Citizens' Issues
Trump Then: ‘I Would Have No Problem’ Banning Lobbyists. Trump Now: You’re Hired!

During his campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly welcomed the idea of banning lobbyists from his administration.


Fast forward eight months, and now-President Trump is welcoming them in.


Last June on CBS's "Face the Nation," host John Dickerson asked Donald Trump: Given the candidate's drumbeat of criticism of the Washington lobbyist class, "Will you say 'No lobbyists will work for me and no big donors?'"


"I would have no problem with it, honestly," Trump responded.


After the exchange, a "Face the Nation" producer followed up with campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks, who confirmed that, yes, Trump was referring to banning lobbyists from his administration.


The sentiment is in line with what Trump told NBC's "Meet the Press" in another interview a year earlier, when he called banning lobbyists from working in his administration "a pretty good idea."


As ProPublica detailed last week, a longtime construction industry lobbyist who previously worked against wage and workplace safety regulations is now in a key position at the Department of Labor. The lobbyist, Geoff Burr, is reportedly in line to be chief of staff if Andrew Puzder is confirmed as Labor secretary.


At the Food and Drug Administration, longtime pharmaceutical lobbyist Jack Kalavritinos has a senior role in the agency's early Trump team, according to Stat News.


Kalavritinos spent more than seven years as the chief lobbyist of the medical device and pharmaceutical firm Covidien. (Covidien was subsequently acquired by Medtronic.) In that role, Kalavritinos lobbied the FDA and Congress on a host of issues related to medical device regulation, disclosure records show. Among the legislation he lobbied on was the Novel Device Regulatory Relief Act and the Food and Drug Administration Mission Reform Act.


Trump himself recently criticized the extensive influence of the pharmaceutical lobby. "Pharma has a lot of lobbies and a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power and there's very little bidding on drugs," he said at a press conference last month.


K Street was a frequent punching bag for Trump on the campaign trail. He once tweeted:


It's difficult to know how many former lobbyists are now working in the Trump administration. Both Burr and Kalavritinos are members of Trump's so-called "beachhead teams," which are made up of officials installed at federal agencies to lay the groundwork while the president's nominees make their way through the Senate confirmation process. The administration has said there are around 500 such staffers, but has not released a list of names.


Trump last month issued an executive order on ethics for appointees that weakened elements of the Obama-era policy on former lobbyists joining government.


Trump also hired a range of lobbyists into influential positions during the transition period, between Election Day and the inauguration on Jan. 20. As The New York Times noted in November, telecom, energy, and agriculture industry consultants and lobbyists were all named to influential roles.


The White House did not respond to a request for comment.


ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.













24% MPs/MLAs say they don't need to pay tax or have no income
In tax returns filed a year before they were elected, 72% Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Congress MPs and MLAs claimed they earn less than Rs 10 lakh, according to an analysis of affidavits of 4,848 (of 4,910) lawmakers.
As many as 75% of MPs and MLAs nationwide declared annual incomes less than Rs10 lakh. Around 35% of lawmakers said their annual income is less than Rs2.5 lakh while 40% have declared annual income between Rs2.5 lakh and Rs10 lakh.
As many as 1,141 (24%) MPs and MLAs claimed exemption from income tax or have no income at all.
"We can conclude that we are largely a tax non-compliant society," Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said, sarcastically, during his budget speech on February 1.
Sharing income tax data, Jaitley said that of 37 million individuals (of a total population of close to 1.3 billion) who filed tax returns in 2015-16, 9.9 million (27%) declared annual incomes below the exemption limit of Rs2.5 lakh; 19.5 million (53%) declared annual incomes between Rs2.5 lakh and Rs5 lakh, while 7.6 million (20%) declared annual incomes of more than Rs 5 lakh.
If the annual incomes of family (incomes of spouse and dependents, as declared in their respective tax returns) are added to the incomes of MPs and MLAs, 62% legislators' households have an income less than Rs10 lakh.
About half (2,410) of MPs and MLAs have declared household assets (movable and immovable assets of the elected member, spouse and dependent/s) of more than Rs2 crore, of which 912 (38% of 2,410) declared family incomes of less than Rs10 lakh.
Of 1,843 MPs and MLAs with family incomes of more than Rs10 lakh, 106 declared household assets of less than Rs1 crore.
Only 25% (1,236 of 4,848) of MPs and MLAs declared in tax returns that their annual incomes were more than Rs10 lakh; 35% (1,676 of 4,848) declared incomes less than Rs2.5 lakh.
While 63% Lok Sabha MPs declared annual incomes of less than Rs10 lakh, only 13% Rajya Sabha MPs declared annual incomes of less than Rs10 lakh.
Among states, over 80% of MLAs in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal and Odisha declared annual incomes less than Rs10 lakh.
As many as 1,676 (35%) elected representatives declared annual incomes less than Rs2.5 lakh. Of these, 1,141 (24%) reported to the Election Commission that they were either exempt from income tax on various grounds, such as being a farmer, being from an area mentioned in the sixth schedule of the constitution -- such as the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura -- and so exempt from income tax, or have no income at all.
Only 38% (1,843 of 4848) legislators said they had annual family incomes (income of an MP or an MLA and incomes of family, such as spouse and dependents/s), more than Rs10 lakh; 28% (1,343 of 4,848) declared family incomes less than Rs2.5 lakh.
Half of India's elected representatives declared household assets of more than Rs2 crore; 28% more than Rs5 crore. As many as 70% of MPs and MLAs had assets more than Rs1 crore.
Although assets are supposed to be declared by elected representatives at market price, immovable assets are grossly under valued. A former Election Commissioner said the law was not being used to value assets by lawmakers accurately and urged people to go to court to force lawful evaluations, Indian Express reported in December 2013.
"How long will we overlook facts that stare us in the face?" Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on December 31, 2016. "I wish to share some information with you, which will either make you laugh, or make you angry. According to information available with the government, only 24 lakh people in India accept that their annual income is more than Rs 10 lakh."
"If we look at any big city, it would have lakhs of people with annual income of more than Rs 10 lakh. Do you not feel that for the good of the country, this movement for honesty needs to be further strengthened?"
In some way, the Prime Minister drew a correlation between assets and income declared to tax authorities. We found a weak correlation existed between the assets and incomes of MPs and MLAs.
* 38% (912 of 2,410) legislators with assets more than Rs2 crore declared family incomes of less than Rs 10 lakh.
* Of 1,079 lawmakers with assets in the range of Rs2 crore and Rs5 crore, only 44% (474) declared incomes more than Rs10 lakh.
* 22% (255 of 1,651) with assets between Rs2 crore and Rs10 crore declared incomes less than Rs2.5 lakh.
* 41% (891 of 2,155) with assets between Rs2 crore and Rs30 crore declared incomes less than Rs10 lakh.
* Of 156 lawmakers with household assets more than Rs50 crore, 10 declared incomes less than Rs10 lakh.
* Of 75 legislators with assets more than Rs 100 crore, four reported incomes less than Rs 2.5 lakh.
* 7% (106 out of 1,470) with assets less than Rs1 crore declared annual incomes more than Rs10 lakh.
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.



Sunil Rebello

3 months ago

Our MPs n MLAs are no better than Trump,
Trump calls himself SMART.
Our MPs n MLAs will Label themselves Super Smart.
ONLY Idiots like us vote for them to rob us of our hard earned income.

Cleaning up NSE has Barely Begun
The National Stock Exchange (NSE), a phenomenal commercial success, was considered a template...
Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)