Regulations
Robinson Worldwide case: SEBI freezes demat, bank accounts of six entities

SEBI has asked to recover Rs8.93 lakh from Mangiram Sharma, Rs6.87 lakh from DPS Shares & Securities, Rs3.76 lakh from Sachin Patil, Rs91,537 from RajKumar Dinesh Masalia and Rs91,521 each from Sujal Shah and Pratik Shah

Market regulator Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has ordered attachment of bank and demat accounts of six entities to recover dues worth over Rs22 lakh in the Robinson Worldwide Trade Ltd case.

 

SEBI has asked to recover Rs8.93 lakh from Mangiram Sharma, Rs6.87 lakh from DPS Shares & Securities, Rs3.76 lakh from Sachin Patil, Rs91,537 from RajKumar Dinesh Masalia and Rs91,521 each from Sujal Shah and Pratik Shah.

 

The dues include penalties imposed on the entities on charges of violating capital market norms in the matter of Robinson Worldwide Trade Ltd.

 

In six separate attachment orders dated 11th July, SEBI has asked banks to attach all accounts, including lockers held by the entities.

 

Similarly, the regulator has directed depositories - NSDL and CDSL -- to attach all demat accounts of the defaulters.

 

SEBI informed the banks and the depositories that there was "sufficient reason" to believe that defaulters may dispose of the amounts in the accounts and "realisation of amount due under the certificate would in consequence be delayed or obstructed".

 

The regulator has also asked banks to attach the lockers held by the entities as well as "all other amount/ proceeds due or may become due to the defaulters or any other money held or may subsequently hold for or on account of defaulter".

 

It has further ordered the banks and depositories that with immediate effect no debit would be made in these accounts until further directions from the market regulator.

 

However, the credits, if any, into the account may be allowed, SEBI said.

 

The regulator has also asked for various details of the accounts held by the entities, including account statements.

User

FMC asks NSEL to file recovery suits against all defaulters

NSEL has recovered about Rs356.39 crore of dues from defaulting members out of the total outstanding amount of Rs5,689 crore. So far only two members out of 24 defaulters have paid their dues

Commodities market regulator Forward Markets Commission (FMC) has asked crisis-hit National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) to strengthen its recovery team and file suits in this regard against all defaulting members. FMC is concerned with the slow pace of recovery of money from NSEL defaulters as out of 24 defaulters, only two members have paid fully, while the rest 22 members are still defaulting on payments.

 

NSEL, a subsidiary of the Jignesh Shah-led Financial Technologies India Ltd (FTIL), has recovered about Rs356.39 crore of dues from defaulting members out of the total outstanding amount of Rs5,689 crore so far.

 

At a recent meeting with NSEL management and Monitoring and Auction Committee, the commodities regulator reviewed recovery of dues from defaulters and asked NSEL to fasten the process and file the suits for realisation of money.

 

FMC said: "NSEL assured that they would take steps such as strengthening the recovery team at NSEL, filing of FIR and recovery suits against all defaulting members."

 

The exchange also said it will initiate proceedings under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against defaulters and pursue the matters relating to realisation of funds from cooperative federation, National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (NAFED) and value-added tax (VAT) related issues, the regulator said in a statement.

 

NSEL has been grappling with a payment crisis since suspending trade in July last year following a government order. Multiple agencies are probing the NSEL's activities and assets of defaulters have also been attached.

 

The exchange has also sought the intervention of state governments to recover the dues from defaulters.

User

Gadkari seeks three more months to review Motor Vehicle Act

Repeated violations of traffic rules resulting in cancellation of driving license is likely to be one of the major amendments to the Bill

The amendment to the Motor Vehicle Act is likely to be delayed by a couple of months as the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways has said it needs three months to review the current Act and thereafter will introduce it afresh in Parliament.

 

The Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, which could be passed only in the Rajya Sabha in May 2012, proposes hefty penalties for traffic rule violations and drunken driving.

 

Union Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari said, "We need three months to study the (Motor Vehicle) Act in its totality and then we will try and bring it in Parliament in its next session."

 

He added that the Act should be as per international standards.

 

Gadkari, on 5th June, had said that the government in a month's time will re-draft the Motor Vehicle amendment bill, which will be in sync with six advanced nations - US, Canada, Singapore, Japan, Germany and the UK, and thereafter will introduce it in Parliament.

 

Repeated violations of traffic rules resulting in cancellation of driving license is likely to be one of the major amendments to the Bill.

 

"If anyone violates the road rules more than three times, his driving licence will be suspended for six months and if he continues to violate after that, then the driving licence will be cancelled. These are some of the considerations as part of redrafting the Motor Vehicles bill," the Minister had said.

 

Several provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act of 1988, especially those related to penalties for violations, have not been found to be effective in checking road accidents. The last time the Act was amended was in 2001.

User

COMMENTS

Gopalakrishnan T V

3 years ago

The amendment should address the issue of interstate movement of vehicles involving payment of Life Tax in different states. With the liberalisation of the economy and invasion of IT, the interstate movement of professionals has been on the rapid increase and they are being harassed by the state RTOs for payment of Life tax although the vehicle has a life tax paid in the state from where the vehicle is purchased. Repeated payment of life tax is a nuisance and does not carry any conviction.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)