Citizens' Issues
Public Interest Exclusive
Probe former CJI KG Balakrishnan: Supreme Court

The apex court has asked a competent authority to look into allegations of misconduct against the former CJI even though it has refused to direct the government to recommend a presidential reference to remove justice Balakrishnan as NHRC chairman

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the competent authority of the Centre to look into the allegation of judicial misconduct against the former chief justice of India and current National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chairman Konakuppakatil Gopinathan Balakrishnan (KG Balakrishnan) for his alleged misconduct during his tenure as a judge in the apex court.

The court passed the order on a PIL (public interest litigation) by non-government organisation (NGO) Common Cause, which had sought directions from the court to the government to make a presidential reference to the apex court for removal of former CJI Balakrishnan as the chairman of NHRC.

The NGO had alleged that the ex-CJI and his relatives amassed wealth far exceeding their legal income during Justice Balakrishnan's tenure as an apex court judge.

According to a PTI report, a bench of justices BS Chauhan and JS Khehar said if there is any truth in the allegations, then it is for the president to make a reference to the Supreme Court, on the advice of council of ministers, for inquiry against the former CJI.

The Supreme Court, however, refused to direct the Centre to recommend a presidential reference to remove him from NHRC.

Earlier, former chief justice JS Verma, former apex court Judge VR Krishna Iyer, noted jurist Fali S Nariman, former member of NHRC Sudarshan Agrawal and prominent activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan had called for justice Balakrishnan to step down from the chairmanship of the NHRC pending an inquiry into the matter.

Justice HL Gokhale of the Supreme Court also had accused justice Balakrishnan of misrepresenting facts to conceal sacked telecom minister A Raja's attempt to influence Justice R Reghupathy of the Madras High Court, on behalf of two murder accused known to the DMK leader.

Justice Balakrishnan had been elevated as a Supreme Court judge in June 2000 and was appointed the Chief Justice of India on 14 January 2007. He retired on 12 May 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC chairman.

The NGO had also sought directions to the ministry of home affairs (MHA) for making a reference to the apex court under the Human Rights Act to look into the allegations of 'misbehaviour' against justice Balakrishnan. The court had reserved its verdict on the NGO's plea on 7th May.

A provision under the Human Rights Act says the NHRC chairperson or its members cannot be removed from their offices unless the President of India orders it on the ground of proved misbehaviour, ascertained by the Supreme Court after an inquiry on the president's reference for the probe.

Common Cause, in its petition, had annexed media reports as documents to buttress its allegations that 'benami' properties were acquired by justice Balakrishnan's kin during his tenure in the Supreme Court.

On an earlier date of hearing, the Centre had informed the apex court that it is probing into the allegations that justice Balakrishnan and his relatives had amassed disproportionate assets during his tenure as a judge and had submitted a probe status report to it in a sealed envelop.

The court after going through the report had asked the government to tell it as to what further action it intended to take on the allegations against the former CJI and appraise it about it.

According to media reports, justice Balakrishnan's son-in-law and Indian Youth Congress leader PV Srinijan, who did not have any land four years ago, is now the owner of property worth hundreds of thousands of rupees.

During his tenure as Chief Justice of India, he also tried to exempt the Office of the chief justice of India from the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. Justice Balakrishnan ordered the Supreme Court registry to file an appeal before the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court judgement making the office of the CJI amenable to the RTI act. He has also spoken about the need for amending the RTI act in the interests of the right to privacy.

User

COMMENTS

Nagesh Kini FCA

5 years ago

Mr. Balakrishnan, he no longer deserves to be called "justice" ought to have gracefully stepped down from the NHRC.
Possibly he thinks he can get away with blue murder just like his equally dishonourable predecessors Ramaswamy and Sen.
The charges are very serious from blatant corrupt practices to tampering with Raja's case and most unbecoming of the position of CJI.
There is absolutely no case for wasting nation's money on the fruitless exercises of Presidential Reference and Impeachment by Parliament, we all know what happened in the two cases - ended as damp squibs.
That he was, and not is a sitting CJI, should not make any difference in the eyes of law. He has been given enough opportunity to defend himself. The CBI should straight away charge him.We are not living in Orwel's land of 'some being more equal than others'. Gone are days of Gandhi/Annagiri.
This is a fit case for Team Anna's IAC to pursue to its logical end to bring about conviction.Otherwise they are not worth the Anti-corruption crusade they crow about.

REPLY

Gopinath Prabhu

In Reply to Nagesh Kini FCA 5 years ago

The biggest irony is that he can only be removed on a reference by the President :)

anil bhatia

5 years ago

the EX- chief justice of india is under the suspicion of graft charges . the justice sen was tried in to the joint session of parliament for impeachment but nothing happened .In india the judiaciary and administerative quasi judicial officials are not worried about the wrong and illogical orders and judgements in various courts after getting bribed . becuase none has been tried since independece to today so who is going to afraid of being caught .even the administerative and revenue officials on quasi judicial position do deliberatly defy and made disobedience to various court orders as everyone knows that nothing is going to happen and the officials will transfer and refuse to accept the court's notices !

e-wallet: ‘Virtual’ card for online transactions

State Bank of India (SBI) launched a ‘virtual’ electronic debit card for e-commerce...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation
New Bank: FirstRand’s in india

South Africa-based financial services group, FirstRand Bank said it has entered into retail...

Premium Content
Monthly Digital Access

Subscribe

Already A Subscriber?
Login
Yearly Digital+Print Access

Subscribe

Moneylife Magazine Subscriber or MSSN member?
Login

Yearly Subscriber Login

Enter the mail id that you want to use & click on Go. We will send you a link to your email for verficiation

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)