Nation
Sena demands Maharashtra advocate general's resignation
The Shiv Sena on Monday demanded the resignation of Maharashtra Advocate General Shrihari Aney for propounding the cause of a separate Vidarbha state, even as pro-Vidarbha groups rushed to his support.
 
Sena MP Sanjay Raut made the demand while reacting to Aney's statement seeking a referendum on the sensitive issue.
 
Aney stuck to his stand by saying he respected the Sena sentiments, but what he had stated was "historically correct".
 
He said legislators have a right to raise issues in the assembly and even (Shiv Sena) could raise it, though Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis sought to downplay the matter.
 
On Sunday, speaking at a function to release his book, 'Vidarbha Gatha' (Vidarbha Saga), Aney asked for a referendum on the issue and said if 51 percent people vote in favour, the centre must carve out a separate Vidarbha from Maharashtra.
 
Aney -- grandson of former Congress MP and pro-Vidarbha campaigner -- expressed confidence that more than 80 percent of the people in the region would vote in favour (of Vidarbha) and that is why the centre was reluctant to take it up.
 
Endorsing Aney, senior Congress leader and moving spirit behind Vidarbha Rajya Andolan Samiti (VRAS) Vikram Bokey said that in a mini-referendum conducted last year in Akola, Amravati, Bhandara, Chandrapur, Nagpur and Yavatmal, 97 percent of the respondents voted in favour of separate state.
 
"The 2.50 crore people of Vidarbha strongly feel that the region has faced the brunt of stepmotherly treatment by non-Vidarbha leaders and parties. On behalf of our top activists Shriniwas Khandawale, Wamanrao Chatap, Ram Newale and others, we urged the Bharatiya Janata Party to implement its election promises and immediately carve out a separate Vidarbha," Bokey told IANS.
 
Criticising Aney's statement, Congress senior leader in Council Sanjay Dutt asked: "How can a Constitutional authority like the advocate-general representing the entire state, demanding its splitting and making a separate Vidarbha?"
 
Aney pointed out that several referendums by NGOs and other groups, have indicated the pro-Vidarbha sentiments clearly, local bar associations in all 11 districts there have passed unanimous resolutions favouring Vidarbha.
 
Bokey added that the nature and mindset of the people there is different and "they feel that their unique identity will be protected in a separate state".
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

User

Sushma Swaraj to visit Pakistan, meet Nawaz Sharif
External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj will on Tuesday travel to Pakistan where she will meet Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, just days after the National Security Advisers (NSAs) of the two countries met in Thailand.
 
"EAM Sushma Swaraj to lead Indian delegation for Heart of Asia 5th Ministerial Meeting on Afghanistan on December 9 in Islamabad," India's external affairs ministry's official spokesperson Vikas Swarup tweeted.
 
Earlier in the day, union Minister Rajiv Pratap Rudy said: "Tomorrow (Tuesday) Sushma Swaraj is leaving for Islamabad and will give a statement after coming back."
 
"The government will brief in detail on talks in both houses (parliament) once Sushma Swaraj returns from Islamabad," Rudy told the media in Delhi.
 
In Islamabad, Pakistan prime minister's Adviser on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz said he was looking forward to meet Sushma Swaraj.
 
"Talks are the only solution," the Daily Pakistan quoted Aziz as saying.
 
Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani and Sushma Swaraj will arrive in Islamabad on Wednesday and Tuesday respectively to attend the two-day summit.
 
Aziz said there have been breakthroughs in dialogue with Afghanistan and India and the Pakistani relationship with two countries will now further be strengthened.
 
Matters of conflict between Pakistan and India will be discussed in the meeting and a road map will be devised to resume the composite bilateral dialogue during the visit, he said.
 
Asked whether the proposed Pakistan-India Cricket series was also discussed during the meeting of the national security advisors in Bangkok, Aziz said it remained confined to matters related to national security and mutual ties.
 
Sushma Swaraj's visit comes after the NSAs of India and Pakistan met in Bangkok on Sunday and "agreed to carry forward the constructive engagement".
 
A joint statement issued after the Bangkok meeting said Ajit Doval of India and Naseer Khan Janjua of Pakistan held discussions "in a candid, cordial and constructive atmosphere".
 
Foreign secretaries S. Jaishanker of India and Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry of Pakistan also took part in the meeting.
 
"Discussions covered peace and security, terrorism, Jammu and Kashmir, and other issues including tranquility along the LoC (Line of Control)", the statement said.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

User

COMMENTS

Shirish Sadanand Shanbhag

1 year ago

India Pakistan dialogue,in past 68 years has not given any break through, over several Prime Ministers of both the countries.
Whether EAM Sushma Swaraj or PM Narendra Modi, it will not make any difference in improving the peace relationship between two countries.
To add to this conflicting relationship, Jammu & Kashmir state (J&K) is not interested in deletion of Article 370, and to become fully integral part of India. In case J&K state want special provisions, it can be added by creating a new Article 371-J, where Articles 371, and 371-A to 371-I, have special provisions to different states of India, where they don't have any conflict with existing Constitution of India.

National Herald case: HC dismisses Gandhis' plea against summons
The Delhi High Court on Monday dismissed the pleas of Congress president Sonia Gandhi and vice president Rahul Gandhi seeking to quash summons issued to them by a trial court on BJP leader Subramanian Swamy's complaint in the National Herald case.
 
Justice Sunil Gaur dismissed their pleas which means they will have to appear before the trial court in the case.
 
Apart from the Gandhis, the court also dismissed the pleas of Congress treasurer Motilal Vora, family friend Suman Dubey and party leader Oscar Fernandes who had moved the high court for quashing of summons to them by a trial court. 
 
On June 26, the trial court issued summons to the Congress leaders on Swamy's complaint about "cheating" in the acquisition of AJL by YIL - "a firm in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi each own a 38 percent stake".
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.

User

COMMENTS

Vaibhav Dhoka

1 year ago

Top lawyers are higher-ed to manipulate justice.And in India we have flexible,manipulative Justice system always ready to oblige political masters.It is selective justice.

REPLY

MG Warrier

In Reply to Vaibhav Dhoka 1 year ago

BPL stands for Businessmen-Politicians-Lawyers NEXUS, Sir

Simple Indian

1 year ago

Good to know that atleast a part of higher judiciary believes that all are equal before the law. Laws rarely take their own course in India, particularly when it involves the rich & the powerful, who engage top lawyers who know enough loopholes in laws to get their rich/powerful clients released from the clutches of law. Only the poor languish in jails, often well beyond the years they may have been jailed, had they been convicted of their alleged offenses. However, but for an (largely) upright judiciary, our country would have become a full-fledged banana republic long ago.

REPLY

Gupta

In Reply to Simple Indian 1 year ago

This is only summons..let's wait till justice is delivered. You are assuming your victory too soon. Even after judgment is delivered, wait till it is appealed endlessly till Supreme Court first. I can assure you they will be released as has always been the case. And the judiciary is upright only selectively. No one wants to touch hot potato cases till they get transferred. That's how cases languish for decades in courts. I sometimes feel surprised why this country loves this judiciary so much, which performs atleast 90% below its potential if not more. Walk into a civil court anywhere in the country and see the extent of corruption and drama.

Nilesh KAMERKAR

1 year ago

why so many have suddenly gone deaf & blind . . . Itna Sannata kyun hai bhai?

God bless Dr. Subramanian Swamy!

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)