New Delhi: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is believed to have turned down any out-of-court like settlement sought by Reliance Industries (RIL) in the ongoing probe relating to alleged insider trading in shares of erstwhile group firm Reliance Petroleum Ltd (RPL), reports PTI.
Sources said that a final order could be made soon in this case by SEBI, which has rejected twice RIL's request for settling the case by paying a consent fee — an out-of-court settlement like resolution reached through negotiations between the two parties.
When contacted, an RIL spokesperson declined to comment on whether its requests have been rejected by SEBI for settling the matter through payment of consent fees.
The investigation into Mukesh Ambani-led RIL relates to alleged violation of insider trading norms way back in 2007 in the dealings of shares of now-delisted subsidiary RPL.
Market leader RIL's shares have been under pressure for nearly a month now amid speculations of an imminent SEBI order and have lost over 10% in value. Despite a gain of about a percentage point today, the stock continues to remain below Rs 1,000 mark. It closed at Rs 988.15, up 1.16%.
Sources said that RIL, in its second consent settlement request, offered a substantial increase to its earlier consent fee offer of Rs2 crore in November, 2009. But, the market regulator is said to have assessed the illegal gains from the alleged insider trading at over Rs500 crore and found the offered consent fee too less in comparison.
Incidentally, the capital market regulator would also hear on 3rd September a case related to alleged violations in the market dealings of two Anil Ambani group companies — Reliance Infrastructure Ltd (R-Infra) and Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL).
The two ADAG firms, along with some top group executives including chairman Anil Ambani, have been issued notices by SEBI in this regard and have been asked to appear for personal hearing on 3rd September. The case is believed to be related to transactions in 2007.
Interestingly, the SEBI probe on RIL also relates to transactions conducted in the year 2007, when it allegedly violated insider trading norms in dealings of shares of RPL.
The investigations into both the cases started on the basis of anonymous complaints received by SEBI.
A subsidiary of RIL, RPL was merged with the parent last year and subsequently delisted from the stock market.
SEBI had begun quasi-judicial proceedings against RIL after it found violations to insider trading regulations pursuant to its investigation in the trading pattern in the RPL stock for the period between 1 and 29 November, 2007.
New Delhi: There is a debt funding gap of over Rs1.62 lakh crore in infrastructure financing for the current 11th Five Year Plan but the government has no plans to channelize foreign savings in the sector, reports PTI.
"There is...a funding gap of Rs1,62,496 crore or $40.62 billion in the debt component (for financing infrastructure)," minister of state for finance Namo Narain Meena told the Lok Sabha in a written reply.
He said that according to the projections of the Planning Commission, the total requirement of debt for infrastructure financing, both public and private, during the 11th Plan is likely to be Rs9,88,035 crore or $247.01 billion.
Of this, debt financing available has been estimated at Rs8,25,539 crore or $206.38 crore.
The minister said there is no proposal for using foreign savings in the infrastructure sector.
"The government has no proposed dedicated debt funds to channelize foreign savings into the infrastructure sector," Mr Meena said.
However, he added that a concept paper on setting up an India Infrastructure Debt Fund has been submitted by a committee constituted by the Planning Commission under the leadership of HDFC chairman Deepak Parikh.
Replying to another question, the minister said that the government has approved a Rs626 crore scheme for computerisation of state treasuries.
"The scheme, to be implemented in about three year beginning 2010-11, would support states and union territories to fill the existing gaps in their treasury computerisation, upgradation, expansion and interface requirements, apart from supporting basic computerisation," Mr Meena said.
The project is intended to bring more efficiency to the budgeting process and improve cash flow management, besides bringing in transparency in the public delivery systems of states and union territories, he added.
Mumbai, 17th August 2010: "Aadhaar will not be able to effectively address the structural issues that lead to chronic poverty," explained Vickram Crishna, an IITian and Senior Fellow, Privacy International, elaborating on the government's contentious claim that its ambitious unique identification (UID) project will solve the problems of the poor and marginalised sections of the society. Mr Crishna was speaking on the occasion of a workshop conducted by Moneylife Foundation to explore issues revolving around the UID project or 'Aadhaar'.
Some of the key issues debated in the workshop were whether Aadhaar will be effective in stopping leakages in the public distribution system (PDS) as is being touted by the government, whether it will be able to put a stop to illegal immigration and whether the government would be able to ensure protection of the database and prevent it from being misused.
In his presentation, Vickram Crishna said, "India's privacy laws are draconian. There is a potential of misuse of the system. Whether the government can maintain an inviolable and secure database is a key issue. Have any safeguards been put in place to ensure that the processes are secure and transparent?"
However, the central point of debate was whether UID is restricting itself merely to issuing a unique number, not knowing what ultimate use to put it to. "End-user application is the issue here; not merely issuing a unique number," said Mr Crishna. The knowledgeable audience also debated on the efficacy of spending Rs42,000 crore over five years for issuing just a unique identification number (UIN) to half the population of the country. Some people were of the opinion that instead of spending such a huge amount on issuing an ID number, we should check the status of voter cards in the country and that the government should do a cost analysis for the UID project.
Another major claim by the authorities is that the UID project will give a significant boost to the economy through creation of multiple jobs and revenue streams. However Mr Crishna, a graduate of IIT (Delhi) and IIM (Calcutta), highlighted that the system would mostly use existing proprietary technology and will not be able to address systematic issues.
The implementation of technology for the project also emerged as a key cause of disagreement among the participants. Many people felt that it would be difficult to have devices across the country that would identify data based on biometrics, which are supposed to be used for the UIN. While some participants wanted to have an additional ID number, stressing that poor people's existence is basically linked to having some sort of identification; others felt there is no need to go for one more ID, especially if it is going to remain just a number and not a card.
Dr Prakash G Hebalkar, who was instrumental in forming and building up the joint venture of Tata and Unisys as a software and consultancy services activity, said that instead of going for the UID project in one go, we should start it with foreign visitors. After testing the UID with foreigners for about 10 years or so, if the results are encouraging then we should go in for issuing such a number to Indians, he said.
Pictures of the event