Investors flock to Venture Capital and earn poor returns because they’re fixated on the kind of astounding returns generated by a Facebook rather than understanding the high risks associated with it
Venture capitalists (VCs) hardly make tonnes of money, except one or two cases of great successes. Not everyone predicts the next Facebook or Google. Statistics show that venture capitalists hardly create much wealth as a whole, much less return the original amount to investors. Kaufman Foundation, an institution that invests in venture capital, that less cash has been returned to investors than has been invested in VC since 1997 and only 20 out of 100 venture capital handily outperforming the market by more than three percentage points. Moreover, half of these were created prior to 1995. Read it here.
A reason for the failure of VCs to outperform market can be squarely blamed on an investor’s poor financial literacy, or lack of it, when investing in a venture capital fund. It is important to understand where savings are going and how the firm managing your savings will utilise it. Unfortunately, investors are ignorant of the basics of VC and their average track record. They invest because they’re fixated on the kind of astounding returns generated by a Facebook rather than understanding the high risks associated with it. What if Facebook had failed? What would have happened to the initial funds invested? Some of these questions are rarely asked, let alone answered. The Kauffman Foundation study says, “Our research shows that LPs regularly accept the risks of investing in a “black box” of VC firm economics. It is common for institutional investors to make investments in VC funds without requiring information about general partner (GP) compensation, carry structure, ownership, and firm-level income, expenses, or profits. The “black box” in this context refers to the unknown parameters of a VC firm. Much like its hedge fund counterparts which make scant disclosures to their investors, the VCs are opaque in structure, disclosures and such.
Even intelligent investors are conned into investing by VCs as latter sell the idea of “J Curve” a fancy investment jargon and metric that makes VCs look tempting to invest. Shaped like the letter J, venture capitalists hard-sell the idea by starting that the biggest profits come at the end of the investment period, usually 5-10 years. Usually, the returns will be negative during the initial years as money is spent on developing an idea before it becomes a product or services ripe enough for market wherein the profits are huge. However, this was all an eyewash! According to Kaufman Foundation, instead, it found out that its VC portfolio resembles an ‘n’ curve, where the internal rate of return (IRR) peaks once VC has raised enough funds to move to the next fund or create a brand new fund. It said, “The ‘n-curve’ we found in our portfolio suggests that many VCs have moved from professional risk-taking and investing to professional fundraising.” The whole incentive behind this is that most VCs are always in search of many ideas, often most of them failing, until they hit the jackpot, which is hard to come by, if statistics mentioned earlier is anything to go by.
One of the ways to demystify VC is to do the ‘homework’. Without doing proper due diligence on VCs, one cannot be sure of their performance. Investment managers must make all the efforts to ensure that information is gathered vis-a-vis consultation with VC partners and the companies they’ve invested in it. It is hard work, but it is the only way to ensure that savings goes into the right hands. Of course, the other alternative is to pray that regulators mandate VC to disclose everything (which is unlikely ever going to happen—whether in America or rest of the world).
Another solution is to have a metric by which one can measure and compare VC performance. This is much like comparing any HDFC Bank mutual fund to the NSE Nifty stock market index. The study suggests taking a benchmark while acknowledges certain limitations by stating, “despite some statistical limitations, [public market equivalent] (PME ) is the most informative measure of VC fund performance. “ The reason for the limitation is that not all publicly traded small-cap companies behave the same way as early-stage start ups that VCs invest in. However, using a small-cap benchmark is the closest approximate measure and could be used as a proxy for VC performance. This could enable a fund manager to see where VCs stand vis-a-vis other investment classes.
At the end of the day, it is the investor’s responsibility to ensure that financial literacy prevails and thorough homework is done before an investment is made, keeping in cognizance of risk involved. At the moment, the odds of finding the next ‘Facebook’ (or for that matter Google or Microsoft) are slim or next to none and heavily stacked against the investor and venture capitalist. An investor, according to the study, would be far better off investing in a basket of small-cap equity shares or a small-cap index fund that tracks publicly listed small-cap companies.
Moneylife has added an extra layer of security so that only genuine readers with a valid email ID can post comments on articles on the website. You need to register with your name and valid email ID once only to become registered member of Moneylife
With the new web design, the Moneylife Team has also revamped the login and registration process to make it simpler and robust. Earlier, we kept the login optional and allowed anyone to post comments on any article on our site. However, on several occasions we found users without a valid email ID posting comments and abusing others. Therefore, in the revamped process we decided to add an extra layer of security and only allow genuine readers with valid email ID to post comments. The process of registration (in case you have not done) is quite simple.
1. Visit Moneylife.in from any browser, preferably using the latest version.
2. On the right side of the page in the top corner, you would see a welcome message.
It says Hello Guest, Login and also has Help and Feedback tabs. If you are already registered but have logged out, you can click on Login button. The same button/text can be used for registration as well. After clicking, you would see following popup
If you are a registered member, then you need to enter your email ID and password for login on the left. If you are not a registered member and want to register, then fill in your name, email ID and password on the right side and click on Register.
3. The Moneylife system would send an email for confirming your valid email ID. So, you need to go to your email account, open the mail received from Moneylife and click on the verification link. This is a one time exercise. After verifying your email ID, you can log in to Moneylife.in whenever you want to and post your comment.
4. Kindly note, the system would keep you logged in for 15 continuous days once you have visited the site. If you have not visited Moneylife.in at all for 15 days in a row, only then you would be logged out for security reasons. After that you simple need to login again as described in step 2 above and repeated below. One small thing, you need to keep the cookies enabled for automatically login for 15 days. In case you deleted cookies, then you will have to login again.
5. As a registered user, your own Moneylife page gets created. You can upload a picture here if you wish to.
Once you upload your picture, your picture will appear along with your comment
6. In case you face any problem in registering, you can always drop a mail to [email protected]
The Vijay Mallya-owned airline offered to pay one month's salary soon and promised to expedite payment of the remaining six months as soon as the company gets recapitalised. However, striking employees rejected this offer
Mumbai/New Delhi: The crisis in debt-ridden Kingfisher Airlines worsened on Wednesday as reconciliatory talks between its management and striking engineers and pilots over payment of seven-month salary backlog failed with the protestors rejecting the offer of part payment and vowing to continue their agitation, reports PTI.
With no end to the deadlock, a question mark hung over the airline's plans to resume operations from Friday, after a four-day partial lockout and complete suspension of all operations since Monday night.
"Our strike will continue as management has failed to give any commitment on payment of salary," a representative of striking Kingfisher engineers and pilots, Capt Vikrant Patkar, told reporters after a brief meeting in Mumbai.
On its part, the management offered to pay one month's salary soon and "expedite the payment of the remaining six months as soon as the company gets recapitalised," an airline official said on condition of anonymity.
But this offer was rejected by the employees. "There is no money and they can't give any commitment also. The engineers and pilots will continue with their agitation," Patkar said.
He said the management "offered us one month salary and that too 10-15 days later. We are not going to work unless we are paid for seven months. So we have rejected their offer."
Top Kingfisher officials had promised aviation regulator DGCA that they would hold meetings with various sections of the staff in an attempt to end the strike and the process began today.
Airline CEO Sanjay Agarwal and UB Group's Chief Financial Officer Ravi Nedungadi attended the meetings with the commercial staff as well as engineers and pilots in Mumbai.
They are expected to meet the employees in Delhi tomorrow.
Earlier in the day, Civil Aviation Minister Ajit Singh said the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) would submit an interim report on the situation facing Kingfisher, including the safety issue as aircraft engineers were on strike.
Kingfisher has been saddled with a huge loss of Rs8,000 crore and a debt burden of another over Rs7,000 crore, a large part of which has not serviced since January.
Several of its aircraft have been either taken away by its lessors or grounded by the Airports Authority of India for non-payment of dues during the past few months.