices.


In effect, the FBI is asking for Apple to write software that will provide something the government has sought without success for more than a decade: A "backdoor" that cracks the increasingly sophisticated encryption on consumers' phones.


The government has previously attempted to create its own "golden key" that could unlock every device. That effort collapsed in the face of fierce objections across the political spectrum. Now, the government is pushing a private company 2013 Apple 2013 to create a key.


What's at stake in this clash of titans, therefore, is a much larger issue: How far should tech companies go to help the government conduct surveillance of their users.


The court has asked Apple to build special software that would disable the security on the device, and to install that software to the target iPhone as an update. Once the phone is updated with the new software, the FBI will be able to break into it.


Last year, a White House working group examined just this approach to creating a backdoor into encrypted devices 2013 which it described in typically dense bureaucratic language as "provider-enabled remote access to encrypted devices through current update procedures."


Translated into English, they were considering using the routine updates that every phone receives as a means for law enforcement to plant spyware that could track everything on the device, from whereabouts to text messages to all emails.


The panel saw a potentially fatal flaw in this approach, noting it "could call into question the trustworthiness of established software update channels."


This is no small thing: software updates are key to cybersecurity. Updates are issued regularly to patch the inevitable flaws that are discovered in today's complex software. Failing to install software updates leaves users' vulnerable to hackers. The lack of timely software updates, in fact, has forced the U.S. military to turn off certain features of its non-battlefield smartphones.


If Apple gives its stamp of approval to the FBiOS and the technique becomes common, phone users may start to wonder whether the updates they receive contain spyware.


In addition, Apple says the FBiOS would "be relentlessly attacked by hackers and cybercriminals" hoping to obtain a copy of the golden key. The government counters that Apple can install the software on the device at Apple's physical premises. Apple will "retain control over it entirely," and is free to destroy it afterwards, the government states.


It's also not at all clear that the government will prevail in its court fight with Apple.


Albert Gidari, a leading surveillance lawyer who has represented Google and other companies and is now director of privacy at Stanford University's Center for Internet and Society, argues that the government is over-reaching in its request. He points to a 1994 telecommunications law that says the government does not have the power to require companies to implement "any specific design of equipment, facilities, services, features, or system configurations" for surveillance purposes.


The government argues that the 1994 law is irrelevant to its case, and instead is relying on a 1789 law, the All Writs Act, that gives courts "all writs necessary and appropriate" to conduct their business.


However, Orin Kerr, a former federal prosecutor and professor at George Washington University Law School, argues that the 1789 law may not support the government's position. In 1977, the Supreme Court ruled that the law did require a telephone company to help law enforcement set up surveillance equipment on certain lines, but that "the power of federal courts to impose duties upon third parties is not without limits; unreasonable burdens may not be imposed."


In a court filing, Apple argues that the government's request is "burdensome" and requires "involved engineering."


It is not a coincidence that the FBI has taken its battle to the courts. For the past two years, the FBI has been campaigning to win a so-called "backdoor" into encrypted devices. In 2014, FBI director James Comey called for a "regulatory or legislative fix" that would allow the agency to access devices with a court order.


But late last year, the Obama Administration decided not to pursue legislation.


With Congress out of the picture, the debate between tech and law enforcement will play out in the U.S. District Court in the Central District of California.


The FBI says that the debate is narrower than it has been portrayed. "The relief we seek is limited and its value increasingly obsolete because the technology continues to evolve," FBI director Comey wrote in a blog post.


Microsoft founder Bill Gates told the Financial Times that he supports the FBI: "They are not asking for some general thing, they are asking for a particular case."


But, several companies such as Google and Twitter 2013 which all could face similar surveillance requests 2013 have weighed in to support Apple.


"We build secure products to keep your information safe and we give law enforcement access to data based on valid legal orders," tweeted Google CEO Sundar Pichai, "But that's wholly different than requiring companies to enable hacking of customer devices & data."


ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.







Take Notes Easily with Keep
An easy-to-use app from Google
Those who want to take notes in Android are spoilt for options. ‘Keep’ is a very light note-keeper by Google. You can quickly make notes and access them from any of your devices. Keep is just so simple and easy to handle. Once you tap on Keep, you can make text notes, voice notes or photo notes or even turn your notes into a checklist by adding check boxes. You also have options to colour your notes, so that all notes for a particular group of tasks are colour-coded for easy access. When you are done with a note, you can just swipe it into an archive for future reference. The best part of this handy app is that you can use your notes from anywhere; they are safely stored on cloud and available on the web at
Keep allows you to set reminders for notes, like: later today, tomorrow morning, or next week. You can also select the exact date and time for the reminder. An interesting feature is that you can set a reminder based on location. So, if you need to be reminded about a particular task when you reach office, you can easily set a location-based reminder and it will pop-up when you reach that location! This one is surely for keeps! 
Yazdi Tantra is a chartered accountant by training, computer consultant by profession, entrepreneur-developer by hobby and trainer in his leisure time. He is currently the vice-chairman of Zoroastrian Co-operative Bank Ltd and has been running a medium-sized computer company ON-LYNE for the past 24 years. 


Nifty, Sensex headed for further decline – Wednesday closing report
Nifty has to close above 7,110 for the decline to end
We had mentioned that Nifty, Sensex might continue to struggle and that Nifty has to head back above 7,150 for the new downtrend to end. The major indices of the Indian stock markets suffered a further correction of more than 1.30%-1.50%. During the intra-day trade, the Sensex touched a high of 23,338.89 points and a low of 23,057.45 points. The BSE market breadth was heavily tilted towards the bears -- with 1,707 declines and 831 advances.
The key indices of the Indian equity markets opened on a negative note in sync with their Asian peers and Tuesday's lower close at the US indices. Caution, just a day ahead of the railway budget and F&O (futures and options) expiry, dragged the equity markets lower. Besides, investors' confidence was eroded by the continuing conflict between the ruling NDA (National Democratic Alliance) and the opposition, which is seen as having a bearing on some key economic legislations that await parliamentary approval. The government is desirous of pushing through major economic legislations like bankruptcy code and Goods and Services Tax (GST) Bill during the ongoing Budget session. In addition, softening of crude oil prices, which declined by 1.72% to $31.33, and negative global markets, deterred investors from chasing stock prices higher. During the session, the markets rose briefly on the back of strengthening rupee and short-covering value-buying which were triggered by budgetary expectations. 
Despite opening on a weak note at 68.63 to a US dollar from its previous close of 68.59 to a greenback, the rupee strengthened in the later part of the day's trade. Market participants hope that the central government may increase expenditure, announce tax concessions and pave the way to reduce the NPAs (non-performing assets) levels of the banking sector. Notwithstanding the brief uptrend, the equity markets again plunged on the back of caution-selling. Chinese shares staged a remarkable rally on Wednesday, recovering from the early losses brought about by small-cap stocks. The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index surged 0.88% to close at 2,928.9 points 
The top gainers and top losers of the major indices are given in the table below:
The closing values of major Asian indices are given below:




1 year ago

Nifty resistance @ 7055 small week support @ 6885 below 6860 free flow up to 6335-6030 if before Budget this lvl's tested than A post Budget rally possible

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)