Citizens' Issues
Supreme Court asks BCCI to probe IPL case

The SC also allowed Sundar Raman to continue as COO IPL7 that would begin on Wednesday

The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) should conduct a probe against N Srinivasan and 12 others in the betting and spot fixing scandal to maintain its institutional autonomy as the Court cannot “close its eyes” to the allegations made by the Justice Mukul Mudgal Committee.

The apex court also allowed Sundar Raman to continue as chief operating officer of the seventh edition of Indian Premier League (IPL) T20 cricket tournaments.

A bench headed by Justice AK Patnaik, however, expressed reservations over ordering a probe by a special investigation team (SIT) or Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), saying that the institutional autonomy of the board has to be maintained and a committee constituted by the BCCI to look into the issue would be preferred.

“Having come to know the nature of allegations, we cannot close our eyes,” the bench said, adding that it is concerned about the game of cricket in the country and not about individuals.

Referring to a sealed envelope report of the Justice Mudgal Committee, the bench said, “It (report) said all these allegations were brought to his (Srinivasan) notice but he did not take any action. That means he was aware about the allegations and did not take them seriously.”

In the meantime, the bench allowed Raman to continue to function as chief operating officer (COO) of IPL7, which is to begin on Wednesday in Abu Dhabi.

The bench allowed his continuation on the post after veteran cricketer Sunil Gavaskar, appointed as an interim president of BCCI by the apex court, wrote to it to take a decision on the fate of Raman.

The apex court had earlier asked Gavaskar to take a decision on whether to remove Raman as COO or not.

The court also made it clear that IPL 7 would go on, as scheduled, and it also agreed to hear the plea of the BCCI and Srinivasan for allowing them to get the tapes of audio recordings of interactions of the Mudgal Committee with Indian captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Srinivasan.


Small- and Mid-cap funds on Fire

Is it worth investing in these schemes now?

With the broad market indices hitting new...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
No records of Rs20,000 crore spent from MP LADS in public domain

Over Rs20,000 crore from the MP LADS were disbursed since a decade, but there are no records. The funds allotted for MPs to use for providing drinking water, public health, education, sanitation, sports and roads are either unused or misused

The Member of Parliament (MP) Local Area Development Scheme (LADS) funds, which were instituted in 1993 at Rs50 lakh per year have grown to Rs5 crore per year in 2011. However, the usage of MPLADS funds from all MPs of Lok Sabha as well as Rajya Sabha, remain in controversy, thanks to the opaqueness in their expenditure.

As per the Annual report for 2010-2011 by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, which disburses these funds, at least 45% to 60% of MPLADS funds in most of the states have been spent on roads. Looks like most of our Parliamentarians, believe that creating roads means development!

As per the guidelines of MP LAD funds, preference of works under this scheme is to be given to works relating to national priorities such as provision of drinking water, public health, education, sanitation, sports and roads. However, as per the Annual Report findings, in most of the States, only 1% to 7% money has been spent on public sanitation, drinking water, electricity, health and family welfare. Except for Odisha, Kerala, Punjab, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Uttarakhand and Tripura, which have spent between 20% to 50% money for education, other progressive states have not spent beyond 3%-7%. Lakshadweep has been an exception, spending 100% of the funds on education. Sports too is very low on the priority list of most states that have spent not more than 3% of the funds except for North-East states like Manipur and Mizoram who spent more than 20% of it.

The committee’s findings in the Annual Report also observe that in 13 states/ union territories (UTs), Rs1.30 crore was used for not admissible items like payment of honorarium/ wages/ travelling, expenses of staff, fuel for official vehicles and purchase of laptops. It also observed that no proper records were maintained; eight States executed 700 works costing Rs9.45 crore without formal recommendations of the MPs; 150 works worth to Rs2.44 crore were recommended by the representatives of the MPs. Nearly Rs15 crore were disbursed to private trusts/ societies beyond the permissible limit of Rs25 lakh per trust and 145 illegal trusts were given around Rs6 crore from the MP LAD funds. Works worth Rs20 crore for which the district collectorates had already released money during 2004-2009, are yet to commence.

Besides the Annual Report, the website is not abiding comprehensively by the Section 4 of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The website gives details of disbursed funds of MPs but not the detailed proposals, progress of works and completion of works that has been made mandatory. All citizens have the right to get information on the detailed plan, progress and implementation of the MP funds and this has to be mandatorily put up on the respective websites. However, this is not done. A plaque has to be permanently put at the work site with the name of the MP and that it is done from the MP LAD fund, but you hardly see such plaques.

As per the directives of the government, the following norms of transparency under the RTI Act must be followed by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation and all the district authorities which implement the works. They are:

As per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 and the rules framed there under, all citizens have the right to information on any aspect of the MPLAD Scheme including works recommended/ sanctioned/ executed under it, cost of works sanctioned, implementing agencies, quality of works completed, user agencies, etc. The district authorities are responsible for providing information to the public in the manner required under the RTI Act, 2005.

Under the guidelines, it has been stipulated that for all works executed under the scheme, a plaque (stone/ metal) carrying the inscription ‘Member of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme Works’ indicating the cost involved, the commencement, completion and inauguration date and name of the MP sponsoring the project, should be erected permanently.

The MPLADS guidelines stipulate that the list of all completed and ongoing works with MPLADS funds should be displayed at the District Authority Office and posted Background and Policy on the website for information of the general public.

As per the Guidelines, there is a stipulated time limit of 75 days for consideration of sanction for a recommended work, and of one year for the completion of sanctioned work. In case of rejection of a work recommended by an MP, District Authority is to intimate to the MP within a period of 45 days with reasons thereof.

For greater transparency, it has been directed:

District Authorities are to provide information on any aspect of MPLAD Scheme, such as works recommended by MPs, works sanctioned/ not sanctioned, cost of works sanctioned, implementing agencies and quality of work completed to the general public in the manner as required under the RTI Act, 2005, as the implementation of the scheme has been brought under the purview of the said Act.

There is a MPLADS website ( ) where information on release of funds, details of works completed and under execution are available. The District Authority is required to upload the work details on the website to make them available in the public domain.

In order to bring transparency and accountability at the ground level and to promote e-governance, software for monitoring MPLADS works was launched in November 2004. The software enables online monitoring of details of works and the analysis of this data is used to bring out various reports, once the data entry and uploading in respect of a constituency or a Rajya Sabha MP is completed.

 The modus operandi of these funds are as follows:

* The Members of Parliament-MPs have a recommendatory role under the MP LAD Scheme. They recommend their choice of works to the concerned District Authorities who implement these works by following the established procedures of the concerned State Government.

* The District Authority is empowered to examine the eligibility of works, sanction funds and select the Implementing agencies, prioritise works, supervise overall execution, and monitor the scheme at the ground level. The District Authorities get the works executed through the line departments, local self governments or other government agencies. In some cases, the District Authorities get the works executed through reputed non- government organizations (NGOs).

* Members from the Lok Sabha can recommend works in their respective constituencies. The elected members of the Rajya Sabha can recommend works anywhere in the state from which they are elected. Nominated Members of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha may select works for implementation anywhere in the country.

* There is no limit for works to be executed by government agencies. However, as per the background and policy, there is a ceiling of Rs25 lakh for works meant for the life time of each Trust/ Society. An MP can recommend funds only up to Rs50 lakh in a financial year from MPLADS funds for works to societies/ trusts.

* MPLADS works can be implemented in areas affected by natural calamities like, floods, cyclone, hailstorm, avalanche, cloud burst, pest attack, landslides, tornado, earthquake, drought, Tsunami, fire, chemical, biological and radiological hazards. MPs from the non-affected areas of the state can also recommend permissible works up to a maximum of Rs10 lakh per annum in the affected area(s) in that state.

* All recommended eligible works should be sanctioned within 75 days from the date of receipt of the recommendation, after completing all formalities. The District Authority shall, however, inform MPs regarding rejection, if any, within 45 days from the date of receipt of recommendations, with reasons thereof.”

* The time frame for completion of works should be stipulated to the implementing agency and should not normally exceed one year.


Office buildings, residential buildings, and other buildings relating to Central or State Governments, Departments, Agencies or Organisations.

Works belonging to commercial organisations, private institutions or co-operative institutions.

Repair and maintenance works of any type other than special repairs for restoration/ up-gradation of any durable asset.

Memorials or memorial buildings.

Acquisition of land or any compensation for land acquired.

Assets of individual benefit except those which are part of approved schemes.

Places for religious worship.

(Vinita Deshmukh is consulting editor of Moneylife, an RTI activist and convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book “To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte” with Vinita Kamte and is the author of “The Mighty Fall”.)



Babubhai Vaghela

3 years ago

Criminal Prosecution of erring MPs Desperate Need of Hour.

Dr Paresh Vaidya

3 years ago

Good study.
We have 3 tiers of representative Democracy: MP, MLA and Corporator / Panchayat Member. They have their respective functions well defined. But under the new buzz word of "development" all want to do the same thing; Build roads which people can identify them with !

All three levels have this fund in different names. In Navi Mumbai I saw all Bus Stands in a stretch duplicated - one built by Municipality and just next, the other by the MLA !! So unimaginative. May be his fund was getting closed.

Actually time has come to scrap this scheme at all levels.


Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to Dr Paresh Vaidya 3 years ago

rather prosecute and punish them for misusing the public funds for setting up bus stands side by side. send them to jail for 3 years and fine 10 times the money wated that would make these people function properly

Dayananda Kamath k

3 years ago

they have used the funds for donating to ngo of election commissioner earlier. rather he was appointed after funding his ngo. none bothered to question and recover the amount.

Nagesh Kini

3 years ago

Thanks Vinita for the enlightening article on the stark realities of the MPLAD.
The entire fraud needs a serious review. But the mulla and stakes involved no MP or MLA will ever touch it, they'll only insist on enhancing as they do regularly with their own salaries and perks.
These funds ought to placed in the hands of the 73rd and 74th Amendment institutions on which they may be given a limited say.
They ought to be taken out of the present bunch who are found to be either grossly abusing or not using it at all.
The two Congress MP now re-nominated to Mumbai SC proudly publicly boasts of 'exhausting' all his funds on public toilets and drawing on others' funds as well. But no visible signs of his spends. Only a RTI will disclose this!

Ratilal Shah

3 years ago

It will be interesting to know how much and where these funds have been utilised in the states not mentioned in this report.


3 years ago

One more missing drop from a missing bucket!

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)