Economy & Nation Exclusive
The new FDI policy: Mix of relief and burden of additional compliances and limitations

After the Budget 2012-13 disappointments, foreign investors are expected to be relieved by some of the steps taken by the government to relax the FDI norms

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) on Tuesday issued the revised Consolidated Policy for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into India. After the Budget 2012-13 disappointments, foreign investors are expected to be relieved by some of the steps taken by the government to relax the FDI norms. Here are some of the key changes made in the new FDI policy.

1. Clarification on ‘leasing’ activity of NBFCs

The government has clarified that one of the 18 permitted activities of a non-banking finance company (NBFC), viz. leasing and finance, in which FDI is permitted under automatic route, pertains only to financial leases and not operating leases. This makes it clear that an NBFC classification will only be required if a company is undertaking financial leasing and not when it is undertaking operating leasing.

2. Pharmaceutical sector

A new sector limitation has been added under the new FDI policy for the pharmaceutical sector. Earlier, 100% FDI was permitted under the automatic route with no classification or differentiation based on greenfield or brownfield investment. Now, though the government has retained that 100% FDI in pharmaceutical sector is permissible, it has restricted investment under the automatic route only to the greenfield investments. Brownfield investment in the pharmaceutical sector is differentiated and is made permissible only pursuant to the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approval (i.e. the government route).

The amendment seems to have risen from the concern of the government that foreign entities, instead of investment in greenfield ventures were choosing to take over existing pharmaceutical companies in India. As was also reported by The Hindu in September 2011, between 2006 and 2010, six major Indian companies, including Matrix Lab by Mylan, Dabur Pharma by Fresenius Kabi, Ranbaxy Labs (which was India’s largest pharmaceutical company) by Daiichi Sankyo, Shanta Biotech (Sanofi Aventis), Orchid Chemicals (Hospira) and Piramal Healthcare (Abbott), have been taken over by MNCs and only 10% of FDI has gone to greenfield ventures. This had ignited concerns on India’s healthcare scenario, one of the most important being pricing of drugs. In view of the same, this seems to be a positive change as the approval route gives an opportunity to the government to review the investment on a case-by-case basis and impose restrictions and conditions, as may be appropriate.

3. Foreign Venture Capital Investors permitted to do secondary purchases

Recently, Foreign Venture Capital Investors (FVCIs) were permitted to undertake secondary purchases, which earlier was not permissible and FVCIs could only make primary purchases in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (FVCI) Regulations, 2000. The same has now been incorporated in the new FDI policy. This is a welcome change as there have been concerns with the FVCIs for not being able to make secondary purchases.

However, since SEBI’s Regulations on the Alternative Investment Funds (AIF) has not been released as of now, the new FDI policy states that FVCI can investment 100% of its corpus in Indian Venture Capital Undertaking (IVCU) and Venture Capital Funds (VCFs). However, the same is likely to change once the SEBI (VCF) Regulations, 1996 are repealed with the notification of the AIF Regulations.

4. Provision on Qualified Financial Investor (QFI) inserted

A new type of a foreign investor—not being a SEBI-registered FII and FVCI—has been inserted in the new FDI policy called a Qualified Financial Investors (QFI) who would meet SEBI requirements for making investment into India. Such QFIs are permitted to make primary as well as secondary investments of listed companies (i.e. invest in equity shares of listed Indian companies as well as in equity shares of Indian companies which are offered to public in India). QFls have also been permitted to acquire equity shares by way of right shares, bonus shares or equity shares, on account of stock split/consolidation or equity shares on account of amalgamation, demerger or such corporate actions. The individual and aggregate investment limit for QFIs is 5% and 10%, respectively, of the paid up capital of a company.

This opens additional doors for foreign investors for making investments into India. Currently, investment could be made under the FDI route, as a SEBI registered FII (or an FII sub-account) or as a SEBI registered FVCI. One positive point from a foreign investor perspective is that no separate registration is required for investment as a QFI. We have to wait and watch to see if SEBI would like to issue guidelines for operation of QFIs.

5. Relaxation in approvals for investment in commodity exchanges

While the sectoral limit for FDI in commodity exchanges remains unchanged, the government has removed the requirement to obtain FIPB approval for investments by FIIs and has only retained the requirement to obtain FIPB approval for the FDI component of the investment. As stated by the government, this change aligns the policy for FDI in commodity exchanges, with that of other infrastructure companies in the securities markets, such as stock exchanges, depositories and clearing corporations.

6. Single-brand retailing

Earlier, investment under the government route in single brand retailing was permissible to the extent of 51% only. Though the government has continued to monitor investments in the single brand retail sector by keeping it under the government route, it has enhanced the sector limit to 100%.

This surely is a step forward to further incentivise the foreign investment in the retail sector by continuing to act as a watchdog at the same time.

7. Investment by Foreign Institutional Investors

At present, FIIs may invest in the capital of an Indian company under the Portfolio Investment Scheme which limits the individual holding of an FII to 10% of the capital of the company and the aggregate limit for FII investment to 24% of the capital of the company. This aggregate limit of 24% can be increased to the sectoral cap/statutory ceiling, as applicable, by the Indian company concerned, through a resolution by its board of directors, followed by a special resolution to that effect.

With a view to make this increase in the sectoral limit more stringent, prior intimation to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is now required if the investment is made exceeding the aggregate limit of 25%, but within the specified sectoral caps. It is to be noted that while only intimation is required, approval has not been mandated. This does not additionally burden the FII with approval requirements but at the same time keeps the government informed of the FII investments.

8. Import of capital goods/machinery/equipment—conversion to equity

Presently, conversion to equity is permitted for import of capital goods/machinery/equipment including second-hand machinery. With a view to incentivizing machinery embodying state-of-the-art technology, compliant with international standards, in terms of being green, clean and energy efficient, second-hand machinery has now been excluded from the purview of this provision.

Overall, the changes brought in by the government are to balance the interest of the foreign investors to bring them in line with the economic goals of the government.

For the detailed FDI policy click here

(The authors can be contacted at [email protected] and [email protected])


Sony Mobile launches Xperia S at Rs32,549

The flagship smartphone Xperia S has a 4.3-inch scratch resistant TFT touchscreen, along with 12.1 mega pixel camera and 1.5GHz Qualcomm dual core processor

Sony Mobile Communications launched Xperia S handset in the Indian market at a price of Rs32,549, along with three other devices.

These are the first phones to be made available in the country since Sony Mobile Communications became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sony Corporation earlier this year post its split with Ericsson.

The flagship smartphone Xperia S has a 4.3-inch scratch resistant TFT touchscreen, along with 12.1 mega pixel camera and 1.5GHz Qualcomm dual core processor.

The pricing of the other devices -- Xperia P, Xperia U and Xperia Sola -- was however not disclosed.

Sony Xperia P has 8 MP camera, 2. 4-inch reality display, Mobile BRAVIA engine, 1 GHz Qualcomm dual core processor Android 2.3 Gingerbread (upgradeable to Android 4.0 ICS) and 16GB memory.

Sony Xperia U and Sony Xperia Sola have 5MP camera, 8GB memory and Android 2.3 Gingerbread (upgradeable to Android 4.0 ICS).

“Of the 150 million phones sold last year in India, about 10 million were smartphones. The category is growing at 70 per cent and we estimate that by 2015, one in two phones sold would be a smartphone. This is the potential that we see in the smartphone category in India,” Sony Mobile Communications India managing director P Balaji told reporters.

As part of the Sony group, the company is in a stronger position to bring connected entertainment experiences to consumers in India, he added.

“Bringing together the best of Sony's electronics, networked services and content, the Xperia smartphone is a cornerstone to enjoy entertainment in this connected world,” he said.

To introduce Xperia smartphones, Sony has launched one of its largest brand and marketing campaigns in India called ‘Made of Imagination’.

Balaji, however, declined to comment on the investments in the campaign or the number of devices to be launched this year.



Vinesh Balan

5 years ago

Is it worth 32K?

SIPs are not selling. A wake up call for Sebi?

Decline in mutual funds SIP registrations over the last 7 months is a wake up call for regulators and market intermediaries

Data from Computer Age Management Services (CAMS), a registrar of mutual funds, on trends covering the last 11 months time period between April 2011 and February 2012, showed a decline in interest in systematic investment plan (SIP). Ever since the regulator started experimenting since August 2009, as to how mutual funds should be sold, inflows into funds have been erratic, and on the whole, negative. But all this while the fund industry and distributors were all pointing to SIPs as the saviour. The hope was a that a new breed of investors are adopting SIPs which would in time grow to a sizeable corpus. However, this hope too is dashed. The number of new SIP accounts peaked at around 200,000 in August 2011 month when HDFC Bank ran a massive contest to enrol SIP and this has since steadily declined by more than 60% to 75,000 new accounts. The average ticket size stood at Rs2,613 which is up 1% from last year. This decline in SIP interest should be a wake up call for the regulator – assuming of course it wants to wake up.

Fund companies had spent large amount of money on advertising, thinking that SIP would be the key to getting more investors on board. Yet, despite this, the location-wise SIP registrations haven’t seen much of a difference, indicating that investors are uniformly not interested in signing up for new SIP schemes. While bullet investments (i.e. lumpsum) have been very erratic, showing no definite trend, mutual funds tout regular SIP as a safe mode of investing. In the absence of persuasive selling by both fund companies and distributors, customers are uninterested.

This decline in SIP is not a surprise to regular Moneylife readers. Our Position Paper from Moneylife Foundation on issues faced by retail investors pointed out the reasons why, the investor population has declined from 20 million in the 1990s to just over 8 million by 2009 (according to the 2009 Swaroop Committee Report)




5 years ago


Vaibhav Dhoka

5 years ago

SEBI is experiamenting with different regulation and is bound take to dooms day.

HG Sharma

5 years ago

While decline in SIP mode is a Market indicator,are there any loop holes in the system it self ?,what are Moneylife's commemts and advise to SIP contributors.


5 years ago

It all started when SEBI removed distributors commission. Slowly and slowly, all major retail distributors have shifted to new business. They can not survive by doing social service. Now, there is no one to educate retail investor. SEBI needs to re-think on their 3 years old decision.

Anil Agashe

5 years ago

My experience is that most potential investors are not clear about the concept. Individual investors when explained the concept do get convinced and do invest. The sellers of MF schemes are to be blamed. They do not want ot do the hard work. And we all know how banks sell financial products!

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)