New Delhi: Indian GSM telecom operators added a whopping 17.45 million new subscribers in November, taking the all-India GSM cellular subscriber base to 526.18 million, reports PTI quoting the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI).
The GSM subscriber base stood at 508.72 million at the end of October 2010.
Bharti Airtel, the largest GSM player, added 3.10 million new users in November, taking its total subscriber base to 149.39 million, data released by COAI showed.
It had 28.39% market share as of the end of November 2010, it added.
Rival Vodafone Essar, with a 23.03% market share, notched up 3.12 million new subscribers during the month, the highest amongst all the service providers in the country. Its subscriber base stood at 121.16 million at the end of the reporting month.
Aditya Birla group firm Idea Cellular added 2.80 million users during the month to take its total user base to 78.82 million, while Aircel added 1.21 million customers to take its subscriber base to 48.73 million.
In addition, state-run telecom firms Bharat Sanchar Nigam (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam (MTNL) added 3.01 million and 37,110 new users, respectively, taking their subscriber base to 78.19 million and 5.09 million, respectively.
Gainers: The festive season spruced up the sales numbers of DTH service providers, with nearly...
New Delhi: Having reluctantly agreed on the need for government approval to sell a majority stake in its India unit to Vedanta Resources, Cairn Energy CEO Bill Gammell today met top government officials, including oil secretary S Sundareshan, to seek support for the $9.6 billion deal, reports PTI.
“It was a courtesy call... I told him (Mr Gammell) that we will take a decision (on giving approval to the deal) on merit,” Mr Sundareshan said after the 20-minute meeting.
Edinburgh-based Mr Gammell, on his third trip to India since announcing a prospective deal to sell up to 51% stake in Cairn India on 16th August, is also believed to have met officials in the Prime Minister's Office and other key government departments.
“By February-end, we should be able to decide” whether Cairn can sell its majority stake in the Indian unit to a firm with no experience in the oil sector, he said, adding that the oil ministry has not yet formed any opinion on the transaction.
A Cairn spokesperson confirmed that Mr Gammell met with government officials, but refused to elaborate on the discussions.
Indian hydrocarbon laws make it mandatory for companies to have prior experience in order to secure a lease for exploration and production of oil and gas and the oil ministry will need to satisfy itself that Vedanta—a mining major with no oil sector experience—can satisfactorily operate Cairn’s oilfields.
The UK explorer initially denied there was any need for government approval on what it called a “corporate transaction”, involving the sale of shares and transfer of control of Cairn India to billionaire Anil Agarwal’s mining group.
In September, Cairn partially relented to the demand and applied for a formal nod to transfer control in seven non-producing exploration blocks, which Cairn India had won during the course of the New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP) rounds since 2000.
However, it left out its mainstay producing properties, like the landmark Barmer oilfields in Rajasthan, saying these were pre-NELP blocks and did not have provisions requiring prior government consent.
Nevertheless, the oil ministry, backed by a legal opinion from the law ministry and the nation’s second highest law officer, the Solicitor General of India (SGI), insisted on Cairn applying for permission for each block separately.
Subsequently, on 23rd November, Cairn yielded ground and made what Mr Sundareshan said was a “conditional” application.
“They have applied with some conditions... we are accepting it and processing it,” he said.
Though the British firm has reluctantly acquiesced to the need for prior government consent, it still maintains that partner Oil and Natural Gas Corporation’s (ONGC) nod is not required.
ONGC partners Cairn in all three of its producing properties in the country, besides five of the seven exploration blocks, by virtue of which it claims to have pre-emption rights over the Vedanta deal.
In a 23rd November letter, Cairn said: “We must make expressly clear that we are acceding to the government of India’s position (that the proposed transaction needs their consent), whilst we fully reserve our position regarding any rights available to our joint venture partner (ONGC).”
“Nothing in this letter may be construed as an acceptance of any claim to a requirement for consent or pre-emption rights of ONGC arising from the proposed transaction,” it said.
Cairn had previously applied for permission only with respect to its seven exploration acreages in India, while leaving out the three producing properties.
However, the oil ministry told Cairn that it would have to apply for separate approvals for all 10 assets before the government could consider granting consent to the deal.
On 23rd November, Cairn made three separate applications seeking clearance for transfer of its majority stake in the Barmer oilfields in Rajasthan, the eastern offshore Ravva oil and gas fields and the Cambay fields off the West Coast to Vedanta.
“Even after acceding to the government of India's position on this matter, our view and that of the senior counsel remains that the requirement for government consent does not trigger any rights of joint venture partners,” the applications stated.
Cairn Energy had on 16th August announced the sale of a 40% to 51% stake in its Indian unit to London-listed Vedanta, but was selective in approaching the government for approval of the deal.
The law ministry had given the opinion that the transaction was nothing but the transfer of control in all 10 properties held by Cairn India. As such, it would require government consent and trigger the pre-emption or right of first refusal (ROFR) of ONGC, as it partnered the UK-based company in all three producing properties and several exploration acreages.
Cairn, however, continues to insist that the requirement for government consent on the deal does not trigger ONGC's pre-emption rights.