Stocks
Steel price hike bodes well for Tata Steel

Brokerages say the latest price hike is sustainable on improved demand and particularly favourable for the world’s seventh-largest steel producer which has captive raw material supplies

The future is looking pretty exciting for Indian steelmakers, according to brokerages.

In a report on Tata Steel released recently, Motilal Oswal Securities (MOSL) says, "Steel prices have recovered by 10-15% across the world over the past one month due to end of de-stocking, supply correction, and raw material cost pressures. HRC (hot-rolled coil steel) prices have risen to $670 per tonne. Demand is likely to pick up over the next couple of months, as buyers return to the market post winter vacations in the western world. A strong steel price scenario is expected for 4-5 months."

In the past few days, Indian steel producers JSW Steel, Essar Steel and Steel Authority of India have announced a 3-5% hike in prices. Kotak said in a report on 3rd January, "Unlike earlier price revision, this appears to be sustainable, noting (1) the cost-push driven increase in steel prices globally over the past few weeks, (2) likely seasonal improvement in demand and restocking, and (3) alignment of domestic steel prices with landed costs of imports. We expect companies with captive raw materials to benefit; Tata Steel will be the biggest beneficiary, in our view."  

MOSL agrees that the future for Tata Steel looks particularly exciting. The steelmaker, which has a presence in Europe, Thailand and Singapore, is set to expand its capacity at Jamshedpur from 6.8 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) to 10 mtpa, to start coking coal production at its Benga project in Mozambique and iron ore production at its newly-acquired direct shipping ore (DSO) project in Canada. The brokerage says that a "$100 per tonne increase in steel prices tends to expand the margins of Indian operations by $50 per tonne, thereby driving the equity value by $425 million".

In November 2009, Tata Steel paid $88.2 million to Sydney-based Riversdale Mining to jointly mine coking coal from Benga in Mozambique, to feed its Corus steel-making facilities in the UK and Europe. According to the company, the Benga project has coal reserves of 502 million tonnes. Tata Steel owns 35% stake in Benga with the right to buy 40% of the produce and this will remain even if it sells its 24% stake in Riversdale, on the A$3.9 billion takeover offer by Rio Tinto for the Australian mining company.

In a report late December, independent brokerage CLSA had said, "Recent commentary by Tata Steel's management indicates that the company has not yet decided on making a counter-bid for Riversdale. We consider a counter-bid by Tata Steel as unlikely, as it would reverse the focused balance sheet de-leveraging process currently underway. Acceptance of Rio Tinto's offer for Riversdale has a higher likelihood, but would require Tata Steel getting comfort from Rio Tinto on coking coal supplies."

MOSL says, "Though the coal production is expected to be small at about one million tonnes (on attributable basis from Benga) in FY13 and logistic bottlenecks remain in evacuating large quantity of coal from Mozambique, the keen interest of Rio Tinto group with a firm bid of A$3.9 billion for Riversdale, and a possible counter bid, is likely to get reflected in valuations of Tata Steel sooner than expected."

In September 2010, Tata Steel acquired an 80% stake in the direct shipping ore (DSO) project in Canada's New Millennium Capital Corp (NML). The DSO project has 64 million tonnes of proven and probable mineral reserves. As part of the agreement, Tata Steel will reimburse NML 80% of the cost to date on the project, arrange funding up to CDN$300 million for capital costs and commit to take 100% of the DSO project's iron ore products, of specified quality, at world market prices for the life of the mining operation. The joint venture is expected to produce four million dry tonnes per year of iron ore products.

The Tata Steel stock price was up by over 1% today, after New Millennium said it received environmental approval for its iron ore project with the Indian steelmaker and the joint venture partners expect to begin production by the second quarter of 2012.

According to MOSL, "The Jamshedpur expansion to 10mtpa would be completed by December 2011 and coking coal and iron ore production would start in 2HCY11." The sale of Teesside Cast Products steel plant in northern England for nearly $500 million will help deleverage its balance sheet and reduce earnings volatility for its Europe operations, MOSL says.

The brokerage also points out that over FY10-11 Tata Steel has sold around Rs12 billion worth investments in group companies such as TCS, Tata Power and Tata Motor and it is likely to further unlock value of investments worth about $900 million over the next 2-3 years.


MOSL points out that while steel volume sales and realisations are expected to improve over the next two years, "declining coking coal integration on account of lack of growth at coal mines and appreciation of Indian currency (Rs43 a dollar for FY13) will drag margins".

Capacity utilisation at Tata Steel Europe (formerly Corus) has improved dramatically since FY09, mainly because it reduced purchases of third-party steel. It has undertaken various cost-cutting measures, including rationalisation of staff. Tata Steel margins recovered in 1HFY11 but a subsequent steel price correction and raw material cost inflation weighed in the second half. But with a recovery in steel prices, margins are expected to be higher in FY12.

User

Citizens’ groups oppose Gaikwad’s promotion as chief secretary of Maharashtra

Write to chief minister Prithviraj Chavan complaining that the former MMRDA commissioner cleared Adarsh housing file and was also responsible for wasteful expenditure on metro and skywalk projects 

This has to be a strange promotion. The Adarsh society scam, which has caused the resignation of a chief minister, has also resulted in the elevation of former commissioner of Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) Ratnakar Gaikwad to the post of the state's chief secretary. Now, activists and a section of citizens have come forward to support a representation to newly-appointed chief minister Prithviraj Chavan against the appointment of Mr Gaikwad to the key government position for his apparent involvement in the Adarsh housing scandal and wasteful expenditure in some major projects.

In a letter to Mr Chavan, Viren Shah, president of the Federation of Retail Traders Welfare Association, has said that Mr Gaikwad wasted crores of rupees on the failed skywalk project, which had to be stalled halfway. The project did not provide pedestrians any relief, and instead aggravated the traffic situation in many places. Many shopkeepers protested when the project affected their business, but suddenly found themselves behind bars for no reason.

Mr Shah wrote in his letter, "If this person has no knowledge of the grass roots of Mumbai's issues how can he handle issues of Maharashtra? How can such a person make Mumbai a global financial capital and take crucial decisions on infrastructure, when he himself cleared the file of the Adarsh housing society and was a part of conspiracy?"

Transport activist Sudhir Badami points out that Mr Gaikwad's association with the Rs700-crore skywalk project and the monorail project was far worse than the Adarsh scam itself. The 20-km monorail project, which is estimated to cost Rs2,500 crore, works out to about Rs125 crore per km, and this could have been brought down drastically to only Rs15 crore a km had Mr Gaikwad carried out feasibility studies and compared relevant project reports for a bus rapid transport system. Monorail is used worldwide mainly for sightseeing and not commuting. Mr Gaikwad has proposed 180 km monorail for commuting in Mumbai and MMR which would eventually cost Rs27,000 crore as per Mumbai Monorail Master Plan.

Shirley Singh, secretary of the Juhu Scheme Residents' Association, which has protested against the MMRDA's metro project for long, agrees with Mr Shah about Mr Gaikwad's lack of understanding of the city's problems. "The Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar metro project which Mr Gaikwad had pushed is full of flaws," she said. "It is a burden on the city's infrastructure; he knows that, but refuses to act upon it. Most of the stations are not even two feet from houses in the locality. Underground was a more viable alternative, but he kept on saying that activists have made an issue out of privacy, which is not true. Most of the projects are long overdue and the costs have gone up. If they are not completed after so many extensions, what will he do?"

The Adarsh housing scandal was revealed through an RTI inquiry by Jogecharya Ananji, that showed Mr Gaikwad had granted the occupation certificate, despite an objection from Navy Chief Staff Officer Satish Bajaj. State human rights commissioner Subhash Lalla was forced to put in his papers over the Adarsh matter, whereas state information commissioner Ramanand Tiwari, who has reportedly been asked to step down in this matter, has proceeded on leave. But many are surprised that instead of investigating Mr Gaikwad's apparent role in these matters, he has been given a very important responsibility.

Further, there are some who warn that in case Mr Gaikwad is removed from the important post of chief secretary, he should not be reinstated as MMRDA commissioner. "I am sure that Mr Gaikwad will put a person of his choice as MMRDA chief, so as to enable him to push for what he thinks is right for Mumbai. The chief minister should not revert him back to MMRDA if he is removed as chief secretary. "

User

COMMENTS

nagesh kini

6 years ago

The residents of Mahim at Mumbai successfully prevented the MMRDA's hare-brained Mori Road and MMC Road skywalks which would have lined some pockets and no benefit for the residents. This is a case of peoples' power at work. I say this because I took part in the making of the submissions.

Jino G John

6 years ago

My Humble request to the newly appointed Chief minister of Maharastra is - NOT to commit the same blunders, which his predecessor did.
He, in fact, needs to give serious thought into the points raised by the rights group & act with prudence and diligence without much delay.

Kotak dupes investor of Rs2.27 crore through bogus claims

The wealth management arm of Kotak Mahindra Bank misled a customer into investing in its India Growth Fund at a steep premium, based on bogus claims. Kotak officials remain impassive even as the investor struggles to find buyers

It seems that customers everywhere are paying a hefty price for their blind trust in companies with strong brand images. Citibank claims it had no inkling about the Rs400-crore fraud played out by one of its employees on unsuspecting clients. Now, a customer of Kotak Mahindra Bank has learnt a harsh lesson after reposing unquestioning faith in the brand he trusted so much.

In a shocking incident, a high net-worth client of Kotak Mahindra Bank was hustled into buying a dud product for a whopping sum of Rs2.27 crore, with the bank pocketing a cool profit of Rs1 crore in the process. The wealth management arm of the bank allegedly misled the investor into putting the money in its India Growth Fund, based on bogus claims regarding its worth and taking undue advantage of the brand name to influence the buyer. The investor's repeated pleas to rectify the damage have fallen on deaf ears as Kotak officials refuse to budge.

The investor, Rajan Manchanda, had in June 2007, invested large amounts in two of Kotak's funds-Biotech fund and Realty fund. Mr Manchanda was given a detailed presentation for both these funds and he gave his acceptance to make the investments. Mr Manchanda also assisted Kotak in getting equivalent investments from his cousin for these two funds. Kotak zeroed in on him again to sell him another product-India Growth Fund.

Mr Manchanda was allegedly misled into investing in the fund by making bogus claims about its worth. Claiming that the fund was being sold to him by another investor in a distress sale at an attractive discount, the Kotak official made a strong pitch in favour of the fund. Although the investor had some reservations, he was persuaded into buying it, saying there was a rush of investors wanting the product while it was available at a discount. Kotak collected Rs2.27 crore from Mr Manchanda, who was under the impression that he was getting the fund at a discount to its value of Rs2.5 crore.

"I told him I had already made huge commitments in the two funds and would like to avoid further commitment. He insisted that I trust him and would not regret as three to four companies were going public in the next 12 months and that would more than take care of the amounts payable for the two other funds. He wanted a commitment immediately or else I would lose out. Upon his assurances and insistence I agreed to invest," said Mr Manchanda, describing his situation.

Curiously, Mr Manchanda was asked to make out the cheque in favour of Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd, the car financing division of Kotak, and not the seller of the fund. He was told that this was due to certain 'technicalities' involved in the transfer of the fund and that Kotak was not benefiting in any way but only facilitating the transfer. He was repeatedly told that the premium on the distress sale had been paid to the seller of the fund. Surprisingly, the investor was not issued any agreement letter, despite assurances to that effect. Neither was he given any valuation report. Mr Manchanda lost trust and requested the officials to sell all the three funds. Kotak officials, however, kept on assuring him that the funds would be sold and that he should bear with them as the markets were bad.

Sensing foul play, Mr Manchanda approached the Chennai-based seller of the fund in October 2009 and found that he had been taken for a ride all along. Apparently, the seller was paid only his contribution of Rs1.25 crore, minus Rs6 lakh collected by Kotak. Mr Manchanda realised that Kotak had betrayed the trust he had reposed in them and that Kotak had fraudulently dumped onto him a worthless investment at a steep premium. It is obvious that someone at Kotak has made off with a cool Rs1 crore in the process.

Mr Manchanda also tells us that the Realty fund was sold by Kotak on his behalf at Rs1.01 crore, against his investment of Rs1.47 crore. He had to bear a loss of Rs46 lakh on the investment. Apparently, the fund was valued at 1.2 times the investment but sold at a 35% discount to the actual investment. The Biotech fund, supposedly valued at twice the investment, cannot find a buyer, claim Kotak officials. The India Growth Fund is also failing to attract any buyers.

The investor now finds himself in a deep hole as his repeated attempts to get the attention of the top authorities at Kotak have taken him nowhere. Shockingly, every time he finds himself being redirected to the very people who sold him the fund in the first place!

Only recently did the investor get a reply from the wealth management arm on behalf of Uday Kotak, stating that he was not duped in any way. Even Moneylife's attempts to get answers have not yielded any response yet.

The investor has also lodged a complaint with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), but has not made any progress here too.

User

COMMENTS

Suiketu Shah

3 years ago

I would like to share with moneylife and its readers how much "wealth management managers" are becoming outcasts in our society.

In posh South Mumbai one MBA was working for a private banks wealth management team.She has cheated,fooled and defrauded almost everyone she knows-relatives,friends,neighbours,etc almost everyone with mfunds in 2007 at sky high price--all in her quest to make commission for her bank and herself.

The result-she was thrown out of her bank in 2008 and nowadays wherever she goes out -be a restuarant,club,outing etc she checks who is in that restuarant(even before having a seat) and is someone familar is there,she flees that place immediately!!!!!!

The day is not far away where most wealth management companies will be considered socially as outcasts as criminals.Keep running for yr lives fraud wealth managers!!

vipul

4 years ago

I HAVE LOST 20 LAKH RUPPES ON STOCK INVESTMENT BASED ON KOTAK SECURITIES RECOMMENDATION.HOWEVER THE COMPANY IS A FRAUD AND HAS SHOWN DUBIOUS RESULTS AS CLAIMED BY ITS OWN SENIOR EMPOLOYYES..I HAD THE GONE TO THE COMPANY AND FOUND FROM THE EMPLOYEES OF ARSHIYA WORKING WITH FINANCE AND COMPANY SECRATARY DEPARTMENT THAT THE COMPANY IS REAL FRAUD NAD THEY HAD ASKED SAMEER ARORA OF HELIOS CAPITSL KOTAK SECURITIE AND EMKAY STOCK BROKER TO PUBLISH GOOD RESEARCH REPORT FOR THE COMPANY AND THE REPORTS WERE MADE BY THE ARSHIYA EMPLOYYES AND GIVEN TO THESE BROKERAGE...
NOW KNOWING THAT I HAVE BEEN DUPED OF MY MONEY CAUSE OF CRIME COMMITED BY KOTAK SECURITY ANALYST I HAD PUT UP A COMPLAINT TO MR UDAY MITTAL ..BUT I WAS TOLD THAT HE DOES NOT LOOK INTO PERSONNEL ISSUES . VP OK KOTAK TOLD ME THAT HE CAN ONLY BE SORRY FOR THE MONEY I HAVE LOST BUT HE CANT REFUND MONEY CAUSE OF COMPANY POLICY.

PRM

4 years ago

Mr Manchanda,
What I have learnt is that for many days your complain was not heard and dealt professionaly. Your emails were also not acknowledged.

But finally one day you got your money how. How ? What was the process followed by you can you please tell. This will be of great help to others.

Mr Manchanda, I am also very curious to know did they force-sell you scheme and pushed heavily to invest just like street side sales men pushing for credit cards ?

When they told that they want the chq to credited to so an so name not even once you hesitated or refused for the same ?

Finally,didn't you confirmed the overall investment scheme from seniors of the bank.

Please do make an effort to tell how did you finally recieved the moeny.

REPLY

240p FLV

In Reply to PRM 4 years ago

Hello, PRM

Please also reveal your intention about asking all these questions now. What is it that you are trying to establish?

Rajan Manchanda

In Reply to PRM 4 years ago

Gentleman,
The issue was resolved in Jan 2011,and now is nearly two years old.I can only say Money was recovered with the untiring efforts of Ms.Sucheta Dalal. All other actions with various departments did not help.Keep reading Moneylife and attend the seminars to keep yourself updated.No point in going into my past history of misinvestments.

PRM

In Reply to Rajan Manchanda 4 years ago

@FLV,
Although this issue is old I came accross this issue recently.
My intention:we learn from other's sucess and failure and accordinly was interested and somewhat curious in knowing how the investor got back his money considering the hardships he underwent.For example. many emails sent by him were not even being replied.

@Rajan,
We learn from history and for this reason I was trying to understand ur case.

Now, I have got answers to my questions, thank you for replying.

Chhanda

4 years ago

I would also like to thank Moneylife for bringing out these cases of fraud / misselling / wrongful charges (whether big or small) by financial institutions consistently. Most of us either have been victims ourselves at some point or know somebody who has been duped out of his/her money. By consistently bringing these incidents into public focus, Moneylife is managing to generate greater financial awareness amongst people. There are many finance-based magazines, but none take up these causes with the focus and single-mindedness of Moneylife team. Kudos to the 'Moneylife' team especially those who work behind the scenes and whose names we do not know.

Although many of us are not proactive enough to bother about making our appreciation known, please do remember that we do appreciate the effort.

P.S. I have known about and read Moneylife articles for almost 2 years and even attended one of their seminars before registering today to write a comment for the first time.

Chhanda

4 years ago

Although this post seems like an old one (going by the comments), I am still glad I read it. Wealth Management has become synonymous with 'Let's fleece the customer'. We would do well to remember that the bank are not really interested in managing OUR wealth. They just want to 'increase their revenues' through commissions on sale of financial products. Would like to narrate a personal anecdote here. I came into some money through sale of a property, and while it is nowhere as large a sum as crores, it is not a small sum in lakhs. Suddenly the relationship managers of the various banks in which i parked the money woke up and started giving me lot of importance and giving all wealth management fundas. They tried very hard to sell some equities and bond products but fortunately since i am familiar with equities and have followed their lack-lustre performance i refused. I also resisted buying any of their Fixed Maturity Plans, and bond based products before i could adequately research their pros and cons. This article serves as a reminder of why it is so important not to get swayed by their 'overly optimistic' projections especially when you have interacted with them in the past and have begun to trust them enough to take their word for it. I thank God and myself for being able to resist their pressure tactics in the past and hopefully in the future.

SocialContributor

5 years ago

All of you please read the book "IF GOD WAS A BANKER"

Dr Vaibhav G Dhoka

5 years ago

Kotak 's group has taken centreage in PERPETRATION of scams.The group headed by Mr Uday Kotak are trained for such frauds and groups head is cool as he has managed all regulators and top Finance ministry honchos.So no action is assured in every SCAM/Fraud. perpetrated by this group.

FIRST CHOICE IPO ANALYSIS

6 years ago

The worst performing BRLM too is Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Limited. They have duped millions of small investors with poor quality IPOs and unrealistic premiums. In the process they have earned hefty fees.

vijay dixit

6 years ago

Similarly there is hugh problem with kotak life smart advantage scheme. it is not transperant. from the first lump sum payment 24% comm is paid to agent and 24% is taken by company. this is done in very arbitary manner. company people misled investor. i do not understand how irda gives permission to this scheme. pl let me know where to complain against irda

regards,

vijay dixit

anshuman rai

6 years ago

It is nice to know that your issue is resolved. I assume that Kotak paid you the money that you lost. That makes you richer by Rs one crore at least!

Did they pay you interest for your 3 year fight?

Also, are you saying that you got this help for just the cost of a Moneylife Subscription? I assume you are a subscriber?


anshuman

REPLY

Rajan Manchanda

In Reply to anshuman rai 6 years ago

It is not a question of being richer. It is a question of what one can salvage ! A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.

Expecting Interest ? I would get an entry in Guinness book of world records. Gentleman we are not living in USA. We are governed by local laws, processes and procedures.

I was " NOT " REPEAT " NOT " a subscriber of Moneylife, although occasionally I did pick up a copy at the book stall. I am today a subscriber. I got this help with just one phone call to Ms.Sucheta Dalal. So getting help at the cost of a Moneylife subscription does not arise.

ONE DOOR CLOSES - GOD OPENS ANOTHER--

Rajan Manchanda

6 years ago

This MESSAGE IS TO THANK Ms.SUCHETA DALAL FOR HER SELFLESS & UNFLINCHING SUPPORT AND FOR THE ARTICLE WHICH HAS RECEIVED WIDE COVERAGE. HER EFFORTS HAVE HELPED IMMENSELY TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE TO QUITE AN EXTENT.

INDEED - MONEY LIFE FOR INVESTOR PROTECTION !!!!!

REPLY

Debashis Basu

In Reply to Rajan Manchanda 6 years ago

We wish, SEBI had decided to play our role, which is also their obligation

Rajan Manchanda

In Reply to Debashis Basu 6 years ago

English Author Edward Bulwer-Lytton -1839 Coined " The Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword "

2011

" The Pen Is Mightier Than The
Regulator "

Deepak R Khemani

In Reply to Rajan Manchanda 6 years ago

Dear Sir,
Please elaborate when you say that the issue has been resolved to quite an extent, have they made good your losses, have you been given any assurances from Kotak or SEBI or any one else? I'm sure that will help others to solve their pending grievances if any

Rajan Manchanda

In Reply to Debashis Basu 6 years ago

Mr.Debashis Basu

I agree 100 % that SEBI should have acted promptly.The complaint was lodged on 1st December 2010.

In a fraud case, where an employee is concerned, SEBI & RBI were very prompt in handling the CITI Bank case. An investors complaint should also receive equal attention specially if the complaint is against a BANK itself.

Today, it is because of an effective MEDIA that people have woken up from slumber. I hope going forward Money Life will play a much bigger role in protecting Investor Interests / taking up the cause of investors.

Mr.C.B.Bhave Chairman SEBI has taken many effective steps for Investor protection and I hope during his tenure WEALTH MANAGEMENT will be properly regulated.

Best Regards

Prakash

In Reply to Rajan Manchanda 6 years ago

Kudos to Debashis, Sucheta and the Moneylife team...

There is someone who stands up and takes up issues fearlessly for investors and gives the right guidance.

Please keep up the good work.

B V KRISHNAN

6 years ago

Thanks for bringing this stunning incident to the notice of other readers. It shows that one has to be very careful while dealing with finance companies - whatever may be their brand image. But it is rather intruiging that Mr.Manchanda who is obviously not new to the world of finance, did not pause to think a bit before writing the cheque to Kotak.

Amit Jindal

6 years ago

I think in this case Mr. Manchanfa should file a FIR with police against the bank and Mr. Kotak like in the Citibank case.

ramkumar barchha

6 years ago

The main problem with such type of incidents is that due to such bad taste people resort to the conventional saving instruments like post,PPF & Bank Fd's.
We than complain that the capital market attracts hardly 2-3% of Indian savings. I strongly believe that if one does not understand a product stay away from trying exotic investment avenues.

NAVIN G BISSA

6 years ago

First of all I do have full sympothy with the client who lost so heavily.But nothing personal I would like to share my general view.In my view these all financial mkts or products never ever creats wealth.But transfer from one pocket to another one.Nobody likes to loose.But this is the market where one wins and other looses.This is a simple rule of this game,which every investor must be aware of .The fact is that whenever one loose money he cries foul in the system.It's very difficult to accept the losses.Then investor blames the system or organisation or the particular person.And just overlooks his fault or mistake while taking decision to invest his hard earned money..So one should be honest enough to judge the facts.If as an investor we should stop cheating ourselves.That's the only solution to avoid such circumstances.

REPLY

TENSING RODRIGUES

In Reply to NAVIN G BISSA 6 years ago

I cannot agree with that. What you have described is gambling, not investment. Gambling is a zero sum game - A loses exactly what B gains. But investment is a win-win game - A and B both gain. One needs to decide whether one is gambling or investing. If one gambles one should expect the results of gambling; if one invests one can expect results of investment.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)