Citizens' Issues
Srinivasan barred from contesting BCCI election due to commercial interests

While asking Srinivasan to choose between Chennai Super Kings and BCCI chief's post, the Supreme Court held guilty his son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra, husband of Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty for betting in the IPL scam

 

The Supreme Court on Thursday, barred N Srinivasan, the former chief of Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from contesting elections of the Cricket Board till such time he had commercial interest in cricket. Upholding the charges made in the Mudgal Committee report, the SC observed that Meiyappan, the son-in-law of Srinivasan and Raj Kundra, the co-owner of Rajasthan Royals franchise in the Indian Premier League (IPL) were guilty of betting. 
 
The apex court also struck down the controversial 6.2.4 clause that allows BCCI officials to own IPL teams and have commercial interests. The conflict of interest concerning Srinivasan has come under the scrutiny as he was not only the BCCI chief but was also managing director of India Cements, which owns the IPL team Chennai Super Kings. 
 
In a 130-page judgement, the apex court observed that Srinivasan was not guilty of cover-up and at best there is only a case of suspicion against the former BCCI chief of cover up. 
 
According to the Mudgal Committee report, Gurunath Meiyappan, the son-in-law of Srinivasan, was an official of the Chennai Super Kings and was allegedly involved in the betting.
 
BCCI did not adhere to prescribed procedures while conducting probe in IPL spot-fixing and betting scandal, the Court said.
 
The court has also constituted a three-member panel of Justices RM Lodha, Ashok Bhan and RV Ravindran to decide the fate of Chennai Super Kings, Rajasthan Royals and recommend changes in the BCCI constitution. The panel will give its report in six months.

User

Why can’t we use postal stamps for RTI applications?
The DoPT has invited suggestions from citizens before 7th February to develop a full proof system for using postal stamps as fees for RTI applications. This follows several suggestions and verdicts from the CIC
 
As users of Right to Information (RTI) Act would know, different states have different norms for paying the mandated fees. For example, the Rs10 court fee stamp that is accepted by Maharashtra is not accepted elsewhere. In some States, you are compelled to use the Indian Postal Order (IPO) or Demand Draft (DD) mode for paying the RTI application fees. As activists have analysed, each IPO costs the government over Rs35 and a DD for Rs10 also cost about the same.
 
Delhi-based RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal had approached the CIC in 2013 to make it easier for people to file RTI for any kind of application be it the first application or first or second appeal. The Central Information Commission (CIC) in its recommendations to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) stated that fees should be accepted in the form of IPO, DD, cheque and cash against receipt. In addition, for online applications, the RTI applicant could use debit or credit card for payment. The CIC had also recommended that the Department of Posts should issue special RTI stamps on the line of postal stamps.
 
The Department of Posts expressed its inability to print exclusive RTI stamps. Subsequently, this department recommended “use of definitive series of postal stamps which are ubiquitously available in the post offices across the country in different denominations.” However, this meant amendment in RTI rules. This meant that they can be considered only when RTI rules are amended and that could be for any period of time.
 
The CIC in its decision of 12 December 2014 again recommended to DoPT “to adopt the proposal of the Department of Posts of use of ordinary postal stamps for payment of the RTI fee”. However, once again the DoPT has pointed out that “use of ordinary postal stamps for the purpose of RTI may lead to accounting problem, as it would not be possible to account the amount collected for RTI through ordinary stamps. Section 25 (3) of the RTI Act lays down that each public authority is required to communicate to CIC/SIC as the case may be, the amount of charges collected under this Act for incorporation in their Annual Report; there is an apprehension of misuse of ordinary stamps for the purpose of RTI in the absence of specific procedures and; whether postal stamps may be considered for initial RTI fees only or for payment of additional fees also.’’
 
RTI activist Subhashchandra Agrawal counters excuses of DoPT:
  1. Amending RTI-rules 2012 for incorporating use of postal-stamps as RTI-fees including additional fees should not be difficult because it does not require any legislative process.
  2. Misuse of any apprehension of postal-stamps used for RTI-fees including additional fees is baseless because it will be responsibility of respective public-authorities to cancel postal-stamps used as RTI-fees including additional fees through their rubber-seals.
  3. Postal-stamps are to be used for all types of RTI-fees including additional fees.
  4. Use of postal-stamps towards RTI-fees including additional fees will save huge amount of funds because of very high handling cost of postal-orders. Even a postal-order worth rupees ten cost rupees 37.45 as per statistics available for fiscal year 2011-12 which must have been increased much more by now. Therefore all revenue coming from postal-stamps being used as RTI-fees including additional fees even if going to earning of postal-department will ultimately be credited in public-exchequer. Public-authorities can communicate CIC/SCI about RTI-fees including additional fees collected by them as required under section 25(3)(e) of RTI Act through compiling of information on amount received as RTI-fees including additional fees from postal-stamps cancelled by them.
The committee, which has been formed to clear all hurdles for use of postage stamps as RTI fees has now decided to invite suggestions and views from citizens. The committee has appealed: “the views and suggestions preferably not exceeding one page may be sent by 7th February 2015 through email only to RK Girdhar, Under Secretary (RTI), North Block at [email protected].’
 
So, do hurry up if you have any suggestions to make use of postage stamps as RTI fees without problems.
 
 

The CIC had made the following recommendations on several other counts that would help the RTI user to file his or her application, easily:

• All public authorities shall accept demand draft or banker cheque or IPOs payable to their Account Officers and no instrument shall be returned


• All public authorities shall accept IPOs of the denomination of higher values vis a vis the fee/copying charges and the excess amount or fees may not be returned

 

• CPIOs and APIOs under their command to accept application fee and copying charges in cash from the information seeker

 

• DoP&T shall direct CPIOs/APIOs/Accounts Officers to accept money orders towards the deposition of fee/copying charges

 

• The Department of Posts has issued a detailed circulars…...dated 12.10.2007 which prescribes display `RTI APPLICATIONS ARE ACCEPTED HERE' and in addition to display names/addresses of the CPIO and appropriate authorities

 

• The commission advises the secretary, Department of Posts to consider designating all 25,464 Departmental post offices to accept RTI applications and the requisite fee instead of 4700 post offices

 

• To issue RTI stamps of the denomination of Rs10 by Department of Posts. It would be a time and cost effective step. The commission would urge Department of Posts/DOP&T to consider the viability of the suggestion with utmost dispatch

 

• The commission also directed CPIOs and the Appellate Authorities to mention names, designation and fax number of the RTI related correspondence

 
 
(Vinita Deshmukh is consulting editor of Moneylife, an RTI activist and convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book “To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte” with Vinita Kamte and is the author of “The Mighty Fall”.)
 

User

COMMENTS

Kumari Puja

8 months ago

This is very nice initiative to accept Postal Stamps for paying RTI Fees because Postal Stamps are easily accessible at post offices.

To make Indian Postal Order (IPO) easily available to the citizen, Government of India has already introduced online facility to buy e-IPO for RTI. To know the step by step procedure to get e-IPO, you may visit following link:
http://www.esbyme.org/#!how-to-get-indian-postal-order-online/i2pfy

To understand various procedures involved in RTI You may visit below website:
http://www.esbyme.org/

Thanking You

REPLY

Kumari Puja

In Reply to Kumari Puja 5 months ago

To know more about RTI Act, 2005, you may visit http://rtiact2005.com/.

MOHAN SIROYA

2 years ago

Good analogy. More or less, on the same lines, on behalf of Consumer Complaints Cell, I have sent the comments, extract of which is reproduced:

Consumer Complaints Cell, is an NGO ,working in the field of Guidance and Awareness of
all Consumers since last 26 years. To make the mode of payment and fee under the RTI Act , more citizen friendly and hassle free steps are required to meet the ends of Act intent.
1. First and foremost, need is to take the power of making rules under the ACT uniformly applicable to all the States and Union Territories In India. Presently, there is a plethora of different modes
Of payment like Cash, Money Order , Postal Order , Court Fee Stamp, Bank DD or Pay Order etc.and differs from State to State . This entails an avoidable waste of time , use of paper/ stationary and extra cost by way of commissions for service sought and or personal visits to procure. To top it , often the required quantity or denomination of either Postal Orders or Court fee stamps
are not available. Many times, one has to purchase two seven rupee denomination of Postal Order for paying a fee of Rs. Ten. Such waste of money and hassle can be avoided for information seekers by making the following rules :
i) An Uniform payment system all over India by using the Postal stamps has to be
ntroduced, abolishing all other existing modes, for all types of payment and fee to be paid for seeking an information right from PIO/CPIO level to the First or Second Appellate levels. Postal Authority should print ,if not already existing ,the stamps in
denomination of Rs. 10 and Rs.20 in adequate quantity. To take care of the accounting
and income reporting requirement under RTI, the PIO/CPIO should immediately cancelsuch stamps on receipt and deposit in a “Special RTI Account”, which may be created in each Govt. or Public establishment where RTI Act is applicable
ii)Simultaneously, to take care of Ecology and cost factor, ONLINE payment thru’ NEFT be introduced ,whether an application is made ONLINE or in Physical form. To make this
method easy , each Government ,Public Establishment must transparently make public
thru’ electronic or other media the Bank account details with IFSC code etc. to enable
transfer of E payment .

Mohan Siroya
Chairperson --- Consumer Complaints Cell ,Mumbai




manhar kothari

2 years ago

The use of postal stamp is a good Idea however misuse of the same can not be ruled out. Exclusive RTI stamp may not be economical viable suggestion.
Even if postal order whose cost is Rs.37.45 is not used for RTI fee than post office is not going to stop printing of postal order.
Iam of the opinion till RTI applicants increases substantially existing system of making payment be continued.
One more addition for paying fees be started i.e transfer of amount online through Bank.

Arshad Ali

2 years ago

A good step towards making RTI accessible to every citizen by bringing postal stamp especially for filing RTI .

For RTI filling you can log on to FileRTIonline.

https://http://www.filertionline.in

P M Ravindran

2 years ago

I had posted the following suggestions to DoPT:

1. Refer your Circular No No.1/3/2014-IR dated 14 Jan 2015.

2. Postal stamps are NOT recommended for paying rti fees and cost. There would not only be misuse but also serious confrontations between the public, who want rti implemented effectively, and public servants who want to bury it as if it never existed!

3. Given the plethora of stamps being brought out by dept of posts it should not be any problem at all to bring out special rti stamps. It is suggested that such stamps blend the features of stamps with the features of postal orders. That is to say these stamps should have provision to fill up the name of the applicant, the name of the public authority and date.

4. A better suggestion is to permit the use of money orders because it is after all paying in cash, permitted as per existing rules, through a third person!

5. It is fervently hoped that the best suggestions will be accepted for implementation. The history of DoPT handling RTI matters leave much to be desired and one can't avoid being a skeptic!

john menezes

2 years ago

Rs.10 Court Fee stamps should be available at all post offices and usable for all RTI applications to central and state organizations for which the Rules should be suitably amended.
John Menezes

REPLY

Dayananda Kamath k

In Reply to john menezes 2 years ago

They have stopped selling revenue stamp in post office and you are talking about court fee stamp. the money should reach the pio and a track can be established. the purpose of advocating fees is this as well as to avoid frivolous queries. So any method whether postal order,money order, cheque, dd should be ok. the best way is to avoid the fees itself. RTI became necessary because information was not forthcoming. they could have achieved it by changing the rules than passing the Act. now it has given one more avenue to avoid information based on interpretation of rules and red tape. Under RTI you have right to information not the right information. this is my experience. Even the Karnatka highcourt replied to my rti quiry of action taken on the complaint of misusing legal process to delay and deny justice is 'filed'. and technically they are right.

Dayanidhi Maran accuses CBI of fixing him

Maran, who is facing the CBI heat, alleged that the investigating agency was compelling the three arrested persons to complain against him and that they were even tortured to give 'false statement'

 

Dayanidhi Maran, former minister of telecom on Thursday charged the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) with trying to fix him to please an RSS leader from Tamil Nadu. CBI on Wednesday arrested Maran's close aide and two others in the illegal telephone exchange case. 
 
“CBI should be a fact-finding machine and not a fixing one.... I am being singled out. CBI is fixing me to please an RSS ideologue from Tamil Nadu,” a combative Maran told reporters after briefing DMK chief M Karunanidhi on the developments. He, however, did not name anyone.
 
Maran, who is facing the CBI heat, alleged that the investigating agency was compelling the three arrested persons to complain against him and that they were even tortured to give “false statement”.
 
CBI had arrested V Gowthaman, then additional private secretary of Dayanidhi Maran, and two others in connection with alleged allotment of more than 300 high-speed telephone lines to the former minister’s residence in Chennai, which were extended to his brother’s TV channel.
 
CBI had named Maran and BSNL officials, including the then chief general manager K Bramhanathan and MP Veluswami in the FIR filed in October 2013.
 
“...after eight years, they are just fixing this case. They have arrested three people. Irony is they have been ill-treated and were forced to give false statement. When they refused, they were arrested. They were compelled to complain against me. Third degree treatment was meted out to them,” ” Maran alleged.
 
Asserting that he would fight out the case, Maran hit out at CBI, saying “Is CBI trying to impress the RSS ideologue from Tamil Nadu? The telephone line still functions in my residence....CBI wants to pass the buck, I have no choice but to fight it out.”
 
“CBI has filed FIR against me alleging when I was the telecom minister and there was excess use of telephone connection. I have explained. This investigation has been going on for eight years”, he said.
 
He said for the last 18 months the arrested people have been called by CBI and they cooperated in all the investigation procedures.
 

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)