Connect with Us
Moneylife - Facebook Moneylife - Twitter Moneylife - Linkedin Moneylife - Youtube Moneylife Rss feed

Moneylife » Life » Public Interest » SC quashes High Court's gag order on reporting troops movement

SC quashes High Court's gag order on reporting troops movement

    • 0 Comments, Be the first to comment

MDT/PTI | 14/09/2012 05:21 PM | 

The apex court said Allahabad High Court erred in passing such order as ban on media was not sought and the prayer was only to hold an inquiry into the controversial incident

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday quashed Allahabad High Court order, which had prevented media from reporting on the controversy related to alleged Army units' movement towards Delhi on 16th January amid the then prevailing row over erstwhile Army Chief VK Singh's date of birth, reports PTI.
A bench of justices HL Dattu and CK Prasad allowed the plea of Press Council of India (PCI) which had challenged the order saying that court cannot impose such a ban on media as it violates the freedom of speech.
The bench said the High Court erred in passing such order as ban on media was not sought and the prayer was only to hold an inquiry into the controversial incident.
"We are of the opinion that the High Court should not have passed the order as the prayer before it was entirely different and it was inconsonance with the prayer made by the petitioner," the bench said.
The Court also took into account its recent Constitution bench judgement which had said press can only be directed to postpone the reporting for a certain period.
The Centre also said it was against the High Court's order and it should be quashed.
The High Court had directed various Central and state government authorities on 10th April "to ensure that there is no reporting/release of any news item by the print or electronic media on the movement of troops." 
The high court's order was passed on a PIL which said a national daily and a news magazine had reported on movements of the Army units from Agra to Delhi when the Singh's age row controversy was at peak. The petitioner had said the reports were against national interest.
The PCI had approached the apex court saying the order was in violation of the fundamental right under Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution, granted to the media and every citizen of the country.

Post Comment

More in Moneylife

Medha Patkar quits AAP +514 views


Post your Comment

Alert me when new comment is posted on this article
 Please read our Moderation Policy and Terms of Use before posting


Moneylife Foundation: Maharashtra CM Fadnavis says financial literacy empowers citizens


It is evident that Money Life forgot to delete the website name and thus can be blamed as letter by Mr. Sadique.<.. shadi katyal


Cleaning 60 lakh kgs of adulterated pepper under court diktat! Moneylife Digital Team

A bank run by beggars, for beggars in Bihar town IANS

Be the first to comment
Daily Newsletter

1,00,000 Readers

Follow Moneylife
DNL facebook icon DNL linked in icon DNL twitter icon DNL youtube icon DNL rss icon

Grab a Discount Coupon here

Moneylife Magazine

What's your say?

Will AMFI's decision to cap distributor's upfront commissions at 1% affect sales of close-end schemes?
Can't Say
Enter Code : secure code
    change code

What you said

Who will win the Cricket World Cup 2015?

Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls

Join Over 100,000 Awesome Readers

  1. News that Mainstream media does not always cover
  2. Views that are bold and unbiased
  3. Reports that focus on your interests as consumer, investor & citizen