Companies & Sectors
Sun Pharma receives warning letter from USFDA

In a statement Sun Pharma said it would respond to the warning letter with a detailed plan within the stipulated timeframe

 

Drug major Sun Pharmacuetical Industries Ltd on Saturday said it has received a warning letter from USFDA relating to its facility in Halol in Gujarat.
 
The letter was a result of the inspection done by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) at Halol plant in September 2014.
 
In a statement Sun Pharma said it would respond to the warning letter with a detailed plan within the stipulated timeframe.
 
"While our team is working hard to ensure that the commitments made to the USFDA in September 2014 are fully completed, we will continue to cooperate with the USFDA and undertake any additional steps necessary to ensure that the US agency is completely satisfied with our remediation of the Halol facility," Dilip Shanghvi, managing director, was quoted as saying in the statement.
 
Post the September 2014 inspection, the USFDA has withheld future product approvals from the Halol facility.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
 

User

Sonia, Rahul appear in court, granted bail

They appeared before Metropolitan Magistrate Loveleen in the Patiala House courts complex

 

Congress president Sonia Gandhi and party vice president Rahul Gandhi were granted bail in the National Herald case on Saturday by a trial court.
 
They appeared before Metropolitan Magistrate Loveleen in the Patiala House courts complex.
 
Kapil Sibal, who appeared on their behalf, told reporters that the court rejected petitioner Subramanian Swamy's plea to impose restrictions on their travel abroad.
 
The court fixed February 20, 2016 at 2 p.m. for the next hearing. 
 
Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul Gandhi left the court complex immediately thereafter.
 
On June 26 last year, the trial court issued summons to the Congress leaders on Swamy's complaint about "cheating" in the acquisition of Associated Journals Ltd., which published the National Herald newspaper, by Young India Ltd., "a firm in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi each own a 38 percent stake".
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.
 

User

COMMENTS

Nilesh KAMERKAR

12 months ago

The article nowhere mentions Gandhis as 'Accused'.

Did they visit the court for a 'Field Trip'?

Critics of Shailesh Gandhi silenced
As an RTI activist turned Central Information Commissioner (CIC), Shailesh Gandhi was often criticised, for some of his orders as CIC. A set of 10 orders upheld by the Supreme Court recently, serve to prove that he did his work without fear or favour 
 
The latest Supreme Court judgment, exploding on the face of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and all other banks, which have been rejecting RTI queries regularly, also bears testimony to the judiciousness of Shailesh Gandhi. The apex court order mentions 11 orders passed by the Central Information Commission, out of which 10 were decided by Mr Gandhi, the Right to Information (RTI) activist turned Central Information Commissioner (CIC). 
 
He, being an activist seemed to have had an adverse effect sometimes, as fellow activists expected that he should always decide in their favour. A sterling example is the appeal in a case related to the Mumbai airport by an activist against a rejection of his query by the Airports Authority of India (AAI). Mr Gandhi had turned down second appeal of the applicant who sought information from IDBI Bank, which had extended a loan of Rs4,000 crore to the Airports Authority. The RTI applicant had sought details on the loan, with copies of documents submitted, reason for the loan, copy of the MoU and whether 9% interest on the loan was justified. 
 
Mr Gandhi turned down the request, stating there was a ‘fiduciary’ relationship between the Bank and the borrower, and unless the public interest is clearly evident, this information falls under the exceptions provided under Section 8 of the RTI Act. He put the onus on the applicant to prove public interest; his order had been widely criticised by the RTI activist community. 
 
I am not going into the merits of the decision, but highlighting how activists were shocked that a member of their fraternity, now on the other side of the bench, could have given a pro-establishment decision. The expectations from Mr Gandhi as also journalist turned State Information Commissioner Vijay Kuvalekar were too high and often unreasonable. One has rarely seen bureaucrats turned information commissioners being similarly criticised for their decisions (people expect they are made that way and conditioned to be pro-establishment). Both Mr Gandhi and Mr Kuvalekar have given sterling orders but they came in for flak when their decisions were found unacceptable by activists.
 
To cite an example, there has always been a heated debate on whether co-operative banks come under the RTI or not. Mr Gandhi stood firm on his view that they did, despite lobbies trying ways and means to interpret it otherwise. In one of his decisions as CIC, a Baroda resident had sought information on procedure, rules and regulation of inspection being carried out in co-operative banks and, in particular, the inspection report copy of  the Makarpura Industrial Estate Co-Operative Bank Ltd.  Mr Gandhi, directed the CPIO, who refused to give information, to provide complete information on the inspection reports, thus laying to rest whether co-operative banks come under the RTI or not. It was a historic decision. The links of other bank related decisions have been mentioned in this Moneylife story
 
RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar, who has been closely observing the performance and public perception about the two information commissioners – Mr Gandhi and Mr Kuvalekar -who were not former bureaucrats but were highly regarded in public life and were selected as information commissioner. He believes that sometimes people scrutinized their work rather unfairly. He says, “We know how bureaucrats turned information commissioners have largely seen their role as an extension of their government jobs and rarely took strong decisions; the passion for RTI as a citizens’ movement has been missing. Society needs to understand the value of a person in public life becoming information commissioner and playing an invaluable role through decisions that empower citizens. Only such people can take the RTI forward in its true spirit.’’
 
Highlighting some decisions by Mr Gandhi and Mr Kuvalekar, Vijay Kumbhar says, “(Mr) Gandhi has given so many sterling decisions (quantity and quality) that they are fit to be included in the Guinness Book of Records. Mr Kuvalekar’s decision on ‘missing files’, ‘answer sheets’ and ‘private organisations with substantial government funds’ are historic.”
 
Mr Gandhi always felt strongly hurt about CIC decisions being stayed by the courts. In his blog, Mr Gandhi, who after serving as Central Information Commissioner, is back to being a simple RTI activist, had stated, “As Central Information Commissioners presiding over appeals on the Right to Information Act, my colleagues and I have the same conditions of service and salaries as Supreme Court judges. And yet, on several occasions, public authorities do not obey the orders we pass. When faced with action for non-compliance, they rush to the High Court and obtain a stay on our order. My question is simple. Long after the deadline for complying with our order has passed, should a person or organisation that has flouted our order get a stay from any Court? Shouldn’t there be some penalty for violating the orders we pass? If not, what value are our orders?” 
 
Today, none other than the Supreme Court has delivered justice to Mr Gandhi. In the order, the apex court stated, “…orders were based on elaborate consideration, gave valid reasons and did not ‘suffer from any error of law, irrationality or arbitrariness’ and therefore, ‘need no interference by this Court’.
 
Moneylife proudly felicitates him on Sunday.
 
 
 
(Vinita Deshmukh is consulting editor of Moneylife, and also convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book "To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte" with Vinita Kamte and is the author of "The Mighty Fall".)

User

COMMENTS

Mahesh Khanna

12 months ago

It is slap to all those who did not agree with decisions of Shailesh Gandhi. It will disturb the officials of RBI who had a protective attitude towards who have perpetrated wrong. Otherwise also RBI is an Non Transparent organization which does not reveal information about the allowances, foreign tour details of their executives, details of the official cars being misused by family members of the executives, friends and their relatives, it does not information on how much they spend on their litigations before courts, they do not have information how much they spent on digitalization of their records etc etc along list.
It is definitely a landmark judgment which will go in the long run to strengthen RTI Act. Hats off to victory of Shaileshji and it is definitely defeat of all those who wanted to kill the spirit of RTI Act 2005.Also hats off to the judges of SC.

Subramani P K

12 months ago

Mr. Shailesh Gandhi deserves open felicitation especially for his orders without fear or favour while in service. Besides, the comment by SC judges stand testimony for his thorough knowledge of the statute & the purpose with which the RTI Act was enacted by legislature. Congrats Mr. Gandhi.

Prakash Patel

12 months ago

Thanks for the report.
Indian democracy is moving forward because of such personalities like Mr.Shailesh Gandhi who go on working upholding right values even without expecting any appreciation.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)