SEBI tells listed cos to run updated websites from tomorrow

As per the SEBI guideline, companies not adhering to the requirement of having an ‘up and running’ website will face the risk of getting delisted from the stock exchange where their shares are traded

New Delhi: Having a website with up-to-date information at any given point of time will become mandatory for all the listed companies with effect from 1st April—a move aimed at providing investors with easy access to information, reports PTI.

A notification by market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), which makes it mandatory for listed companies to have a functional website with latest details of various investor-sensitive information about them, will come into effect from 1st April.

The websites would require to have updated information about the company’s basic business and financial details, shareholding pattern, corporate governance, contact details, as also information about any agreements with media companies.

As per the SEBI guideline, companies not adhering to the requirement of having an ‘up and running’ website will face the risk of getting delisted from the stock exchange where their shares are traded.

Changes to this effect have been brought forward by SEBI by amending Equity Listing Agreement, which a company needs to enter into with a stock exchange before getting listed. The market regulator said that these amendments to the listing agreement were aimed to “ensure/enhance public dissemination of all basic information about the listed entity.”

As per the amendment, proposed to come into effect from 1 April 2011, it would be mandatory for any listed company to “maintain a functional website.”

On its website, the company would need to provide “details of its business, financial information, shareholding pattern, compliance with corporate governance, contact information of designated officials responsible for assisting and handling investor grievances, details of agreements entered into with the media companies and/or their associates, etc.

Besides, companies would have to “ensure that contents of the said website are updated at any given point of time.”

With effect from 1 January 2011, SEBI has already made it mandatory for listed companies to make relevant disclosures about their agreements with media companies.

Besides their websites, the listed companies are also required to notify the stock exchanges with details of agreements entered into by corporates with media companies

Disclosures are required regarding shareholding of media companies, details of nominee of the media companies on the board of a listed company and any management control or potential conflict of interest arising out of such agreements.

Besides, the companies are also required to disclose “any other treaties/contracts/agreements/MoUs or similar instruments entered into by the issuer company with media companies and/or their associates for the purpose of advertising, publicity, etc.”


Shares prices rise for 8th day in a row: Thursday Closing Report

Expecting a correction has been futile, but there is hardly any record of the market rising for a 9th day in a row

Joining in India’s celebrated semi-final win in the Cricket World Cup last night, the market continued its gaining spree for yet another day. The Sensex opened 50 points higher at 19,340 and the Nifty gained 15 points to 5803.05. Banking and realty counters witnessed early demand. Volatility on account of the futures and options expiry was evident since the start of trade today.

The market touched the day’s high just after mid-day, with the Sensex scaling 19,575 and the Nifty touching 5,872. However, intense profit-booking pushed the indices to their intra-day lows at around 2.50pm. The indices fell below its opening levels and even dipped into the red (Sensex to 19,284 and the Nifty to 5,779).

The market has rallied for eight days in a row and it would be a surprise if it does not correct tomorrow.

Vodafone, the world’s largest mobile phone operator by revenue, today said it has exercised its option to acquire Essar’s stake in their joint venture for $5 billion. Essar has a 33% stake in the joint venture company and with this buy Vodafone will have a direct holding of 75% in the Indian telecom company. Essar will exit completely from the joint venture. The company also said that a final settlement is expected to be completed by November 2011.

The market picked up some momentum amid fluctuations in the last half an hour and closed in the positive for an eighth day, an indication of a strong bull-run. The Sensex closed at 19,445, a gain of 155 points over its previous close, and the Nifty was up 46 points at 5,834.

In the fiscal-end rally which started on 22nd March the Sensex has gained 1,606 points and the Nifty has risen by 469 points.

Among the broader markets, the BSE Mid-cap index gained 0.29% and the BSE Small-cap index added 0.21%.

In the sectoral space, BSE IT (up 1.92%), BSE Fast Moving Consumer Goods (up 1.67%), Oil & Gas (up 1.44%), BSE TECk (up 1.42%) and BSE Metal (up 0.98%) were the major gainers. BSE Bankex (down 0.70%), BSE Healthcare (down 0.35%), BSE Consumer Durables (down 0.22%) and BSE Capital Goods (down 0.16%) were the main losers.

Bajaj Auto (up 2.90%), ONGC (up 2.76%), TCS (up 2.71%), Hindustan Unilever (up 2.50%) and Hero Honda (up 2.23%) were the best performers on the Sensex today. State Bank of India (down 3.19%), Cipla (down 2.01%), Reliance Communications (down 2%), Mahindra & Mahindra (down 1.61%) and Maruti Suzuki (down 0.95%) were the top lowers on the index.

Food inflation eased to single digits at 9.5% for the week ended 19th March helped by cheaper pulses even though vegetables and fruits remained expensive. Food inflation, measured on the basis of wholesale prices, had soared to 10.05% in mid-March after remaining in single digits for two weeks in a row.

The drop in food inflation in the week under review is also due to higher base in the corresponding period last year, when the rate of price rise was 20.18%.

Markets in Asia recovered from early hiccups and barring the Shanghai Composite, all others closed in the green. The Chinese benchmark settled lower on worries that the country’s central bank could go in for another round of rate hikes. However, geo-political issues and debt concerns in Europe capped the gains. The Seoul market gained on support from insurers and airlines. The realty sector aided the Hang Seng to close higher.

The Hang Seng gained 0.32%, the Jakarta Composite surged 1.04%, the KLSE Composite advanced 0.88%, the Nikkei 225 rose 0.48%, the Straits Times was up 0.34%, the Seoul Composite gained 0.73% and the Taiwan Weighted climbed 0.43%. On the other hand, the Shanghai Composite declined 0.88%.

Back home, foreign institutional investors were net buyers of stocks worth Rs739.61 crore on Wednesday. On the other hand, domestic institutional investors were net sellers of stocks worth Rs615.34 crore.

Aurobindo Pharma (up 1.08%) has received final approval from the US Food & Drug Administration (USFDA) to manufacture and market Fosinopril Sodium Tablets USP 10mg, 20mg and 40mg in the US. The drug is the generic version of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Pharmaceutical Research Institute’s Monopril tablets 10mg, 20mg, and 40mg. The product falls under the cardiovascular (CVS) therapeutic category and is indicated for the treatment of hypertension. The product has a market size of about $20 million for the twelve months ending September 2010.

Tata Power (up 0.34%) today said it had started commercial operation of another 120-MW unit at its coal-based power plant at Jojobera, in Jamshedpur. Commercial operation of the latest 120-MW unit at Jojobera—dubbed Unit 5—began on 27th March. With the addition of this unit, the total capacity of the Jojobera thermal power station is now 547.5 MW.

KEC International (1.66%), the flagship company of RPG Group has bagged orders totalling Rs801 crore in the areas of transmission (domestic and international) and cables.

In India, the company has secured three orders from Power Grid Corporation of India aggregating Rs224 crore and one order from state utility Aptransco worth Rs84 crore on a turnkey basis. In the global arena, the company has bagged orders worth Rs386 crore from Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United States and Brazil.



k a prasanna

7 years ago

Market is over heated, will correct tomorrow. Expect 70-100 points correction in NIFTY.

Retail investors in Jay Energy suffer loss due to continuing demat delay

The company relisted in September last year, but registrars repeatedly put off dematerialising shares on excuse of faulty master data. Investors demand investigation into alleged manipulation

Many small retail investors of Jay Energy & S Energies Ltd are struggling to dematerialise their physical shares, because, according to the company's registrar transfer agents (RTAs) the master data of shares is not in order. And those retail investors, who have managed to dematerialise their physical shares after a long struggle, have already missed the opportunity to sell the shares at higher prices.

Jay Energy & S Energies tied up with the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) and re-listed the stock after 13 years on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) on 29th September 2010, but the move appears suspicious. On 30th September, the company informed the BSE about the shareholding declaration, saying that the company had dematerialised 42.82% of the total 6,797,700 shares. The company dematerialised 48.86% shares of promoters, who own 2,250,000 shares, while 39.83% of the holding of non-promoters, who have 4,547,700 shares.

But retail investors were not informed about the relisting and the shareholding declaration. After seeing the notice of shareholding declaration on the BSE and noting that 39.83% of the non-promoter shareholding had been dematerialised by 30th September 2010, the retail investors started sending physical shares for demat.

However, the company's RTA-Purva Sharegistry (India) Pvt Ltd-did not accept any applications of retail investors to demat their shares, as Jay Energy & S Energies had instructed it not to process any transfers or demat requests as the company was in the process of changing the registrar.

"Yes, we asked Purva not to process any demat or transfer requests as we were in the process of appointing our new registrar, because Purva did not complete the given work on time," Mihir Parikh, director, Jay Energy & S Energies told Moneylife.

However, according to SEBI guidelines an existing RTA can continue to process requests for demat/share transfer until a new RTA is appointed.

Meanwhile, Jay Energy & S Energies appointed Cameo Corporate Services (CCS) as the new RTA. CCS delayed processing requests by retail investors to demat their shares, for two months, saying it had not established 'connectivity' for the scrip and had not received records from the company.

The struggle of shareholders did not end here. After connectivity was established in early December, CCS informed investors that "the master data of shares is not in order and the certificate numbers and distinctive numbers are not tallying with the master data of shares."

"We will complete the dematerialisation process within the next one week," said Mr Parikh. However, he declined any further comment.

This is strange, for when the company got re-listed, 39.83% of non-promoters' shares were converted into demat with the same master data of shares. Why didn't the registrar raise the same problem then, ask investors.

Was the master data of shares made an excuse to create an artificial scarcity and influence the share price? Or was the data bad even before 30th September 2010 and were procedures violated at the previous registrar to allow over 39% of shares to be dematerialised without a problem?

The capital market regulator must find out who the "favoured" people/entities were who managed to get their shares dematerialised quickly and just in time on the resumption of trading in the scrip from 29th September 2010, and without facing the issue of incorrect master data.

Many shareholders have raised these issues with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, but they have not received any response so far.

Dematerialised shareholding increased to 55.19%-- made up of 48.86% of the total promoters' share holding and 58.33% of the total non-promoter holding--by 30th December 2010. However, NSDL statistics for 31st December 2010 showed that 292 demat requests of the company were pending for more than 21 days.

Finally, some retail shareholders started getting dematerialised shares back in January this year. However, some are still waiting for their shares to be demated.

Jay Energy & S Energies announced that it had fixed 15th February 2011 as the record date for the purpose of change in face value of the equity shares from Rs10 to Rs2 per share.

However, retail investors have not benefited from this as share prices fell dramatically from a peak of Rs203.45 on 5th January 2011 to Rs66.70 on 11th February (before the share split). Today, the stock trades at Rs6.15 (about Rs30 pre-split), a whopping 85% down in just three months.  

It seems that the non-promoters, whose shares were dematerialised before 30th September 2010, earned mammoth profit and on the fear of a share split, the big non-promoters sold their shares and that this led to a fall in share prices.




6 years ago

The criteria to start investigations in the scrip of a company is stipulated
under section 11(C)(1)(a) and (b) of the SEBI Act, 1992 which says:
“11C. (1) Where the Board has reasonable ground to believe that –
(a) the transactions in securities are being dealt with in a manner detrimental to the investors or the securities
market; or
(b) any intermediary or any person associated with the securities market has violated any of the provisions of
this Act or the rules or the regulations made or directions issued by the Board thereunder”
In the Jay Energy case, while investors shares were stuck in demat/transfer for months, the stock price went places (High was RS 203). By the time investors started receiving their shares, the stock went into a tailspin.
The Director of the company has openly admitted asking the old RTA Purva Sharegistry (India) Pvt Ltd to stop processing demat & share transfer requests at the beginning of Oct 2010, much before the new RTA could be appointed and begin work, thus leaving shareholders with no recourse to get shares transferred / dematted .
New RTA claimed that sharemaster data given to them was in shambles, hence further delay.
So if this saga is not deemed "detrimental to the interest of the investors", and a fit case for a SEBI investigation , i wonder what is ?


6 years ago

Stock has halved even from the low rate of 3 months ago.
I hope some well-heeled shareholder takes the company and it's old & new RTA's (who collectively held up shares in demat for months on end while the stock reached fancy levels) to court & asks for compensation for all shareholders whose shares were held up beyond the permitted time frame.


7 years ago

complaints are already there but no action from exchanges as company is taking care in all respects of regualatories so nothing can be done you have loose your money.



In Reply to adaljaarun 7 years ago

Suggest you to inform MoneyLife about this, after you get your shares & are able to exit the stock.


In Reply to Bosco 7 years ago

I think all complaints shows Dust Bin......No Complaints...........No Action........


7 years ago

In my personal opinion, between the following 3 parties, shareholders have been terribly shortchanged & there is a case for them to seek compensation for the lost opportunity to sell the share at high rates while their shares were stuck for 5-6 months in demat / share transfer :
1. Jay Energy & S. Energies Ltd – for asking the old RTA Purva Sharegistry (India) Pvt Ltd to stop processing demat & share transfer requests at the beginning of Oct 2010, much before the new RTA could be appointed and begin work, thus leaving shareholders with no recourse to get shares transferred / dematted . Same has been openly admitted by Mr. Mihir Parikh, director of Jay Energy & S Energies Ltd to MoneyLife
2. Purva Sharegistry (India) Pvt Ltd – for agreeing to this highly suspect request despite knowing that as per procedure they were duty bound to continue to handle demat requests & share transfer requests till the new RTA established connectivity with NSDL/CDSL. The form to be filled up by outgoing RTA specifically has this clause mentioned . You can view & download the same here :
3. Cameo Corporate Services Ltd – for delay in dematerializing the shares from the time connectivity was established in Dec 2010. Cameo claims the share master data given to them was in very bad shape – this in turn points to Jay Energy’s culpability – but was it really so ? And if it was, how come Purva dematted huge number of shares before 30th Sept 2010 ? Did Purva do so to favour certain people ?
Only a full fledged SEBI investigation can give justice to aggrieved shareholders.



In Reply to Bosco 7 years ago

Dear Bosco.......I agree with you sir and SEBI must investigate the matter without further delay.


7 years ago

i have submit my physical shares for transfer at dated 26/10/2010 of jay energy at registered office but i have not received my transfer share till today. my folio number is 7144 for 200 shares and folio no. 7739 for 200 shares total 400 shares i have submit for transfer but company cannot reply me so please legal action against company can proceed.
with regards,
nayna bharat bhavsar
(m) 09327071694

vijay oswal

7 years ago

Dear Sir,
SEBI must punished promoters of companies like JAY ENERGY who have only vested interest in PRICE RIGGING and not in Company. SEBI must give order to promoters to compensate losses to small shareholders which are ORIGINAL shareholders since public issue of company and kept faith in company for more than 15 years.

vijay oswal

7 years ago

Dear Sir,
Thanking you very much for disclosing MODUS OPERANDI of promoters of JAY ENERGY. I am still awaiting to get my shares transferred in my name which were sent in 1996 for transfer,which clearly suggests manipulation happened in price rigging.

arun adalja

7 years ago

their contact no given on bse site is changed and it is 07930221822 and registrars no not given on bse site and no 02652341105.

arun adalja

7 years ago

yes i also faced this problem and i sent by courier and i had acknowledge but still company says they have not recd courier and price dropped to 50% sebi must penalise with heavy penalty.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Online Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine)