Sensex, Nifty headed down: Wednesday Closing Report

Nifty has to make a higher high and stay above today's low. Or else, it may move to the level of 5,545


The market snapped its four-day winning streak and closed lower today on selling in rate-sensitive sectors like realty, capital goods, auto and metal. The Nifty will have to make a higher high and stay above today's low, else may move to the level of 5,545. The National Stock Exchange (NSE) reported a volume of 70.45 crore shares and advance-decline ratio of 629:878.


The market opened in the negative on profit booking after four days of gains on pressure from fast moving consumer goods, oil & gas and auto sectors. On the other hand, the Asian markets were mostly higher in morning trade hopes of a favourable outcome from the Bank of Japan’s two-day policy meeting which got underway today. US markets closed higher on Tuesday as the government put off plans to reduce payments for private Medicare Advantage for seniors.


The Nifty opened eight points lower at 5,740 and the Sensex resumed trade at 19,034, a fall of seven points from its previous close. The Sensex hit its intraday highs in initial trade with the index at 19,035 while the Nifty’s high came in the noon session at 5,746.


The market witnessed choppy trade in the morning session although the benchmarks were in the negative terrain. The benchmarks extended their losses in the second half led by auto, oil & gas and technology sectors. A negative opening of the European markets added to the woes of local investors in post-noon trade.


The slide continued in late trade with the market dipping to its lows in the last half hour of trade. The Nifty fell to 5,651 and the Sensex dropping to 18,722. Snapping its four-day winning streak, the market closed marginally off the lows of the day with 11 of the 13 sectoral indices settling in the red.


The Nifty declined 75 points (1.31%) to close at 5,673 and the Sensex settled at 18,802, down 239 points or 1.26%.


Among the broader indices, the BSE Mid-cap index dropped 0.81% and the BSE Small-cap index fell 0.41%.


Except for BSE Healthcare (up 0.17%) and BSE Power (up 0.06%), all the sectoral indices closed in the negative. The top losers were BSE Realty (down 2.68%); BSE Capital Goods (down 2.29%); BSE Auto (down 2.23%); BSE Metal (down 2.08%) and BSE Oil & Gas (down 1.82%).


Four of the 30 stocks on the Sensex closed in the positive. The gainers were Sun Pharmaceutical Industries (up 1.54%); NTPC (up 0.94%); Tata Power (up 0.73%) and ITC (up 0.24%). The chief losers were Bharti Airtel (down 3.95%); Bajaj Auto (down 3.68%); Tata Motors (down 3.45%); Larsen & Toubro (down 3.01%) and Sterlite Industries (down 2.79%).


The top two A Group gainers on the BSE were—Adani Power (up 8.79%) and United Breweries (up 5.61%).

The top two A Group losers on the BSE were—AstraZeneca Pharma India (down 4.94%) and Tech Mahindra (down 4.64%).


The top two B Group gainers on the BSE were—Jetking Info (up 20%) and Welspun Investments & Commercials (up 19.95%).

The top two B Group losers on the BSE were—Kama Holdings (down 16.48%) and Everlon Synthetics (down 14.29%).


Of the 50 stocks on the Nifty, six ended in the green. The key gainers were Sun Pharma (up 1.40%); NTPC (up 1.18%); Ranbaxy (up 1%); Tata Power (up 0.31%) and Dr Reddy's Lab (up 0.04%). The major losers were NMDC (down 4.26%); DLF (down 4.22%); Bharti Airtel (down 3.87%); Bajaj Auto (down 3.85%) and Bank of Baroda (down 3.65%).


Markets in Asia closed mostly higher on speculations that the Japanese central bank will announced fresh stimulus measures at the end of its two-day policy meeting on Thursday and on positive economic indicators from the US.


The Jakarta Composite rose 0.49%; the KLSE Composite added 0.02 %; the Nikkei 225 jumped 2.99%; the Straits Times gained 0.13% ant the Taiwan Weighted advanced 0.375. On the other hand, the Shanghai Composite fell 0.11%; the Hang Seng declined 0.14% and the Seoul Composite lost 0.15%.


At the time of writing, the key European indices were trading with losses of up to 0.50% while the US stock futures were marginally in the green.


Back home, foreign institutional investors were net sellers of shares amounting Rs45.41 crore on Tuesday while domestic institutional investors were net buyers of equities totalling Rs205.80 crore.


Mercator has sold its very large crude carrier MT Kamakshi Prem (built 2006, 299,235 DWT) to one of its subsidiaries in Singapore as a strategic decision. The stock fell 1.74% to close at Rs14.10 on the NSE.


With reference to the earlier announcement dated 2 April 2013 regarding indefinite strike by workmen, GKB Ophthalmics has now informed that the workmen affiliated to Goa Trade & Commercial Worker’s Union (affiliated to AITUC), have called off their strike unconditionally and have resumed work on 3 April 2013. The stock fell 4.81% to close at Rs19.80 on the NSE.


Problems of Being an Indian Entrepreneur-I: I was never interested in money

This is the first part of the four-part series on the difficulties of an entrepreneur doing business in India and how India loses by forcing small businesses to pay for bribes and lose out to multinationals. PS Deodhar talks about his background and his love for engineering

Friends and relatives often ask me one question that puzzles them: Why is APLAB not a thousand crore company despite its reputation for high its quality products, innovation and business integrity and solid exports. The answer is simple and two-fold—my upbringing and, two, our sense of integrity and unfaltering resistance to making deals with government authorities. Unfortunately, in India, there’s a price to be paid for being honest and full of integrity.


Chasing money never excited me. Business circles like the chambers of commerce, CII or FICCI do not interest me either. I do hold in great esteem a few of the successful entreprenuers whose money has been a corollary of their great vision, extra-ordinary skill and wisdom. They wear their wealth very elegantly and conduct themselves in a gracefully simple manner. However, there is another kind that make me sick—those who conduct themselves without any respect to society, law & order and integrity. I never can admire their commercial success accrued through moral and legal compromises. This type of business people will never be role models for anyone with respect for law and integrity.


In India, one also has to be willing to make compromises. My domain knowledge happens to be in electronics and engineering materials. I never really pushed my team for monetary growth. I was happy as long as my company had enough wealth to invest in the development of products that excited me. I preferred to focus on product development, continued learning of technological advances and deliver products that consumers wanted which other Indian companies could not. My ego booster is technological achievement. I have the mindset of a craftsman and love to harness technology to provide a well-crafted solution. This is because I had the benefit of coming from a “Do It Yourself” (DIY) family.


I had adequate technical knowledge and skills in design and production of well-engineered electronic products. In the early years, I enjoyed great benefits of being a pioneer. Many companies were admirers of APLAB: IIT Bombay, BARC, TIFR, Bharat Electronics, Indian Telephone Industries, NAL and many others. We were developing products for them, helping them to substitute imports with superior domestic products.


My priority was always to put unrelenting efforts in manufacturing such products and trying to match them with those from Europe in terms of quality and packaging. My annual visits to Japan in the early seventies, and then to Germany till the early eighties, helped me understand the intricacies of technological excellence. I challenged to attempt their technological approach in India.


I recollect, in 1967, Lt General AC Aiyappa, chairman of BEL, called me, offering a challenge to develop an AC Voltage Regulator to meet the K114E environmental endurance test. The product had to work at -40°C, that too in a moving military vehicle. Within four weeks, I went with a sample that passed all the stringent tests. This helped BEL to replace a similar product from Siemens. Big orders followed from the Indian military for decades! Never ever was there a word about a bribe or a gift.


My first mentor was an engineer par excellence who lived and breathed engineering: Late MG Bhat of Automatic Electric. We quickly developed mutual respect and appreciation. He was a total “hands-on” electrical and mechanical engineer and had an outstanding range of electrical products, ranging from electrical panel meters to variable torroidal transformers and resin-cast metering transformers. All these were deeply integrated developments started with basic materials. Bhat and I together developed India's first stepper motor and a range of line voltage regulators. All his products were highly respected by big electrical engineering groups in India. He introduced me to Japan, which we often visited together. Our skills were complementary and in 1964, two years after I set up Applied Electronics Laboratories, Bhat became my sleeping shareholder in APLAB. Throughout his life, he never once questioned the way I managed APLAB. A few mutual friends often tell me that he was proud of what I was doing.


In the second part of the series, he will discuss how the company evolved, by using quality engineering and talent, to grow from a small company to a world-class exporter and finally how his decision to work for the government and honest approach affected his company.


(PS Deodhar is founder and former chairman of the APLAB Group of companies. He is also the former chairman of the Electronics Commission of the Government of India and was an advisor to late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi on electronics. He also was the chairman of the Broadcast Council in 1992-93 that set in motion the privatisation of the electronic media with metro channels.)

Read the Second part of the series




3 years ago

all i hear is crying and bitc hing and moaning and crying.


4 years ago

MDT and Deodhar Jee : Difficulties expressed by you are not applicable to mfg industries but also to service industies working from residence. (1) No firm( both Prop and Partnership) can open the account in any bank unless they submit two certificates from Govt. Agencies such as Professional Tax(PT). Service Tax(ST) Shop n Establishment Act (SET) ,Sales Tax etc (SLT). Generally person working from home do not apply for SLT, as once it is established he is doing business, the Society where stays, Municipality etc. charges double for water tax, electric companies for electricity and host of periodical returns. Getting your name in PT is difficult, as they insist for bank details of the firm and bank do not open account unless you provide registrations. There is no sales tax for service industry and service tax is applicable only when income limit exceeds Rs.10.00 lacs. Even for PT u need two certificates - one for employer and one for employee with host of periodical returns.

Resham Thakur

4 years ago

I totally agree with Mr.P.S.Deodhar' frank views, even i feel that we are sailing in the same boat. In India, it's just next to impossible to do any good work or business honestly & sincerely, your own colleagues & friends from your fraternity will laugh at you & make a joke of you. I remember Justice Markandey Katju's golden worlds " 90 % Indians are fools" I would further like to improve & correct him, Sir, it is 99 % not 90 %. We Indians are Morons & bottom lickers of people in power, where as I am a bottom kicker of all these rogue characters in power. Our house,offices & furniture manufacturing factories were raided by corrupt IT & ST departments on several occasions, just to harass us & coerce us in paying bribes. We refused to bow down. We will fight till the end,in courts, but will never ever pay bribes to these scavengers & spineless creatures (men in power). Jai Hind!


4 years ago

Aplabs products were amongst the most rugged devices I have ever used. Their bench top power supplies were more abused than used - and never ever failed.


p s d

In Reply to jtd 4 years ago


Consumer forum fines MSEDCL for not attending complaint within four hours

The consumer forum also directed the electricity supplier to recover the compensation from the staff and officials responsible for the harassment of a senior citizen

Amravati-based Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) has directed the executive engineer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (MSEDCL) to pay a compensation of Rs2,950 to Vinayak Prabhune for failing to attend the complaint within the mandated four hours.
The forum has also directed the company to recover the compensation amount from its staff and officials by fixing responsibility for the failure apart from other actions as per regulations.
Akola-based Vinayak Prabhune had lodged complaint of power failure to his house on 23 July 2012 at 9.45am. As per standard of performances (SOP) specified by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC), the complaint should have been attended within four hours. However, MSEDCL staff did not turn up for about 24 hours. Mr Prabhune then filed a written complaint on 24 July 2012, following which the staff visited and suggested that the service line should be changed. 
As Mr Prabhune was in the dark for over 24 hours, he immediately purchased service line wires and requested the staff to connect it on the same day. But MSEDCL staff did not consider his request. Finally on 25 July 2012, MSEDCL staff restored supply at 3.30pm. Mr Prabhune, a senior citizen, had to remain in dark for about 55 hours without any fault from his side.
He then sent a letter to KA Sagne, executive engineer, seeking compensation for failing to meet the SOP and to take action against the erring staff. He stated that the approach of the MSEDCL staff was extremely unfair and adamant. However, Mr Sagne also did not take any cognizance.
So, Mr Prabhune lodged a complaint in January 2013 with the Consumer Forum, with the prayer to direct MSEDCL to pay compensation of Rs2,550 towards failure to meet SOP provisions and to direct MSEDCL management to take disciplinary action on the officials/ staff responsible for harassment to the senior citizens and to pay cost of Rs500.
The CGRF conducted the hearing on 20 February 2013, where Vinayak Prabhune represented the matter. The forum passed the order on 12 March 2013, which was received by Mr Prabhune on 30 March 2013.
The CGRF has confirmed that if the concerned staff and officer of MSEDCL would have attended the complaint properly there would not have been reason for the complainant to approach this forum, resulting in monetary liability of compensation and costs on MSEDCL. It is the liability of these concerned staff and official and MSEDCL to take appropriate steps in that respect against them.
The Government of Maharashtra has given specific directives to all the departments for avoiding inconvenience to senior citizens, while availing various services. But it appears that MSEDCL officials and staff blatantly dare to ignore it and pay the price for the same, Avinash Prabhune (son of Vinayak Prabhune) said in an email. 




4 years ago


We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)