Regulations
The Onerous Rules of Insider Trading
Every listed company and market intermediary must have a code of conduct to regulate, monitor and report trading by its employees and connected persons. Every other person who may handle unpublished price sensitive information are also required to frame a Code of Conduct
 
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) intends to cover any person in possession or reasonably expected to be in possession of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI) to formulate a Code of Conduct (CoC) to ensure that there is no price discovery of securities and trading before an UPSI is made generally available. The Compliance Officer as well as market intermediaries and other persons, who regularly participate in the affairs of the Company, have to ensure that the CoC is in place and is duly implemented.
 
The market regulator rolled out SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (Regulations, 2015) on 15 January 2015 which will come into force on 120th date of its publication in Official Gazette i.e. 15 May 2015. Regulations 2015 are based on the submission of report of High Level Committee set up under the Chairmanship of NK Sodhi, former Chief Justice of High Courts of Kerala and Karnataka and former Presiding Officer of the Securities Appellate Tribunal on 7 December 2013.
 
Insider trading means trading in securities of a company by its directors, employees or other insiders based on UPSI. Such dealings by insiders erode the investors' confidence in the integrity of the management and are unhealthy for the capital markets. Regulations 2015 inter-alia mandates every listed company and every market intermediary registered with SEBI to formulate a CoC [Regulation 9] to regulate, monitor and report trading by its employees and other connected persons. Additionally, every other person who is required to handle UPSI in the course of business operations is also required to frame a Code of Conduct.
 
Regulations 2015 also casts responsibility on the Board of listed companies to ensure timely, uniform and adequate disclosure of UPSI to the investor community by the Company to enable them to take informed investment decisions with regard to the Company's Securities. In view of the same, every company, whose securities are listed on a stock exchange, are required to formulate a Code of Practices and Procedures for Fair Disclosure (CoFD) [Regulation 8] for fair disclosure of events and occurrences that could impact price discovery in the market for its securities.
 

The present Circular:

 
SEBI vide CIR/ISD/01/2015 dated 11 May 2015 issued a circular (Circular) thereby specifying the formats in which the initial and continuous disclosures, as stipulated under Regulation 7 of Regulations, 2015 shall be made. In addition to requiring the Stock Exchanges to have systems in place for ensuring implementation of the Circular, the Circular requires the listed companies to confirm following to the Stock Exchanges:
 
a) The Company has formulated CoFD and published the same on its official website. Regulation 8 (2) of Regulations, 2015 mandates prompt intimation to the Stock Exchange of every amendment made in CoFD
 
b) The Company has formulated CoC.
 
c) The Company is dealing with only such market intermediary / every other person, who is required to handle UPSI, who have formulated a code of conduct as per the requirements of the Regulations.
 

Meaning of Market Intermediary and Other Person:

 
The definition of insider under Regulations 2015 includes a connected person, which inter alia includes a market intermediary, and any person who is possession or having access to UPSI.
 
As per Regulation 2(g) of SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008, “intermediary” means a person mentioned in clauses (b) and (ba) of sub-section (2) of section 11 and sub-section (1) and (1A) of section 12 of the Act and includes an asset management company in relation to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, a clearing member of a clearing corporation or clearing house and a trading member of a derivative segment  of a stock exchange but does not include foreign institutional investor, foreign venture capital investor, mutual fund, collective investment scheme and venture capital fund.
 
As per Section 11(2) (b) and 11(2)(ba) of the SEBI Act, 1992, intermediary includes stock brokers, sub-brokers, share transfer agents, bankers to an issue, trustees of trust deeds, registrars to an issue, merchant bankers, underwriters, portfolio managers, investment advisers, depositories, participants, custodians of securities, foreign institutional investors, credit rating agencies and such other intermediaries who may be associated with securities markets in any manner; 
 
However, there is no readymade definition of other persons, which the Company could refer to ascertain whether the requirement of the Circular is being met. They are to be identified by the Company considering the extent of dealings with them by the Company and their ability to access UPSI. These may include:
 
a) Employees of holding company (whether immediate or ultimate) who by virtue of his or her position approves key decision, functions of the Company, or has an access to UPSI relating to the Company;
b) Any strategic shareholder whose affirmative vote or sanction is pre-requisite for key actions of the Company;
c) Professionals, consultants, advocates, auditors whom the Company may consult prior to deciding the corporate action or occurrence or who play an active role in formulating systems or processes.
 

Suggestive Action points to comply with aforesaid requirement

 
The Compliance Officer shall ensure the following:
  1. Identify such Market Intermediary and every other person who is required to handle UPSI of the Company; 
  2. Send a mail to each of such identified person enclosing a suggested format of confirmation that such identified person has formulated CoC as per the Regulation 2015; 
  3. Allow such identified person time frame of 14 days from the date of mail  to confirm that they have formulated the CoC; 
  4. In case of no response, send a reminder mail after the expiry of 7 days from the date of original mail;
  5. If no confirmation is received after the expiry of 21 days from the date of original mail, the Company shall stop sharing UPSI with such identified person.
(Both Vinita Nair and Aman Nijhawan are practising Company Secretaries at Vinod Kothari & Co)

 

User

COMMENTS

manoharlalsharma

2 years ago

Rules r made for GENTLE MAN but not for CRINKLES the business to break the RULES.

R Balakrishnan

2 years ago

THe biggest insider traders are the promoters, merchant bankers, auditors and one or two key employees. Across companies. Most of them operate through perverse accounts. SEBI is perhaps the most pathetic 'regulator' India has ever had and UK SInha must rank amongst the worst in the world. Pathetic rent seekers who jump in to SEBI from government posts.

Ex-CBI chief's meetings with coal scam accused improper: SC

Declining the plea by non-governmnet organisation (NGO) Common Cause for a special investigation team (SIT) probe into the meetings that Sinha held with coal scam accused, the court also rejected Ranjit Sinha's plea for initiating proceedings against counsel Prashant Bhushan on the allegation of perjury

 

 In a setback to former Central Bureau Investigation(CBI) director Ranjit Sinha, the Supreme Court on Thursday termed his meetings with coal scam accused at his official residence as "inappropriate".
 
"It was inappropriate for Ranjit Sinha to have met the accused persons at his residence...," obseved the apex court bench headed by Justice Madan B. Lokur in the judgment on Thursday. 
 
Terming the meetings with coal scam accused as "inappropriate", the court referred the matter to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) for its opinion about a further probe in the matter. 
 
Declining the plea by non-governmnet organisation (NGO) Common Cause for a special investigation team (SIT) probe into the meetings that Sinha held with coal scam accused, the court also rejected Ranjit Sinha's plea for initiating proceedings against counsel Prashant Bhushan on the allegation of perjury.

User

SC stays AAP government's circular threatening defamation
The observations came while hearing an application by Amit Sibal, seeking vacation of the stay of the defamation proceedings against Kejriwal initiated by him
 
The Supreme Court on Thursday accused Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal of double standards by seeking stay of criminal defamation proceedings against him but issuing a circular permitting action against media groups for defamatory reporting.
 
"Don't you feel that there is dichotomy between you challenging section 499 and section 500 of the Indian Penal Code relating to defamation and the circular issued by you?" asked the apex court bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Prafulla C. Pant.
 
The observations came while hearing an application by Amit Sibal, seeking vacation of the stay of the defamation proceedings against Kejriwal initiated by him.
 
Kejriwal and other AAP leaders had alleged conflict of interest in the responsibilities of his father, Kapil Sibal, as the then telecom minister with Amit Sibal appearing for telecom operators in court. 
 
Not accepting the plea for the stay, Justice Dipak Misra said: "We are not vacating the stay but we are staying the circular." 
 
The Kejriwal government had on May 6 issued a circular which says that if any person was aggrieved by any publication of a news item, that person can refer it to the Delhi Home Department which in consultation with the Law Department can grant sanction for prosecution, leading to a defamation case.
 
The defamation suit is rooted in a May 15, 2013 press conference in which Kejriwal had alleged the conflict of interest saying that Amit Sibal had appeared in the Supreme Court for Vodafone while his father Kapil Sibal was the communications minister.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)