“The policy that we have followed for long time (is) that the rupee should move according to market conditions... We allow the rupee to fluctuate depending on market situation. The RBI would only intervene when there is excessive instability,” RBI deputy governor Anand Sinha said
New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday said that it will not intervene in the foreign exchange market unless the situation is grave, though the rupee touched 16-month low of 47.59 against the US dollar, reports PTI.
“It is clear policy of RBI that we address volatility and not the level unless it is grave and adverse situation,” RBI deputy governor Anand Sinha told reporters when asked if the RBI would intervene to check volatility in the currency market.
The rupee closed at 47.59/60 to a US dollar today, lowest since May 2010. As the stock markets fell around the world and capital flows reversed from the emerging markets, including India, the rupee lost by more than 2% against the dollar in the last one week.
Agreeing with Mr Sinha, Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia too said that the central bank should intervene in forex market only in extreme circumstances.
“The policy that we have followed for long time (is) that the rupee should move according to market conditions... We allow the rupee to fluctuate depending on market situation. The RBI would only intervene when there is excessive instability,” he said.
Meanwhile, replying to a query related with entry of corporates in the banking sector, Mr Sinha said the business houses have shown that they have the managerial capacity.
“...at the same time we are acutely aware of self-dealing and therefore the draft guideline talks in terms of stringent eligibility criteria and a host of surrounding control to ensure that self-dealing is not allowed or it is checked in time,” he said.
The RBI recently released draft guidelines for entry of new private banks in the country.
However, central bank would issue the final guidelines for granting bank licences to corporates only after Parliament approves the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2011.
“SEBI had given its in-principle approval to BSE to launch the BSE SME Exchange, but since the last three months we have been awaiting the final nod from the regulator to start operations,” BSE SME Exchange CEO Lakshman Gugulothu said
Ahmedabad: The BSE SME Exchange has been awaiting final nod of the market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for launch for the last three months, reports PTI.
“SEBI had given its in-principle approval to BSE to launch the BSE SME Exchange, but since the last three months we have been awaiting the final nod from the regulator to start operations,” BSE SME Exchange chief executive officer Lakshman Gugulothu said here.
He was speaking at a seminar on ‘SME Exchange: A Platform for Equity Finance for Small & Medium Enterprises’, organised by Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI).
“BSE is leveraging the existing equity platform—BOLT system—for launching the SME exchange. This will be an integrated exchange having provision for migration from BSE SME Exchange to main board and vice-versa,” he said.
“There are around 26 million SME units in the country out of which over one million have the potential to get listed on this exchange. Initially, our target would be to reach out to one lakh SMEs in a focused manner,” Mr Gugulothu said.
“SMEs with a paid up capital of up to Rs10 crore can come on the SME Exchange,” he added.
The advantage of getting listed on this exchange shall be that no SEBI approval is required to bring out an IPO.
However, some exchange guidelines will have to be followed on it, Mr Gugulothu said.
“Even the three years of profit making is not mandatory for a company to get listed on the exchange,” he said.
According to BSE, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) contribute 8% to the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP), 45% to the manufactured output and 40% to exports. It provides employment to about six crore people through 2.6 crore enterprises.
“The trading on this platform shall be done in lots instead of individual shares,” Mr Gugulothu said.
Speaking on eligibility criteria for companies, he said “At least 50 investors are needed at the time of the IPO and each investor should invest at least Rs1 lakh. The post-issue paid-up capital can be as less as Rs50 lakh."
However, grading of the IPO shall be mandatory and clause 49, which mandates 50% of the directors to be independent directors on a company’s board, shall be applicable, he said.
Speaking on the occasion Gujarat minister of state for industry Saurabh Patel said, “14% of the country’s SMEs are in Gujarat so we are concerned about them. The state government could play the role of a catalyst in promoting such (SME exchange) an initiative.”
“Nearly Rs3 lakh crore are deposited in the banks of the state annually, but very meagre amount is used to finance the state-based companies,” Mr Patel added.
Upholding the contention, the SAT order stated that not allowing cross-examination of witnesses whose statements are being relied upon is a violation of principles of natural justice
Mumbai: In a set back to capital market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) on Tuesday retained its order that allowed PriceWaterhouse (PW) to cross examine the audit firm’s members, who had acted as witnesses in the Satyam fraud case, to come out clean.
SAT had allowed PW to go ahead with the cross examination of its members, a move that was opposed by SEBI which filed the review petition with the tribunal, reports PTI.
SAT said, however, the market regulator could approach the Supreme Court in case it wants a review of the order.
“The points now sought to be raised in the review application may be taken in the appeals, if filed, in the Supreme Court. We find no ground to review our order dated 1 June 2011. Consequently, the application is rejected,” SAT said.
The members include Srinivas Talluri, CH Ravindranath, P Siva Prasad and N Ramu. In an order in December 2010, SEBI had rejected the plea of PW and others to cross examine them.
PW moved SAT against it.
Upholding the contention, the SAT order said, “We are of the view that there has been violation of principles of natural justice in not allowing cross-examination of the witnesses whose statements are being relied upon in the show-cause notice and also in not making available copies of the statements which have been relied upon by the board in issuing the show-cause notice.”
The order pertains to enquiry in the Satyam case, which came to light after the company’s founder B Ramalinga Raju admitted in January 2009 to fudging of books of accounts.
Satyam Computer was later taken over by Tech Mahindra and renamed as Mahindra Satyam.