Connect with Us
Moneylife - Facebook Moneylife - Twitter Moneylife - Linkedin Moneylife - Youtube Moneylife Rss feed

Moneylife » Economy & Nation » MLM / Chain Money » QNet, the MLM company, has no answers to Moneylife’s simple questions

QNet, the MLM company, has no answers to Moneylife’s simple questions

Sucheta Dalal and Yogesh Sapkale | 20/11/2012 05:50 PM | 

QNet, GoldQuest, QuestNet, MLM, Pyramid, Bio disc, chi pendant, Vijay Eswaran

QNet, the MLM company which has become active again in India, cannot provide answer to a single question asked by us. Instead it sent us a threatening and defamatory mail that raises more questions as to their real motive

QNet, the controversial Hong Kong-based multi-level marketing (MLM) operator with multiple names (GoldQuest, QuestNet, QNet, QI Ltd and QI group are the better known names) refused to answer simple questions like how much money their independent representative (IR) earns on an average every month and why their products are priced so highly.


Instead Zaheer K Merchant, director for corporate affairs at QNet, sent us a mail (after five days) which not only admits that the company tried to bribe us, but has also threatened us accusing Moneylife for targeting only QNet not other MLMs. As regular readers of Moneylife know, we have been writing on a large huge number of MLMs, pyramid or ponzi schemes. A simple search of would reveal scores of stories of these shady schemes. Here is a quick rundown on how Moneylife has never flinched from reporting on the corrosive influence of MLMs whenever it has had a chance to.


Remember Speak Asia, Stockguru and NMart? Even mainstream media has acknowledged that Moneylife was the first to expose them.  Moneylife flagged Speak Asia as a fraud, way back in October 2010. In December 2010, Moneylife had reported about the dubious modus operandi of Stockguru.India and advised investors to stay away from investing in the company. It collapsed much later. Similarly, in August 2011, we informed our readers, how Surat-based NMart Retails, a division of Newlook Multitrade Pvt Ltd, is running a collective investment scheme (CIS) based on MLM model, under the guise of selling products through its retail chain. Needless to say all the three mentioned above duped lakhs of people. There are scores of other such examples.


Here are a few initial questions that we asked to QNet, which it has failed to reply…


1. What is the churning ratio of QNet Independent Representatives (IRs)? On an average, how many IRs join and leave the company in a 12-month period? What is the IR retention rate in this line of sponsorship? What is the renewal rate of IRs?

2. What is the average amount an IR typically earns in a year?

3. How many IRs earn less than $1,000 as commission in a year?

4. What is the maximum amount an IR had earned in a year as commission and royalty through selling QNet products and through selling promotional, motivational materials?

5. Are the products sold by QNet priced competitively? If not, how much is the difference? Is it true that QNet products are costlier by over 100% than similar products available in the market since you shell out 50% as commission?

6. Who has certified your nutritional and wellness products? Is there any certification from FDA (US FDA) available for the nutritional supplements you sell? Who decides whether a person needs nutritional supplements? Is it your IR or a qualified doctor?

7. If someone decides that the QNet business is not for him, what is your refund policy?

8. Does the business model really free people from their jobs or have they just replaced their job with another that has more risk?

9. Does the QNet business really allow the leaders more time with their families?

10. What are the chances that someone starts from the scratch and own an office in QI Tower*?

11. Are you registered in India? Who is the regulator, governing your business activities in the country?

12. What is the status of court cases regarding GoldQuest and QuestNet in India?


Instead, five days after our queries, Mr Merchant (now Director Corporate Affairs, who was projected as legal head in 2009) wrote to us with a series of counter questions. We publish them with our replies below each sentence…


QNet: We had invited your organisation and Ms Sucheta Dalal, to attend at our office in Hong Kong to provide her with every opportunity to review our operations.


Moneylife: This was in August 2009, soon after the police action in Chennai had closed down its sale of numismatic coins in a company called GoldQuest. Moneylife had written extensively about it and was constantly writing to Ms Usha Thorat, the then Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) asking why action wasn’t taken against the company. She in turn passed the buck on to chief secretaries of states by writing to them. We had already written a story “Coin Game” on the shady business of GoldQuest coins.  It is obvious that this carefully timed media junket was seen as a way to ‘soften’ journalists with a paid foreign holiday rather than a review. Naturally Moneylife rejected it.


QNet: We made overtures to meet with her, and did do so in Mumbai some time back.


Moneylife: This is a lie. There has been no ‘overtures’. The fact is, ever since Moneylife has been campaigning against dubious MLMs and pyramids, both Amway and the Indian Direct Selling Association (IDSA) have long meetings at our office but could not answer many of our queries. Some of the questions asked to QNet were also asked to Amway. In fact, Amway representatives Richard N Holwill and Rajat Banerjee admitted to us that although some distributors tend to go overboard in pitching the scheme, income from being a distributor of Amway can, at best, be a source of additional income or pocket money for most people. It is not the pathway to riches as MLM companies make it out to be. However, Amway also insisted that there is no longer any joining fee and the model does not necessarily require enrolment of distributors. However, there was no answer to expensive nutraceuticals being prescribed by doctors, whose wives or relatives were Amway agents.


QNet: We had provided Ms Dalal with relevant information and material. Our distributors thereafter also met with her and attempted to communicate with her in connection with our business and its legitimacy.


Moneylife: Another lie. No distributor has ever met us in to communicate about the business or its legitimacy. The only person who met us, came as a close personal friend and on checking with him again, he insists that he had not met us as a QNet representative.


QNet: The fact that there is no express legislation governing the business in India doesn't make the same ‘illegal’ in the manner in which the same has often been cited and reported in the seminars and documents which your establishment presents.


Moneylife: This is a matter of dispute and debate. Mr Merchant agrees that they operated in a legally unclear area. He also indicated that QuestNet was being kept out of the Indian Direct Selling Association (IDSA) by a cabal of US MLMs such as Amway and Tupperware despite its best efforts. He also pointed out that these MLMs had not been facing problems in India.

The fact is there has been plenty of litigation on the issue, precisely because various authorities consider that the operations are illegal under the Prize Chits & Money Circulation (PCMC) Act of 1978.  Moneylife Foundation, an NGO for spreading financial literacy has repeatedly warned people about falling for MLM and pyramid companies with innumerable examples of losses incurred. Moneylife Foundation sent a representation to the Prime Minister, Finance Minister, Governor of RBI and SEBI.

Former Expenditure Secretary EAS Sarma has also written to the PM and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) about the need to check the proliferation of Ponzis and binary pyramids which are duping people.  We have been specifically told by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs that they are investigating these scams and plan action/tightening of legislation. To turn Mr Merchant’s argument on its head, just because our regulators are sleeping and scams are always discovered too late, if at all, does not make an unregulated scheme legal.


QNet: We have also found on several occasions that there is a marked level of partiality towards reporting inaccurate material about our business.

The discussions which have come about as to your site and seminars and the ‘talk’ is, contrary to what is projected by you as to being industry watchdogs with care and concern for the people allegedly duped by MLM business, you seemingly prefer certain MLM companies over others. The mantle almost of a crusade is thus assumed only against certain MLM entitles. Why do people have this impression? Can you please explain? I am certain that this is not the case, but I would appreciate your confirmation in writing to this assertion made by several other entities that you are not what you make yourselves out to be. Additionally, matters such as the success we have had in the courts are never dealt with. Preference is given in fact to reporting salacious and incorrect material, which is always unverified and inaccurate.


Moneylife: Mr Merchant prefers to throw unsubstantiated accusations. We prefer to offer facts. Only Moneylife has been writing about the menace of MLM schemes, including GoldQuest, QuestNet, Stockguru.India, JapanLIFE, Amway, Speak Asia, NMart, AdMatrix and so on. On the other hand Moneylife Foundation is helping people to become aware about money circulation or MLM schemes and is actively involved in making changes in the government policies through representations, memorandums etc.


It is laughable that Moneylife is accused of being partial towards any MLM when we alone are crusading against ALL such schemes. QNet should drop its defamatory and scandalous tone and please offer us one shred of proof.


Talking about getting in touch, we have been contacted by IDSA and Amway, who promised us to provide answers to questions raised by us. So what was stopping QNet from reaching out us? We reiterate that it was Moneylife which got in touch with QNet before writing any story and not the other way round as is being claimed by Mr Merchant.


QNet: Additionally, you have already written and filed a story which is defamatory, aside from being totally baseless and confused, about us. This leads to the possible conclusion that there is no real sincerity to the assertion that you are seeking information and wish to truly educate anyone. On the contrary, it begs the question whether any information given will be used properly, reported accurately or simply (worse as we have been warned about) that you may misuse or divulge information to other organisations which may be allied to you. The essential element is whether we will get a fair outcome or hearing, since the actions belie the request. The story is as below in the link pasted. Again, I am inclined to believe this cannot be case, but I would like formal confirmation in writing as to the same. Additionally, if you are going to publish your request for information and this response, please do us the courtesy of publishing the contents of this email in full as opposed to simply abridging and prefacing it wrongly. Your purported seminar on 23rd November also makes several assumptions and comments of us, preferring to lump us together with other (wrongful) companies quite baselessly. All these lead to concerns as to the points made above, which no doubt you will appreciate as much as address.


Moneylife: Before writing and publishing the current article, we contacted QNet through Mr Werner Fernandes whose company used to handle the PR of QNet, and gave them enough time to reply. However, instead of a simple reply, Mr Merchant sent a mail whose tone is threatening and defamatory.


According to Robert FitzPatrick, President of US-based Pyramid Scheme Alert, schemes like QNet or GoldQuest are an “endless chain”, or a “pyramid scheme”.


“I believe this form of fraud is a clear danger to national economies. They subvert efforts to accumulate wealth. They divert energy and funds from real businesses. They often divert people from seeking more education with their promises of fast wealth. They destroy savings and equity of lower income people. They confuse people as to what a legitimate value-based business is. Unless the regulators and analysts recognize and are willing to assert that this form of business is ‘inherently' fraudulent and harmful, it is rather difficult to stop any one particular company. Such a fraud, whether the products are soaps, gold coins, vitamins or air in a box, will always cause 90%-99% of the investors to ‘fail’. Whether some of the people engage in retail selling or not, the income promise that relies on continued expansion is deceptive, that is, it is a lie. The financial harm to the vast majority is predetermined. Calling it a business does not make it so. A real business requires an exchange of value," wrote Mr FitzPatrick to us. He is actively exposing several pyramid, ponzi and MLMs.


Mr FitzPatrik was involved in framing new law in Sri Lanka to deal with MLMs, especially GoldQuest. During 2005, the GoldQuest scheme spread across Sri Lanka, marketing gold coins for double their worth. Sri Lanka's central bank noticed that the equivalent in their currency of millions of dollars had left the country, a big drain.


What is sad is many people have left high-paying jobs to “pursue their dreams” in an MLM. Having been conned so dramatically, they do not easily admit defeat. It seems easier to cling to the bad dream in an increasing cycle of desperation to make the MLM work against all odds.


*QI Tower in Malaysia is where QNet founder Vijay Eswaran has his new office. (

Post Comment


jitu moni

jitu moni 3 months ago

VIJAYAWADA: Yet another multi-level marketing (MLM) company Vihaan Direct Selling Ltd was sealed by police and its representatives were paraded before mediapersons here on Tuesday. Police will soon serve a notice on its promoters -- Vasudeva Reddy and Ch Gangadhar - who are currently in Dubai and alert the Interpol to help nab the duo.

Addressing a press conference here on Tuesday, commissioner of police A B Venkateswara Rao said that 134 people in the city have fallen prey to the company. "Vihaan Direct collected Rs 1.16 crore and deposited Rs 65 lakh in the account of Vihaan Direct Selling Ltd, which is based in Mumbai. Another Rs 10 lakh was deposited in the account of VR 1 Training Centre, which is based in Bangalore. Rest of the funds have been misappropriated," he said.

Acting on a complaint from a depositor Prathipathi Lakshmi Ganesh, Krishna Lanka police led by circle inspector S V V S Murthy arrested four representatives of the firm- Gourang Desai, Y Babul Reddy, D Nagaraju and Ch Manikanta -- on June 22 and recovered Rs 15 lakh in cash and four mobile phones.

It was on January 5 this year Mumbai-based Vasudeva Reddy, a notorious MLM agent, opened Vihaan Direct as a franchise of Hong Kong-based Q-Net near Prasanthi Hospital in Labbipet. He also ran a training centre called VR 1. City-lad Desai, who met Vasudeva in Mumbai, was nominated as in-charge of the training centre. Gangadhar, a close aide of Vasudava, was nominated to run the direct selling firm.

Gangadhar recruited Babul, Nagaraju and Manikanta as independent representatives (IRs) to carry out the fraudulent MLM operations. Their modus operandi was typical of a binary tree structure- each IR has to recruit more members. IRs will receive commission based on the number of referrals and sales volume of other IRs in their team.

The police commissioner said that Vijay Eswaran, who runs Q-Net, is the brain behind the MLM firms. "From 2002-08, he ran a firm in Chennai that swindled Rs 1,100 crore. Between 2010-14, he ran another MLM firm with Vasudeva Reddy, which swindled Rs 425 crore from depositors," he added.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
jitu moni

jitu moni 3 months ago

QNET multi-level marketing scam busted in Vijayawada - Tv9


Reply »Link » Report abuse
jitu moni

jitu moni 3 months ago
Four persons have been held today for their alleged involvement in the multi-level marketing 'Qnet' case, police said.

The four persons, identified as V Bal Reddy, Gautam Desai, Dasari Nagaraju and Cheemakurti Manikanta, were arrested today and Rs 15 lakh, deposited in different bank accounts, were seized from them, district Police Commissioner A

B Venkateswara Rao said.

The accused were nabbed by Economic Offences wing of the Commissionarate and the key person involved in the alleged fraud, Gangadhar from Vijayawada, is absconding and is currently said to be in Dubai, the senior officer said.

The five persons were associated with multi-level international marketing firm Qnet, a company founded by one Vijay Eswaran, a Malaysian citizen based in Hong Kong, in 1998, where the company agents extracted huge money from people by offering them lucrative incentives, he said.

The company also operated in India with other names like 'Qen' and 'Quest, police said.

Eswaran had appointed one Vihan Direct Selling, owned by Gangadhar, as the sole selling company in India, where the firm had assigned some agents to recruit salesmen under the direct selling system.

According to police, the agents had appointed 134 first level salesmen by collecting Rs 1,16,55,000 and another 13,400 second level salesmen were joined by the 134 sales persons.

In the meantime, one of the salesmen suspected company's activities and lodged a complaint with the police and the four accused were arrested after investigations.

Rao said if necessary, a red corner notice will be issued against Gangadhar.

He said Qnet is facing many charges in the country and some of the cases against the company are pending in courts.

A decade back, the company was involved in a Rs 11 crore case of alleged fraud in Chennai. It has also been facing some cases in Mumbai, the officer said.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
jitu moni

jitu moni 4 months ago

A Mumbai resident today approached the Economic Offences Wing of police seeking inquiry into QNet, a multi-level marketing company facing allegations of duping investors, being one of the sponsors of onoging International Indian Film Academy Awards, 2015.

The EOW of Mumbai police is probing the Hong Kong-based Qnet for an alleged Rs 425-crore fraud.

Gurpreet Singh Anand, who is one of the original complainants against the firm, contends in the fresh complaint that the "purpose of sponsoring IIFA awards is to further the Qnet scam in India and create an image that it is a respectable brand".

IIFA website lists Qnet as one of the 'official direct selling partners'.

While Singh has demanded probe into "why they (organisers) have appointed this company as sponsor", IIFA officials were unavailable for comment. Its legal cell informed PTI that senior officials were busy in Malaysia where the awards ceremony is taking place.

The EOW has so far arrested 17 persons for allegedly duping investors by selling Qnet products including magnetic disks, herbal products and holiday schemes through allegedly fraudulent means.

It has been accused of using the banned 'binary pyramid business model', and a case has been registered under the Prize, Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

Reply »Link » Report abuse
jitu moni

jitu moni 7 months ago

Lets spread it friends

Two top representatives of QNet, a Hong Kong-based multi-level marketing company allegedly involved in a Rs 425-crore fraud here, were arrested today after being picked up from Delhi international airport, police said.

The controversial company's senior independent representatives, identified as Sandeep Kalra and Hitesh Miglani, were intercepted by immigration authorities at the Indira Gandhi International Airport at Delhi last night, said an officer with Mumbai Police Economic Offence Wing (EOW).

The duo, who arrived from Dubai in separate flights, was stopped at the airport as Look Out Circulars (LOC) were issued against them by the EOW probing the case.

The two suspects, who were suspected to have had pocketed lakhs of rupees through the scheme and organised several training camps to lure investors, have been subsequently brought to the metropolis and placed under arrest this evening, police said.

The LOCs have been issued against those whose statements have been necessitated in the probe but did not appear before the investigators despite summons.

Kalra hails from Delhi while Miglani is from Bangalore, police said adding that this is the first arrest of those against whom LOCs had been issued.

The EOW had earlier arrested 15 persons for allegedly duping investors by selling QNet products, including magnetic disks, herbal products and holiday schemes, through allegedly fraudulent means.

The EOW has invoked the stringent Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) against the company which has denied any wrongdoing on its part.

QNet has also been accused of using the banned binary pyramid business model. An FIR in the case was registered in August in 2013.

The accused had been charged with cheating and forgery under relevant sections of the Prize, Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

Reply »Link » Report abuse

beaulah12 2 months ago in reply to jitu moni

Yeah, I accepted as true your thought. Perhaps, Qnet MLM Company is not possible to answer your money related question. But, you can take great thought about MLM business from ask them to all your money related problems.

Reply» Link » Report abuse
Daily Newsletter

1,00,000 Readers

Follow Moneylife
DNL facebook icon DNL linked in icon DNL twitter icon DNL youtube icon DNL rss icon
Moneylife Magazine

Grab a Discount Coupon here

What's your say?

Will the RBI cut rates in its monetary policy review on 29th Sept 2015?
Can't Say
Enter Code : secure code
    change code

What you said

Will the Smart City Mission make cities smart and peopler smarter?

Thanks for casting your votes! View Previous Polls

Join Over 100,000 Awesome Readers

  1. News that Mainstream media does not always cover
  2. Views that are bold and unbiased
  3. Reports that focus on your interests as consumer, investor & citizen