Toyota sees strong growth in India

Toyota Kirloskar Motor official claims that the recent troubles with global Toyota recalls have had no Indian impact and that sales continue to surge

Brand Toyota may have taken a beating after the Japanese carmaker had to recall millions of vehicles in the US, but in India the company sees no impact. In fact, the carmaker is eyeing strong growth, reports PTI.

"(There will be) no impact in India. Our sales have doubled. It's limited to the US. Each of our vehicles is in short supply (in India),” said Sandeep Singh, deputy managing director (Marketing) of Toyota Kirloskar Motor (TKM), the company's joint venture with the Kirloskar Group in India.

"(Over the) last two months, we have grown by 100%,” he said, referring to cumulative sales for January-February 2010 which stood at 11,982 units, a 109% increase over the same period last year.

TKM, in fact, is aiming for more than 25% growth in India in the current calendar year (2010) as it targets to sell a minimum of 70,000 units. TKM sold 55,497 units in 2009.

But Singh acknowledged that the growth in the first two months was over a very low base.

"As we go along (in the rest of the calendar year), growth may not be 100%. It will taper down,” he told PTI.

TKM expects growth to slow down in April-May as some states have raised VAT and road tax, while the Centre has hiked excise duty, but believes that "sales should be all right if the economy continues to do well.”


India Inc may grant 12% pay hike in 2010-11

Ernst & Young reports that India Inc may hike salaries by 9%-12% in the next fiscal amid revival in the job market

India Inc may grant salary hikes in the range of 9%-12% in the coming financial year to retain talent amid revival in the job market, according to consultancy firm Ernst & Young, reports PTI.

Most companies are expecting higher attrition levels over the next few months on jobs coming back into the economy resulting in salary hikes being used as a tool to retain talent.

"At an overall level, extraordinary jump in increments do not seem probable and the average salary increase is likely to be in the range of 9%-12%," Ernst & Young partner and national head (People & Organisation) N S Rajan said.

However, Mr Rajan cautioned that along with the pay hikes, companies are likely to follow a cautious approach of keeping tight monitoring and controlling of any additional salary costs. In spite of excitement around economic recovery, average pay hikes across sectors would be slightly conservative.

"While on the one hand, pharma and FMCG companies will lead the space with increments in the range of 10%-13%, the IT and technology companies will give reasonable increments close to 8%," Mr Rajan added.

Moreover, the telecom sector is expected to give above-average salary hikes in the range of 12%-15%.

The Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI) sector is likely to have maximum disparity in terms of future increment levels compared with current ones, with projected salary hikes of 10%-12% against nil during the downturn, Ernst & Young believes.

Meanwhile, it said that it would be a while before the economy returns to the boom phase of 2007, despite the sentiment being optimistic across sectors.

Mr Rajan further stated that a lot of innovation in designing compensation packages may be seen, as there would be a stronger linkage to pay for performance.

"Individual performance, coupled with company performance will be the most commonly used criterion for determining performance bonus. Across levels, variable pay component of compensation packages is likely to go up," he said.

At the senior management level, compensation packages may be linked to the company's performance and there would be a renewed focus towards balancing out executive compensation through a focus on retention and reward.

Recently, global HR consultancy Hewitt had forecast that Indian companies may provide an average of 10.6% salary hikes—the highest in the Asia-Pacific region in 2010.


VAT and service tax swamp new home buyers

Mumbai builders are slapping new home buyers with a nasty surprise in the form of value-added tax and service tax. This means that buyers have to pay 12% more on taking possession of their contracted and fully-paid apartments

Property prices in Mumbai have already zoomed past their pre-2008 peak and have become inaccessible to most people, but the nasty surprises for buyers who had already booked and paid for their flats do not seem to end.

Moneylife learns that builders are demanding extra money under value-added tax (VAT) and service tax from homebuyers who had booked properties during the recent slump. The demand apparently comes up when a person goes to complete possession formalities, leaving investors high and dry, say aggrieved buyers. 

In fact, in case of service tax, there is no clear regulation passed by the government as of yet on whether the buyer has to pay the tax. This tax seems to be just another way for builders to extract more money than contracted, although some of the amount collected may be in the form of an undertaking to pay. However, for homebuyers who have borrowed heavily to pay for their properties, this additional 8%-10% cost differential is often difficult to cough up.

Importantly, developers do not mention these costs while booking the property— nor is it mentioned in the sale agreement. Consumers are asked to pay 4.5% VAT on the agreement value plus approximately 4% as service tax for buying a new property only while taking possession. Some consumers have had to give up their booked apartments because they could not arrange this additional financial demand.

“I had to cancel my deal as the developer asked me to pay 4.5% VAT on agreement value and also asked for a blank cheque with an undertaking for the service tax. It is very difficult to arrange such amounts just when you go to take the possession of the property,” said a buyer, who is a senior executive with a leading IT company.

Sources say that developers try to make this additional demand appear very justified and even pretend to help the customer. Some suggest putting the money into an escrow account or creating a fixed deposit to pay the tax amount in the future, if necessary. They are told that the deposit /escrow will be tapped only if the ongoing litigation on the VAT issue goes against them.

“The Maharashtra government is yet not clear on VAT. There will be clarity in a few weeks, so we are collecting the money and keeping it separately in an escrow account as it is very difficult to collect the amount from the consumers after the Act is enacted,” said Lalit Kumar Jain, chairman, Kumar Urban Development Ltd.

However, sources connected with the realty industry say that builders could just as well take an undertaking from each buyer that they (the builders) will pay VAT if the court rules against the builders. They further point out that litigation in India goes on for decades and there is no reason to collect money from customers today in anticipation of a judgement. Some point to a similar litigation in the 1990s over the stamp duty issue—at that time, builders merely collected undertakings from buyers and when the issue was decided, the state government offered an amnesty scheme permitting a reasonable stamp duty payment to ensure that buyers were not unduly harassed.

Sources also tell us that charging VAT from customers is a new development. Earlier, builders used to include VAT in the sale price. The demand for a blank cheque for service tax payment is another travesty. “As of now, developers are not supposed to charge service tax because it is still not mandated by statute. After it becomes a final Act, the government will notify the date from when it can be applicable and only then can you ask for service tax,” said Vimal Punmiya, chartered accountant and proprietor, Vimal Punmiya and Company (an audit firm). {break}

However, legal firms are not yet clear on the whole issue of VAT and service tax payment on property.

“The Supreme Court has ruled on this issue in the case of K Raheja Development Corporation versus the State of Karnataka [2005] 2 STT 178 (SC)] where the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, was held to be applicable to payments made towards construction activity taking place between the date of agreement and transfer of possession to the buyer. Subsequently the service tax authorities issued a clarificatory circular stating that service tax would be applicable to these ‘works contract’ arrangements. The validity of this circular is currently being questioned before the Bombay High Court. Meanwhile the 2010 Finance Bill has also introduced an explanation including such construction services within the definition of taxable construction services. This explanation will come into effect in a couple of months when the Bill is passed,” said Shreya Rao, lawyer, Nishith Desai Associates.

She also clarified, “Both service tax and VAT apply to ‘works contract’ arrangements such as construction contracts, which involve an inextricable element of both sale of goods and service. This is why an abatement is provided, both for VAT and service tax which are applied to works contracts at a lower rate than usual. If the purchase is of a completed property there should be no ‘works contract’ with the buyer, pursuant to the decision in Raheja. Therefore these taxes should not be applicable as VAT/service tax does not generally apply to sale of completed immovable property.”

However, an independent charted accountant, Prem Chhatpar, argues, “In 2008, while giving the judgement for Larsen & Toubro’s case under works contract, the Supreme Court doubted the law laid down in the Raheja case. The Court has decided to reconsider the principles in the Raheja case in front of the larger bench of the Court. The Court also hinted that examination has to be made in the context of definition of sale under the Sale of Goods Act and Transfer of Property Act.”
“In the L&T judgement, the court hinted that it is perverse to consider every case where the flat is booked under construction to be deemed to be under ‘works contract’,” added Mr Chhatpar.

The issue from the customer perspective is that he/she is suddenly being asked to pay more—an additional amount which was neither disclosed nor contracted earlier. As things stand now, for a purchaser acquiring a new property, he has to pay 5% stamp duty (for value over Rs5 lakh), 1% as registration fee, 4.5% as VAT and 3.5%-4% as service tax. This works out to14% over the property price which is extracted by the government on property prices, which are already astronomical.

The ground reality also is that a customer booking a flat is not signing a construction contract with the builder, he is only contracting to buy a completed property. The developer is not rendering any service to the consumers but only carrying out his duty.

Besides these taxes, the interest rates on home loans are also increasing gradually. A common man hunting for a roof over his head is now totally pinched with the sudden increase in property prices, taxes and interest rates.




6 years ago

i have purchase home at nalasopara buy builder demanding vat 3% & vat 1% by cash and after that he giving me sale agreement for loan purpose . i have paid already stamp duty & registration fees

another issue is builder demanding two years mentence s in advance

pls gide me what will be do in this case


6 years ago


lalji patel

6 years ago

i want to know howmuch percentage of vat on construction service in maharastra?
plz guide me

Dhiraj S Suvarna

6 years ago

Thank u very much for giving me information.


6 years ago

No one can charge any amount for any legislation to be / not to be passed in future. And Govt. should make them applicable on dates after it is gezetted.


6 years ago

i have booked a flat in mumbai on auguast 2009 but registration is not done yet some one tell me i have to pay vat or service tax


6 years ago

I have booked a flat in March 2010 and did the registration in march itself. Now, its ready for possession and the builder is asking a 5% VAT. Is 5% VAT a valid one, where i read in the newspapers as the vat to be charged at 1%. What should i do in this case, as i hardly have such a big money again to shell out

6 years ago

i just read in anothe rweb site stating that it would be 1% for the deals clossing after 1st April, would it be a correct information?


6 years ago

i have brought a flat under resale. My agreement is dated 21st of April, 2010.At the time of my agreement - my flat is 90% complete.
The original agreement of the seller was dated september 2009 with the builder , when he made a agreement with the builder the flat was 60% complete.
I want to know - the liability of service tax and vat that would be applicable tome.
Pls advise


7 years ago

Dear Sir,

I purchased a house which is still under construction and expect possession in 2011. I paid stamp duty and registered my Sale agreement in 2009, will I have to pay VAT and Service Tax.
Kindly advise.
Many Thanks

CA. Dhiraj Satra

7 years ago

The article seems very biased. The issue here discussed is the builders have started collecting vat and service tax by whatever name it may be called though it was not informed to the buyers of the property when they entered into the agreement for sale. However the main issue is both the state and the central Government wants to earn out of the real estate market and imposed vat and service tax without considering the constitutional validity of the tax levied.

The state Government has imposed 1% VAT on the agreement value of a flat. The sale price of flat includes cost of land which is an immovable property and the state government has not right to levy vat on immovable property which is not considered as goods as per the definition of goods.

The central government has also proposed service tax on the value of the agreement without considering the actual value of service being provided by a developer.

Since both the statutes the VAT Act and the Finance Act 1994 under which the service tax is proposed are different statutes implemented by different government, the rules framed by both the governments for valuation of the quantum of tax will be favouring its own revenue and will have independent of the valuation rules framed by the other government.
There are number of cases where both the governments are state to collect the taxes, state claiming it is liable to vat and the center claiming it is liable to service tax and resulting into unnecessary litigation and harrassment to the tax payers. One such example is taxation of Software, where the companies are charging both vat and service tax to their customers without going into litigation however the consumer has to suffer ultimately.

The main culprit here are the State and Central Governement, who have levied the unconstitutional taxes, whereas the builders or in that case any businessman is just an implementing and collecting and paying the taxes levied by the governments without any commission earned out of it.
Both State and Center should come forward and decide the issue whether the tax is to be chargeable by state or the Center and if by both then the common valuation rules or levies should be made applicable so that there is no scope left for litigation.
Warm regards
CA. Dhiraj Satra

A. Aftab Ahmed

7 years ago

Sir, Please tell me any Transporation seperate service tax percentage, i want to need the details.

A. Aftab Ahmed

7 years ago

Sir, Please tell me any Transporation seperate service tax percentage, i want to need the details.


7 years ago

I have gone through your article & in true sense is an eye opener, still needs practical yes or no answer from you regarding the following question that is making me sleepless now a days....
I have booked a flat on 16th march. It is under Construction Property & about 80 -90% work has been over & builder has agreed to give us possestion in July'2010. The sale agreement is made on 19th march 2010. I am going to mortgadge this property to the SBI for Home loan. My Question is Whether I will be asked / forced for 4% Service tax?
Awaiting a answer from your side....

navin kumar bhatia

7 years ago

I read your article on VAT & Service tax it was really mind blowing & a eye opener.
i have booked a shop in mumbai in a under construction project can you guide me whether i shall have to pay service tax & vat if i get the registration done before 31st march & if not what would be the percentage of vat & service tax applicable.
warm regards navin

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)