The Supreme Court told BCCI that cricket must be played in its true spirit and should remain a gentleman’s game
The Supreme Court on Monday warned the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) against 'killing the game of cricket' saying it must be played in its true spirit and should remain a gentleman's game. The apex court was hearing the spot-fixing case related with the Indian Premier league (IPL).
"If you allow these things to happen, then you are killing the game of cricket,'' it said, while referring to IPL spot-fixing scandal.
"We take the findings of Justice Mudgal Committee’s report as gospel truth,'' it said.
While questioning the return of N Srinivasan as the chief of BCCI, the Supreme Court said, “Can’t make a distinction between BCCI and IPL. IPL is a by-product of BCCI.”
“Some people who are in BCCI now own a team. It has become a mutual benefit society. Ownership of team raises conflict of interest. BCCI chief has to run the show but you have a team, which raises questions. Can BCCI president own a team? How far is this fair?” it added.
Commenting on Srinivasan, the apex court said, "You will have to address question of conflict of interest as head of BCCI and also as owner of IPL team, whose official is found to be involved in betting''.
BCCI, however, dismissed any conflict of interest.
Besides HSBC Securities, which acted as the merchant banker, SEBI also reprimanded India Star (Mauritius) that had made the open offer for Global Offshore Services
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has 'reprimanded' HSBC Securities and Capital Markets Pvt Ltd for failing to make adequate disclosures related to an open offer for shares of Global Offshore Services Ltd, erstwhile Garware Offshore Services Ltd made in 2008.
Besides HSBC Securities, which acted as the merchant banker, the market regulator also reprimanded India Star (Mauritius) Ltd, which had made the open offer. However, SEBI ruled that "a direction in the nature of ordering the acquirer to make another public offer is not warranted".
Prashant Saran, SEBI's Whole Time member, in his 30-page order said, "I reprimand the acquirer (India Star) and the merchant banker (HSBC Securities and Capital Markets) for failing to reach the standards of disclosures."
The ruling came on a complaint filed by one Amit Bhagvatprasad Barot in 2012 that India Star failed to make certain disclosures while making the open offer for acquiring additional shares of Global Offshore Services.
Barot had held shares of Global Offshore Services but had not participated in the open offer. In his plea, he had sought a fresh open offer. "I note the allegation that adequate disclosures, with respect to the persons in control of the acquirer, was not made. However, it has not been shown that the shortfall in disclosure would have changed the decision of the shareholders who had tendered shares in the open offer," Saran said.
Taking note of inadequate disclosures, SEBI cautioned that "repeated violations by either of them would be viewed very seriously."
The open offer closed in 2008 and Barot lodged a complaint in 2012, which is almost after four years of completion of the offer. Though there is no limitation period for such complaints to be made to SEBI, a period of 21 days is provided to the shareholders.
SEBI said that even if a complaint is received after one day of closure and completion of open offer formalities, the same would create a huge difficulty in undoing the process that is already complete. Further, it could also be possible that third party rights would have been created in the meantime.
Accordingly, SEBI said that it may not be appropriate or reasonable to allow the relief as sought for by the complainant, who requested the regulator to direct the acquirer to make another open offer and provide an opportunity to the shareholders to take an informed decision whether or not to tender their equity shares.
India Star made an open offer in March 2008 after increasing its stake in Global Offshore to 21.56% through conversion of optionally convertible debentures.
Despite receiving the green signal from SEBI four companies, Lavasa Corp, Adlabs, Ortel Communications and Monte Carlo Fashions are yet to launch their IPOs
Looking to tap into the upbeat investor sentiment, over a dozen companies including Videocon D2H and Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd have filed initial papers with market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for being listed so far during FY2015.
Since April this year, 13 companies have filed their draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) with SEBI to launch an initial public offer (IPO), while SMC Global Securities Ltd sought SEBI’s approval for its follow-on public offer (FPO).
All these companies filed their initial papers after the general election verdict was announced in mid-May.
Of these, the SEBI has already given nod to the IPOs of Lavasa Corporation Ltd, Adlabs Entertainment Ltd, Ortel Communications Ltd and Monte Carlo Fashions Ltd. However, these four companies are yet to launch their public offers.
Besides, the regulator has sought clarification or additional information from the merchant bankers of some of the companies.
Most of the companies plan to utilise IPO proceeds for capacity expansion as well as working capital requirements.
These filings come at a time when the equity market has been on an upswing this year in the wake of bullish investor sentiments.
According to market experts, landslide victory of BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in the general elections has perked up investor sentiment and prompted companies to file IPO papers.
Moreover, companies, that debuted on the stock markets this financial year are trading above their issue price giving big returns to investors, also helped others to file for their public offers.
So far in the current fiscal (2014-15), the 30-share benchmark Sensex has gained over 26% spurred by robust fund flows and revival of risk appetite amid signs of improving economic conditions.