RTI Judgement Series
RTI Judgement Series: PIO issued show cause notice for not giving info on ration card

The CIC issued a show cause notice to erstwhile PIO for not replying within 30 days as mandated under the RTI Act and also for not following orders of FAA. This is the 192nd in a series of important RTI judgements given by former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi

The Central Information Commission (CIC), while allowing an appeal, directed the Public Information Officer (PIO) of Food Supplies & Consumer Affairs Department at the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD), to provide complete information to the appellant about his ration card. The Bench also issued a show cause notice to erstwhile PIO for not replying within 30 days as mandated under the Right to Information (RTI) Act and also for not following orders of First Appellate Authority (FAA).

 

While giving the judgement on 17 September 2009, Shailesh Gandhi, the then Central Information Commissioner said, "From the facts before the Bench it is apparent that the PIO, KD Trehan is guilty of not furnishing information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days. He has further refused to obey the orders of his superior officer, which raises a reasonable doubt that the denial of information may also be malafide."

 

Delhi resident, Ali Mohammad Saifi, on 2 April 2009, sought from the PIO information regarding his application for ration card. Here is the information he sought...

 

1. Did Appellant mention House in the IE column of his application form?

2. Appellant requested for photocopy of application form.

3. Has the order to give 12 Kg wheat instead of whole been given and when?

4. Appellant requested for inspecting receipts from November 2008 to March 2009. Why are 12kg of sugar and 5kg of rice given?

 

The reply provided by the PIO was not enclosed with the appeal to the CIC.

 

Ali Mohammad Saifi then approached the FAA with his first appeal stating that he did not receive any information from the PIO.

 

In his order, the FAA directed the PIO to requisite information to the RTI application dated 2 April 2009. Regarding non-receipt of 25 kgs of ration, it was explained by the PIO, that there was some clerical error. The FAA also ordered the PIO to provide the correct information within 15 days.

 

However, the appellant did not receive any information from the PIO, despite order from the FAA.

 

Ali Mohammad Saifi then filed his second appeal before the CIC.

 

During the hearing before Mr Gandhi, the then CIC, the PIO stated the RTI application was not received by him. However, the Bench noted that the appellant had included the receipt no: ED844602289IN issued by Speed Post on 2 April 2009. It is also significant that no such plea of non-receipt of the RTI application has been recorded in the order of FAA, Mr Gandhi observed.

 

The PIO OP Gupta, who was present during the hearing, stated that he had joined only recently and the person responsible for the delay was KD Trehan (assistant commissioner, East Zone and PIO).

 

The PIO did not show any evidence that the information had been provided to Saifi. However, he showed documents stating that on 9 September 2009, the grievance of the appellant was resolved.

 

Saifi, in his second appeal had alleged that a bribe of Rs1,000 was demanded by officials of the public authority to correct mistakes in the name mentioned in his ration card. "The PIO appears to be showing the Commission that the bribe may not have been taken but no information has been given," Mr Gandhi noted.

 

While allowing the appeal, the Bench directed the PIO to provide complete information to Saifi before 30 September 2009.

 

Mr Gandhi said, "From the facts before the Commission it is apparent that the PIO, KD Trehan is guilty of not furnishing information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI Act. He has further refused to obey the orders of his superior officer, which raises a reasonable doubt that the denial of information may also be malafide. It appears that the PIO's actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1)."

 

The Bench then issued a show cause notice to Trehan asking him to make a written submission showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on him.

 

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION

 

Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2009/001812/4832

http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/SG-17092009-08.pdf

Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2009/001812

 

Appellant                                                     : Ali Mohd. Saifi,

                                                                     Delhi-110091

 

Respondent                                                : PIO & Asst. Commissioner (East),

                                                                     Food Supplies & Consumer Affairs Department,

                                                                     GNCTD,

                                                                     DDA Shopping Complex,

                                                                     Dayanand Vihar, Delhi-110092

User

Canara Bank cuts fixed deposit rates by 100 bps

Canara Bank has cut its interest rate on fixed deposit on maturities of 61-90 days to 7.75% from 8.75%

State-run Canara Bank on Tuesday reduced its fixed deposit (FD) rates by up to 100 basis points (bps) or 1% on select maturities.

 

Canara Bank has cut its interest rate by 1% on maturities of 61-90 days to 7.75% from 8.75%. For maturities of 91-120 days, the new rate would be cut by 0.5% to 8.50%, while for 121-179 days, the FD rate has been reduced by 0.25% to 8.75%, the lender said in a statement.

 

Besides, FDs of one-two years would now earn 9% compared with 9.1% earlier.

 

On 29th October, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had raised the repo rate by 0.25% in its monetary policy review making the cost of fund expensive for banks.

 

Following the central bank’s move, some banks including Punjab National Bank and Canara Bank raised the interest rates in some maturity brackets by 25-50 basis points.

 

State Bank of India and HDFC Bank had raised their base rate or the minimum lending rate by 0.2% to 10%.

User

Sonia Gandhi's name removed from list of richest leaders

Huffington Post has removed Sonia Gandhi from list of richest leaders, where it appeared at 12th place with a wealth of $ billion

HuffPost World that compiled a list of the 20 richest world leaders currently in power based on available data, had removed the name of Congress president and United Progress Alliance (UPA) chairperson Sonia Gandhi from the list.

 

In an updated post about the list of world’s richest leader, the editor of Huffington Post wrote on its website last evening stating, “Sonia Gandhi and the former emir of Qatar Hamid bin Khalifa al-Thani have been removed from this list”.

 

“Gandhi was originally included based on a listing on a third party site which was subsequently called into question,” he said without giving name of the third-party site.

 

“Our editors have been unable to verify the amount, removed the link, and regret any confusion,” the Huffington post said, four days after it listed Gandhi as the 12th richest world leader putting her asset to $2 billion.

 

The Congress Party had questioned the authenticity of such a figure by Huffington Post. “If Huffington Post would stick to huffing puffing, then I think they would do a much better job for themselves. Because if you do put out these absurd and ridiculous things out in print, then you only open yourself to be made a laughing stock. I would not even like to dignify with a response,” said Manish Tewari, minister for Information and Broadcasting (MIB) yesterday in New Delhi after the list was released.

User

COMMENTS

shadi katyal

3 years ago

One wonders how Sonia Gandhi name was inserted into the list. First of all this list was of the rulers of the other nations and she is not one either the PM or President of India. Was this done to malign her.
Zardari and many other Billionaires were not in this list?
Is the Huffington writer not aware that Sonia Gandhi is president of Congress party? What a shame?

REPLY

MOHAN

In Reply to shadi katyal 3 years ago

You are absolutely right. But why didn't Congress party protest when her name was "inserted" in the list of most powerful persons. She was the third most powerful woman as Russian President Vladimir Putin beat President Barack Obama to the top spot on Forbes' list of "The World's Most Powerful People". As per report Ms. Gandhi, 66, described as "de facto head of India", is ranked 21st among the world's 72 most powerful. She takes the third spot after German Chancellor Angela Merkel (No.5) and Brazil's Dilma Rousseff (No. 20)when her name was "inserted'

Do you agree that Ms. Gandhi was the "de facto" head of India and Mr. Man Mohan Singh is only a "de jure" head of the Nation?

Didn't Forbes aware that "Sonia Gandhi is president of Congress party? What a shame?"

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)