Union Flash Remit from Union Bank of India has revolutionised the account credit scenario.
UAE Exchange, a leading global remittance and foreign exchange brand, and Union Bank of India (UBI), announced the launch of the real-time account credit service called “Union Flash Remit.”
UBI, the 5th largest public sector bank in India, is the first public sector bank from the country to introduce this service that ensures that the beneficiary will receive money in his or her bank account within minutes, in a secured manner.
Dr. B.R. Shetty, managing director and chief executive of the exchange, said Flash Remit has revolutionised the account credit scenario. “The moment the amount is credited to the beneficiary’s account, an SMS notification is instantly sent to the mobile phones of both the sender and the receiver, thus reducing follow-up costs. This service is available 24 x 7, 365 days, which includes Sundays and bank holidays.”
M.V Nair, chairman and managing director of UBI, said the new remittance service is a testimony of the bank’s efforts to offer customers the best service possible. “Taking remittance service to the next level, we present the innovative real time account credit facility. With this product, customer satisfaction shall achieve heights never experienced before,” he said.
Y. Sudhir Kumar Shetty, chief operating officer, Global Operations, of UAE Exchange, said, with Flash Remit the exchange is fortifying its proposition to bring more value to our Indian expatriates, world over.
Net sales of Lupin Limited grew 21.9% to Rs 1,791.7 crore for the third quarter of FY12
Drug firm Lupin Limited said its consolidated net profit rose 4.95% to Rs235.1 crore for the third quarter ended 31 December 2011, over the same period last fiscal. The company had posted a net profit of Rs224 crore for the corresponding period of previous fiscal.
Net sales of the company grew 21.9% to Rs 1,791.7 crore for the third quarter, compared to Rs 1,469.4 crore in the same period of the previous fiscal.
Dr. Kamal K. Sharma, managing director, Lupin Limited, said “We had a good quarter aided by strong operating performance, new launches and strong growth across U.S., India and Japan."
During the quarter the company filed three ANDAs (Abbreviated New Drug Applications) bringing the cumulative filings to 156 ANDAs. The company received 7 ANDA approvals in the quarter (13 in all in the past 9 months), which takes the total approvals to 61.
Lupin’s South African Business, Pharma Dynamics grew by 17.2% to Rs58.3 crore during Q3, FY 2011-12 as against Rs49.8 crore (Q3, FY 2010-11).
API (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient) sales were at Rs198.1 crore during Q3, FY 2011-12 as against Rs227.3 crore (Q3, FY 2010-11) contributing 11% to Lupin’s consolidated revenues.
In the late afternoon, Lupin was trading at around Rs445.55 per share on the Bombay Stock Exchange, 1.85% up from the previous close.
Alliance Air refused to give information on former minister’s daughter’s travel with IPL team despite a previous ruling
The Maharaja has long lost his sheen. Yet, he refuses to speak of those who robbed him. The Central Information Commission (CIC) has pulled up national carrier Air India once again, this time for refusing disclosure despite an order on 23rd February 2011. It has issued a show-cause notice to an official of its subsidiary Alliance Air. The low-cost subsidiary refused to provide complete information on a flight which was pulled out less than 12 hours before its scheduled departure, in order to transport former civil aviation minister Praful Patel’s daughter Poorna and some IPL players to Chennai.
Central Information Commissioner Ms Sushma Singh said in the ruling dated 20 January 2012, “The commission observes that Arun K Goyal, PIO/company secretary, Alliance Air has only partly complied with the directions of the CIC contained in the order dated 23 February 2011. The CPIO is hereby directed to provide complete information to the appellant and to show cause why a penalty of Rs25,000 should not be imposed on him for causing a delay of more than 100 days in providing the information to the appellant.” The CIC has asked the CPIO to provide all requested information within 15 days of receipt of the order.
Mr Agrawal, who had sought the information about the flight, said, “After clear instructions from the honourable CIC in the matter, no exemption clause apply. But the CPIO, after seeking time to respond, ultimately declined the sought information and documents as exempted under section 8(1)(d) of RTI Act. This is an unnecessary tactic to harass RTI petitioners.”
On 20 April, 2010, the Delhi-Coimbatore Air India flight IC 7603 which was scheduled to leave at 5:20am, was suddenly aborted. The reason, allegedly, was to use the aircraft as a chartered flight for taking then civil aviation minister Mr Patel’s daughter, Poorna Patel, and some IPL players from Chandigarh to Chennai. Subsequently, Air India clubbed the 5:20 flight with a later one.
Legally, it is forbidden to divert a scheduled passenger flight aircraft for charter purposes, if the airline does not have an aircraft to use as the scheduled flight. Ms Poorna Patel, IPL’s hospitality manager, called the airline, and got her request granted. The aircraft belonging to Alliance Air was pulled out of the fleet.
Air India later said that the diversion was made after a request by India Cements, owners of the Chennai Super Kings team. The chartered flight came back to Chandigarh empty while the Coimbatore-bound passengers reached their destination at 11:45am, three hours late.
Mr Agrawal had filed a Right to Information (RTI) petition on 26 April 2010 asking for detailed file notings, documents and related correspondence. The CIC ruled in his favour on 23 February 2011 and ordered the CPIO to disclose complete information. However, on 22 March 2011, Alliance Air replied to Mr Agrawal saying that the information is commercially sensitive, and hence claimed exemption to the disclosure.
On 26 March, 2011 Mr Agarwal filed a fresh query, asking for the same details. Finally, on 18 May 2011 the CPIO declined disclosure, claiming exemptions. Mr Agrawal then complained before the CIC citing non-compliance on behalf of the national carrier.
Air India had earlier refused to give information about a carrier allegedly diverted for Mr Patel’s other daughter. Read http://www.moneylife.in/article/78/23103.html. The lawmakers, it seems, have no trouble getting the Maharaja to dance to their tunes.