Right to Information
Use RTI to procure your medical information

Senior journalist Chitra Subramaniam has taken Manipal Hospitals to Consumer Court for medical negligence and using non-standard implants for her ankle surgery. She can also use the RTI Act to obtain information from hospitals through the regulatory authority

 

Noted journalist, Chitra Subramaniam, has taken Manipal Hospitals to the Consumer Court for gross medical negligence and wilfully providing false and dangerously misleading information about implants, which did not meet standards. Her complaint in a Bangalore court relates to her ankle surgery in January 2014 where implants to correct a fracture did not meet medical standards. 
 
The press statement issued by Crestlaw Partners, a Bangalore-based law firm states that, “Ms Subramaniam’s life was put at grave risk by the use of faulty implants, details of which were never given to her despite repeated pleas and several meetings with Swami Swaminathan, Executive Chairman of Manipal Health Enterprises.” 
 
“Manipal Hospitals and Dr Murlidhar Rao – the orthopaedic surgeon who operated on Ms Subramaniam at Manipal Northside Hospital in Malleswaram – repeatedly provided wrong and misleading information, claiming it was given to them by the Indian arm of Synthes, the Switzerland-based subsidiary of the global conglomerate Johnson and Johnson.”
 
The consumer complaint case has been filed against the Hospital’s Chairman-Medical Advisory Board and Medical Director Dr H Sudarshan Ballal, and Dr Murlidhar Rao, who operated on her ankle and an Indian subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
 
Under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, a decision by the Central Information Commission (CIC) makes it mandatory for all private hospitals to maintain daily reports of medical records of patients and provide them the information. The CIC had recommended the central and state government to “force” private hospitals to give medical records of patients on a daily basis and be transparent about it. It also quoted Section 2 of the RTI Act under which it is mandatory for private hospitals to provide information as treatment comes under “services”.
 
The CIC, in its order of 4th July, 2015 posed these questions before itself –“The issues before the Commission are:  a) Whether information sought by appellant in this case is ‘information’ as per section 2(f)?  b) Whether this Commission has power under RTI Act, to enforce the Right to information of the appellant against a body, which is not held to be public authority, by directing the respondent public authority to collect the information by exercising their regulatory power?  c) Whether the Commission has power to consider the authorities of private hospitals as deemed PIOs and proceed against them with penal actions for breach of RTI Act by obstructing the supply of information? 
 
CIC concluded: ‘Information’ under section 2(f) 16.  This Commission has examined the issue of right of patient to have the medical records in Nisha Priya Bhatia v Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences GNCTD, and stated “the Patient has a right to his/her medical record and Respondent Hospital Authorities have a duty to provide the same under Right to Information Act, 2005, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, The Medical Council Act as per world medical ethics.
 
“The Commission recommended the Public Authority to develop a timeframe mechanism of disclosure of medical records to patients or their relatives with safeguards for privacy and confidentiality of the patient.” 
 
In that order, the Commission referred to various legislations.
 
“We need to refer to provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to ascertain whether appellant has the right to information about her own medical record. 
Right to information under RTI and Consumer Protection Act: 17.   
Expression “Consumer’’ is defined in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986:     
S 2(1) (d) "consumer" means any person who, ¬(i) [omitted] (ii) hires (or avails of) any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person who hires (or avails of) the service for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and   partly   promised,   or   under   any   system   of   deferred   payment,   when   such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person,
Similarly as per Section 2(1)(o) : "service" means –  “service of any description which is made available to the potential users and includes the provision of facilities in connection with banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing, supply of electrical or other energy, board or lodging or both, (housing construction), entertainment, amusement or the purveying of news or other information, but does not include rendering of any service free of charge or under a contract of personal service.”
 
The CIC decision of 4 July, 2015  recommends “forcing” private hospitals to provide daily medical records states “The Commission recommends the Government of India, states and Union Territories besides the respondent authority in this case, to take necessary steps to enforce the right to information, i.e., forcing the private hospitals to give medical records of the patients on day to day basis, because this daily disclosure will prevent undesirable practices of altering records after damage caused to patient.”
 
“Forcing the private hospitals to provide daily-wise medical records will also act as a check on some hospitals from resorting to extortionist, inhuman and ruthless business of prescribing unnecessary diagnostic tests, unnecessary   surgical   operations,   caesarean   deliveries,   unwarranted   angioplasties, inserting stents, without need, or of substandard nature, or putting low quality stent while collecting price of high quality stent, and several such malpractices amounting to medical terrorism, etc. They should not be allowed to such malpractices with all impunity and get away   without   any   legal   consequences   as   if   there   is   an   absolute   immunity.   The Government, Medical Council of India and the health regulatory has to see that licence to practice medicine will not become licence to kill and extort and come to the rescue of helpless patients.”
 
This order was a sequel to Delhi based RTI applicant, Prabat Kumar, who appealed to the CIC. As per the details quoted in the CIC order, his father was admitted into the hospital with the complaint of constipation, but he was kept in the ICU. He spent nearly Rs18 lakh on his father’s treatment in the Fortis Hospital, and in spite of that his father expired during the treatment.  
 
The CIC Order states: “The appellant claimed that, being son of patient, who is party to the contract and consumer besides being victim of treatment, he has right to know the details of diagnosis, treatment and the prescriptions of the doctors who have attended him. When (the) Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) wrote to the Hospital seeking the details of treatment given to his father, the Hospital denied. Hence, appellant was compelled to use RTI for information from private hospital through the respondent public authority, the regulatory authority of the hospitals. Appellant complained that the respondent authority has forwarded reply received from the private hospital without taking any regulatory steps to secure the information as per the law.
 
The CIC order noted: “It is the legitimate right of the son of the deceased patient to know such details of treatment, which the hospital also contractually bound to supply,   having received a consideration (payment) from the deceased’s family. It could not only be breach of contract by the hospital, but also breach of the provisions of Medical Council Act, 1971. The respondent authority being the regulatory authority, is expected to enforce the law and come to the rescue of the deceased’s family, when the rights are being violated by a private or public hospital.   (Read full order here: http://jksic.nic.in/E%20-library/Prabat%20KUmar%20-%20Fortis.pdf )
 
As for Chitra, the press statement stated, “She lives with multiple myeloma, a life-threatening cancer of the bone marrow. Regular MRIs are part of routine check-ups. The faulty implants made MRIs impossible and the implants had to be removed by a second surgery. Ms Subramaniam has publicly spoken out about her diagnosis and advocates internationally for access to affordable treatment including cancer treatment.”
 
(Vinita Deshmukh  is consulting editor of Moneylife, and also convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book "To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte" with Vinita Kamte and is the author of "The Mighty Fall".)

User

COMMENTS

shakuntala

5 months ago

the system should be made strict for providing information under RTI Act and the Doctors should honour the RTI Act and should provide information under law.

Economic Survey sees 7-7.75 percent growth in next fiscal
New Delhi : The Economic Survey for 2015-16 tabled in parliament on Friday has pegged India's growth for the next fiscal in the 7-7.75 percent range.
 
Reviewing the major developments during the fiscal, the survey said that according to the Central Statistics Office, the growth rate of GDP at constant market prices is projected to rise to 7.6 percent in 2015-16 from 7.2 percent in 2014-15.
 
Authored by the finance ministry's Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian, the survey said: "India's long run potential GDP growth is substantial, about 8-10 percent."
 
"Amidst a gloomy international economic landscape, India stands as a haven of stability and will be the fastest growing major economy," it added. 
 
On the inflation front, the survey projected the consumer price-indexed (CPI), or retail, inflation in the next fiscal would settle in the 4.5 to 5 percent range.
 
Declaring low inflation has taken hold and there is improved confidence over price stability, the Survey said it expects the Reserve Bank of India to meet the 5 percent inflation target set for the end of the next fiscal in March 2017.
 
India's trade deficit in April to January period of the fiscal declined to $106.8 billion from $119.6 billion in the corresponding period of 2014-15. 
 
The country's current account deficit (CAD) during April-September period of the fiscal was at 1.4 percent of the GDP.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

User

COMMENTS

shadi katyal

9 months ago

One fils to find that what is being counted in Indian GDP gtrowth as thois is not rest of world consiers indicators of growth. The indicators like exports,manfucturing etc are sll down. Kindly tell us what are the growth indicators???

Economic Survey calls for fertiliser subsidy reform
New Delhi : Calling for reform in the fertiliser subsidy system, the government's Economic Survey 2015-16 said on Friday that there is a major need to rationalise fertiliser subsidies and plug leakages in the system.
 
"There is a need to rationalise fertilizer subsidy in an input, crop and region neutral format and minimise diversions," said the Economic Survey 2015-16 authored by Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian, tabled in parliament.
 
"The disbursal of subsidy on fertilizers should shift to DBT (Direct Benefit Transfer scheme), the benefits of which will be maximised, if all controls (including imports) on the fertilizer industry/outputs are lifted simultaneously," it said.
 
"In the case of Phosphatic and Potassic fertilizer subsidy, with the Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) scheme, a fixed amount of subsidy will be given on each grade based on their content," it added.
 
Last month, the agriculture sector sought extension of the DBT scheme for paying out fertiliser subsidies, in line with that in cooking gas and the December decision to start the scheme for kerosene.
 
"We are ready for direct benefit transfer of subsidy to farmers and are prepared to work with the government on this. We will capture the last mile data on customers and farmers and hope that next year onwards direct transfers can start," Fertiliser Association of India director general Satish Chander told reporters here after a pre-Budget meeting with Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.
 
The Economic Survey sharply lowered the economic growth forecast for the current fiscal to the 7-7.75 percent range, from the previously projected 8.1-8.5 percent, mainly because of lower agricultural output due to deficit rainfall.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)