Regulations
SEBI puts brake on crowdfunding
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a warning for investors asking them to stay away from participating in fund-raising through digital platforms. This warning is surprising, especially when in 2014, SEBI itself has floated a consultation paper on crowdfunding in India, which underlined how this method would help entrepreneurs to raise funds without incurring too much cost. Add to this, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in April 2016 released a consultation paper on peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, which is one of the forms of crowdfunding. 
 
In a release, SEBI said, "It has also come to the notice of SEBI that certain electronic platforms are facilitating fund-raising on digital platforms like websites and other internet platforms, which are similar to the platforms of stock exchanges. These digital platforms are neither authorised nor recognised under any law governing the securities market. The electronic platforms are allegedly facilitating investment in the form of private placement with companies, as the offer is open to all the investors registered with the platform amounting to a contravention of the provisions of Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA) and the Companies Act, 2013. Only recognised stock exchanges provide a platform where equity and other securities issued by companies are listed and traded in accordance with the provisions of the SCRA.” 
 
Technology has opened a virtual world, which is now gaining traction for doing business surpassing geographical limitations. Lending and borrowing is an age-old relationship. Technology is now removing the limitations of physical presence for lending decisions and is creating a new virtual space for undertaking lending decisions.
 
As per a report from the Economic Times, this SEBI note has virtually pronounced over half-a-dozen digital equity crowdfunding platforms (ECP), including prominent ones like Grex, LetsVenture, Termsheet, Equity Crest and Tracxn, as unauthorised, unregulated and illegal. "Such platforms have emerged as a new source of funding for startups. Close to 200 companies have raised Rs350 crore to Rs450 crore on these platforms over the past 18 months," the report says citing industry estimates. 
 
According to the report, SEBI is not comfortable with the structure of ECPs in the country. It says, "None of these platforms meet the critical net worth criteria (of Rs100 crore) required to set up security exchanges. SEBI is also worried about small investors getting sucked into unknown, illiquid companies. Although these platforms cater to a closed set of registered investors, lower investment threshold limits (in many cases, as low as Rs5 lakh) make them almost 'barrier-free'."
 
Over past few years, peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, a form of crowdfunding has become an important part of the financial services sector in many countries worldwide. Companies like Lending Club, in the United States of America and Zopa in the United Kingdom, which started their operation just few years back have already became a threat to the retail banks. These companies are now worth billions. They advance loans of nearly equal values as any retail banks in the respective countries. However, SEBI seems to have taken a different step with its recent warning about crowdfunding. 
 
In April, the central bank released a consultation paper on P2P lending that outlined pros and cons of regulating the sector and proposes a suitable framework for regulating this activity. This includes minimum capital, permitted activity, governance requirements, fair practices code for customer dealing and data security for P2P lending. RBI in its first bi-monthly monetary policy for FY2016-17 had mentioned about releasing the consultation paper on P2P lending. “…the contours of regulating P2P lending will be decided in consultation with SEBI,” RBI had said.
 
In July 2016, quoting people in the know, a report from Business Standard stated that SEBI had decided not to proceed with final regulations on crowdfunding. The report says, "Divergent views from the market and lack of interest for its recently launched start-up platform have discouraged SEBI from issuing final guidelines on crowdfunding, said a source. Also, the market feedback given to SEBI was that there might not be enough takers for the regulator’s proposed framework as it was ‘too restrictive’, the source added".
 
Coming back to SEBI's consultation paper issued two years ago, it talked about a structure and framework for crowdfunding in the country. It said, "The proposed structure for crowdfunding will provide an enabling framework. Crowdfunding may provide an alternative source of capital for entrepreneurs that either have limited access to capital or have exhausted other available sources of capital. This also saves the entrepreneur from a lot of effort required in obtaining capital and allows him/ her to focus on the business."
 
"Crowdfunding facilitates such entrepreneurs in raising funds without incurring too much of the costs by doing away with the requirement of appointing a merchant banker, marketing and advertising expenses and book building. Further, there shall be no listing requirements and no prospectus needs be filed with SEBI. However, a company seeking display in recognized crowdfunding platform may be required to pay fees to such platform, which is expected to be substantially lower in comparison to the current issue expenditure. The fees to a platform may be dependent on various factors like number of platforms in the market, number of companies seeking display at such crowdfunding platforms," the SEBI paper had said.
 
In India, the traditional sources of funding are well established. Banks and financial institutions in India have been largely responsible for making available credit in the economy. The needs of the financially excluded have been catered to through community-based financing, chit funds, co-operative societies and so on. All these sources of funding, conventional or otherwise, over the years have had a limitation of physical interface. Since technological intervention is more and more becoming a part of life, the redundancy of physical interaction will be growing in the lending and financial services business as well. SEBI, as market regulator, may well have to come around to a solution for ECP rather than issuing a blanket ban.

User

COMMENTS

Srinivasan

2 months ago

The question is what should be done to make it easier, transparent, and legitimate for crowdfunding. It has now come to stay as a way of life. Also given the large number of new tech startups - you can be assured that 8 of the 10 are quite likely to fail...
But banning a visible platform, could result in more informal networks - which will never see the light of any regulation.
So, we need regulation and have to be progressive...

Manish Kumar

3 months ago

Also such platforms neither have an aspiration to become an exchange nor should they be judged through that lens. The SCRA act is a fairly old act - there waa nothing called digital in those days; today the PM is talking about digitizing governance through the govts digital India initiative. Moreover as mentioned in the article, RBI, DIPP etc all have been singing a tune that is more enabling for new and more efficient ways of doing business. All this simply doesn't add up - SEBI's move is in contravention of the general principles adopted by various regulators and government including the Indian government. These platforms are an opportunity to increase access to capital and reduce the cost of capital for the our companies - both Startups and SMEs.

Manish Kumar

3 months ago

SEBI has simply absolved itself of its responsibility and mandate of market development. It is very discouraging and in bad faith to paint such FinTech ventures to be in 'contravention of law'. There is no law that is pertinent. We have made many submissions to SEBI abd have been requesting them to take cognizance of how things can be done in the new paradigm of digital

Tata Motors reports robust volume numbers in August
Tata Motors, India’s largest automobile company, reported impressive August numbers for its luxury brand Jaguar Land Rover (JLR). Its wholesale volumes in August grew by a robust 28% year-on-year (y-o-y) to 42,260 units, while its retail volumes rose by 26% y-o-y to 36,926 units. Its global vehicle sales rose by 16% to 86,288 units in August. However, its global commercial vehicle sales remained flat in August. Cumulative commercial vehicles wholesale for the fiscal rose by 6% over 2015-16 standing at 1,55,296. 
 
Jaguar’s wholesale and retail volumes roughly doubled. These volumes were aided by recently launched F-Pace and XE. However, Land Rover’s volumes have grown at a slower pace. Its wholesale and retail volumes have risen by 10.2% y-o-y and 8.6% respectively.  
 
 
North America, Europe and China reported superb growth with North America reporting a huge 45% y-o-y growth. Europe and China too reported impressive growth at 36.8% and 34% respectively. United Kingdom (UK) and other markets reported negative growth. However, the numbers were not good on a month-on-month (m-o-m) basis. Europe’s volumes declined by 25% m-o-m. The decline in UK’s volumes was significant at 69% m-o-m to 2,373 units. China’s month-on-month volumes rose by 7.6% while the volumes of North America and other markets declined slightly. 
 
Coming to different models, its sales of XE rose by a robust 50% to 2,792 units. Its new launches F-Pace, XE and Land Rover Discovery Sport performed exceedingly well. F-Pace sold 4,460 units, while XE’s sales rose by more than half to 2,792 units. Discovery Sport’s volumes too jumped by 57% to 7,053 units. 
 
One of the most notable features is the change in revenues contributed by different regions over the years. For instance, according to Religare, United Kingdom (UK) contributed to 17.7% of its volumes in FY13-14. However, this contribution has declined to merely 6.4% in August 2016. On the contrary, the contribution of North America to its revenues over the years has increased to 28% in August 2016 from 17.4% in FY13-14. The contribution of Europe, North America and other markets over the years has remained roughly similar over the years. 
 
In terms of the future, the launching of XFL model in China is expected to lead to a rise in volumes of Jaguar. New Discovery is expected to be unveiled in late – September, which is expected to lead the volumes for Land Rover. In addition, Evoque convertible will also be released. 
 
Tata Motors is the market leader in commercial vehicles in India. It has operations in UK, South Korea, Thailand, Indonesia and South Africa. Its consolidated revenues stood at a humungous Rs2,75,561 crore in 2015-16. Tata Motors trades at a price-to-earnings (PE) multiple of 18 times its trailing 12 months earnings. Its consolidated debt-equity ratio stood at 0.78. The stock has had an extraordinary run in the past 6 months. During this period, it has more than doubled from a low of Rs266 in February 2016 to Rs554 currently. 

User

COMMENTS

N.Hanumanta Rao

3 months ago

Impressive results by Tata Motors. Keep up the good work in the months ahead.

JB Chemicals: Good Chemistry
The stock of JB Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals has been buzzing for the past few months,...
Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)