Leisure, Lifestyle & Wellness
Scene from ‘Making a Murderer’ Echoes in Etan Patz Case

Inflammatory pre-trial publicity was an issue in the Netflix series, and now a defense lawyer wants to make it an issue in New York’s famous missing child case


Update, Jan. 14, 2016: This story has been updated to include the formal response by the district attorney's office.


It is one of the most controversial moments from the Netflix sensation "Making a Murderer" 2014 the graphic pre-trial news conference held by local prosecutors seeking to convict a Wisconsin man and his nephew of murder. The lead prosecutor, in front of television cameras and radio microphones, talks in detail about the alleged confession of the nephew, complete with details of the rape and strangling of a young woman.


The news conference outraged the lawyers defending the man, Steven Avery. And the larger question of a prosecutor's responsibility to avoid inflammatory publicity before a criminal trial has been a topic of debate on the Internet since the series became available last month.


This week, a variation of that debate surfaced in one of New York's more controversial murder cases 2014 the prosecution of a former Manhattan bodega clerk for the 1979 killing of Etan Patz, a 6-year-old boy who went missing on his way to school. Defense lawyers have asked the judge in the case to bar the original prosecutor from publicly appearing at the former clerk's re-trial next month.


Like almost everything about the decades-old Patz case, this latest development requires some background.


Last year, Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, a veteran prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney's office, spent weeks trying to convince a jury that the clerk, Pedro Hernandez, had lured Patz into a Soho bodega's basement and killed him. Hernandez had confessed to detectives 33 years after the boy went missing, but then recanted. His lawyer argued that Hernandez was mentally ill and that he had been manipulated into making the confession 2014 one that the lawyer argued did not even match the few known facts about the boy's famous disappearance.


The trial resulted in a deadlocked jury. Illuzzi-Orbon had persuaded 11 of the 12 jurors of Hernandez's guilt. The lone holdout, however, gave a detailed account of why he believed prosecutors had failed to meet the burden of establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Shortly after the trial, Illuzzi-Orbon left the Manhattan prosecutor's office and ran to become the district attorney for Staten Island. The Patz case was a feature of her campaign, and the boy's family even formally endorsed her candidacy. Illuzzi-Orbon eventually lost the race, and just recently returned to her old office. In announcing her return, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance made clear Illuzzi-Orbon would assist in Hernandez's re-trial, now set for Feb. 22.


Hernandez's lawyers, however, on Tuesday filed formal arguments asserting that Illuzzi-Orbon should lose her place at the prosecution table.


"Ms. Illuzzi made the prosecution of Pedro Hernandez the centerpiece of her ultimately unsuccessful campaign, which included public statements stressing the strength of the evidence against him, touting the importance of his confession, her belief in Mr. Hernandez's guilt, and a public endorsement by the Patz family," Harvey Fishbein, a lawyer for Hernandez, said in a court filing this week seeking to bar Illuzzi-Orbon from a public role in the re-trial. "While campaigning, Ms. Illuzzi became an outspoken promoter of Mr. Hernandez's guilt, directly violating the New York Rules of Professional Conduct."


Fishbein cites both the New York and American Bar Association rules of professional conduct in making his claim:

  • "Except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."
  • "A lawyer who is participating or has participated in a criminal or civil matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter."

"Given the extraordinary amount of publicity surrounding this case in the 37 years since the disappearance of Etan Patz, and the enormous difficulty 2014 or impossibility 2014 of Mr. Hernandez obtaining a fair and impartial jury, Ms. Illuzzi's actions were reckless and damaging," Fishbein wrote.


In its formal response, the district attorney's office said Fishbein's motion "falls far short of demonstrating how ADA Illuzzi's statements and/or presence will necessarily and materially prejudice the defendant's right to a fair trial." The response noted that portions of Hernandez's confession had been played in public during the first trial and developments in the trial had been widely covered in the news media.


Vance's office said Illuzi-Orbon's discussions of the case were limited and came only after her opponent in the campaign blamed her for the mistrial. The office said the potential jury pool in Manhattan 2014 not the borough where Illuzzi-Orbon ran for office 2014 was so vast there was no chance her remarks would poison the process. Finally, the response cited what it called Fishbein's own public discussions of the case, including during the trial, calling it a "campaign that has not ended to this date."


The defense motion filed this week is among a flurry of legal wrangling in the run-up to the second trial.


Hernandez's defense team lost its latest effort to have the case dismissed. Back in November, Fishbein argued that Hernandez's first trial had proved that so much time had passed since Patz's 1979 disappearance that it was impossible for Hernandez to actually get a fair hearing.


"The passage of 36 years has seen the death or disability of a number of essential witnesses, the erosion of the memories of myriad witnesses, including police officers involved in the 1979 investigation, and the loss of critical employment and government records of the defendant," Fishbein wrote in his motion to dismiss the case.


Patz went missing on the first day his parents permitted him to walk to the nearby school bus by himself. Fishbein argued in November that two witnesses who saw the boy on the morning of May 25, 1979, could be vital to Hernandez's defense. But one was dead and the other, Fishbein said, was suffering from a psychiatric disorder. Fishbein also cited the testimony at the first trial of Juan Santana, the manager of the bodega where Hernandez worked. Santana testified that he could not remember when Hernandez had started working at the bodega, how long he had worked there or the date he left. Establishing Hernandez's work record at the bodega, Fishbein said, was also critical to his defense.


The prosecution rejected Fishbein's arguments, and in December Justice Maxwell Wiley denied the motion to dismiss the case.


The defense did score one recent victory when it persuaded Wiley to reject the prosecution's request to permit the next jury in the case to visit the SoHo neighborhood where Patz went missing and where Hernandez once confessed he had stashed the boy's body. In his disputed confession, Hernandez said he had strangled Patz in the bodega basement after luring him inside with the offer of a soda. He said he had put the still-breathing boy in a trash bag and then inside a cardboard box. He said he had taken the box in broad daylight several blocks away and left it in an alley. The SoHo neighborhood has changed radically since 1979. The bodega no longer exists. The block where Hernandez said he left the boy has been transformed.


But prosecutors wanted to bring the jury to the neighborhood during the trial. Fishbein argued such an event would turn into a media circus and would unfairly color the jury's thinking.

Judge Wiley sided with the defense last month.


ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.
















Insurance: Fine Print

Vehicle Insurance Premium To Go Up in Metros? 

Vehicle insurance premium may increase up...
Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
Pakistan Army must dismantle unholy alliance with fundamentalist outfits
The Pakistan Army must immediately dismantle the unholy alliance between a section of it and the fundamentalist outfits. Unfortunately no such serious attempt is in sight
One of the most unintended casualties of the terrorist attack at Pathankot has been that the Indian media, or large sections of it, went overboard in giving out the "news" of the "detention of Masood Azhar", the chief of the dreaded Jaish-e-Mohammed which has been accused by India of masterminding the attack on the the Indian Air Force base. Governmental authorities in both India and Pakistan contradicted the story. This was too natural. Masood Azhar is very close to sections of the Pakistani civil and military administration.
It was later clarified that he was only taken under "protective custody". A day after, the Pakistani establishment openly clarified that Masood Azhar was not arrested.
But this is enough to shake the very foundation of the state of Pakistan. It conclusively establishes before the world that Pakistan is now only some steps away from being a territorial conglomeration of different terrorist power centres. Very little of Islamabad's writ runs in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas(FATA). In Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan(TTP) is supreme. Although a provincial government run by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) of Imran Khan is there, it is common knowledge that the PTI could win the election because of tacit support from the TTP. Different terrorist organizations have in fact divided Sindh among themselves and have carved out their own territorial jurisdictions. In Punjab four terrorist organizations - Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Sipah-i-Sahaba - are really powerful. Of late the TTP has also penetrated deep inside the province.
Pakistan has now the onus to prove to the world that it is not a terrorist state. It has now become extremely necessary for Islamabad, after US President Barack Obama's comments that Pakistan could become a safe haven for terrorists and that the country would continue to face instability for decades to come.
The Pathankot incident, however, did display a difference with what happened during the Mumbai attack of 2008 when Pakistan had denied any connection with the terrorists and washed its hands off the charge. This time, the response as well as cooperation from Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was prompt. It shows that a qualitative change has occurred in the equation that some of the terrorist groups enjoy with the Pakistani administration and the army.
This change is however half-hearted and, therefore, Pakistan is now saying that it would take action against Masood Azhar if his culpability is proved "beyond doubt". There is no need to wait for the completion of the probe as there is plenty of evidence against the Jaish-e-Mohammed chief and his organization. After it was banned in 2002, Jaish-e-Mohammed split into several cells which were linked to the Al-Qaeda. Masood Azhar coordinated the activities of these splinter groups from his underground shelter and launched two successive attempts to eliminate then president Pervez Musharraf. Azhar was also the principal brain behind the building up of Islamic fundamentalist insurgency around Islamabad's Lal Masjid.
The Pathankot terrorist strike affects Pakistan very seriously. By a single stroke, it has disrobed the extreme vulnerability of the country's security and stability. Both India and Pakistan have exhibited prudence by only deferring the foreign secretary-level talks and rescheduling it in the "very near future". But saner voices in Pakistan are now questioning the policy of the state in giving long rope to some non-state actors who are creating havoc with impunity.
But Pakistan needs to undertake some surgical operations into its polity if it really wants to come out of the quagmire and stave off destruction. There is a limit to which it can go so far as operations in the FATA area are concerned. Moreover, the Pashtun community lives on both sides of the Durand Line that separates Pakistan and Afghanistan. But the agreement creating the Durand Line expired long ago and if the Pashtuns living on the Pakistan side and facing military action now want to join Afghanistan, it will mean the dismemberment of Pakistan.
Patronization of the Deobandi school of thought has now become the bane of Pakistan. Fundamentalism has now struck so deep a root that even the Election Commission has not been left untouched. During the last election, the commission had invoked articles 62 and 63 of the constitution which forbade anybody who was not a practising Muslim from contesting. Even the candidature of a renowned journalist like Ayaz Amir was rejected on the charge that he drank.
The Pakistan Army must immediately dismantle the unholy alliance between a section of it and the fundamentalist outfits. Unfortunately no such serious attempt is in sight. On the contrary quite a few army and naval officers, many of them being Shias, have been murdered after they protested against inaction on the part of their superiors against organizations like the Jaish-e-Mohammed and the Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article.



Anand Vaidya

1 year ago

Just wishful thinking. No practical solutions.

USA, India must collaborate to break up Pak - give independence to Balochistan, return parts to Afghanistan, and take back PoK+more. Destroy their cache of nukes and reactors.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)