UPA tactics: Decry the institutions; erode the government's credibility

By repeatedly decrying the CAG and trying to malign the person occupying that Constitutional office, the UPA government is weakening an important pillar of democracy and lowering its own credibility

Admitting that there is a great deal of uncertainty and a perception of policy paralysis in the government these days, a senior Cabinet colleague of the prime minister recently observed that it was being created by the activities of (Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG)! “We have to think ourselves whether we have selected a proper person... I haven’t seen something like this (CAG’s numerous reports on the scams of the UPA) in the 45 years of my career as a politician”. What he unwittingly implied was that the scams associated with the UPA were the biggest ever to take place during the sixty-four years of independent India and, had CAG remained a mute spectator to them, UPA would have succeeded in keeping the Parliament and the people of the country in blissful ignorance of the sheer magnitude and the virulence of those scams.

It was indeed the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India which audited the accounts of the government in recent years and provided comprehensive reports to the Parliament and the people at large on the irregularities and the excesses committed in the infamous Lavasa scam in Maharashtra, the 2G (second generation) spectrum scam at the Centre, the improprieties committed in the conduct of the Commonwealth Games, the design and implementation of the production sharing contracts entered into with private oil company (Reliance Industries) that is developing the Krishna Godavari natural gas fields and the arbitrary allotment of captive coal blocks to private companies, all having huge financial implications to the public exchequer.

The CAG’s revelations on the captive coal scam touched the sensitive nerves of the UPA politicians because the UPA, largely during the time when the prime minister himself headed the coal ministry, allotted 248 captive coal blocks to companies mostly in the private sector, in a highly non-transparent manner, yielding huge windfall profits to the latter. On a complaint received by it, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), yet another statutory body, rightly ordered an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to ascertain whether there were any improprieties committed and determine the responsibility of all those concerned. When Anna Hazare and the opposition demanded that the investigation should also cover the involvement of the PMO, the latter rubbished it saying that there was no need for it, thereby pre-empting both the CVC and the CBI in one go from doing anything that would tarnish PMO’s image!

With specific reference to the coal scam, a UPA minister even went to the extent of flaying the role of the CAG and said, “the CAG has no business, power or authority to question the government’s policy... They can only consider if the due process is followed or not... Nowadays what happens is that the CAG has become an organization that questions the policy of the government.”

To the billion people of this country, what really matters is not whether the CAG or CVC can question the executive’s actions but whether the executive itself has acted in the larger public interest. The minister was evidently trying to obfuscate this central issue! The people of this country have not forgotten how the UPA had earlier tried to make a questionable appointment to the office of CVC itself and how the not so palatable facts came to light, entirely through judicial intervention.

By repeatedly decrying the role of the CAG and trying to malign the person occupying that high Constitutional office, these political functionaries have not only lowered their own government’s credibility but also done something unpardonable, that is, tried to weaken an important pillar of our democracy, created as such in Part V of the Constitution. The CAG is as an important instrument of the Parliament to exercise control over the executive, in terms of the way it manages the public finances. What these politicians have deliberately or unwittingly done was to weaken the Parliamentary system of democracy itself by making such irresponsible statements. Not one of these politicians has ever tried to strengthen the hands of CAG to help promote greater transparency in the way the government manages the resources of the public exchequer.

As it is, the CAG’s audit covers only half of the public expenditure incurred in the country.  The Parliament has no way to get authentic information on how the rest of the expenditure is incurred, especially the amounts routed through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), Self Help Groups (SHGs) and so on. Article 149 of the Constitution empowers the Parliament to enlarge the ambit of CAG to cover this. To meet this end, as long ago as in November 2009, the CAG proposed a far reaching amendment to CAG (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971. More than thirty months have elapsed and the government is yet to refer the draft to the Parliament.

Coming to the role of the judiciary the apex court of India, in its order of 27 July 2010, found fault with the government for allowing millions of tonnes of foodgrain to rot in the godowns of Food Corporation of India (FCI) and asked the government to consider distributing the foodgrain to the poor, free of cost. This invoked a righteous indignation among the UPA leaders who questioned the judiciary's authority to ‘intrude’ into the executive’s policy domain.

Free foodgrain to the poor would no doubt cost the nation a whopping Rs1,00,000 crore and, for the UPA, ‘subsidy’ is apparently a bad word, if it were to be given to the poor. On the other hand, the same UPA leaders had no compunction whatsoever in doling out tax exemptions to the corporates to the tune of Rs5,29,432 crore (latest Budget estimate for 2011-12). The concessions given to the industry are “economic incentives” for promoting growth. There seems to be one theory of economics for the poor and a different one for the rich!

One could feel the heat of UPA’s resentment against the apex court’s order on rotting foodgrain when the prime minister himself made the following remarks, addressing an international conference of jurists a couple of months later.

“I respectfully submit that the Supreme Court should not go into the realm of policy formulation. I respect the sentiments behind the (court) decision that when foodgrain are rotting and people are suffering from deprivation, then some way should be found to ensure that the food needs of the deprived sections are met. But quite honestly it is not possible in this country to give free food to all the poor people.”

The Indian Constitution has always guaranteed food and nutritional security to its citizens. However, the successive governments have never thought it obligatory on their part to translate that guarantee into a well-defined policy for more than six decades since Independence! It was only when the judiciary nudged them into action that they thought it fit to introduce a Bill on food security. What the National Advisory Council (NAC) proposed by way of food security was not to the liking of some senior leaders of UPA. As a result, there has been a further delay in processing the Bill. Meanwhile, foodgrain continue to rot in FCI’s godowns and the poor continue to starve.

Has the UPA executive sincerely tried enough to take the people of this country into confidence on matters of public importance?

Certainly, the enactment of the Right to Information (RTI) Act in 2005 was a defining step taken in that direction, though it was the civil society that forced the executive to enact the law and it was the judiciary that interpreted the ambit of Article 19 of the Constitution that such a law would be necessary.

Unfortunately, subsequent moves made by the UPA failed to invoke public confidence in its intentions. The subjective way in which the information commissioners were chosen left much to be desired. When the government tried to exempt the official file notings from RTI Act, it was the citizens who resisted that move, since the notes recorded in the files of the public authorities revealed the thought processes that went into decision making. When investigative journalism exposed the various scandals, some of which have been specifically referred above, it was the judiciary that intervened to direct the CBI to investigate the same, independent of the executive. As if to keep the public in the dark about what the CBI was doing, the present UPA government hurriedly exempted CBI from the RTI!

The main grievance of the people residing around Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project is that they have all along been kept in the dark about the activities that revolved around the project. The Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) headed by the prime minister himself made a mockery of the RTI by not complying fully with the mandatory disclosure requirement under Section 4. Instead of respecting the citizen’s right to know under Article 19 of the Constitution, the UPA government has slipped in a non-disclosure clause in the recently introduced Bill on nuclear regulation, once again in open defiance of the RTI. By making light of the RTI, the UPA government has eroded its own credibility.

The UPA leadership should understand clearly that no political party has the right to undermine the integrity of the institutions that play a central role in nurturing our great Parliamentary democratic system. After all, no political party is ever certain that it will remain in power permanently. It is the Constitution and the institutions created by it that help the ruling party to deliver good governance and the opposition to play the role of a constructive critic, expected from it. Any weakening of the institutions will only upset this delicate balance that is so crucial for the working of our democracy. Sooner the UPA leadership realises this, the better would it be for the future of our democracy.

(Dr EAS Sarma, IAS, is a post-graduate in Nuclear Physics (Andhra University) and in Public Administration (Harvard University) and a Ph D from IIT, Delhi. As a Union Secretary he has held the portfolios of Power, Economic Affairs and Expenditure. He quit the government in 2000 over differences regarding policy issues with the National Democratic Alliance government. He is the convener of Forum for Better Visakha (FBV), a civil society group set up in 2004.)



anantha ramdas

5 years ago

Thank you Mr Kini for your kind words.

NRI, which originally stood for Non Resident Indians, has gone through phases to Not required Indians to Now
Returned Indians, to which, perhaps we may add to say Now Required Indians, so that each one of us can share our experience, and, where possible, make a contribution, however small, to improve conditions back home.

Thanks for your support sir.


Nagesh Kini

In Reply to anantha ramdas 5 years ago

Yes you are bang on - a Now Required Indian to bring home the vast experience out of wide exposure to contribute in a big way to improve conditions here.
With the deteriorating conditions arising out of the meltdown in the West, it is time our desi expats consider relocating home.
Most employers and companies abroad would certainly find it worth their while to post them in India because it makes for more economic sense and well being, win-win for both employer and employee. Unlike the goras they need not be paid any overseas allowances and put up in high end downtown apartments. Our guys with be nearer their kith and kin and can take better care of their folks!

Nagesh Kini FCA

5 years ago

Ramdas, it is in deed a delight reading your experiences that are so lucidly put across.
Now Welcome back NRI that stands for Now Returned Indian.
Doesn't it feel nice to be back home to Mera Mahaan Bharat?
Eagerly look forward to read more from you.

Kalam refuses to get into Presidential race

Many citizens have expressed the wish which only reflects their love and affection for me and the aspiration of the people, but after considering present political situation, I decided not to contest the Presidential election, Dr Kalam said


New Delhi: In a rebuff to Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee and the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), former President Dr APJ Abdul Kalam on Moday announced that he would not contest the Presidential poll against United Progressive Alliance (UPA) nominee Pranab Mukherjee, reports PTI.

Issuing a formal announcement, he said he had taken the decision after considering "the totality of this matter and the present political situation".

Dr Kalam, who was propped up by Trinamool as a nominee for the Presidential poll to be held on 19th July, said, "though I have never aspired to serve another term or shown interest in contesting the elections", Mamata Banerjee and other political parties "wanted me" to be the candidate.

"Many, many citizens have also expressed the same wish. It only reflects their love and affection for me and the aspiration of the people. I am really overwhelmed by this support," his statement said.

"This being their wish, I respect it. I want to thank them for the trust they have in me," he said, adding, "I have considered the totality of this matter and the present political situation, and decided not to contest the Presidential election 2012."

After Mamata pushed his candidature, breaking ranks with UPA over the issue, BJP also tried hard to persuade him to contest as Opposition's common candidate against Mukherjee.

BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani called him thrice and sent his close aide Sudheendra Kulkarni twice to convince him. However, Dr Kalam made clear to Advani that his "conscience" is not permitting him to contest, sources said.

The former President has been insisting that he could consider entering the fray only if there was surety about his victory. Several opposition leaders talked to Dr Kalam over phone yesterday to know about his plans.

BJP was more in favour of fielding Dr Kalam than former Lok Sabha Speaker PA Sangma, who is AIADMK Chief J Jayalalithaa and BJD head Naveen Patnaik's choice.

Even JD(U), which wants a consensus for Mukherjee, may support Dr Kalam as he shares a good equation with Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar.



nagesh kini

5 years ago

Anna Hazare in disbanding his so-called Team Anna by disassociating his movement from the politically greedy lot did the best thing after Dr. Kalam rightly choosing to opt out of the presidential race.
Goes to prove that there is still some sanity left!

Justin P

5 years ago

People are eagerly waiting for 2014 elections to throw this Congress out.



In Reply to Justin P 5 years ago

it will be hung parl in 2014 and many more afterwards, until someone (anna,ramdev,etc) decide to float a new party and insert clean patriotic brave honest people into the party while themselves staying away from the political chairs (there are plenty of great ppl around but they never get support from india ppl who sell their country (vote) for a Rs 500 note or alcohol or freebies). jai ho !

Nagesh Kini FCA

5 years ago

It is those fearing exposure seek to preempt by just attacking the CAG or the Judiciary for "overreach".
Sharad Pawar is the latest of the neta-mantri to come out with his opposition openly.
Yes, there is an urgent need to revisit the laws and practices which call for an urgent review.The sooner it is brought about the better it is.
The PM's statement needs to be translated into effective action.

Mamata debuts on Facebook, says Kalam the choice of millions

Stating that the will of the people is supreme in a democracy, Mamata Banerjee requested fellow citizens to petition their public representatives to stand up, support and vote for Kalam


Kolkata: Taking up the campaign for Dr APJ Abdul Kalam online, Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee on Saturday said her choice of the Presidential candidate was the choice of millions of Indians, reports PTI.

Debuting on social networking site Facebook ( ), she wrote in her first post, "I gave voice to what millions of Indians want to see in a President."

Refusing to budge from her stand, she said, "My party is a small party. We are not a big party with none of the resources others possess. We are led by truth and conviction. All through my life I have stood by my principles. I stand by the position I have taken".

Stating that the will of the people is supreme in a democracy, Banerjee requested fellow citizens to petition their public representatives to stand up, support and vote for Kalam.

"Let your voice be heard. I will bow to the will of the people," she said.

Describing the 'missile man' as a proud and distinguished son of India who continues to inspire all Indians, the chief minister said Kalam remains above narrow politics.

"He is a seeker of truth, a fount of knowledge and an impartial voice of reason and sanity, who is above narrow politics. He is the kind of man all our citizens aspire to make President," Banerjee said.

The TMC chief had joined hands with SP chief Mulayam Singh Yadav to propose the name of Kalam. However, the SP later broke away and pledged support to Pranab Mukherjee, leaving the West Bengal Chief Minister totally isolated.

Unfazed by the isolation after Congress-led UPA named Mukherjee as its Presidential nominee, Banerjee said last night that her party remained firm on the candidature of Kalam and said "the game has just begun".

"We are firm on the candidature of Kalam. He is the fittest candidate. We are not shifting from our stand of what we have announced earlier," Banerjee had said.

Noting that she and her party has already given a clarion call to other parties to support Kalam as President, Banerjee said, "Along with my other fellow citizens I can only urge them to consider this call. Let our country be led forward by people such as him, people of free thought and honourable action who will not hesitate to do what is just and right".

By recalling Tagore's famous lines of 'Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high' in her first posting on any social networking site, she said, "I am a humble, transparent, common person like the vast majority of you".




5 years ago

Although vaccine-derived polio is clinically identical to wild polio, WHO and the national immunization authorities refuse to acknowledge it. They designate all cases of acute flaccid paralysis cases (reported after polio vaccination) as unrelated to polio. Last year, over 60,000 kids were diagnosed with acute flaccid paralysis within 15 days of vaccination. All of them were chucked away as "not-related to polio."

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine)