Citizens' Issues
Targeting Dr KC Chakrabarty

We suddenly have a premature exit of a great deputy governor who favoured competition among banks, was against banks selling third-party products and was pro-consumer

On 25th April, one of the most forthright and honest deputy governors (DG) of the RBI will retire—three months before his term ends. It is befitting that Dr KC Chakrabarty, who got the post and an extension without the customary lobbying, has chosen to quit before his term ends.

Unlike many colleagues and predecessors, he is not hanging on in the hope of another extension or a post-retirement sinecure. Dr Chakrabarty’s forthrightness has always disconcerted the denizens of Mint Street; but what made them really squirm is that he is usually right.

In August 2010, the then governor, Dr D Subbarao stripped Dr Chakrabarty of key portfolios following a deliberate set up. A vitriolic media report was used to drum up frenzy over his alleged comment that interest rates ought to have been hiked more aggressively to control inflation, claiming that it had rocked the bond market. Nobody has ever apologised to Dr Chakrabarty for the humiliation, although he has been proven spectacularly correct.

After holding off interest rates then, RBI was forced to hike interest rates so aggressively, that it caused a huge rift between the finance ministry and RBI governor Dr Subbarao, who had come to RBI as a blue-eyed boy of the government.

Although most of his portfolios were restored in a subsequent reshuffle, RBI has remained a faction-ridden and non-transparent organisation, which hampers its ability to frame policy transparently and quickly. Consequently, many decisions that would benefit ordinary people and depositors take forever.

Dr Chakrabarty often said that it took him several years to have some obvious pro-customer decisions implemented. One of these was to bar the pre-payment penalty that banks impose on home loan borrowers, to prevent them from switching to other borrowers. Since banks discriminated against existing borrowers by offering lower interest to new customers, the scrapping of foreclosure charges levelled the playing field for customers. He also stopped banks lending below their base rate and, more recently, from fooling customers with fake zero-interest loan offers during festivals.

Dr Chakrabarty has also been most vocal about mis-selling of third-party financial products by banks but was unable to stop it during his tenure. However, to Dr Chakrabarty goes the credit for ensuring one of the biggest ever payments by a foreign bank to actor-singer Suchitra Krishnamoorthi in a case of mis-selling. Despite resistance at various levels in the central bank, inaction by the insurance regulator and part-action by the capital market regulator, it is to his credit that Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) was forced to make a settlement.

User

COMMENTS

Dayananda Kamath k

3 years ago

why action was not initated aainst bankers and chartred accountants who gave certificate regarding tds on royalty and facilitated remittence royalty by nokia. why rbi has not taken steps to see whether banks have proper proceedures and guielines after moving from fera to fema. today there is no controll on foriegn exchange fema now stands for foriegn exchange mismanagement act.with active support of rbi.
rbi has left verification and follow up of bills of entry of less than usd one lakh to bankers. but none of the banks have developed infrastructure for monitoring the same nor rbi is bothered. nor there is mechanism to follow up export advance received. whether export has taken place. all these matters have been brought to the notice of rbi. but no action.just like govt squandering borrowed money. rbi also is squandering borrwed forign exchange.

Dayananda Kamath k

3 years ago

to day rbi is also functioning as a fiefdom and not a regulator. why action was not initiated against banks( there are 89 bank branches as per rti reply) which allowed third party import of gold for almost 5 years in violation of fema, banking laws and import export policy. rbi just isued a circular after 5 years that it is not in order. collected data but did not initiate action. nor reported it to enforcement directorate for action. and even did not intervene when one of the bank started harrassing the auditor who reported this transaction 3years before the circular. even after bring it to the notice of rbi.

vipan mahajan

3 years ago

I fully agree with the comments of Mr. Behera.
His penchent for playing to the gallery, self rightousness and rigidity to the extreme was never a virtue for a person at such a position.

Vikas

3 years ago

The Business Standard article published on April 4 about the extensive recovery of NPAs and UBI's likely turnaround in March quarter is interesting to read.........Someone in the bank has definitely saved a PSU Bank!! Would love to know who?

SUNIL KUMAR HEMNANI

3 years ago

Honesty is the most difficult policy in life & business.The Dy RBI Govenor leaving early must have a reason ,wonder what it could be ? Surely he should have stayed the remainder period and done good for the public at large

Sam Koshy

3 years ago

Banks should not be allowed to sell third party products. If they do, the customers hard earned money will be lost. Dealing with finance need continuous follow up. Every person's financial plan varies from other. If different employees are coming frequently for personal Financial portfolio management, then it's assured that the customer's hard earned money is left for playing with someone who has nothing to do with investments & planning.

REPLY

rajivahuja

In Reply to Sam Koshy 3 years ago

I agree with Sam Koshy's observation that bank should not be allowed to sell third party products.

Prashant Bansal

3 years ago

I wish he joins AAP party where he can take his struggle much ahead.

Khaja Mohiuddin

3 years ago

India is lacking encouragement to honest people thus depriving the improvement, controlling the corruption, lessening the political influence etc. A strong Government assisted by intellectuals to foresee the necessity of growth and development etc.

Ramesh Poapt

3 years ago

Superb!!!

rajivahuja

3 years ago

I bet there was a powerful lobby wanting to dislodge him. Leading banks ,big names against him.

Khaja Mohiuddin

3 years ago

We suddenly have a premature exit of a great deputy governor who favoured competition among banks, was against banks selling third-party products and was pro-consumer. On 25th April, one of the most forthright and honest deputy governors (DG) of the RBI will retire—three months before his term ends. It is befitting that Dr KC Chakrabarty, who got the post and an extension without the customary lobbying, has chosen to quit before his term ends.

Customer service within the law should be encouraged. The Banks should not sell third-party products (insurance) thus diverting from their regularly banking service more particularly credit management, now stands to lacks of crores of rupees as NPA, who is responsible? India needs genuine laws and policies and the organisations given the task to perform within their limits. Banks going in for insurance and selling other products is diverting attention, the employees given target will focus on this allied activity forgetting his main job/role.

REPLY

rajivahuja

In Reply to Khaja Mohiuddin 3 years ago

I whole heartly agree with your observations. But in this society there no place for a man favouring policies which are in interest of common man like me & you.Big names are involved in this .

SuchindranathAiyerS

3 years ago

Simply not more Khangress than the Khangress?

Yerram Raju Behara

3 years ago

You seem to be presumptuous in dissociating lobbying for his key post. Second, while he is blunt and forthright in several observations, what he could have done from being Dy. Governor, he chose the impetuous path of announcing on public platforms platitudes. His vocal assertions of financial inclusion have derided the primary cooperatives and nearly buried them. He could have ushered in reforms in PACS, DCCBs and SCBs as a PACK and helped institutional building at grassroots instead of pitching his fork on new institution of BCs over which the principals - commercial banks are not comfortable. It is of course our good culture to say goodie goodies when people leave their positions and I commend your article on that count and not on other grounds. Impetuosity did not result in impatience for seeing the expected results.

Subrata Roy’s Massive Rs10,000-crore Bail

By asking employees to contribute to his bail, Roy still seems to be in his own world, unable to comprehend the reality around him

Since Subrata Roy likes big numbers, it seems fitting that the Supreme Court, on 26th March, set an extraordinary figure of Rs10,000 crore (Rs5,000 crore to be deposited  upfront and Rs5,000 crore in bank guarantees) as a condition for his release, but agreed to defreeze bank accounts. The flamboyant head of the Sahara pariwar had, by then, spent 22 days in custody for failing to come up with a plan to deposit Rs20,000 crore as has been ordered by the apex court in its landmark judgement of August 2012. The bail terms were significantly more onerous than Sahara’s proposal to pay Rs2,500 crore immediately and the balance in three instalments by 2015.

Meanwhile, Sahara’s bizarre defiance continued unabated. On the eve of the SC hearing, its PR team put out a statement by its counsel, Keshav Mohan, making another set of allegations against the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI), which it has previously called a ‘sarkari gunda’.

This time, Mr Mohan accused SEBI of trying to siphon off the Rs5,120 crore it had deposited with the regulator, under the guise of carrying out court orders. It also charged SEBI with ‘malafide intent’ and ‘sinister’ motives in making false claims about its inability to trace Sahara investors while trying to ‘usurp’ investors’ money.

The case certainly sets an unsavoury precedent about the kind of allegations that accused entities can make against a regulatory body. The reaction of the courts as well as SEBI is being watched intently by corporate India as well as thousands of ponzi schemes that proliferate around the country.

User

COMMENTS

rihanahmad

3 years ago

Keep up the good work . India would indeed become a banana republic if the likes of Sahara are not booked for flouting the law . The whole world is watching ..how this money laundering entity is calling everyone bad names and taking out full page ads . I wonder why the Serious Frauds Investigation is not being initiated , if there is a smell of fake depositors , inter company transfer of money , over valuation of properties , fake ownerships of land , etc .

Manoj Mehra

3 years ago

I don't understand why Supreme Court take action against those who didn't done any crime. Sahara India Pariwar is one who have a clean chit. Supreme Court just trying to defame Sahara .

REPLY

rihanahmad

In Reply to Manoj Mehra 3 years ago

The SC is 100% right . SEBI has done a damn good job of booking this group and its myriad ponzi schemes which have targeted the poor rural investors . Everything that Sahara has done seems to be illegal and designed to inflate profits and make tall promises . It is a money laundering entity par excellence .

Manoj Mehra

3 years ago

why don't SC and Sebi take such type of action against corrupted politician who did huge amount of money laundering or scandal.Even the charges against subrata roy is not clear.

suchita

3 years ago

Sahara Shree is Patriotic and biggest philanthropist, above all he is thorough gentleman with a great heart. His affectionate and caring nature for others has made him God Father. His trouble is our trouble and justice should come to him with due consideration of what he contributed to people of India.

RAJESH PATEL

3 years ago

Nobody is above the Law? keep up the good work Moneylife

pranave

3 years ago

Justice cannot be denied to a true and kind individual #subrataroy...

viv

3 years ago

It is the unprofessional attitude of some of the officials of SEBI which is forcing such unfortunate remark against the entire SEBI. The observations of "fictitious investors" without any investigation / enquiry is enough for justifying their attitude. The world largest bail amount for liberty from detention without any charges proves the motives behind the entire case instead of a proposal wherein the accountable of both the parties i.e. SEBI & Sahara are clearly defined. It is very surprising why SEBI is spending money of its legal team which is definitely not required for fighting the case in current scenario.

REPLY

Sahil

In Reply to viv 3 years ago

Seems like Moneylife has made it a habit to post each an every news against Sahara, that too by taking topics out of context. Journalism cant get anymore biased than this.

rajivahuja

In Reply to Sahil 3 years ago

Wake up !

Aadhaar turns Nir-aadhaar

Finally, real truth about lack of data privacy is exposed

On 24th March, in one fell swoop, the Supreme Court of India (SC) defanged the Congress-led government’s most expensive and most controversial Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) programme. The government was asked to withdraw all orders making the Aadhaar number mandatory and told that UIDAI cannot share Aadhaar details with any agency without a person’s concurrence.

Strangely, the deathblow came from UIDAI’s own petition. UIDAI had appealed against a lower court’s order asking it to share biometric data with the police for a criminal investigation. UIDAI did not want to share data or allow its competence or capability to be tested, as ordered by the high court. It was then that it admitted that its technology was not foolproof as touted and the 0.057% error rate could lead to lakhs of false identification possibilities in criminal cases, if applied to 57 crore Indians whose biometrics (fingerprints and iris scan) are captured by UIDAI.

The UIDAI has always maintained that Aadhaar was not mandatory and that the data could not be shared without a person’s consent. However, in the absence of a clear statute and non-transparent functioning, privacy activists had filed petitions raising several key concerns about UIDAI’s backdoor strategy of making Aadhaar mandatory for payment of salaries to government employees, LPG subsidies, birth and death registrations, admissions to schools and colleges, etc. Nandan Nilekani, a founder of Infosys and the high-profile technocrat behind this programme, personally lobbied with Reserve Bank of India (RBI), individual banks and the capital market regulator to try and make it mandatory even for those with multiple identities.

Ironically, the massive spending on Aadhaar was sanctioned on the grounds that it would provide identity to millions of poor and disenfranchised Indians and allow them to get the benefits of government schemes and subsidies. In making these claims, Aadhaar hid many crucial facts.

These were: biometrics are not fool proof; finger prints change, have to be revalidated every few years and can be cloned easily; and the sub-contracted data collection process was flawed. People have multiple Aadhaar numbers and Aadhaar numbers have been issued to chairs and tables and, as a sting operation confirmed, Aadhaar was easily issued to foreigners for a price and a letter from a politician.

On 26th March, CJ Karira, an activist, won an appeal against the UIDAI’s reluctance to respond to Right to Information (RTI) queries and obtained answers to some crucial questions. First, that oil companies are not using Aadhaar to ‘authenticate’ the identity, but only to ‘match’ the number for themselves. There is no way to delete biometric data if a person wants to ‘opt’ out of Aadhaar—there is no exit. The most stunning revelation was that UIDAI does not maintain any record of who the Aadhaar data is shared with or when.

All this only exposes the dubious role played by the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government on a project that admits to have spent Rs4,000 crore already to enrol 57 crore Indians and has been sanctioned a huge budget for further spending without a parliamentary nod.
 

User

COMMENTS

Narayanaswami Natarajan

3 years ago

My rejoinder to Mr. Sandeep.
Nilakeni's intentions were probably noble. Poor fellow got into a wrong company with vested interests and lent his name to the games it played. It is non- achievement because the method adopted was opaque and illegal and the product is suspect. The huge expenditure had no parliamentary sanction. Coercion was used to force it down the throats of innocent participants. It had no parliamentary nod. A smart guy like NN must certainly have understood this issue early in the game. If he still cooperated and colluded one is forced to infer that ambition came before national interest. His candidate as a member of congress party proves the point. He had at least one more honorable option to become an MP. Money Life is only a messenger. No point in shooting it. Let Nilakeni clarify on all the points.

REPLY

Sandeep

In Reply to Narayanaswami Natarajan 3 years ago

Hi Narayanan

spending 3800 crore on Aadhaar/NPR no. is nothing as compared to benefit it'll give to coming generations.

Aadhaar has helped to cut down leakage of 1 billion USD just in LPG subsidies only in last year, so Aadhaar has already paid off it's cost. Now it's just a cash cow only for Indian exchequer, any sensible next finance minister would love(provided it's majority goverment) to make it mandatory as soon as entire India is covered by end of 2015 to cut down subsidy bill/fiscal deficit/stop leakage/eliminate ghost beneficiary.

India spends around 300000 crore every year in subsidies along and we all know 10-40% is diversion, leakage, never reaches the end beneficiary. Aadhaar/NPR no. has the potential to save that 40 % or direct to right beneficiary so government will be saving. Even if it saves 10%, still it's 5 billion USD every year!!!

I am no one to comment about why NN choose this party or that to be MP, but I also, like you; thought about it why he would do that, then just had a thought may be he would be then only one(if elected) in parliament who can explain in Loksabha what's aadhaar/NPR no. as a concept and defend this as an idea to help coming generations otherwise you also know what kind of MPs we send to loksabha.

Aaadhaar was started in 2009 with an Executive order(legal by costitution)and UIDAI bill 2010 was sent to standing committee headed by Yashwant Sinha, didn't let it go to next step and same guy recently telling at TV that NPR is good but Aadhaar is bad, just because NPR was concept of BJP in Vajpayee goverment and Aadhaar is Congress game changer. if you call Aadhaar illegal then take it as NPR no. which is legal as per Indian constitution




MDT

In Reply to Sandeep 3 years ago

Sandeep,
Thanks for your comments.
Philanthropy without productivity, welfare without wealth and charity without capital will guarantee the bankruptcy of any nation.
http://www.moneylife.in/article/food-sec...

Talking about the ordinance, this is a clear constitutional impropriety. The power to promulgate ordinances is vested with the President and Governors under Articles 123 and 213 of the Constitution and is based on similar powers that the Governor-General of India and the Governors of provinces had before independence. In a heated debate on 23 May 1949, several members of the Constituent Assembly expressed fears of a misuse of this power. Dr BR Abukir informed the members that this extraordinary power was necessary because the “framework for passing law in the ordinary process does not exist”. In the end, the members accepted that this extraordinary power was a necessary evil to be used in extraordinary situations and not perverted to serve political ends. As has happened several times in the past, our politicians have done exactly what the founding fathers did not expect them to do.

In the case of ordinance, it requires to be passed as an Act by the Parliament within six months of its promulgation to be deemed legal.

Coming back to your 'achievement' of LPG subsidy transfere.... Several people who have linked their Aadhaar with LPG distribution are either not receiving subsidy on time or not receiving the SMS. On the other hand, some people are receiving multiple SMS with different customer IDs about LPG refill and subsidy not related with them.
http://www.moneylife.in/article/aadhaar-...

Ram Das

3 years ago

Anti-Aadhaar ranting is at least entertaining. Even when UIDAI is vindicated by the supreme court, new spin of moneylife shows how UIDAI was defanged.
Facts
1. All UIDAI documents including proposed parliament bill insisted on treating resident's biometric as private and could not be shared without resident's consent.
2. UIDAI appealed to court to insist on this resident's privacy.
3. No documents of UIDAI has ever said that Aadhaar is compulsory. It always has said that Aadhaar is optional.

State agencies and other central government agencies administrating benefit programs insisted on Aadhaar. This is wrong and I am glad the supreme court upheld it.

REPLY

MDT

In Reply to Ram Das 3 years ago

Dear Ram Das,
Thanks for your comment.
n a strange case of conflict of interests, Nandan Nilekani, the IT czar, is either heading or part of a committee or group that is turning the 'voluntary' UID number or Aadhaar of residents as mandatory for citizens to access several services and benefits from the government!
http://www.moneylife.in/article/nandan-n...

MG Warrier

3 years ago

This is in response to Sandeep’s comment that “…seems like moneylife team has no topic left to cover other than criticizing Aadhaar all the time…”. The further observations Sandeep has made on April 5 justifies the criticism AADHAAR is encountering in the media. After all, media gives voice to the common man’s concerns.

REPLY

Sandeep

In Reply to MG Warrier 3 years ago

Sir, no where I mentioned that Aadhaar criticism is justified, rather you should appreciate that UPA has only done this one good thing in last 10 year of ghotala tenure!!

MG Warrier

In Reply to Sandeep 3 years ago

I said "The further observations Sandeep has made on April 5 justifies the criticism AADHAAR is encountering in the media. After all, media gives voice to the common man’s concerns." There are enough ifs and buts and uncertainties about AADHAAR in your observations recorded here. They justify the criticism AADHAAR is attracting!

Narayanaswami Natarajan

3 years ago

It is now Nandan nilakeni without his Aadhaar!On the back of this non-achievement he has also joined the corrupt congress bandwagon to seek an MP's job from Bangalore. I hope the enlightened electorate of his constituency will see through the game of this wannabe PM!
N. Natarajan

REPLY

Sandeep

In Reply to Narayanaswami Natarajan 3 years ago

he spearheaded this project and gave ID to 60 crore residents of India and UID will be completing another 33 crore by early next year and in your terms still it is non- achievement???

Sandeep

3 years ago

seems like moneylife team has no topic left to cover other than criticizing Aadhaar all the time. they might forget food but even in dreams they think about how we can manipulate any news to defame aadhaar but fact of the matter is Aadhaar aka NPR no. is there to stay forever and only ID that is covering more than 85 crore(61 UID +24 by NPR) people residing in India.

There is no other single ID that can match it and has no duplicates with online authentication.

So Moneylife team rather than criticizing UID as a concept, start thinking how you can make it better.. that's called constructive journalism...contributing to society

REPLY

MDT

In Reply to Sandeep 3 years ago

Sandeep,
Thanks for your comment.
You need to read more in Moneylife to get to know the truth.
Here is the list of article that are most read at present by readers and Aadhaar related article is the last one on it!


1. The Real Story of how HSBC Was Made To Pay
2. Football and cricket most susceptible to money laundering
3. IDFC, Bandhan Financial get RBI nod for banking licence
4. Safe & Higher Returns: Look beyond Bank FDs
5. Aadhaar turns Nir-aadhaar

Talking about constructive journalism... Moneylife has been sending several question to Mr Nilekani and other top executives of UIDAI. But they dont believe in constructive, free flow of information. But may be you can aks them to be more open and share their opaqueness while providing answers. This experience, unfortunately is not limitd with only Moneylife. Several activist, who used the RTI route, were also denied information from the "open, constructive" UIDAI on its Aadhaar. Read http://www.moneylife.in/article/aadhaar-... and http://www.moneylife.in/article/uidais-c...

Sandeep

In Reply to MDT 3 years ago

I remember one saying of my ex boss, very experience fellow, don't just complain about anything wrong or not being done in a right manner unless you have found/can suggest a better way otherwise you're just magnifying the issue at hand.

same goes here at moneylife about Aadhaar, in last 2-3 year since I have started following UID/NPR as a concept, have never seen a positive thing about Aadhaar by ML or a better alternative solution to address the ghost/duplicate/cut down middlemen beneficiary in the government system.

just criticizing without giving feedback specifying areas of improvement doesn't make much of a sense.

by the way I did send a feedback about modifying the LPG subsidy the same way as PDS solution by UIDAI(to be rolled out) where consumer will have option to go to any Fair price shop to get ration and Depot holder will have to compete by providing better service and on time.

for some of activists, UID has all the process docs at website

http://uidai.gov.in/library/references.h...

these process docs are worth reviewing and come out with better solution for aam aadmi

MG Warrier

In Reply to Sandeep 3 years ago

This response from me is not on behalf of MDT. Since the initial days of UID or 'Nilekani' experiment I too have been following the identity story. I had felt that the project was on the wrong track. Several comments were recorded and many letters to the editor were published calling for a review. As regards AAdhaar-linked benefit transfer, an article was also posted at moneylife.in If you are not able to find the right path, that does not mean that knowingly you should proceed on th wrong path which may be taking you in the opposite direction 'at your cost'

Udit C

3 years ago

What do the big guns care? They have made name, fame and given BIG contracts!

MM & Co can scuttle their mothers and fathers if they find their purpose spent.

MG Warrier

3 years ago

Copied below is my response to a newspaper report on AADHAAR:

December 23, 2011

Review Aadhaar

“Aadhaar or Niraadhaar? That’s the question!”(Business Line, December 23) sums up the present predicament of UID project and the not so envious situation in which Mr. Nanden Nilekani is placed. Nilekani doesn’t lose much, because he gains experience in the learning process which will take him to greater heights. Government has no prestige issue on such matters, because this sort of meddling, cost and time overruns and huge losses are part of any game government plays, at least in the recent past in India. 70 per cent of the 120 crore people for whose benefit the project was allegedly conceived, are also not bothered about the present and future of this wonderful exercise as they are literally unaware of the goings on, because they are out of reach for the media. Then, why B S Raghavan is getting over-worked about the success or failure of this Aadhaar? He represents the voice of the taxpayer whose hard-earned money is being wasted and at whose doors finally the buck will stop.
UID, for various reasons including inadequate funding, non-availability of in-house expertise and resultant dependence on external agencies including banks and government departments is bound to take much more time than originally envisaged, even to cover the already ‘identified’ citizens. If government is convinced about the utility of UID, the project should be allowed to merge with the Census of India and access the infrastructure and methodology in use by that organization for decades and fast-track the process.
M G Warrier, Thiruvananthapuram

REPLY

Sandeep

In Reply to MG Warrier 3 years ago

answer to your merging of UID and Census of India i.e. NPR card. .....at back end UID and NPR both share same no.generation mechanism.

To avoid duplication and double work, UID was allowed to enroll 60 Crore and NPR was allowed to enroll 65 crore. UID has completed the target of 60 crore and NPR has enrolled only 24 crore so far so UID was allowed to another 33 crore in UP, Bihar, chattisgarh and uttrakhand by early next year. so by end of 2015 almost everyone residing in India (doesn't matter nationality)will have Aadhaar no. generated and NPR will keep issuing Smart ID if you're a citizen of India.

Bottom line if you're resident in India, you have Aadhaar only and if you are citizen of india then you'll have smart ID with aadhaar no. on it.


MG Warrier

In Reply to Sandeep 3 years ago

Sandeep
Please clarify whether UID(Adhaar) and NPR are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. In which case, those who have AADHAAR will not have NPR number and vice versa.

Sandeep

In Reply to MG Warrier 3 years ago

NPR and Aadhaar are mutually exclusive only in a sense that NPR has information about your declared nationality(of course you have to have supporting document to justify your claim)along with some more parameter for statistical purpose. Thats why all border area where there is possible influx of people from bordering countries like bangladesh(west bengal), Srilanka(tamil nadu), pak (J&K) being covered under NPR to keep check on outsiders.

just a correction what I said above, people having aadhaar card may get the Smart ID as well but that will have Nationality information stored on a chip. But still aadhaar is not a proof of your declared nationality but NPR is.



follow FAQ about NPR
http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-Commo...

aadhaar is just a no. being given on a simple card. you can print it online anytime but it'll speedify the complete enrollment process because NPR may take another 5-10 year to provide smart card at the speed it's going.

Only purpose Aadhaar is serving is to certify the uniqueness of individual by matching your biometrics, iris and photo alongwith your demographics. It's eliminating ghost, duplicates and middleperson from the government system and that's people who has been abusing the system has been trying hard to anyhow derail this aadhaar card enrollment.

For common man in India doesn't matter whether they get the 12 digit UID no. from Aadhaar or NPR...

Abhijit Gosavi

3 years ago

These machine vision algorithms use a finite (a small) number of points (which form the so-called "profile" within the computer's database) to represent data from millions of points (actually infinitely many points) on our fingers. Naturally, they are very imperfect. Further, as pointed out, fingerprints change with time. Mr. Nilekani, an electrical engineer and a programmer, must know these serious flaws exist in these algorithms. But like everything else, this scam also can be traced to money; in this case, about Rs. 4,000 crores!

REPLY

Ram Das

In Reply to Abhijit Gosavi 3 years ago

Mr. Gosavi is kindly requested to read accuracy report of UIDAI (http://uidai.gov.in/images/FrontPageUpda.... Besides use of all ten fingers, use of iris (multi-modal) biometrics provides required accuracy. You can understand math behind multi-modal by reading numerous papers published by NIST, Prof. Anil Jain or other well renowned biometrics scientists.

Please do understand full science and engineering behind biometrics before accepting hearsay claims.

Other countries such as Indonesia have already shown the accuracy they can get using nearly identical scheme.

KARTAR SAINANI

3 years ago

Rs770 crores was not enough for NN that he had to start such a dubious & traitorous scheme whch gave away the details of our citizens to CIA connected companies.His Rs770 crores should be confiscated to make up the loss of Rs4000 crores loss to the exchequer.

Bhaskar Raut

3 years ago

'Aadhar' has no value, and the crores of rupees spent on providing 'aadhar'is a waste. It only helped the private agencies to siphon money from the government excenquer.

REPLY

ganapathy mani

In Reply to Bhaskar Raut 3 years ago

The P.M has to answer this.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)