Companies & Sectors
Power companies fall on new CERC guidelines; NTPC worst hit

The draft guidelines for the new power regulatory regime and price has been formulated by CERC and it is expected to hit NTPC the worst

National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (NTPC) share crashed 11.26% Tuesday on BSE following news of new draft guidelines issued by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), which may make it tougher for power producers to earn healthy profits.

As per the draft guidelines, the new regulatory regime is expected to commence from 1 April 2014 and will extend to 31 March 2019. In the new guidelines, the method of calculating incentives is the same—return on equity method—but tightening has been done in other areas, particularly in the taxation and expenses front. This is seen as harsh and is likely to affect the profitability and operations of power plants over the next five years. Other power companies like Power Grid Corp (Power Grid) is also expected to be hit by the new norms. Share price of Power Grid was seen down 3% and Neyvelli Lignite Corporation closed down 1.29%.

As per the draft guidelines released by CERC, the post tax return on equity (RoE) has been maintained at 15.5%, but the incentive structure has been linked to actual generation (PLF) beyond the threshold level of 85%. This number has been pegged 50 paisa/kWh for “ex-bus scheduled energy corresponding to scheduled generation in excess of ex-bus energy corresponding to Normative Annual Plant Load Factor (NAPLF).” This means, producers like NTPC, have to crank out power with a high load factor to make returns worthwhile, regardless of the expenses (such as import of coal from abroad).

The new regime is expected to benefit end consumers (read: other big power companies, large corporations to who buy power from NTPC and Power Grid). Previously, power generating companies like NTPC, Damodar Valley Corporation and NEEPCO were previously “grossing up” their tax liabilities and claiming it from end consumers. However, as per new regulatory guidelines, they will have to claim only on the ‘actual tax paid’. This will reduce margins for companies like NTPC and Power Grid. Edelweiss Securities in a research report said, “We believe the new norms have been framed by tightening operating rules to ensure end consumer benefits from higher efficiency in the system.”

The scope of this regulation is only applicable to companies or power stations where tariff is decided by the CERC. Private players who have sought tariffs through competitive bidding have been excluded from this regulation as are renewable energy companies. The draft regulation states the scope: “where tariff of a generating station or a unit thereof and a transmission system or an element thereof including communication system used for inter-State transmission of electricity is required to be determined by the Commission under section 62 of the Act read with section 79 thereof.”

Edelweiss expects NTPC to be affected badly and sees the company generating 9% RoE instead of the 24% it has been generating so far. The report said, “NTPC, which has historically earned higher RoE (over base rate of 15.5%) of 24% plus via incentives, operational efficiency and tax benefits (we estimate  about 9% under existing norms), will likely see pressure on profitability/RoE impacting valuations.”

On Power Grid, Edelweiss says it will be marginally affected. “Tighter operational norms will also impact Power Grid, we estimate it to be limited since RoE of approx 16.5%-17.0% (over base RoE of 15.5%) has marginal contribution from incentives,” the report said.

The CERC has called for views and recommendations from stakeholders and there could be modifications to the guidelines before 31 March 2014. Even if the new norms are enforced, it remains to be seen how companies like NTPC and Power Grid Corporation will be able to recover tariffs as many power companies and power utilities are cutting down on expenses due to the paralysis in the power sector and lack of government initiative to get it off the ground.

NTPC closed Tuesday 11.26% down at Rs136, while Power Grid Corp and Neyveli Lignite ended the day 3% and 1.5% down at Rs98.3 and Rs61.2, respectively on the BSE. The 30-share Sensex also ended the day marginally down at 21,255.


Sensex, Nifty end lower on profit-booking

Nifty is still on an uptrend and would appear to be weak below 6,285

After three days of rise, the domestic indices closed in the negative Tuesday breaking the uptrend. The indices opened in the red and continued to head lower on profit booking. Around 1.30pm the indices hit their respective low from where it tried recovering but closed in the negative.


After the poor performance in assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) getting victory, the Congress has retained power in Mizoram with a landslide margin.


The Sensex and the Nifty opened at 21,294 and 6,355. The indices immediately hit their days high at 21,328 and 6,362, respectively after which it started its downward journey. The Sensex and the Nifty hit low of 21,175 and 6,308. The Sensex closed at 21,255 (down 71 points or 0.33%) while the Nifty closed at 6,333 (down 31 points or 0.49%). The National Stock Exchange recorded a volume of 68.40 crore shares.


Among the other indices on the NSE, only four indices rose which were IT (1.90%); FMCG (0.92%); Metal (0.61%) and Pharma (0.30%) while the top five losers were Infra (3.20%); PSE (3.17%); Bank Nifty (1.84%); PSU Bank (1.83%) and Finance (1.75%).


Of the 50 stocks on the Nifty, 19 ended in the green. The top five gainers were TCS (4.10%); Hero MotoCorp (3.81%); Sesa Sterlite (2.42%); Lupin (2.36%) and ITC (1.58%). While the top five losers were NTPC (11.37%); LT (4.11%); Power Grid (3.85%); I C I C I Bank (3.55%) and BHEL (3.21%).


Out of the 1,223 stocks on the NSE, 354 ended in the positive, 814 closed in the negative while 55 remained unchanged.


NTPC, a benchmark stock, fell 11.26% to Rs136 on the BSE after the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission released draft regulations that will decide the multi-year power tariffs for 2014-2019.


The setback for ruling Congress Party in recent state elections could imperil the country's fiscal deficit target by tempting the government to have less restraint on spending, Fitch Ratings warned on Tuesday. Fitch noted that unless revenue unexpectedly surged, India would ultimately need to cut spending if it wanted to meet its fiscal deficit target. US indices closed in the positive on Monday.


Fed Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said in a speech the odds of tapering bond purchases have risen along with gains in the labour market, and any reduction should be modest to account for low inflation. His Dallas counterpart, Richard Fisher, said in a Chicago speech that the Fed needs to begin tapering at the earliest opportunity, as the current pace of stimulus comes at a cost that far exceeds its purported benefits.


Except for Jakarta Composite (up 1.46%) and KLSE Composite (up 0.11%) all the other Asian indices closed in the negative. Straits Times fell the most (1.03%).


A series of Chinese data was released today. Industrial output for November rose 10% from a year earlier, slowing from the previous month's 10.3% increase. Retail sales rose 13.7% in November, accelerating from October's 13.3% rise. Tuesday's data also included urban fixed-asset investment, which was up an annualized 19.9% in the January-November period, slowing from a 20.1% gain for January-October. Fixed-asset investment, which is reported on a year-to-date basis, is seen as an indicator of construction activity in China. The European indices were trading in the green. The US Futures were trading marginally higher.


AIBEA blows the whistle on bad loans of Indian banks

Bank union, AIBEA, demands that banks recover bad loans from wilful defaulters

Trade unions are usually quick to announce protests to demand higher wages or better working conditions. This time, however, the All India Bank Employees Union (AIBEA), one of the biggest employees unions in India, has decided to turn into a powerful whistleblower. On 5th December, AIBEA gave a call to ‘stop the loot of public funds’ and start recovery of bad loans. This is a welcome development. I have always held that the destruction of giant entities, such as Air India, Unit Trust of India, and giant public sector entities in telecom and engineering, is as much due to employee apathy as it is due to the loot by politicians and bureaucrats. AIBEA has signalled that it will name and shame defaulters, if necessary, to force banks to start acting tough and recover bad loans. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), as the banking regulator, is fully aware of what is going on; but now, the unions are asking it to move from rhetoric to action. The AIBEA cites the overused quote about India having sick industries but no sick industrialists. It also quotes RBI governor, Dr Raghuram Rajan, who recently told banks, “You can put lipstick on a pig but it doesn’t become a princess. So dressing up a loan and showing it as restructured and not provisioning for it when it stops paying, is an issue. Anything which postpones a problem (rather) than recognising it, is to be avoided.” AIBEA points out that the top four bad loan accounts add up to a massive Rs22,666 crore, which include Kingfisher Airlines and Winsome Diamond and Jewellery Co. Will RBI stop the “systematic loot of public money” by recognising these as pigs with lipstick?

The data collated and released by the AIBEA is a frightening indictment of the banking regulator and the finance ministry. While the government has been boasting about India having escaped the global financial crisis, how does it explain the four-fold increase in bad loans—from Rs39,000 crore in 2008 to Rs164,000 crore today? The creation of new bad loans is a mind-boggling Rs495,000 crore, according to AIBEA.  And, corporate debt restructuring through provisioning, concessions, waivers, write-offs, concessions, one-time settlements (which are done multiple times), compromise proposals, etc, add up to a massive Rs325,000 crore.  

Write-offs of bad loans by PSU banks in the past seven years amount to a massive Rs140,000 crore. If we include the bad loans of private banks and foreign banks and other financial institutions, the total bad loans are more than Rs2,50,000 crore, says the AIBEA statement. Worryingly, it says, things have reached a point where management is making banks vulnerable by reducing the provisioning of bad loans. RBI has pointed out, and is aware, that the provision coverage ratio of India’s banking system has dropped from 55% to 45% as against a global average ratio of 70% to 80%.

AIBEA’s demand will resonate with depositors who are being asked to pay higher charges for every service, to ensure higher profits for banks every quarter. AIBEA, for once, is on the same side as two big stakeholders of banks—bank customers and shareholders. Clearly, the call to publish the names of defaulters, to make wilful default a criminal offence, investigate collusion between banks and borrowers and the demand not to ‘incentivise corporate delinquency’, will find huge support among ordinary people.



Yerram Raju Behara

3 years ago

The point of inflexion is 1993 when liberalization and globalization had set in. The banks clamoured for legal protection and SAFRAESI Act came into being to securitize assets. This provided opportunity for banks to do armchair lending. Corporate lending, Infrastructure lending, lending to PSUs under government pressure, Housing Loans, Retail loan segment other than Agriculture and Micro and Small Enterprises fall under such category. The priority sector lending was blamed for rising NPAs and in particular agriculture and MSMEs as they are now called, in the name of behest lending. Today out of the NPAs in MSMEs, it is Medium enterprises that took a greater slice. It is good that AIBEA has taken up the cause obviously under fear of their own existence. There are workmen directors on Boards. And they are representatives of AIBEA. Being silent on Boards to get waivers or reduction in punishments of their highly delinquent members whose cases come to Board scrutiny, they have not contributed to raising concern on loan delinquencies. Seeing this articulation, I only hope they now take courage to raise the same concern and remedy the situation. The remedy lies in proper due diligence and stopping express and super express sanctions and the home loan and car loan melas. This must be mandated by the regulator without any delay. Loans can't be sanctioned in 24 and 48 hours save guarantees or LCs of the existing good loan accounts or adequately collateralized ones. Regulators have to come clean on these issues and the responsibilities of the nominee directors.

Gopalakrishnan T V

3 years ago

This loot through banks by Corporates and others has been a regular feature and it gets ignored because banks are able to write off of the loans out of profits and they are also able to get capital support fropm the Government.The write offs seldom get scrutinised. On the contrary , influence worksa lot to get the loans written off.Board of Directors who include RBI and Government nominees have no time to seriuosly go through the Agenda items and most of the items cleared as a matter of routine. These agenda include loan proposals and write offs. The auditors of banks seldom make any comment or dissent and there is always a trade of between auditors and the Board of Directors. The banks balance Sheets are drawn as desired by the Chairman and by the influential Board members.It has nothing to do with the ground realities. Chairmen of banks are entitled to draw bonuses based on performance and the performance indicators are window dressed heavily so that they are able to draw a lumsum money on an yera to year basis. Employees representatives are also on the board and they seldom raise any dissent or they are not heard adequately on tyhe Board agenda. The Chamber of Commerce and other representative bodies who always fight for concessions and reliefs are never heard fighting to reduce the bad loans and are never found disciplining the borrowers.Thee only way to reduce the formation of bad oans is to have a self correcting mechanism by which right from the day of sanctioning of loans
the borrowers need to be disciplined by a rating method based on their conduct of acounts. Banks also need to be brought under discipline and should be penalised if they are observed to be lax in the proper conduct of loans. Banks need tight regulation as they deal with money and hunman resources and it is humanly impossible to prevent greed and commitment of irregularities. Banks need a strict vigilance on an ongoing basis as they deal with depositors hard earned money. Tax payers also should object supporting banks for their failures by using Govt resources

t k mitra

3 years ago

The move made by AIBEA is timely and needed urgently to save the nation from disaster.It is well known that in our country industries/enterprises become sick whereas the owner/entrepreneuers are generating/getting fat.Loan appraisalsystem,inspection,project monitoring etc. are far from fullproof which fails to protect the financial institutions,there are rampant corruption,political interference,tardy judicial redressal etc.

nagesh kini

3 years ago

Now that the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in DJ Exim vs. SBI, has cleared the 'naming and shaming' exercise of the publishing of the photographs serves the purpose of creating awareness and cautioning prospective clients, it should be the very first move in dealing with wilful defaulters even before going into CDR that results in and calls for major sacrifices for the banks and more benefits for borrowers.


3 years ago

It would be interesting to watch if AIBEA actually publishes the names of defaulters, or if they would be silenced, like many other whistle blowers. Are there not workers' representatives in the Banks' Boards? Why are they not raising the issues there or in the shareholders' AGMs?


3 years ago

Bank employess themselves are responsible for bad loans.

Bank Employees/managers/directors -hand in gloves with known defaulter borrowers ( in consideration of cash/kind/kickbacks) IS WELL KNOWN IN FINANCIAL CIRCLES.

Its high time to bring such bank employees to BOOK to eradicate a portin of large NPAs of all Public sector and private sector banks and financial institutions.

Panchapakesan S

3 years ago

Restructuring of Corporate loan accounts is nothing but a gimmick to show a bad loan as a standard asset. RBI and Govt.of India should take concrete steps to curtail bad corporate loan accounts and stop forthwith restructuring of big corporate loan accounts

Gopalakrishnan T V

3 years ago

AIBEA can strongly recommend for introduction of some self Corrective mechanism to discipline both banks and bad borrowers. The amounts written off by banks as bad loans can be shared among employees and other stakeholders if the banks show some guts to discipline the borrowers. The need to prevent formation of Non Performing Assets in banks in the interests of all stakeholders of banks who include depositors, good borrowers and shareholders is the need of the hour and is long over due. The responsibility for recognition, resolution and recovery of bad assets is basically with the bankers and the borrowers and they cannot be casual and careless in their dealings.The banks can educate and discipline the borrowers on an ongoing basis and the borrowers can be rewarded or punished if they deviate from bank's disciplinary requirements and attempt to hoodwink the banks with their erratic behaviour and conduct of accounts leading to formation of non performing loans.. The erring borrowers can be identified easily by banks and they can be brought under proper discipline by making them to pay a penalty based on their irregular conduct of accounts and deviation from the discipline envisaged. These penalties over a period would be adequate to cover up the losses on account of bad assets. The provisions now made towards bad assets can be minimised and the money saved on provisions can be passed on to the depositors and other stake holders. The write off of loans presently resorted to by banks at the cost of tax payers' and the depositors' money can also be considerably brought down.The basic approach of the bankers is to discipline themselves in the selection of borrowers, grant of loans, coverage of securities, monitoring and supervision of loans,etc and enforce discipline on borrowers in a constructive manner. Borrowers are partners in business and their healthy growth should reflect in banks balance sheets. Likewise, their deterioration in health should not affect banks balance sheets and other stakeholders. Unless and until a built in mechanism is in place, there cannot be an effective control on the defaulting borrowers.Earlier the action,the better for banks, borrowers, and other stakeholders of banks and the economy. RBI being a regulator of banks and being the monetary authority of the economy cannot and should not tolerate unhealthy balance sheets of banks, large corporates and the economy. Bad assets do not contribute to the economy is a fact which cannot be allowed to continue for ever.It affects the economy badly and all its stakeholders.SEBI has also a major responsibility to ensure that by any reckoning defaulting companies should not get listed in the Stock Exchanges and they should never be allowed to raise capital through IPOs.The Corporates should have an excellent ratings from banks and these ratings should reflect on the conduct of loan accounts.These ratings should be made transparent by banks and should be available for all having dealings with the Corporates.Will the RBI and the Government show the guts to discipline both banks and borrowers to ensure that the loans turn productive in the larger interests of the economy, the financial system, and all its stakeholders.


3 years ago

Great that the unions are waking up to this loot. It is wrong and incorrect to say that this loot is of recent origin. The composition of BoD and their selection is the cause of such rising badloans. Directors and Chairmans of PSB are least bothered to do their jobs. They are very aggressive in punishing the lesser mortals in the bank but hardly display such activism in evaluating their faults which are enormous ie the NPAs. The BoD have perfected the system to such an extent that it is impossible to fix responsibility on them and or the Statutory auditors of the Bank. look at the power sector and the coal scam one can understand the magnitude of their incompetence and or corrupt practices. The governance structure in PSBS are a sham and authority without responsibility at the top just does not work. It is these banks which bring a bad name to capitalism and encouraging the left in this country to clamour for increase government control of banks. Surely not the remedy to set right this situation. Act fast else banks will go the Air India way


nagesh kini

In Reply to Bhaskar 3 years ago

Extremely well said.
It is in deed a sad fact. Then Law Minister Ashwin Bansal's CA was 'elected' shareholders' Director of a PSU!

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.

To continue

Sign Up or Sign In


To continue

Sign Up or Sign In



The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)