Stock Exchanges: BSE’s gambit

The BSE estimates the collective savings of brokers will be over Rs1,000 crore per year due...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Can Chidambaram play ‘King Canute’ of divestment?

Finance Minister P Chidambaram has made it a point that divestment target of Rs30,000 crore be met despite lack of reforms, poor performance of PSU shares and deep market apathy on the part of retail investors

Recent media articles have pointed out that the re-appointed Finance Minister, P Chidambaram, has insisted that the divestment target of Rs30,000 crore must be achieved, “regardless of the market conditions.” He has directed his officers to work accordingly. This is wishful thinking. Against the finance minister’s ambitious target of Rs30,000 crore, nothing has been raised so far (only Rs124.97 crore had been raised from NBCC IPO), five months after the budget. 
Most importantly, unless shares of public sector units (PSUs) are offered at really attractive rates, which the previous disinvestment secretaries have not understood, investors will not bite. After all, investors that have put their faith in government shares have lost a bundle as initial public offerings (IPOs) of PSUs have fared miserably. We had written a piece recently, when foreign investors have begun to lose faith in PSUs ( In the piece, we found out only two recent IPOs have given decent returns while Coal India, one of the most promising PSUs, has hardly given any returns. Moreover, if one had a longer term timeframe and invested in the BSE-PSU index, say over the last four years, the investor would have seen his portfolio eroded by almost a third. 
This pathetic performance is because of three reasons:
- The government is merely divesting without reforming them or making them competitive. It must be noted that once divested, the markets will look at PSUs the same way they look at private sector. If PSUs are run unprofessionally, there is not much point in investing in PSUs let alone divesting them. 
- Instead of seeing that PSUs are owned by the public and they should be priced attractively, every time, the government has got greedy and tried to price PSUs as high as possible.
- Policy paralysis across all imports sector. The recent power blowout is an example of the acute failure of the government to take total reforms. Policy paralysis has been hurting the PSUs the most because these companies are in the core sectors of the economy.
A combination of inefficient functioning and high IPO pricing have decimated shareholders value. Added to this, the moribund equity markets following policy paralysis, and Chidambaram will have to pull a rabbit out his hat to meet disinvestment target. Consider the recent government bungling up of Oil and Natural Gas Company (ONGC) wherein it found no retail investors which forced insurance major LIC to scoop up over 80% of the offering. 
As long as the government uses PSUs to raise capital and plug all sorts of leaks and deficits, disinvestment will fail to work. Unless of course, the IPO pricing is really lucrative.



Dayananda Kamath k

5 years ago

they closed the disinvestment department as soon as they came to power. because it was bjp agenda. for every scam they include the bjp regime but forget to include rajiv gandhi and indiragandhi regime. they justify saying nda govt didi not change or act.when markets are booming they closed the window when markets are down they want to disinvest. or is it planned to benefit vested interst, as always with congress regime


5 years ago

Chidambaram must play King Ram at Rameshwaram sea :-))


5 years ago

Who is going to Buy PSU shares ? Off course, Govt can armtwist LIC, GIC & PSU banks. Retailers will not burn their fingers , after reading CAG reports on scams, which are hitting headlines with regular intervals.

S R Bala

5 years ago

Perhaps Chidambaram also knows that this is not possible but the damn politics has to be played. The Govt has not been able to meet the fiscal deficit target in any of the years so far. It is indeed a lot of falsehood being tossed at the nation.

Goldman Sachs pessimistic? Maintains S&P 500 year end target of 1250

Goldman Sachs’s recent note maintains that S&P 500 will be 1250 at year’s end, when currently it is at 1418 signifying huge downside

David Kostin, who recently replaced perma-bull Abby Joseph Cohen as Goldman Sachs US Chief Equity Strategist, has warned investors that S&P is likely to fall from the highs it had been scaling. He is maintaining the year end target that S&P 500 will end the year at 1250 and not revising it up, despite current bullishness prevailing in the markets. This means he expects markets to fall over 11% from current levels of 1418. Whether Goldman Sachs is serious (as they are notorious for short-changing their own clients) is anybody’s guess. However, the analysis is certainly food for thought, given that the markets world over is peppered with bullish analyses and investors in recent weeks.

One of the key points in Goldman’s analysis is the issue of “fiscal cliff” or the massive trillion dollar deficit that America is currently facing. Unless America’s decision makers address this issue rather than act in the last minute, it is unlikely that the market will move up significantly.

It said in its note, “A look at the 2011 trading pattern of the S&P 500 explains the reason for our belief that the market has an asymmetric risk profile and offers more downside than upside. Last year the deadline for Congress to raise the federal debt ceiling was known months in advanceNevertheless, Congress was unable to reach an agreement that satisfied all factions. Investors were stunned and the S&P 500 plunged 11% in 10 trading days (and more than 17% from the level one month prior to the deadline).”

With the American elections in full flow, and lots of countervailing points of view between the incumbent Barack Obama and Mitt Romney (who promised to do away with “Obamacare” a major component of the debt ceiling), there is the eternal question of whether the debt ceiling will be raised, whoever the president elect maybe. The debt ceiling denotes how much the American Government can borrow from the world to plug the deficit. At the moment, it is nearing the limit, after which, it must pass another law in order to raise it or be forced to undertake austerity measures which will affect not only America but the rest of the world as well. The note said, “If no agreement on ‘fiscal cliff’ issues is reached before the election, it will require a lame duck Congress to address the topic. Although the official debt ceiling is likely to be reached in December, Treasury legerdemain will allow the government to be financed under the limit until February 2013, by which point the debt ceiling must be raised.”

Despite obvious facts staring right at investors’ faces, the market has moved up which, according to Goldman Sachs, is unusual and not quite rational. “In our opinion, equity investors seem unduly complacent on this issue (i.e. fiscal cliff). Portfolio managers have been swayed by hope over experience,” the note remarked on the investors’ expectations.

In case US policy makers fail to address the “fiscal cliff” at any point of time, the investment bank expects the American economy to contract 0.4% in 2013, which is a massive amount of money. The note said, “Goldman Sachs US Economics research estimates that the impact of the fiscal cliff would weigh on real 2013 GDP growth by nearly 4 percentage points if scheduled year-end policy changes were to take effect permanently. Applying this to our US economists’ forecast, GDP would contract by roughly 0.4% in 2013.” According to Goldman Sachs, this would mean S&P would touch 1120.

However, if the debt hole is addressed, it expects the US economy to expand by roughly 2.7% and see S&P go up to 1540.

So far the S&P 500, as well as the global markets has been helped by a lot of factors despite headwinds. For instance, Angela Merkel seemingly supportive comments of the European Central Bank (ECB) helped the market a lot given that she has been the most vocal critic of the EU attitude towards bailouts and such. Other risks, according to the note include, “US election; China growth; European political, sovereign debt, and bank funding crises; and Iran/Israel tensions.”

The investment bank expects policy makers to address the fiscal cliff but warned that, “investors must confront the risk they (policy makers) may not act until the final hour“. In other words, expect a lot of uncertainty in the United States political battlefield which could affect the outcome of S&P 500 and the markets.


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)