President Obama is tied to the post of healthcare—he will sail or sink with it. He might as well give it his best shot
A rather peculiar feature of American jurisprudence is that years after or even a decade after a particular judge is appointed by a political party, he or she is supposed to follow the party line. Hence judges appointed by Republican presidents are supposed to follow Republican policies and judges appointed by Democratic presidents are supposed to follow democratic policies. This is regarded as completely normal and passes without much comment and a judge not following the party line is regarded as misjudgement for the president concerned. Hence Earl Warren, who was a appointed by the Republican president Dwight Eisenhower and had been the Republican governor of California, turned out to be one of the most liberal judges (he was responsible for desegregation in the case of Brown Vs Board of Education and was regarded as a disastrous appointment.
Similarly justice Harry Blackmun when appointed was dubbed the Minnesota Twin along with Chief Justice Warren Burger and later went on to write Roe Vs Wade, was regarded as a disaster by the Republicans. It is in this light that Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in the Healthcare case has to be evaluated. Chief Justice John Roberts replaced an extremely conservative judge. Chief Justice Rehnquist was appointed by George W Bush to his position. In split decisions, which went five to four, he has not once decided along with the liberal block. He is a staunch conservative. However, for the first time in what looks like of statesmanship, he sided with the liberal block to uphold the single mandate in the case of National Federation of Independent Businesses Vs Kathleen Seblius.
The single mandate says that those who do not buy insurance will have to pay a minimum penalty. Chief Justice Roberts' judgment is a carefully crafted judgment and is based on basic constitutional tenet i.e. all attempts should be made to uphold the law if legally possible and the court should strike down the law only as a last resort. The judgment of the chief justice also cites the original intent of the framers of the constitution-a common conservative argument to aid his argument in not utilizing the commerce clause to uphold Obama's case. For this, among other things, he interprets the commerce clauses in a typically legalistic fashion which would do a strict constructionist proud.
Justice Roberts is also extremely careful in repeatedly stating that it is not for the court to sit in judgment on the wisdom of the policy that is between the people and their representative and is actually none of the court's business. Justice Roberts saved the Obama case by calling the penalty a tax and bringing it within the power to tax that Congress has. He said that that was a possible interpretation and hence had to be utilized. He is also solicitous of a basic conservative principle of States Rights. However as Justice Roberts upheld a fundamental law initiated by a Democratic president and was opposed tooth and nail by the Republicans., the Democrats were surprised and elated and the Republicans were shocked and wondered how all this happened. However, this happened.
Chief Justice Roberts has done much to restore the credibility of the court after the partisan judgment of Bush Vs Gore (in which the Supreme Court handed the White House to George Bush) which coloured the reputation of the Supreme Court for many years. He has also made the court his own and now it can be truly called the "Chief Justice's Court".
But more importantly what is the impact all this has on the election. As soon as the judgment was passed, Governor Romney announced that the Supreme Court did not comment on the wisdom of the healthcare policies but only on their constitutionality and if he becomes president his first task will be to repeal the healthcare law. This is easier said than done. Even assuming that the Republicans take hold of the Senate they will not have a filibuster proof majority and the Democrats will not allow Obama Care to go without a fight. In the hour after the result it was announced that the Romney campaign had collected a million dollars and it is safe to assume that the conservative base is going to be all fired up.
It is up to President Obama now to take on Romney head on and staunchly defend the healthcare law which he has been avoiding all this while it caused the Republican landslide in 2010. Universal healthcare is understandably something which many presidents have previously failed to get passed and President Obama will now have to be its "chief salesman". President Obama is tied to the post of healthcare-he will sail or sink with it. He might as well give it his best shot.
But the dubbing of penalty tax by the Supreme Court will complicate his task. He will be dubbed a tax and spend liberal with the recent Supreme Court judgment President Obama's legacy is now secure. The same cannot be said of his re-election.
(Harsh Desai has done his BA in Political Science from St Xavier's College & Elphinstone College, Bombay and has done his Master's in Law from Columbia University in the city of New York. He is a practicing advocate at the Bombay High Court.)
While a 29% rainfall deficiency for June per se may look rather depressing, it is less than 5% of the average rainfall of 887mm in the monsoon and could be possibly made up for in the remaining season
The media has apparently gone totally berserk declaring the monsoon dead even as it has just arrived. Their headlines scream that June rainfall was deficient by a whopping 29% and that 83% of the country, including India's granary states of Punjab and Haryana, receiving deficient or scanty rainfall so far.
Self-titled "Food Security Analyst", Devinder Sharma of the NGO sector and founder member of Indian Against Corruption, also joined the scare mongering tamasha when he warned during an interview to a news channel, of the prospect of a negative agricultural growth rate due to a likely El Niño effect. This, Mr Sharma added, will further accentuate the downward pressure that the overall economy is currently experiencing that has seen our economic growth rate slip below the 7% levels-the first time over almost a decade!
It was left for deputy chairman of India's Planning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia to strike a word caution to journalists:
"It's not the date of the onset of the monsoon; it's the overall level and distribution over the next four months. You can have a situation where the monsoon is absolutely on time and then it peters out. You can have a situation where the monsoon is one week late or even 10 days late, but then is healthy."
Though by academic training an economist, it is good to see Montek Singh Ahluwalia display commonsense understanding why the most frequently-used adjective used to describe the monsoon is vagaries.
As seen from the above table, June accounts on an average only 18% of the total rainfall during the south-west monsoon. The monsoon had been demonstrating a pattern change in recent times where the rainfall in June has been decreasing while that in July is increasing. Such a change in rainfall pattern is often used as 'evidence' by NGOs and environmental groups for the building their case of "catastrophic climate change".
In reality; such a change may even be beneficial for agriculture. Though such a trend may result in delayed sowing, the excess rains in July tends to leave sufficient soil moisture for standing crops to tide over even if August rainfall fails to live up to expectations. This makes the performance of July rains absolutely the key month to agriculture growth rate. It is the failure of July rains that could prove 'catastrophic' for Indian agriculture.
Rains can accordingly fail in June but if July records near normal or even above average rainfall, we can be fairly optimistic that this year's agricultural growth will end up in the green. While a 29% rainfall deficiency for June (124 mm of rainfall as compared to 163.6 mm average) may per se look rather depressing, it has to be kept in mind this had been almost less than 40% of the deficiency that the country suffered for the same month during the 2009 monsoon season-also another El Niño year.
In 2009, the June rains were a whopping 47.2% below a 50-year average called as the long period average (LPA). The 2009 El Niño was one of the strongest in recorded history and despite this, the country managed +0.4% agriculture growth rate, suggesting that through irrigation expansion over the years, the vulnerability risk of our agriculture to poor monsoons have significantly reduced. There is no reason why this year should be any different. In fact, we are better placed this year than ever to register a new bumper food record. Whatever momentum in the growth rate in agriculture lost during the Kharif season could be offset in part or whole by the expected bumper Rabi crop this year. While El Niños negatively affect the south west monsoon, it has an extremely favourable influence on the north east monsoon.
On an average, the country receives around 887 mm of rainfall during the monsoon months-June-September. A 29% deficiency for June still adds to date, just a 4.93% deficiency from 887 mm total average SWM rainfall. Such a shortfall could be possibly made up either in part or whole during the next three months of the monsoon performance. This is really the crux Montek Singh Ahluwalia tried telling journalists.
As far as agriculture is concerned, it is not even necessary for the monsoon to perform 100% of its LPA. What matters is what its performance is during the months of July-August and its spatial distribution during these two key monsoon months. While a 10% deficiency of rainfall from its mean by itself should not pose a problem to agriculture, what is more critical is its spatial distribution.
This is particularly true this year as what concerned meteorologists more is not so much the mean rainfall for the country but the alignment of the monsoon troughs. It was the alignment of the north west monsoon trough that initially (in June) posed a problem while the north-eastern bay trough was found well developed. Such a formation however was not helpful for rest of India since entire moisture gets offloaded in the area of the trough here that explains the Assam floods. But the situation now has changed.
A study published in the International Journal of Climatology in 2009, carried out by Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM) director BN Goswami et al showed that the monsoon is demonstrating a new pattern taking more time to reach the northern parts of the country. Instead of the normal onset date of 15th June, the onset at Nagpur is now taking place on 18th June with the Arabian Sea branch more active than the Bay of Bengal branch-the slowing of the monsoon being linked to the weakening of the wind shear. Wind shear is the difference in the wind speed at 1.5 km and at 12 km above the land surface.
While most global models have indicated a deficient monsoon (below 90% of LPA); the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD)'s forecast is 96% of LPA viz. a 'normal' monsoon. Since the model error of IMD is + 5%, their forecast in reality is between 91-101% of LPA, which means, despite the 29% deficiency in June rainfall, the IMD is still very much on target. So is this blog-our revised forecast last week was 94% of LPA or between 92%-98% of LPA at 95% confidence level! We see no reason to revise this forecast further downwards. So don't rule us or the IMD out just yet. If rains fail in July, then please by all means announce the demise of this season's monsoon.
Abusing its market power, the Fast Way Group denied Day and Night News the opportunity for transmission of its TV channel on the cable network and denied access to the market, the CCI said in its order
New Delhi: Anti-competition watchdog Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed a penalty of over Rs8 crore on three entities of cable TV service operator Fast Way Group for abusing its dominant position in Punjab and Chandigarh, reports PTI.
"The CCI has found Fast Way Group abusing its dominance in the cable TV service in the territory of Punjab and Chandigarh in violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002," CCI said in a statement today.
CCI has imposed penalty on the Group's entities -- Fast Way Transmission, Hathway Sukhamrit Cable and Datacom, Creative Cable Network -- at the rate of 6% of their average turnover for the last three financial years, it added.
The order was passed after CCI carried out investigation on information filed by Kansan News that broadcasts news and current affairs TV channel 'Day and Night News' in Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Chandigarh, the statement said.
The Commission held that the group has more than 85% of total subscribers in Punjab and Chandigarh and due to this not only every broadcaster, including the informant, is dependent on its network. Also the consumers of cable TV in Punjab and Chandigarh have huge dependency on Fast Way Group.
"They do not have any effective substitute to switch over to the other network. Abusing its market power, the Fast Way Group has denied the informant the opportunity for transmission of it channel on its network and thereby has effectively denied it access to the market," CCI said in the order.
CCI further directed the contravening multi-service operators to deposit the penalty amount within 90 days.
It has also directed the contravening entities to 'cease and desist' from indulging in anti-competitive practices which have the effect of denial of market access.