Planning Commission defends Rs32 a day limit for poverty line

In its affidavit to the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has stated that a person with consumption of up to Rs32 per day would be considered poor in urban areas. The per capita consumption limit in rural area has been fixed at Rs26 a day. Its deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia clarified that the amount fixed were per each person not per family

Beijing: Defending the Planning Commission's criteria under which those who consume items worth more than Rs32 in urban areas in a day are not poor, its deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia on Monday said the limit will not be the basis for extending benefits to the poor, reports PTI.

"We have not made any new policy decision. The Supreme Court asked us how we calculate the poverty line, we gave the factual explanation. I believe the explanation we have given is factually correct," Mr Ahluwalia, who is here to attend the first India-China Strategic Economic Dialogue, told the Indian media.

"That it how the poverty lines are set up and that is how poverty lines are updated," he said commenting for the first time after the controversy broke following an affidavit filed by the Planning Commission in the Supreme Court.

In its affidavit, the Planning Commission has stated that a person with consumption of up to Rs32 per day would be considered poor in urban areas. The per capita consumption limit in rural area has been fixed at Rs26 a day.

Asserting that the data forwarded to the apex court was set by the Tendulkar Committee which was appointed to define the poverty line, he said the amount fixed were per each person not per family.

"This is the number the Tendulkar Committee recommended which is an expert group. We accepted that which mean that the poverty numbers went up," he said.

"Many in the media misread the affidavit. I have heard the people say how a family of five can live on Rs32. This number is a per capita number, between the rural and urban.

For a family of five it has to be multiplied by five," Mr Ahluwalia said.

About the poverty criteria fixed using the Tendulkar Committee methodology, Mr Ahluwalia said, "I am not sure, what we can do about this as it is a recommendation... may be we can appoint another committee that is all," Mr Ahluwalia said.

He also countered the perception that the poverty line of 32% as per the Tendulkar panel will be applied for the purpose of the proposed food security bill and other such schemes for the Below Poverty Line (BPL) families.

The latest data of the Planning Commission indicates that poverty in India has declined to 32% in 2009-10 from 37.2% of the population five years ago.

The preliminary estimates are based on the formula suggested by the Tendulkar Committee for computing the number of poor in the country.

"Question is what is it that are you upset about? If you are upset about 32% means that the Planning Commission wants to restrict it to 32%, it is factually incorrect. In all the internal discussion, I have been supportive saying we can manage 41%," he said.

"There is no unique logic to what should be poverty line. The Planning Commission believes that poverty is multi-dimensional concept. It is not going to be just looking at consumption but the availability of important elements like clean drinking water, health and education," he said.

"The Planning Commission's motives are being wrongly understood. It is not our objective to deny anybody benefits.

That is a separate issue to be decided by government. It is for government to decide," he said.

He said he is travelling to Paris from here to attend G-20 meeting. He will explain his stand more clearly to after his return to New Delhi on 3rd October.

User

Bottomline by Morparia



Give comments for Morparia Cartoon

User

The Fed’s latest move may not pay off

Twisting long-term interest rates lower will not work, says this analyst.

Read Article...

User

We are listening!

Solve the equation and enter in the Captcha field.
  Loading...
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email
Close

To continue


Please
Sign Up or Sign In
with

Email

BUY NOW

The Scam
24 Year Of The Scam: The Perennial Bestseller, reads like a Thriller!
Moneylife Magazine
Fiercely independent and pro-consumer information on personal finance
Stockletters in 3 Flavours
Outstanding research that beats mutual funds year after year
MAS: Complete Online Financial Advisory
(Includes Moneylife Magazine and Lion Stockletter)