Companies & Sectors
Supreme Court cancels 122 telecom licences issued after 2008

The apex court cancelled licences of 11 telcos, including 21 of Videocon, 22 Uninor, 9 Idea, 3 Tata Tele, 13 Swan, 21 Loop and asked TRAI to come up with guidelines to allocate newer licences

The Supreme Court on Thursday cancelled all licences given to 11 telecom companies issued after January 2008. The apex court has cancelled 122 licences, including 21 of Videocon, 22 of Uninor, 9 of Idea, 3 of Tata Tele, 13 of Swan, 21 of Loop, 6 of S-Tel and 2 of Allianz.

The ruling has come as a major blow to the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. The Supreme Court observed that 85 out of the 122 licences granted by the UPA government on or after 8 January 2008 were outside the eligibility criteria for allocation of the 2G spectrum. "The 122 licences for 2G spectrum were granted in arbitrary and unconstitutional manner," the Court said.

A two-judge bench comprising justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly allowed the impugned licenses to run for four months after which the cancellation order will become operative.The apex court asked the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to come up with fresh recommendation on granting of 2G licences. 

The SC imposed heavy costs of Rs5 crore on Etisalat DB Telecom Pvt Ltd (Swan Telecom Ltd), Unitech Wireless Group and Tata Teleservices Ltd, who were benefited by a "wholly arbitrary and unconstitutional" action of award of licenses to them and for off-loading their stakes for many thousand crores in the name of fresh infusion of equity or transfer of equity.

It ordered Loop Telecom Pvt Ltd, S-Tel, Allianz Infratech and Sistema Shyam Tele Services Ltd, who were also beneficiary of the decision, to pay a cost of Rs50 lakhs each.

Meanwhile, the Finance Ministry said it is working out the financial implication of the Supreme Court judgement to cancel 122 telecom licences on the banking sector. "We have to see the implication. Officers are working on the impact of judgement on the banks...we will soon have a clear picture," a senior finance ministry official told PTI.

Several lenders including the State Bank of India, ICICI Bank, Punjab National Bank and IDBI Bank have extended credit to the telecom companies whose licences have been cancelled. Country's largest lender SBI said the bank has fund based exposure of Rs1,100 crore in telecom companies affected by the apex court order.

In a release, Telenor, the holding company of Uninor, whose 22 licences are cancelled by the apex court, said, "Telenor has yet to review the ruling and will be able to comment further once we had a chance to review it".

The apex court also referred the matter on probing Home Minister P Chidambaram's role in the 2G scam to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Special Court. On Saturday Justice OP Saini of the Special Court is expected to deliver the verdict on whether Mr Chidambaram should be made a co-accused in the 2G scam.

In another important judgement, the Supreme Court refused to sanction a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to over-see the CBI inquiry in the 2G spectrum allocation scam. Instead, the apex court said, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) should monitor the investigation and the CBI should submit its status reports in sealed envelopes to the Commission.

Meanwhile, Central Vigilance Commissioner Pradeep Kumar has expressed satisfaction over the progress in 2G issue and said the Commission will give a prompt response after studying the Supreme Court judgement. "We will study that judgement. We will respect that judgement and CVC as you know has referred the matter to the CBI and we are glad that matter is progressing," Kumar told reporters in New Delhi.




5 years ago

The frenzied media made a huge song and cry about a private episode in Norway, when two children were separated from their parents. One may believe that the Norwegian government acted under due process of law. Yet, the Indian authorities did not accept this process.

A much larger stake is involved here for a Norwegian firm which has invested Rs 6,100 cr under due process of law. We are not competent to comment on the merits or demerits of the decision of the court. But, will the Indian government react in the same manner, if Norway becomes persistent and even importunate in its demands for fair play? Shouldn't the licenses signed and issued under sovereign authority of the Government have some sacrosanct value? Otherwise, what is the use of the FIPB, or other bodies that have approved such investments?

We Indians are too consumed by the myth of our own self perceived power of size of population. That is why we sound the drumbeats in a shrill manner regarding a private episode in Norway concerning just two Indians. But doesn't fair play demand reciprocity?

Private sector banks to handle government business – How about a level playing field?

The RBI has allowed other private sector banks to handle government business but a few more steps are required to ensure a level playing field for all players for healthy growth of banking in India

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has just issued a notification whereby private sector banks are now permitted to handle central and state government business on complying with certain formalities. This will be a step forward in removing the discrimination existing at present between the private and the public sector (nationalised) banks (PSBs).

In fact, three private sector banks, ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank and Axis Bank were treated as more equal than others and allowed to handle government business since long due to the clout they enjoyed with the powers that be and repeated requests from other private banks to treat them at par were not heeded to so far.

Now that RBI has loosened its strings by allowing all the private banks to handle government business, this will not only help these banks to improve their business, but more importantly, it will be of great help to the customers. Customers of these banks and the public at large will be able to do transactions with the nearest branch of any bank they are comfortable with and those who are able to offer better customer service, irrespective of the ownership of the bank concerned. It is not uncommon to see a huge crowd in some of the PSBs like State Bank of India (SBI) during the first week of every month, where customers have to wait for a hours together to get their pension while at the same time the private banks’ branches wore a deserted look for no fault of theirs.  

However, this notification issued by RBI, though not very clear, hopefully will include payment of pension to employees of the central and state governments and those of the defence forces, who now get their pensions only through the PSBs. It would be of great help to these pensioners, if both the governments start disbursing of pensions through any public or private bank according to the choice of the pensioner, thereby helping the retired employees, especially the senior citizens in their old age.

There are still a few more areas of discrimination against the private banks and the RBI should take steps to remove these anomalies and provide a level playing field for all the banks in the interest of encouraging competition and improved customer service.

At present, the Government of India (GoI) provides interest subvention of 2% and 3% on short term crop loans only to the PSBs, co-operative banks and regional rural banks, in respect of their lending to agriculture on certain terms and conditions, to encourage them to lend to the agriculturists at a subsidized rate of 7%. While this will help PSBs to attract farmers into their fold for increasing their lending to the priority sector, the same benefit is not available to private banks, which also have to meet priority sector lending targets or face penalty prescribed by the RBI.

If the subsidy is to encourage lending at a lower rate to the poor people, there is no rhyme or reason, why private banks are excluded from this scheme and the RBI is a silent spectator to this discrimination practiced by the central government.

Again, the central government has been periodically issuing instructions to public sector units or companies (PSUs) to bank and place their surplus funds with PSBs only, even when the PSUs may get better terms or interest from the private banks. This is not only against the interest of the PSUs but also in conflict with the good corporate governance expected to be practiced by all the companies in general and the PSUs in particular. RBI as the regulator of banking sector has the responsibility to ensure that all banks are treated fairly in the interest of orderly development of banking in India.

Let us hope that this will be beginning of an era of equality and fair play for all the banks and the steps initiated by RBI should be a forerunner for licenses to be issued for setting up new banks in the private sector.

(The author is a financial consultant and writes for Moneylife under the pen-name ‘Gurpur’)



Jagan Mohan Rao Ganti

5 years ago

When we talk about level playing field for Pvt.Banks, we are looking at one side only. The govt. banks are having major share of their branches in remote and hostile terrains, where all the so called new generation pvt.banks can never think off. Secondly, when coming to targeted lending through priority sector, the so called new generation banks will be no where near the public sector banks.
Also, private sector banks are aggressive missellers who push all their fancy products to clients. Lastly, Public Sector Banks are not having any say in proper deployment of existing staff. Parking of PSU funds in Govt.Banks is an indirect incentive to PSU banks for their disadvantageous position due to their compulsions. Hence,while allowing Pvt.Banks to have access to PSU funds, the RBI should really try to create a level playing field in all areas for all commercial banks irrespective of their category.

New Year brings smile to car-makers, sales rise in January

“The year seems to have started on a positive note; domestic sales are showing some buoyancy. But we will have to cautiously watch how this momentum picks up in the months ahead,” HMIL director marketing and sales Arvind Saxena said

New Delhi: Major car makers in the country, including Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai and Tata Motors, posted an increase in sales during January, indicating buoyancy in the auto market in the New Year after prolonged sluggishness, reports PTI.

The country’s largest car-maker Maruti Suzuki India (MSI) witnessed a turnaround in monthly sales after seven consecutive months of decline with a 2.42% rise in domestic sales to 88,377 units last month from 86,285 units in January last year.

Rival Hyundai Motor India (HMIL) said its sales grew by 11.85% in January to 33,900 units from 30,306 units in the same month last year. Tata Motors also reported a 14.75% increase in domestic passenger vehicles sales to 34,669 units in January from 30,212 units in the same month last year.

“The year seems to have started on a positive note; domestic sales are showing some buoyancy. But we will have to cautiously watch how this momentum picks up in the months ahead,” HMIL director marketing and sales Arvind Saxena said.

Striking a cautious note, MSI managing executive officer (marketing and sales) Mayank Pareek said: “The fundamental weakness in the market still remains. The problems of high interest rates and fuel prices persist and there is also a huge disparity in the demand for petrol and diesel vehicles.”

As per Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers data (SIAM), domestic passenger sales grew by 4.24% in 2011 to 19,46,373 units from 18,67,246 units in 2010.

Other companies, such as Toyota Kirloskar Motor (TKM) and Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M), also reported good growth during January this year.

M&M posted a 19.56% rise in domestic sales to 41,369 units during the month from 34,601 units in the year-ago period.

TKM reported an 89.34% increase in sales to 17,395 units in January, driven by robust demand for its latest ‘Etios’ and ‘Liva’ models.

“It’s been a good start to the year with a robust growth.

We are happy with the response to the Etios series, the new Innova and the new Fortuner,” TKM deputy managing director (marketing) Sandeep Singh said.

Ford India, on the other hand, reported a 2.99% decline in total sales to 10,789 units during January.

Similarly, General Motors India posted a 17.46% decline in sales to 8,241 units for January, as against 9,984 units in the same month last year.



We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)