Right to Information
RTI query shows that National Women’s Commission is spineless

In the case of slanderous remarks on women by Union minister Prakash Jaiswal in October 2012, RTI reveals that neither the NWC nor the PMO lodged even the elementary police complaint against him. Why have such a lame-duck NWC?

While the horrendous gang-rape of a medical student in South Delhi, who is now battling for life has infuriated the entire nation, the fact is sexual abuse, verbal or otherwise is taken lightly not only by the law enforcing authorities and political powers-that-be but hold your breath—even the National Women’s Commission (NWC)!

While the NWC has not taken any stringent action against the gang-rape case and has merely voiced concern (thank you), its recent history reveals that its chairpersons/members themselves suffer from foot-in-the-mouth syndrome, or worse have outrageous views on women. A couple of examples include the 2009 Mangalore Pub attack case when its member Nirmala Venkatesh made a statement that women who went to that pub should have protected themselves against the backdrop of less security provided by the pub and if they were not in the wrong, should have come forward and given a complaint. She was sacked from NWC. In July 2012, NWC member Alka Lamba leaked out the name of the minor raped in Guwahati and was subsequently removed from the fact-finding committee. Present chairperson of NWC, Mamata Sharma advocated that women dress properly for reduction of rape crimes.

Hence, it is not surprising how casual was the attitude of NWC when Union minister Prakash Jaiswal made derogatory remarks against women at a public function in Kanpur in October 2012. The revelations under the RTI (Right to Information) Act in response to RTI applications filed by ace RTI activist Subhash Agrawal reveals the callous and indifferent attitude towards women abuse.

Just to recall, Prakash Jaiswal, at a poetry function in Kanpur in October 2012, compared India’s T-20 World Cup win to a wife. He stated that like in cricket where a new victory has importance, a new marriage also has charm but with passing time, like the victory, a wife becomes old and loses charm and then there is no fun. (Nayi nayi jeet aur nayi nayi shaadi, iska apna alag mahatva hota hai... jaise jaise samay beetega.. jeet ki yaadein purani hoti jayegi; jaise jaise samay beet ta hai, patni purani hoti chali jati hai, vo maza nahi rehta hai.)

Delhi-based RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal sought information from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) in the first week of this October, regarding action taken against Mr Jaiswal in this issue of derogatory remarks against women and whether the NWC has taken up the matter with the PMO and whether NWC had lodged a police complaint in this regard?

NCW letter to PMO in the Jaiswal case

The PMO sent him a photocopy of a letter written by Mamta Sharma, chairperson of NWC on 3 October 2012 which reveals that all that she did was to dash of a letter which any faceless citizen could have done. The letter written to prime minister Manmohan Singh by Mamta Sharma reads: “I would like to bring to your kind attention regarding the derogatory remarks made by Shri Sriprakash Jaiswal, minister of coal, Government of India against the women while attending a programme during  Kavi Sammelan at KK Girls College. Kanpur, UP.

“The comments made by him were almost abusive for all the women of the country and extremely unfortunate. Women’s groups, social organizations and political parties have strongly criticized his comments.

“The incident was also aired on electronic media as well as print media and the NGOs demonstrated outside his house at Kanpur.

“National Commission for Women is seriously concerned about the remarks made by the minister against the women as the comments are unfortunate abusive and insulting for women of the country. Keeping in view of the above, I shall be grateful if you kindly look into the matter and advised him to be more careful in future while making such comments in public.” (produced verbatim). 

If the NWC does not go beyond the verbose statement of asking the PM to advise Mr Jaiswal to “be more careful in future” what hope can women of being safe or have an organization of the caliber of NWC to fight for them? No police complaint was lodged by NWC as per RTI documents.

PMO’s letter to NWC

The PMO was equally spineless in its reply to Ms Sharma. The copy of the letter received by Mr Agrawal under RTI, from PM Manmohan Singh (written on 17th October) to Mamta Sharma states: “ I am in receipt  of  your  letter  of  3 October, 2012 regarding the alleged remarks made by Shri Sriprakash Jaiswal, minister  of  coal, Government  of  India  while  attending  a programme at KK Girls College, Kanpur,  Uttar Pradesh.  I can understand your sentiments on the issue.

“The government and I personally attach great importance to the need to protect the dignity and status of women.  I agree with you that nothing should be said or done that is or can be construed to be disrespectful to women.” That’s it and the matter of women abuse by a Union minister was over for the NWC as well as the PMO.

Moneylife holds regular seminars on how to use RTI to contribute to improved governance. Read about the latest RTI seminar.

Agrawal’s RTI application:

Subhash Agrawal has asked the following information in his RTI application of 3 October 2012, from the PMO. He had to go to in first appeal to the appellate authority in PMO before he received a reply. Earlier he had sent a letter to PMO asking the PM to sack Mr Jaiswal on this issue.

 He had asked for:

“Has the National Commission of Women (NWC) taken up the matter as referred in queries above with the prime minister and/or PMO as also referred in enclosed news-clippings? If yes, copies of all such correspondence between the NWC and PMO and also information on action taken by PMO on any such reporting by NWC.”

“Complete  information  together  with  related  file-notings/correspondence/documents  on  under-mentioned  aspects  also  relating to  my submissions ‘File police-complaint against Shri Prakash Jaiswal  apart from sacking from Union  Cabinet’  (03.10.2012)  e-mailed  to  PMO,  and  the news item ‘Wives  lose  their charm with age, remarks Jaiswal’ (TOI 03.10.2012) copies enclosed:

“Complete information together with related correspondence/file-notings/documents on action taken on each and every aspect of my submissions. File police complaint against Shri Prakash Jaiswal apart from sacking from the Union cabinet (03.1 0.2012) e-mailed to the PMO by PMO and/or by public-authority where these submissions have been forwarded by the PMO.

Learn how to use the existing RTI Act of India to query the private sector

“Complete information on action taken by the prime minister/PMO and/or concerned public authority against Union minister Shri Prakash Jaiswal for his said remarks against women.

“Has some clarification etc sought from Union minister Shri Prakash Jaiswal for his said remarks against women? If yes, please provide details with copies of explanation sought and received.

“Was resignation sought from Union minister Shri Prakash Jaiswal for his said remarks against women as referred in this RTI petition? Was video-recording of disgraceful remarks against women made by Union minister Shri Prakash Jaiswal sought by PMO/NWC/Union ministry for women/any other concerned public authority for study and/or matching with his twisted clarifications?  If yes to (6) and/or (7), please provide details.”

To Mr Agrawal’s queries of whether the PMO sought explanation from Mr Jaiswal or whether a resignation order was given against him for his derogatory remarks in public, the PMO replied that: “there is no information of such record in this office.”

Let see if both the PMO and NWC limp back to solid action in the gang-rape case.

Moneylife RTI workshop: How to use RTI effectively, for beginners

(Vinita Deshmukh is the consulting editor of Moneylife, an RTI activist and convener of the Pune Metro Jagruti Abhiyaan. She is the recipient of prestigious awards like the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting which she won twice in 1998 and 2005 and the Chameli Devi Jain award for outstanding media person for her investigation series on Dow Chemicals. She co-authored the book “To The Last Bullet - The Inspiring Story of A Braveheart - Ashok Kamte” with Vinita Kamte and is the author of “The Mighty Fall”.)



subrahmanian s h

4 years ago

The clue to our ruling elite is from a Senior Citizen in Delhi yesterday. What do we expect from this sort of NCW..?
“I am ashamed as a human being. I wonder what their mothers think about those boys who did this crime,. Be it the Raisina Hills or 10 Janpath, India’s power corridor got a taste of people’s power on Saturday with thousands of citizens, young and old, coming out voluntarily to protest the gang rape of a 23-year-old paramedical student in a moving bus. Missing to perform duties were the Commissioner of Police, PM, Gandys and Home Ministr and his Secretary. Police were leaderless, aimless and cowardly.
The rage of the citizens is still on display. The protest turned violent was a different matter. Did any neta assumed leadership?
Today, being Sunday more protesters are likely to assemble at public places. Funny all roads leading to Rashtrapati Bhavan are closed. Section 144 is invoked.
The government’s knee-jerk response last evening incident reflects the absolute bankruptcy of ideas in the political class.
Naturally it's feared: "once media spotlight dims, rapes will continue..."

Reliance My Gold Plan: Understand the fine print and your alternatives

Reliance My Gold Plan is an innovative product to create a gold SIP on a daily basis with redemption option of 24k gold coin or jewellery. While it is an alternative to jeweller gold savings schemes you need to know its drawbacks, too  

Reliance My Gold Plan (RMGP) offers an advantage of low minimum monthly investment of Rs1,000 which is invested by a systematic investment plan (SIP) into gold purchased across 20 business days of a month. It means you can get a daily cost averaging of gold with only Rs50 everyday investment. Gold of 24K 995 fineness will be allotted and up to four decimal points rounded grams will be credited to the customer’s account. The product does not need a demat account.


The plan can be subscribed for a tenure ranging from one year to 15 years. Redemption is allowed in the form of 24K gold coin or jewellery at specific outlets after paying making charges and VAT. RMGP competes with Gold Savings Schemes (GSS) from jewellers. While most of the jeweller schemes only allow gold purchase at the price that is offered at end of the term, Gitanjali group offers Swarna Mangal scheme which allows you to lock with the gold price at each instalment payment. Swarna Mangal scheme offers a carrot of 30% discount on making charges of the jewellery that you purchase; it does not give option of gold coin/bar purchase.


RMGP is launched by Reliance Money Precious Metals Pvt Ltd—a Reliance Capital company and World Gold Council. It is not a regulated scheme. While this may be the biggest disadvantage, the safety of RMGP gold is little better than a jeweller shop. RMGP gold is kept with Lemuire Secure Logistics Pvt Ltd and IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd has been appointed as the security trustee.


Bullionindia.in, which was recently launched, claims to offer gold and silver trading at wholesale prices. Its features include no storage, no account opening, no brokerage charges for buying and selling as well as no need for a demat account. It too offers physical redemption option after paying delivery charges. It is promoted by NCDEX Spot Exchange, RiddiSiddhi Bullions and Finkurve Financial Services. While it may not allow SIP creation, customers can do it themselves as gold can be purchased in a low denomination of 0.1 grams.


Bullionindia.in pricing for per gram gold as of 18 December 2012 is Rs3191 (inclusive of VAT), while RMGP gold pricing is Rs3329 (excluding VAT). Both of them offer 24 K 995 fineness gold. Bullionindia.in is also unregulated; it can be considered as competitor to RMGP.


Here are the pros and cons of RMGP



  • It offers low entry level of Rs1,000 per month and in multiples of Rs100 thereafter
  • It allows systematic gold accumulation with subscription split into 20 daily purchases taking away risk of timing the markets
  • Customer’s account is credited with 24K gold of 995 fineness up to four decimals of gram
  • It allows redemption in 24K gold coin or jewellery after paying making charges and VAT
  • RMGP gold is kept with Lemuire Secure Logistics Pvt Ltd and IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd has been appointed as the security trustee



  • Pricing of gold is higher than that offered by Bullionindia.in
  • It is not a regulated scheme
  • The plan can be subscribed for a tenure ranging from one year to 15 years. There is a lock-in period of six months after which you can claim gold in the form of coins or jewellery, but premature termination charges of 2.5% apply
  • There will be administrative charges of 1.5% as a mark-up on the daily gold price
  • It does not offer trading of gold. You have to take physical delivery at the end of the term. There is no option of redeeming in cash. There will be 0.5% safe keeping charge if you don’t take delivery of gold after six months from your maturity or issue of fulfilment voucher

Read - http://moneylife.in/article/gold-savings-scheme-from-jewellers-what-you-need-to-know/30186.html








3 years ago

There is no benefit for the customers/subscribers through this scheme.

There are a lot of charges, admin charges etc, which you normally will not be subjected to if you go to your local jewellers (in Chennai GRT Nathella etc).

Sunil Goyal

3 years ago

It is totally FAKE.. I took the plan and given one cheque. Cheque has been cleared and after that two payments have been debited from Account by ECS.. They are saying that they have not received any payment and asked me to give the ECS mandate.. and bank is saying that amount is credited to RMG (Reliance My Gold Plan)... So it is a big fraud and fake. My Customer ID = 200268



In Reply to Sunil Goyal 3 years ago

Ask them publicly on public portal like there facebook page...you will get instant reply...

I did in same way..


4 years ago

It seems a big fraud. I am supposed to get a receipt of my initial payment within 4 days. Its more than 15 days now and no one is available to answer on customer care help line (1800 3000 2267). Before payment that bitch Miss Shaira called twice in a day.

My Application No. MGP-021750
Customer ID 150453.

Soumen Mondal

4 years ago

I have invested recently. How I will get the investment result after every month.


4 years ago

call me 9916019084 i am interested to invest the gold savings scheme..

Cheque bouncing: Supreme Court corrects itself after 14 years

In 1998, the court had held that you could not file a case on second dishonour of a cheque,...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access


Already A Subscriber?
Yearly Digital+Print Access


Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)