Citizens' Issues
PMO denies accepting Sanjiv Chaturvedi's award money
The Prime Minister Office (PMO) has denied accepting $30,000 donated by Magsaysay Award winner and bureaucrat Sanjiv Chaturvedi, saying conditional donations are not accepted.
 
Refuting the PMO's claim, Chaturvedi, the Indian Forest Service (IFS) officer, said he never put any conditions and threatened to take the matter to court.
 
"Donations can be made towards Prime Minister National Relief Fund (PMNRF) through cheque/demand draft... It is apprised that PMNRF does not accept conditional donations," says a letter written by the PMO to Chaturvedi, suggesting that no money has been received from the bureaucrat.
 
Chaturvedi - who won Magsaysay Award 2015 for his "exemplary courage" in exposing corruption - decided to donate his award money to the PMNRF after AIIMS-New Delhi, under the union health ministry, stonewalled his donation which he had meant to be used for the treatment of cancer patients.
 
He is currently the deputy secretary at AIIMS, having been removed from the post of Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) of the institute in August 2014, much before the completion of his tenure which was to end in 2016.
 
In his letter to the PMO making the donation, Chaturvedi said he decided to donate the Magsaysay Award money to the PMNRF after he failed to get the health ministry to accept it.
 
The bureaucrat's request to donate the money to AIIMS for the treatment of the cancer patients was initially kept on hold and later refused to be accepted.
 
Replying to the latest letter from the PMO, Chaturvedi said that there were never any conditions from his side in making the donation and urged the officials to go through his letter once again.
 
"I reiterate that the said donation is absolutely without any conditions. In spite of my freedom fighter family background and my service career being the biggest testimiony, the hypothetical inferences that have been drawn disregarding the material facts are very unfortunate," wrote Chaturvedi.
 
The letter questions the intention of the PMO officials in examining his documents and the cheque that Chaturvedi said he had submitted to the PMO on December 5.
 
"It appears that either the concerned authorities of the PMO have not bothered to go through my letter and documents or the said cheque has been misplaced," he wrote.
 
"In either case, you (PMO) are requested to timely confirm the non-receipt of cheque No.343000 dated 5th December 2015 to the PMNRF, so that I may cancel the same and issue a fresh cheque of the said amount in favour of the PMNRF." 
 
The bureaucrat has been widely perceived to have a tough stand on corruption and has as a result incurred the displeasure of the political bosses and suffered frequent transfers.
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. 

User

COMMENTS

Subramani P K

1 year ago

Why this donation is not acceptable for PMNRF should be made clear. If the donor has stipulated any condition & if it is in the good of the country & people PMO should not have any objection in accepting it.

Amritraj Peshin

1 year ago

If Cchaturvedi wants to donate to Cancer treatment why does h not give it to one of the hospitals, Tata Memorial for example. Why the publicity hungry AIIMS PMNRF...next we will hear UN refused his money.

Is he indulging in Charity OR shameless Self Promotion ?

REPLY

Babubhai Vaghela

In Reply to Amritraj Peshin 1 year ago

PMs ask for Donations.He has given. Why PMO Not Accept?

Babubhai Vaghela

1 year ago

PMO under BJP PM Narendra Modi Really Acting Funny Towards the Persons who Expose High Level Corruption :(

'Interstellar' - Most pirated film of 2015
Filmmaker Christopher Nolan's sci-fi drama "Interstellar" has taken the top spot as the most pirated movie of 2015.
 
The film, which was released in 2014, was downloaded 46.8 million times, according to piracy tracking firm Excipio, reports variety.com.
 
Other movies prominent on the list are several big money makers like "Furious 7" (44.8 million), "Avengers: Age of Ultron" (41.6 million) and "Jurassic World" (36.9 million). 
 
However, this year's record-breaking movie "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" doesn't make it into the list, probably because the movie didn't start showing up on piracy sites until several days after its release. There's still a chance that it will top the same list in 2016. 
 
In 2014, just like "Interstellar" did, the 2013 release "The Wolf of Wall Street" led the pack to become the most pirated movie. The Leonardo DiCaprio-starrer was downloaded 30 million times last year, significantly less than the space movie's nearly 47 million downloads. 
 
Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced from IANS and do not reflect views of Moneylife and hence Moneylife is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, IANS is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. 

User

RBI's financial inclusion starts and stops with Aadhaar
While the Finance Ministry is reviving its mission to mandatorily quote PAN for financial transactions, the RBI cannot think beyond Aadhaar for financial inclusion
 
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has come out with another strange idea for its financial inclusion drive. Instead of focussing on creating adequate infrastructure for the last-mile service delivery, the central bank thinks only government-to-person (G2P) cash transfer through Aadhaar number would make financial inclusion meaningful. This too without even bothering about the Supreme Court decision on not making Aadhaar mandatory for government schemes even as the Finance Ministry itself is issuing advertisements to quote permanent account number (PAN) for all major financial transactions. If the so-called unique identity is so sacred, why is the Finance Ministry placing emphasis on PAN cards for financial transactions? Does this also mean that financial transactions carried out by using Aadhaar are untraceable unlike where PAN is used?
 
RBI has placed on its website a report prepared by a Committee on Medium-term Path on Financial Inclusion. The Committee headed by Deepak Mohanty was mandated to review existing policy of financial inclusion, including supportive payment system and customer protection; study cross-country experiences of financial inclusion to identify key learnings, particularly in the area of technology-based delivery models; articulate the underlying policy and institutional framework and finally, suggest a monitorable medium term action plan for financial inclusion in terms of its various components such as payments, deposit, credit, social security transfers, and other financial products and services.
 
Interestingly, the Committee itself accepted there were significant gaps in terms of usage, inadequate ‘last mile’ service delivery, and exclusion of women as well as small and marginal farmers and very low formal link for micro and small enterprises. There were also systemic issues of stability of the credit system, over-indebtedness and agrarian distress, it said.
 
However, all it could come up with as a solution was cash transfer through Aadhaar. It says, "...the Committee set a much wider vision of financial inclusion as ‘convenient’ access to a basket of basic formal financial products and services that should include savings, remittance, credit, government-supported insurance and pension products to small and marginal farmers and low-income households at reasonable cost with adequate protection progressively supplemented by social cash transfers, besides increasing the access of small and marginal enterprises to formal finance with a greater reliance on technology to cut costs and improve service delivery, such that by 2021, over 90% of the hitherto underserved sections of society become active stakeholders in economic progress empowered by formal finance."
 
Dr Anupam Saraph, Professor, Future Designer, former IT advisor to Goa’s former Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar, had a question on the motives of the Committee in endorsing Aadhaar. He said, “If the Committee is ignorant of the orders of the Supreme Court in the matter on Aadhaar, can it be expected to be enlightened in the matter of national security, terrorism, creation of millions of bogus accounts and financial scams involving Aadhaar?”
 
In addition, Dr Saraph says, “How can a committee with conflict of interest and non-national representation even deal with the matter? The committee members included AP Hota, MD & CEO who represents the National Payments Corp of India (NPCI) that has interest in Aadhaar-based payments, Pawan Bakshi, who represents the (Bill and Melinda) Gates Foundation, Dr Asli Demirgüç-Kunt is a Director of Research at the World Bank; the others represent financial institution. Who represents the excluded or the citizens and consumers of financial services or even researchers who have been studying financial inclusion?” 
 
The emphasis on Aadhaar by the Committee is contrary to global experience on financial inclusion. The Committee itself states, mobile banking is being used successfully as a delivery channel in several countries. Mobile banking technology has tremendous potential for expanding financial inclusion, especially among the unbanked rural poor. The success of mobile money in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and other African nations shows that these innovations can bring about dramatic changes in how people engage in financial transactions, by lowering entry barriers, reducing costs and expanding access, the Committee says quoting from Demirguc-Kunt and Klapper, 2012 report.
 
Even for making the process of appointing business correspondent (BC) to provide last mile service delivery, the Committee could not think beyond the usage of Aadhaar. The Committee has recommended that the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) may create a Registry of BC Agents wherein BCs will have to register before commencement of operations. "The registration process should be simple online process with photo and Aadhaar identification," it added. 
 
Here are some recommendations of the Committee for financial inclusion...
  1. Given the predominance of individual account holdings (94% of total credit accounts), a unique biometric identifier such as Aadhaar should be linked to each individual credit account and the information shared with credit information companies to enhance the stability of the credit system and improve access.
  2. Deposit accounts of beneficiaries of government social payments, preferably all deposits accounts across banks, including the ‘in-principle’ licensed payments banks and small finance banks, be seeded with Aadhaar in a time-bound manner so as to create the necessary eco-system for cash transfer.
  3. In order to increase formal credit supply to all agrarian segments, digitisation of land records is the way forward. This should be backed by an Aadhaar-linked mechanism for Credit Eligibility Certificates to facilitate credit flow to actual cultivators.
  4. Provision of credit history of all self-help group (SHG) members by linking with individual Aadhaar numbers to check over-indebtedness. This will ensure credit discipline and will also provide comfort to banks. 
  5. Aadhaar and e-know your customer (KYC) should be the uniform KYC accepted by all regulators including Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)  
  6. Banks to complete the task of linking of deposit accounts with Aadhaar in a time bound manner so as to create the necessary eco-system for social cash transfer. 
  7. Bank credit to micro-finance institutes (MFIs) should be encouraged. The MFIs must provide credit information on their borrowers to credit bureaus through Aadhaar-linked unique identification of individual borrowers 
  8. State Level Bankers Committees (SLBCs) to focus more on inter-institutional issues, livelihood models, social cash transfer, gender inclusion, Aadhaar seeding, universal account opening, and less on credit deposit ratio which is a by-product.
  9. As a part of second generation reforms, the government can replace the current agricultural input subsidies on fertilisers, power and irrigation by a direct income transfer scheme.
 
“How can the committee that has no methodology and framework to assess financial inclusion even arrive at any recommendations?” Dr Saraph questions.
 
While the Committee reports goes on talking about linking Aadhaar for everything to make financial inclusion a success, it fails to provide any new idea to help resolve consumer grievances in a time bound manner. On resolving customer issues, all the Committee says is to use bank's internal ombudsman. "Each branch should, therefore, be required to prominently display the name, phone number and email address of the designated officials for such complaints," it says. 
 
In addition, it recommended putting in place a technology-based platform for SMS acknowledgement and disposal of customer complaints, which can provide an audit trail of grievance redressal. All banks must have an online portal for customers to fill complaints, it added. However, there is neither any time limit to resolve customer grievances nor any provision for levying penalty on erring officials, recommended by the Committee.  
 
The Committee said it believes that addressing significant pockets of exclusion, the adoption of technology and allowing multiple models and partnerships to emerge could effectively buttress the cause of financial inclusion. "While financial products have their benefits, there is a clear danger of mis-selling, which could damage marginalised segments who have an uncertain cash flow. Efforts on financial education need to be strengthened, including product-driven financial literacy so that the poor are not short-changed. Grievance redressal for customer complaints in banks needs some imaginative thinking. The overall governance structure would have to be more business-like, focused on delivery," it added.
 
Despite improved financial access, usage remains low, underscoring the need to better leverage technology to facilitate usage, the Committee noted. It says, "On the basis of cross-country evidence and our own experience, the Committee is of the view that to translate financial access into enhanced convenience and usage, there is a need for better utilisation of the mobile banking facility and the maximum possible G2P payments, which would necessitate greater engagement by the government in the financial inclusion drive."
 
The Committee also recommended a universal crop insurance scheme covering all crops starting with small and marginal farmers with a monetary ceiling say of Rs2 lakh. "The insurance should be mandatory for all agricultural loans. The insurance should be made affordable, with the farmer paying a nominal premium and the balance coming from government subsidy. The government can phase out the agricultural loan interest subvention scheme and plough back that allocation into the crop insurance subsidy. A graded crop insurance could be made available to medium and large cultivators with higher monetary ceiling and lower government subsidy," it said.
 
The Committee says it feels that the use of technology would make the insurance scheme more efficient. It says, "Satellite imagery can be used for ‘crop mapping’ and to assess damage. GPS-enabled hand-held devices can be used for ‘ground trothing’. In addition, drones and dove, micro satellites could also be deployed to assess crop damages. This will reduce the number of crop-cutting experiments required and will ensure faster claims settlement."
 
The Committee has invited comments on its report before 29 January 2016 either via email ([email protected]/ [email protected] ) or by post to the Principal Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Financial Inclusion and Development Department, 10th Floor, Central Office Building, Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai- 400001.
  
You may also want to read…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

User

COMMENTS

Mathew Thomas

1 year ago

RBI and the Committees such as this one are not ignorant. They are merely promoting the agenda of foreign countries for reasons best known to them. Readers will notice that no analysis or justification are given on how "Aadhaar" will lead to financial inclusion.
Surely, these worthies cannot be oblivious to the many frauds in "Aadhaar" enrollments reported in media all these years and the case in the Supreme Court, in which RBI also appeared to plead for "Aadhaar". There is a well orchestrated plan to promote this evil. How can RBI make this propaganda when "Aadhaar" is NOT proof of citizenship and when biometrics has been proven as fallible by UIDAI's admission in its affidavit in the SC?

Ramesh B Mhadlekar

1 year ago

It appears RBI cares a foot for Supreme Court.

B. Yerram Raju

1 year ago

The Report to say the least brings disaster and ensures financial exclusion.
While every account holder does not have a PAN card because he does not have income beyond the tax threshold, and securing PAN card is more cumbersome than AADHAR, the latter is fraught with the risk of losing personal data to all and sundry. When the Government of India is tabling several Bills the fact that legalising AADHAR is not being pushed evidences the disability of the instrument as a personal ID notwithstanding the inroads it already made into DBT.The Committee has the shadow of Nachiket Mor Committee that could not find its way in several areas.

It has totally ignored the Swaminathan Committee recommendations of delivering farm credit at 4% p.a. The small and marginal farmers are already on the threshold of suicides in several states deprived of institutional credit. Instead of strengthening the agricultural credit delivery system it has chosen to axe it by suggesting a commercial rate of interest.

MFIs have not proved as efficient and effective delivery points in financial inclusion window. They are highly expensive outfits. The RBI has done in fact great harm in permitting their inclusion under the Priority sector category.

Regarding customer complaints the less said the better would it be. Today, a customer has to complain online to get a reply from the system that the complaint would get attention within 48hours failing which the appropriate authority may be contacted. This appropriate authority is so busy as not to attend to the complaints.

India has more digitally ignorant entrepreneurs and customers of banks. Technology has not reduced the cost of banking. K.C. Chakraborthy used to mention repeatedly that the banks have not been able to reduce the cost of delivery in spite of huge increases in the volume of transactions. banks today are making up their losses in NIM from the levy of service charges and their Profit and Loss statements are an evidence. You fill your savings bank passbook at the bank at the designated machine and pay for it later in some form or other. Several customers even do not know the myriad of charges levied on their accounts. Because CASA is becoming unattractive the minimum balances in SB and Current accounts for retaining the account has been jacked up with the exception of Jan Dhan accounts. Even if you want to close the account you have to pay for it.

In essence on all the aspects that Deepak Mohanty has touched, the Report should be confined to the cupboards of the RBI never to be opened again.

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)