Companies & Sectors
SC hauls up SAT for restraining SEBI from taking action against Sahara cos
The apex court said that the high court and SAT shall not pass any order relating to its direction to Sahara group to refund Rs24,000 crore to investors 
 
The Supreme Court today hauled up the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) for restraining the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) from taking coercive action against Sahara companies for not refunding Rs24,000 crore to investors.
 
It said that the high court and SAT shall not pass any order relating to its direction to Sahara group to refund Rs24,000 crore to investors.
 
The apex court said: “Comply with our order or we will direct personal appearance of companies’ directors and Sahara Group head Subrata Roy.”

User

COMMENTS

Vaibhav Dhoka

3 years ago

Timely hauled SAT.Tribunals and High courts are used as TIME PASS procedures by these MIGHTY PEOPLE.Such stance SC should take in many cases where it is clear that LITIGANT is misusing LEGAL PROCEDURES AND RIGHT.

RTI Judgement Series: PIO's varying statements created suspicion of wrongdoing
The PIO's varying statements in the case of reported fraud created suspicion of wrongdoing. The CIC then directed the executive director of Syndicate Bank to enquire into the matter. This is the 135th in a series of important judgements given by former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi that can be used or quoted in an RTI application
 
The Central Information Commission (CIC), while allowing an appeal, directed executive director of Syndicate Bank to enquire into the matter where the Public Information Officer (PIO) failed to provide information related with a fraud and was giving varying statements.
 
While giving this judgement on 21 September 2011, Shailesh Gandhi, the then Central Information Commissioner said, “...the bench found the statements of the PIO varying, and in the case of reported fraud such different statements create suspicion of wrongdoing.”
 
East Delhi resident VK Bhardwaj, on 14 September 2010, sought information from the Public Information Officer (PIO) of Syndicate Bank's Regional Office at Meerut. Here is the information he sought under the Right to Information (RTI) Act...
 
“In Meerut Main Branch on date 28 September 1991 on savings bank account (SB A/c) No40930 was fraudulently opened by so called ‘Rajeev Bharadwaj’, then on 9 October 1991 a credit of Rs3.85 lakh was sent to the above account. On 10 October 1991, an attempt was made to withdraw the said amount through fraudulent methods for which some of the then employees working in Meerut Main branch were served charge-sheets by the bank, so:
1. Who all employees were given charge-sheets that time?
2. Provide Photostat copies of the charge-sheets issued to the concerned employees.
3. Provide photocopies of the charge-sheet issued to one Rajeev Kumar, the then TSA in Meerut branch.
 
In his reply, the PIO stated that the information sought by the appellant (Bhardwaj) was related to “internal matter held under fiduciary relationship exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(e) of RTI Act-2005 and no public interest is seen”.
 
Aggrieved with the denial of information, Bhardwaj filed his first appeal in which he stated “Section 8 (1)(e) as claimed by the PIO was not applicable and the public interest is involved since it related to public money”.
 
The First Appellate Authority (FAA) in his order directed the PIO to furnish a fresh reply within 15 working days from the date of receipt of copy of his order.
 
Following the order from the FAA, the PIO sent reply to Bhardwaj. The PIO stated, “The sought documents/records pertain to 1999, which were not available now. As per bank’s policy such documents are not preserved beyond 8 years as informed earlier.”
 
Bhardwaj then approached the CIC with his second appeal. In the appeal, he said, “The information provided the PIO was wrong and misleading as the documents which he is not providing were available in the concerned office.”
 
During the hearing, Mr Gandhi, the then CIC, noted that the PIO had refused to give information claiming that information about people alleged to have committed fraud was held by the bank in a fiduciary capacity. According to the PIO, the FAA on 26 November 2010 decided that the information should be provided within 15 days. The PIO, Arun Kumar Tyagi, further stated that he informed the appellant on 4 December 2010 that the information was not kept for more than eight years. 
 
Mr Gandhi asked the PIO whether information relating to a fraud is destroyed in eight years as well. The PIO replied that that information relating to frauds is not destroyed in eight years.
 
Then Tyagi, the PIO, claimed that the information sought by Bhardwaj was stolen or missing. 
 
While allowing the appeal, the bench directed Ravi Chatterjee, executive director of Syndicate Bank, to inquire into this matter and send a report to the appellant and the Commission before 30 October 2011. 
 
The PIO stated that the person responsible for refusing the information was not him but BP Udpa, the then PIO. 
 
Mr Gandhi said, from the fact before the bench, it appeared that the PIO is guilty of not furnishing information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI Act. He (Udpa) has further refused to obey the orders of his superior officer, which raises a reasonable doubt that the denial of information may also be malafide. The FAA has clearly ordered the information to be given.  
 
The bench then issued a show-cause notice to BP Udpa, the then PIO, and asked him to present before the CIC along with his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on him as mandated under Section 20 (1). The Bench also directed Udpa to submit proof of having given the information to the appellant. 
 
 
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
 
Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000653/SG/14723
Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000653/SG
 
 
 
Appellant                                    :              VK Bhardwaj 
                                                                      East Delhi-51
 
Respondent                               :               (1) Arun Kumar Tyagi
                                                                      PIO & Dy. General Manager,
                                                                      Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, 
                                                                      Bhawani Puram, University Road, ,
                                                                      Meerut- 250 004 (UP)
 
                                                      :               (2) Ravi Chatterjee, 
                                                                      Executive Director, 
                                                                      Syndicate Bank, Corporate Office, 
                                                                      Gandhi Nagar, Bengaluru
 

User

RBI opens Rs25,000 crore borrowing window to help mutual fund industry
RBI has decided to conduct a special three-day repo auction under which banks would be encouraged to raise funds totalling Rs25,000 crore at 10.25% for on-lending to the mutual funds
 
The Reserve Bank (RBI) today opened a special borrowing window of Rs25,000 crore to help the crisis-ridden mutual funds tide over their liquidity problems.
 
As a “contingency measure”, RBI has decided to conduct a special three-day repo auction under which banks would be encouraged to raise funds totalling Rs25,000 crore at 10.25% for on-lending to the mutual funds.
 
“This facility will be made available for a temporary period until further notice,” RBI said in a notification.
 
The mutual fund industry has been facing consistent equity folio closures in the past few months due mainly to profit booking and various merger schemes in the industry.
 
Folios are numbers designated to individual investor accounts, although one investor can have multiple folios.
 
The mutual fund industry lost more than 36 lakh investors in 2012-13. The last financial year also marked the fourth consecutive year of loss of folios by mutual funds. During the preceding three financial years, the mutual fund industry had lost over 15 lakh new investor accounts.
 
According to the latest Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) data, mutual funds lost 10 lakh investors, measured in terms of individual accounts or folios, in April-June 2013-14.
 
The total investor accounts with 44 fund houses fell to around 4.18 crore at the end of June 2013, from 4.28 crore in the last fiscal (2012-13).
 
During the April-June period of 2013, the number of investor folios for equity schemes fell by 11 lakh. The total number of folios in equity funds was 3.20 crore at the end of June against 3.31 crore at March-end.
 
According to SEBI data, the total number of folios in debt funds rose by about 1.7 lakh to 63 lakh at the end of June 2013.
 
Besides, exchange traded funds (ETFs) gained 6,558 folios to 7.46 lakh investor accounts at the end of June this year.
 
Balanced schemes, which invest in the equity and debt category, shed 73,415 folios to end at 25.3 lakh at the end of June.
 

User

COMMENTS

M G WARRIER

3 years ago

I am not an expert in folio management. But, how, merger of multiple folios maintained by the same account holder affect the business of the Mutual Fund? Would it not be a better idea to ask MFs to follow some transparent practice by assigning one master folio to every account holder and bring all investments of an individual under that folio with sub numbers for different schemes?

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)