Citizens' Issues
Sahara case: Supreme Court extends Subrata Roy’s custody till 11th March
While accepting Roy's apology, the Bench rapped the Sahara Group chairman for not abiding by its order and taking contradictory stand on payment of investors' money
 
Amid high drama, Sahara Group chief Subrata Roy on Tuesday appeared before the Supreme Court, which extended his custody till the next hearing on 11th March. While ordering the custody of Roy, the apex court, however, clarified that it is not an order on contempt.
 
Two more male directors of the company were also ordered to be taken into custody. However, company director Vandana Bhargava was spared. 
 
A bench of Justices KS Radhakrishnan and JS Khehar said, "Subrata Roy to remain in police custody today. Two other male directors also directed to be taken into custody."
 
The court said it was not happy with the proposal of Sahara on refund of money as “they have not come up with any concrete proposal and bank guarantee.”  
 
The apex court also told the Sahara group chief that he can't make payment in cash as it is contrary to law. "You have to make payment through demand draft or cheque," the Bench said.
 
Earlier Sahara counsels Ram Jethmalani, Ravi Shankar prasad and Rajiv Dhawan stuck to arguments that verification of documents was not done by SEBI and that refunds were already made.
 
SEBI counsel Arvind Datar presented the efforts made by the market regulator and explained the group has been making contrary statements. "Every time we disprove their story. They revise the story," he said accusing the group of wasting time.
 
The Supreme Court also accepted unconditional apology tendered by Sahara chief Roy for not appearing before it last Wednesday.
 
During the hearing, Roy also assured the apex court that its order will be followed by him and sought more time for refunding money to investors.
 
"I have full faith in you. Punish me if I don't comply with your order," Roy told the apex court.
 
While accepting Roy's apology, the Bench rapped the Sahara Group chairman for not abiding by its order and taking contradictory stand on payment of investors' money.
 
"You pushed us to the corner. Had you been serious, this position would not have arrived,” the apex court told Roy.
 
Accepting Roy's apology, the apex court said, "We respected you; you failed to respect us."
 
While directing custody of Roy and two others, the apex court said it is implementing its order (issued earlier). 
 
Earlier, Manoj Sharma from Gwalior threw black ink on the face of Roy when the Sahara group chief was being brought to the Supreme Court amidst chaotic scenes.
 
Sharma, who reportedly has a previous record of having thrown a shoe at Congress MP Suresh Kalmadi when he was being brought to a court, removed his shirt and shouted that “He (Roy) is a thief. He has stolen people’s money and I am against thieves”.

User

COMMENTS

Param

3 years ago

3 cheers to Manoj Sharma!!!

AAP’s Glare is directed at select businessmen

Why’s Arvind Kejriwal silent about the massive loot of banks by large and small businessmen and politicians?

Arvind Kejriwal is, without doubt, one of the sharpest minds on the political scene today. His guerrilla tactics of destabilising established power centres has won him an impressive victory in Delhi and his anarchist ways and disregard for rules has only increased his following among disenchanted Indians who want change at any cost. His followers are uninterested in facts and details. So, if one asks Mr Kejriwal why target Mukesh Ambani alone and remain silent about others, he could well argue that he will do what he can and it is for others to take up the rest.

He has probably calculated that training his guns on public-private partnerships in bijlee and paani will yield better political dividends than issues that do not affect the aam aadmi directly, or are less catchy. But even taking all these calculations into account, one cannot help wondering why Mr Kejriwal is silent about the biggest source of the loot of public money and the watering hole of all dubious capitalists—the frightening amount of bad loans run up by public sector banks.  

In this context, one also wonders about the silence on the Rs7,000-crore largesse, in the guise of corporate debt restructuring, handed to ‘pepper spray’ Rajagopal, the founder of the flying Lanco group, who has run up huge losses and gets bank funding with ease. There is similar silence about Vijay Mallya of Kingfisher Airways, who also owed Rs7,000 crore to Indian banks. One could list many more who are not in AAP’s crosshairs. But one can’t help wondering why they are not.
 

User

COMMENTS

K Manjrekar

3 years ago

It seems you are hurt that Ambani is targeted.Why don't you ask Kejriwal himself.

kaushik shukla

3 years ago

selective approach of attacking industrialist certainly raises questions about his integrity to offer any solution to aam aadmi who has brought him to lime light.
His only objective is to gain popularity at any cost by announcing controversial statements. To raise issue is one thing and to offer effective solution is entirely different ball game. Delhi voters have already understood his game and I am sure other voters across India will show him the correct place in 2014.

REPLY

MG Warrier

In Reply to kaushik shukla 3 years ago

This is indicative of the hopes raised by the AAP message. Politicians and leaders of political parties in India have been giving ‘promises’ through speeches and manifestos for the last 66 years. If Kejriwal is getting an audience, may be, he has been able to infuse some credibility through his deeds. No individual howsoever efficient or honest he may be in his approach, will not be able to clear the present environment of governance, until ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ wake up.

MG Warrier

3 years ago

The concerns and anxieties expressed here about ‘selective approach’ by a political party which came into being based on certain principles that aam aadmi respected are genuine. My personal view is that Kejriwal’s assertion that ‘AAP is a message and not yet a political party in the sense the words are now understood’ should be respected. Other forums and platforms should follow up (or dispute) the initiatives by AAP on an ongoing basis. This includes supplementing the efforts of AAP in exposing corruption and unethical practices. Excerpts from(the unedited version of) my article on AAP published in The Global ANALYST, February 2014 relevant in this context copied below:
“The Indian Aam Aadmi has asserted his right to make his voice heard, thanks to the conduit provided by AAP. Let us not compel AAP to show the results they apparently promised. Now, it is the turn of the common man(Famously referred to as “WE THE PEOPLE” in the preamble of the Constitution of India) to organise, wherever they are, and force the legislature, executive and the judiciary at all levels to uphold the spirit of the Constitution and bring back ethics and morality to governance.
If Aam Aadmi and the BPL(Businessmen-Politician-Lawyers) Combine which is managing the show in Delhi take the message sent out by AAP through the medium of broomstick seriously, and act in a proactive manner, during the short period left for Elections, 2014, several stages of pre-stabilisation experiments of India Growth Story can be skipped. Here, all political parties(Right, Left and Centre) have a responsibility to participate. Time is running out.”

mm sundram

3 years ago

the report cannot be accepted since there were several cases already put up on these companies. they are now in beleaquered state of condition. take the kingfisher. its totally out of business. like wise he sold major junk to foreign companies. his shares already sold out by the institutions. but what is the action taken against the Amabanis. i, myself, made a very serious complaint against the reliance group in 2005-6 when they divided their companies into several entities. there is lot of manipulations. i could not spent much over this complaint since i am an individual and the monies cant be spent much. but the SEBI the market regulator has not taken any action. this kind of activities going on in India whereas u are blaming the Kejriwal he is only hope for the future..

Shivangni Sharma

3 years ago

He is shrewd but even his admirers have started saying that he is over smart. Earlier I doubted his ability, but the way he engineered his exit from Delhi, I have doubts about his intentions too. He reminds me of VP Singh, how he managed to fool us into voting him to power only to be horrified at his hard line on reservation. We could see similar ulterior motives revealed if (heaven forbid) AAP comes to power

Srinivas

3 years ago

I think everyone is caught looking at AK very unjustly. He took on Anil Ambani and Mukesh Ambani as they were both running companies that affected Delhi - Anil by virtue of his control over BSES now Reliance Power and Mukesh Ambani for the gas price increase which forced NTPC to increase rates.

Anil Agashe

3 years ago

You are absolutely right. The problem with him is he does not seem to take a larger view of things. Why is silent about Sahara? He thinks Ambani is soft target that will yield political dividends to him.

Nilesh KAMERKAR

3 years ago

There is more to AAP than meets the eye. . .

Mr. Raju Parulekar, a senior marathi journalist has been exposing 'Saint' Kejriwal.

It is all there for all to see on Mr. Raju Parulekar's twitter account.




FMP is unclear to investors: Our Online Survey Results

Moneylife’s online survey on FMP shows that 25% of the respondents do not invest in FMP. Those who are aware of the tax benefits and decent returns do not shy away from FMPs. What stops others? Lack of clarity and dearth of reliable advice is to blame

Moneylife online survey on fixed maturity plans (FMPs) received 372 responses. At first glance, the survey shows that 25% respondents do not invest in FMPs. If you do not have tax liability, or are in 10% tax bracket, it is better to avoid FMPs. Some 10% of respondents have, rightly, given this as the reason for not investing in FMPs. The survey, and emails received, showed that although people are interested in FMPs, they have to grapple with lack of reliable advice in choosing FMPs (20%).
 

People are looking for indicative returns and portfolio details (32%), but mutual fund companies are not allowed to declare these. Investment details are known only after the launch of FMPs. Moneylife’s Cover Story will serve as a guide for your FMP investment. March is the peak season for offers of FMPs. For the first time, backed by comprehensive analysis of data, not in public domain, we present an FMP guide to invest, calculate returns and ways to ensure that tax is saved by double indexation.
 



Some 22% of the respondents had 0%-5% of their debt portfolio invested in FMPs, while 12% respondents had invested 5%-10% in FMPs. Their main reasons for investing in FMPs are: returns are higher than bank FDs (36%) and they save tax on the returns (36%). One out of 10 respondents was not sure about how FMPs save tax.
 

Some 17% of the respondents are worried about the safety of capital, which is understandable, considering that an FMP is not as safe as an FD from scheduled commercial banks. One out of 10 respondents trust only bank FDs. A good 44%, rightly, said that possible returns on FMPs can be 8% to 10%. Investors avoid guidance from advisors while purchasing FMPs; they rely on their own research (28%).

User

COMMENTS

PERVIN

2 years ago

The survey clearly shows lack of information, clarity how it works for tax savings and since there are uncountable MFs and FMP customers are confused, hesitant to invest in FMPs as Mostly its ones hard earned money and customers look out for safety and growth of their funds with assured returns on investment. Hence if more systematic steps taken to educate public and provide guidance w.r.t. proper FMP Options / MF options without heavy fees etc. I'm sure it will definately make an impact and more people will move out from the FD bracket and invest wisely in FMPs MFs. Same is with stocks. If people can invest and rest assured their money will grow systematically then they will start process of diversified investing in above instruments. Pl. provide honest and specific guidance to customers which will help and go a long way in future making public move away from FDs and get convinced their money will grow multiple times and tell them specifically how. Govt. agencies to guide public. Clarity w.r.t. growth of funds is a MUST. There should be no ambiguity. Just as FDs say in e.g. 1 Year your money invested will become exactly Rs.... same way FMPs too should specify rates and final maturity amts. This will instill guarantee and growth of investments. My views. correct me if I am wrong.

Suiketu Shah

3 years ago

The entire MF rules and regulations have got so complex and controversial (in attempt to safeguard MF brokers) that it is inevitably dying due to poor leadership of the rule makers for the industry.

Nilesh KAMERKAR

3 years ago

In FMPs, Mutual funds hold fixed deposits till maturity and pass on interest income as capital gains to investors(?). . .

FMPs are a refined version of dividend stripping & against the very spirit of mutual funds investing.

REPLY

raj

In Reply to Nilesh KAMERKAR 3 years ago

Not clear about your point. FMPs have dividend and growth option. Yes, FMP will hold the securities (CD, CP, bonds/NCD) till maturity.

Nilesh KAMERKAR

In Reply to raj 3 years ago

1) Request you to please make a list of fundamental characteristics / attributes of mutual funds and then compare those with FMPs. - You shall agree, FMPs are wolves in sheep's clothing

2) Returns from Mutual funds are classified as Capital Gains because they are unpredictable and arise from gains on capital.

3) There is no Capital gain generated by FMPs whatsoever. Returns are only by way of interest recd on maturity of time deposits

Therefore, FMPs are simply exploiting this loophole by passing on interest earned as Capital Gains. Dividend or Growth option does not matter.

Trust this clarifies.

raj

In Reply to Nilesh KAMERKAR 3 years ago

1. See no reason to make such comparison. 2. Do debt mutual funds invest in instruments different than FMP? 3. If debt mutual funds are investing in same instruments as FMP, why would FMP not consider it as capital gains and debt mutual funds are ok to consider it? 4. If Taxman does not have any problem in considering capital gains instead of interest for FMP, your point is irrelevant. 5. Closed ended FMP starting and ending at same time takes away the uncertainties associated with entering and exiting at wrong time in debt mutual fund. Please read Moneylife FMP cover story for more details: http://www.moneylife.in/article/fixed-ma.....

Krishnamurthy Kakaraparthy

3 years ago

FDs provide regular (Monthly/Quarterly) income. FMPs do not. Debt funds, with similar tax benefits, provide liquidity which FMPs do not have.
K Krishnamurthy

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)