Citizens' Issues
SC dismisses 1993 Mumbai serial blast mastermind's plea

Yaqub Abdul Razak Memon's plea seeking recall of apex court verdict upholding his death sentence was dismissed

 

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed 1993 Mumbai serial bomb blast mastermind Yaqub Abdul Razak Memon's plea seeking recall of apex court verdict upholding his death sentence.
 
 

User

Bank Nifty weak, Nifty, Sensex still going strong – Wednesday closing report

Nifty will turn weak below 8,650. Bank Nifty has to close above 18,600 for it to regain upward momentum

 

We mentioned in Tuesday’s closing report that NSE’s CNX Nifty may continue to make gains, especially if it stays above 8,600. The benchmark opened Wednesday in the green and managed to move higher.
 
The S&P BSE Sensex opened at 28,601 while Nifty opened at 8,699. Sensex moved from the low of 28,567 to 28,763 while Nifty moved from 8,680 to 8,731. Sensex closed at 28,708 (up 191 points or 0.67%) and Nifty closed at 8,714 (up 54 points or 0.62%). A day after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) monetary policy, the Bank Nifty continued to remain weak. Bank Nifty opened at 18,560 and moved from the high of 18,596 to the low of 18,382 and closed at 18,417 (down 53 points or 0.29%). NSE recorded a volume of 105.22 crore shares. India VIX rose 0.68% to close at 14.3475.
 
The Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi on Tuesday gave its approval to amendments to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013 pending in the Rajya Sabha, and approved amendments proposed in the Bill. 
 
Market regulator SEBI said it expects the proposed merger of commodities regulator FMC with it to be completed in 6-12 months.
 
In other news, about 30 crore landless people will get employment in the industrial corridors following amendments to the land acquisition bill, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Wednesday.
 
The RBI had instructed banks to restructure loans of farmers whose crops have been damaged by the recent unseasonal rains and hailstorms. Prime Minister Narendra Modi today announced higher compensation for farmers whose crop has been damaged by unseasonal rains.
 
India will be at forefront of strong investment flows into emerging Asian economies in next few years and more individual Indian investors will approach capital markets for financial advice, International Council of Securities Association (ICSA) chairman Ian C W Russell said.
 
The government has allowed pharmaceutical companies to hike rates of 509 essential medicines used for treating various ailments like diabetes, hepatitis and cancer by 3.84% with effect from 1st April.
 
Coming back to the Indian stock market, Bhushan Steel (12.87%) was the top gainer in ‘A’ group on the BSE, while PMC Fincorp (9.56%) was the top loser in the group.
 
State-run Coal India (5.73%) was the top gainer in Sensex 30 pack. The ministry has allowed CIL to revert to the old system, removing the cap on e-auction volumes, with effect from April 2015. HDFC (2.22%) was the top loser in the Sensex 30 stock.
 
US indices closed Tuesday in the negative. 
 
The Federal Reserve should be “extraordinarily patient” and hold off on raising interest rates until the second half of 2016, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Narayana Kocherlakota said yesterday.
 
Asian indices showed mixed performance. Hang Seng (3.80%) was the top gainer while Taiwan Weighted (0.73%) was the top loser.
 
Japan posted its biggest current account surplus of Y1.44 trillion in almost three and a half years in February, the finance ministry said today.
 
The Bank of Japan today kept monetary policy steady. European indices were showing mixed trading, while US Futures were trading marginally in the green.
 

User

Life Exclusive
Do anti-smoking labels encourage smoking?
The government has been insisting on louder warnings for smokers. But strangely they ignore the warning and smoke more. Here’s why
 
Everyone knows that smoking kills. Smoking causes fatal lung cancer, causes emphysema, leads to birth defects if pregnant mothers smoke a lot.  This is why cigarette packs contain statutory warning. The warnings have gone bigger and bolder over the years.  According to a notification issued by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on 15 October 2014, the specified health warning should cover at least 85% of the principal display area of the package. Out of the 85% area, 60% should cover pictorial health warning and rest 25% should have textual health warning. It needs to be on the top edge of the package. For box, carton and pouches, the specified warning must appear on both sides of the package. In addition, the specified health warning on tobacco products are required to be rotated every 24 months. Even during the 24 months, there should be two different images, replaced every 12 months.
 
But are such loud statutory warnings working? Sales of cigarettes have hardly slowed down in India. 
 
The same is story all over the world. European cigarette makers place their warning in coal-black, Magic Marker-thick frames, making them impossible miss. In Canada, Thailand, Australia and Brazil, the warnings are gorily, forensically true-to-life, showing full-colour images of lung tumours, gangrenous feet and toes, and the open sores and disintegrating teeth that accompany mouth and throat cancers. 
 
These graphic images are designed to make people stop smoking. They have not. Despite tobacco advertising bans, banning of smoking in public places and health warning from the medical community, and massive government investment in antismoking campaigns, global consumers continue to smoke more than 15 billion cigarettes every day – that’s 10 million cigarettes sold every minute, a figure which doesn't include duty-free cigarettes, or the huge international black market trade. 
 
Why are smokers blind to warning labels?  We can know only if we can enter the smokers’ mind and see how they react to the warnings on the label and other places. Marketing expert Martin Lindstrom tried to find out exactly that by using fMRI technology on 2081 volunteers from America, England Germany, Japan, and China, who were put through a brain scanner. What he found was startling. Here is what the fMRI study noticed about Marlene, one of the volunteers, a story that Lindstrom narrates in his book Buyology. 
 
“Marlene was in the scanner for a little over an hour. A small reflective apparatus resembling a car's rear-view mirror projected a series of cigarette warning labels from various angles, one after another, on a nearby screen. Asked to rate her desire to smoke during the slide show, Marlene signalled her responses by pressing down on what's known as a button box-a small black console resembling a hand-sized accordion-as each image flashed by. We continued to perform brain scans on new subjects over the next month and a half.
 
Five weeks later, the team leader, Dr Calvert, presented me with the result. I was, to put it, mildly, startled. Even Dr Calcert was taken back by the findings: warning labels on the sides, front and back of cigarette pack had no effect on suppressing the smokers' craving at all. Zero. In other words, all those gruesome photographs, government regulations, billions of dollars some 123 countries had invested in non-smoking campaigns, all amounted, at the end of a day, to, day a big waste of money.
 
“Are you Sure?” I kept saying.
 
“Pretty Damn certain”. She replied, adding that thee statistical validity was as could be.
 
But this wasn't half as amazing as what Dr Calvert discovered once she analysed the result further. Cigarette warning, whether they informed smokers they were at risk of contracting emphysema, heart disease, or a host of other chronic condition-had in fact stimulated an area of the smokers' brains called the nucleus accumbens, otherwise known as “the craving spot.” This region is a chain-link of specialized neurons that lights up when the body desires something-whether it's alcohol, drugs, tobacco, sex, or gambling. When stimulated, the nucleus accumbens requires higher and higher doses to get its fix.
 
In short, the fMRI result showed that cigarette warning labels not only failed to deter smoking, but by activating the nucleus accumbens, it appeared they actually encouraged smokers to light up. We could not help but conclude that those same cigarette warning labels intended to curb smoking, reduce cancer, and save lives had instead become a killer marketing tool for the tobacco industry.
 
If you ask the smokers about the warning labels they would say, as Marlene did, that they believed the warning were right and it made them smoke less.  Maybe because they thought it was the right answer, or what the researchers wanted to hear, or may be because they felt guilty about what they knew smoking was doing to their health. But as Dr Calvert concluded later, it wasn't that our volunteers felt ashamed about what smoking was doing to their bodies; they felt guilty that the labels stimulated their brains' craving areas. It was just that their conscious minds could not tell the difference. Marlene’s brain, the ultimate no bullshit zone-had adamantly contradicted her. Just as our brains do to each one of us every single day. 
 
As government around the world make warning labels bigger and gorier and louder, they may ponder over this enormous wasted effort. There must be ways to wean people away from smoking but the way we are going about it, would achieve little.

User

COMMENTS

Dayananda Kamath k

2 years ago

how does the size of warning matter i do not understand may be one more way to give revenue to printers and designers. tobacco too has medicinal value and total banning will create more opportunity for corruption. in all matters people are talking of individual freedom to do what they like why not tobacco also. everybody knows its effect still do it because there is no social stigma for that.

vswami

2 years ago


Attention may be drawn to-
"Modi steps in, pro-tobacco MPs may be axed from panel" - TOI



I. As commented (@Facebook)
Any measure aimed at good health of ‘netas’ (supposed to lead) as the starting point has to be endorsed uniformly by anyone who is fully conscious of, - ‘smoking is harmful/injurious’ to not only smokers but also the surrounding environment too. Hoping on hopes that all such reforms, -not barring insistence on MPs to be ‘pro-active’ in their vested role, and in attending to commoners’ grouses galore ,- if strictly implemented and followed up, the long wished/clamoured for the day of ‘redemption’ and the inevitable transformation of the nation as proclaimed may not be far off.
A good step, even if it be a baby step; and more, good place of start., aimed at the ideal of 'reformism' and the long wished for eventual transformation of the nation '.
II. < “Finance minister Arun Jaitley made it clear that the central government's decision on increasing the size of health warnings on tobacco products would not be based on opinions of individuals.”
Another BJP MP defends tobacco, says 'no proof smoking causes cancer'

FM speak:
Asserting that a "multi-pronged" approach to discourage tobacco use was needed, Jaitley said, "Individuals can give individual opinions, but the government takes a measured and responsible decisions.

"Therefore in the last two months and in my two budgets, I have certainly reflected what the collective thinking of the government is." >
To add:
If were to be viewed in a different but perspective, one honestly feels, - any decision of government , in order to ultimately measure up to and prove a responsible one, must necessarily have the ‘common good’ in focus.

On the collective thinking of the government he refers to, what he seems to have in mind is the hike in ‘excise duty’ brought in almost annually as a ritual. If so, he has betrayed the known weakness of the men in governance from time to time, in that any failure in implementing any principle or rule based requirement would be met and more than compensated so long as more monies are collected and goes to augment its Treasury. That, to say the least, is patently poor logic and lopsided philosophy of ‘life’. Another like instance that immediately comes to one’s mind is the 15% levy on ‘works contract’ (i.e. house building) because of inability to force builder to comply with the requirements of law, two of which are so called ‘ completion certificate’ and timely and proper ‘completion’.

Jayaram M

2 years ago

There was no pictorial for Walter Raleigh.
In India, public health is absymal & the problem is more from chewing tobacco, 90 %; rather than the smoking kind.
The state of education, which could be more effective, in curbing smoking: is perhaps no better ! Add poverty; where tobacco to a certain extent keeps one to that one meal a day. One cannot really compare studies made in developed countries to the ground situation in India. Awareness; not succumbing to peer pressure; education and perhaps the picture on the pack. Lighting a candle is still a better alternative than cursing the darkness.

Abhijit Gosavi

2 years ago

The U.S. seems to be the only country where smoking rates have declined over the years. That hasn't happened because of any advertisements, but because it is virtually impossible to smoke anywhere. Smoking is not permitted virtually everywhere, e.g., restaurants, bars, hotels, malls, grocery stores, buses, airports, and metros. The only places where people can smoke are their own houses and cars. Other factors that have helped in reducing smoking include their remarkably high prices and the e-cig.

The smoking habit is often acquired during school and college. Campaigns in schools have not helped, but because cigarettes are prohibitively expensive, children and college kids can't buy them easily. Also, selling cigarettes to children below a certain age is banned by law. And yet about 16% of high school kids smoke, which is tragic. Unsurprisingly, mothers seem to have the greatest influence on the smoking habits of their children.

Abhijit Gosavi

2 years ago

The U.S. seems to be the only country where smoking rates have fallen over the years. That hasn't happened because of the ads, but because it is virtually impossible to smoke anywhere. Restaurants, bars, hotels, malls, grocery stores, buses, metros, and every place you can think of doesn't allow smoking. The only place where people can smoke is in their own houses and cars. Other factors that have helped reduce smoking include their remarkably high prices and the e-cig.

The smoking habit is often acquired in the young years. Campaigns in schools have not helped, but the fact that cigarettes are prohibitively expensive prevents children and college kids from buying them. Further, selling cigarettes to children below a certain age is banned. Still about 16% of high school kids smoke, which is a pity. Not surprisingly, mothers seem to have the greatest influence on the smoking habit.

R Balakrishnan

2 years ago

If any govt is serious about the impact of smoking on public health and finances, the only way out is to ban production and sale of all tobacco products. Simply having photos and warnings will not help. It is like keeping the cat to guard the milk. Govt sees the tobacco industry as a cash cow So no govt is actually moving forward to put a halt.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)