Connect with Us
Moneylife - Facebook Moneylife - Twitter Moneylife - Linkedin Moneylife - Youtube Moneylife Rss feed
close

Moneylife » Life » Public Interest » The truth about Satyamev Jayate’s donations

The truth about Satyamev Jayate’s donations

Sucheta Dalal | 26/06/2012 02:53 PM | 

The donation numbers look strange, the actual terms and conditions are not so clear and the show is flagging

 

On 20th June, Moneylife wrote how Satyamev Jayate (SMJ), the do-gooding show that was to redefine prime time and claimed to reach a massive 40 crore Indians (over just five episodes) had collected just Rs1.7 crore for seven NGOs so far. Of this Rs85.25 lakh has come from Reliance Foundation (numbers provided by them), which had offered to match the donations received from others.
 

SMJ’s website (www.satyamevjayate.in) had 13 NGOs on the list, of which seven received the funds until then: Unique Home for Girls, Snehalaya, Amarjyoti School, Family of Disabled, Himmat, Childline and Azad Foundation.


While I wrote to Reliance Foundation, I also contacted SMJ’s official PR agency (Hanmer MS&L) listed on its website and asked for the donation numbers. Late that night, after our report was published, a Hanmer executive wrote to say that she didn’t have the numbers, but the Rs85.25 lakh that Reliance Foundation had paid reflected only the first five days of donation and that Snehalaya had in fact received Rs70 lakh.  She promised to get me the exact numbers by 21st June afternoon.

 


This was after seven episodes had already been aired. We sent a reminder on 23rd June and also pointed out a mistake in the “terms & conditions”, which said that the exact donations received would be announced on Asar, a programmed aired on Aaj Tak channel every Friday night. In fact Asar is aired on ABP News, formerly Star News. This gross mistake was corrected on 25th June along with certain other changes.

Finally on 25th June (seven weeks after the show went on air), five days after our report, the Hanmer PR person wrote to say SMJ has received Rs1.9 crore through Axis Bank and another Rs25 to Rs30 lakh through text messages (so much for precision and disclosures), which means “Rs3 crore plus” of donations after adding “Rs85 lakh donated by Reliance”. She writes, “Reliance only doubles the amount collected in the first week (after telecast date). From a legal perspective, there needs to be a cut off date for Reliance to double the amount”.

But hasn’t Aamir Khan been looking us in the eye (through our TV screens) and telling us that Reliance Foundation will match the donations received? Then why is its contribution less than half the total received? As always, Reliance Foundation seems to have bargained a phenomenal deal—a big dollop of publicity for Nita Ambani’s plans to change the world, being economic with the truth (in terms of what it would match) and coughing up just Rs85 lakh over six weeks, when advertisers have been paying Rs8-Rs10 lakh for a 10 second spot! Bharti Airtel, the presenting sponsor, is understood to have paid Rs17-Rs20 crore while associate sponsors (Skoda, Coca Cola, Axis Bank, etc.) have paid Rs6-Rs7 crore each for far less visibility than Reliance. Why don’t the terms and conditions mention that Reliance Foundation only matches donations of the first week?

Naturally, we found this breezy obfuscation unacceptable and demanded a break up. By now, Star India officials had corrected the terms and conditions and updated the website. They have finally updated the website to say that the show had yielded—630,298,439 connections, 8,839,494 responses, 2,778,984 community members and Rs30,160,678 in donations. There was still no clarity about how these figures were arrived at and who got how much. On asking for a detailed break-up, we received an email from them.

The numbers are interesting (see table). Data for the first two episodes indicates that nearly half the donations were received in the second week after the telecast, despite the flutter on social media caused by the programme’s first episode. Secondly, Snehalaya, the NGO featured in the first programme garnered Rs1.3 crore or nearly half the total donations generated by the first six shows. Yet, barely 2.2% were through sms. Digital marketing experts may explain why sms-happy Indians were so reluctant to donate through texts, but apparently donated through more cumbersome online contributions to Axis Bank, that too a week after the episode. It will be interesting to see how many of the Axis Bank donations came from overseas transfers.

Childline and Himmat managed to attract the next highest number of donations (around Rs40 lakh each) while The Humanity Trust, West Bengal which has been subject of nasty innuendo because it was confused with another trust of the same name (finally corrected and explained by SMJ’s website only on 25th June) had the third highest collection of Rs27 lakh. But given the fact that it is this show that probably had the maximum impact on public consciousness, the amount collected was strangely too small.

What is however evident from the numbers, is that SMJ is fast losing steam. Only two episodes have really made waves—the first on female foeticide, mainly because it startled people and the second on medical malpractices, because it affects us all. Also, the massive clout of the pharmaceutical and medical equipment manufacturers ensures that we get to know so little of the sleazy underbelly healthcare sector. In fact, media reports on medical malpractice rarely go beyond doctor’s negligence.

The political class, which was wary after the first episode, has now begun to ignore the show. SMJ still has the potential to pack a punch for social transformation, but it needs some changes. For one, many viewers say that 90 minutes is far too long on a Sunday morning and there is no follow up action from the producers. They and Aamir Khan Productions obviously expected to just sit back and rake in the moolah and the glory. If activism could be reduced to show business, India would not need drastic transformation 65 years after independence.


Post Comment

More in Moneylife

Saradha, Speak Asia, QNet, PCMCS Act, direct selling companies, Modi government, chit fund, money circulation schemes, Department of Banking and Financial Services.

Is the Modi govt helping Ponzi, MLMs become legal? +11657 views

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

Post your Comment


Alert me when new comment is posted on this article
 Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting


VIDEOS

Insurance problems: How to get justice from Ombudsman in a cost-effective way

LATEST COMMENT

Unicity. Is another company from bangalore I got to know Hemant Sharma

MORE

Would You Arrest Romeo’s Juliet? Bapoo Malcolm

Rajnath says possibility of terror attack cannot be ruled out Moneylife Digital Team

Comment

49 Comments
Victor

Victor 3 weeks ago

I dug a little on the SMS donation and found this http://www.theguardian.com/money/2011/ma...

Assuming that Airtel also charges the same as UK operators which the site confirms in it's T&C ( Rule 2A.2.3 "after the deduction of the mobile operator’s share and applicable government taxes and other service charges.") Isn't it gross misrepresentation when Aamir Khan says '5 Rs from each SMS will go to towards the NGO'?

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Praney Sharma

Praney Sharma 1 month ago

What is the objective of the Satyamev Jayate Trust and who are the trustees of the Trust and what are their background. Just by highlighting sensitive issues you can't bring about changes in the society therefore there must be follow up for actual benefits to people.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Ramesh Poapt

Ramesh Poapt 6 months ago

This is high time to check up deeper on the working of the NGOs. A separate survey may please be done and it may please be taken up by ML and kindly publish it in ML.Lots of CSR activities taking place thru NGOs.Though basically it is a welcome change, much needed one.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Veeresh Malik

Veeresh Malik 6 months ago

The said NGO "HUMANITY TRUST" does not display any information under RTI nor does it place its accounts up for open scrutiny.

Nor can any other real information be found anywhere online as yet.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Nagesh Kini

Nagesh Kini 6 months ago in reply to Veeresh Malik

It is time that the GOI comes out with pre-approving names for trusts to be registered and a new mechanism for getting those already registered by insisting on those latter with similar names to carry out changes. when it can be done for companies and product names it should not be difficult for registered trusts as well.

Reply» Link » Report abuse
X
AUTHOR
Sucheta Dalal

Sucheta Dalal 6 months ago in reply to Veeresh Malik

Veeresh. There are at least three Humanity Trusts in India. That is how we work . Bu the one that got the donations is a legitimate NGO that is doing excellent work. I have posted this and details in some of my comments at the time the show was on last year.

Reply» Link » Report abuse
X
Mr Hi Fi

Mr Hi Fi 2 years ago

SICK AND CHEATS ARE COLLABORATING WITH MEDIA TO EXPOIT EMOTIONAL INDIANS !!!

Reply »Link » Report abuse
X
Daily Newsletter

1,00,000 Readers

Follow Moneylife
DNL facebook icon DNL linked in icon DNL twitter icon DNL youtube icon DNL rss icon
Moneylife Magazine

What's your say?

Will the cut in diesel price help cool off inflation & lower the govt's subsidy bill?
Yes
No
Can't Say
 
Enter Code : secure code
    change code
VOTE

What you said

Which party would get majority in Maharashtra Assembly Election?

Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls

Join Over 100,000 Awesome Readers

  1. News that Mainstream media does not always cover
  2. Views that are bold and unbiased
  3. Reports that focus on your interests as consumer, investor & citizen